September 2019 - nexa - server-nexa.polito.it

Council of Europe - Responsibility and AI

by Guido Noto La Diega

Studio del Consiglio d'Europa su responsabilità e "intelligenza artificiale" Fra le altre cose, "we should nurture research... to be developed by interdisciplinary engagement between the technical community and those from law, the humanities and the social sciences, in order to identify more fully how human rights protections can be translated and given expression via technical protection mechanisms embedded within AI systems, and to understand how a human rights approach responds to problems of value-conflict." https://rm.coe.int/responsability-and-ai-en/168097d9c5 -- Guido Guido Noto La Diega, PhD FHEA Senior Lecturer / International Research Partnerships Coordinator @NorthumbriaLaw Director @italiot | Fellow @nexacenter | Co-convenor @NinsoRig | Co-founder @DPA2018 Northumbria Law School, City Campus East, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 8ST notoladiega(a)gmail.com <noto.la.diega(a)gmail.com> +44(0)191 349 5562 You can access my papers on Academia.edu <http://northumbria.academia.edu/GuidoNotoLaDiega> and on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN <https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=1794950>) This email and any attachment hereto are strictly confidential and are exclusively intended for the person above identified. Without the intended recipient’s entitlement, use, copy, and dissemination of this email are prohibited. If you have received it in error, please advise me immediately by telephone and return the documents received to the above address, deleting the files. Thank you. Sometimes I send emails at odd hours. This is just for my convenience, so please reply at yours.

Sept. 25, 2019

Re: [nexa] Google wins landmark right to be forgotten case - BBC News

by Oreste Pollicino

Qui un' approssimativa nota a primissima lettura https://www.ilsole24ore.com/art/limitare-diritto-all-oblio-e-rischio-ACiINem Inviato da smartphone Samsung Galaxy. -------- Messaggio originale -------- Da: Carlo Blengino <blengino(a)penalistiassociati.it> Data: 24/09/19 19:52 (GMT+02:00) A: GC F <gcfrosio(a)gmail.com> Cc: Center Nexa <nexa(a)server-nexa.polito.it> Oggetto: Re: [nexa] Google wins landmark right to be forgotten case - BBC News Mi pare che si delineino diversi scenari sia extra UE che IntraUe. La deindicizzazione su tutto il territorio UE presuppone, credo, la procedura di coordinamento/cooperazione (richiamata al punto 68 della sentenza) per i trattamenti transfontalieri, con l'intervento della capofila. Non è ciò che avviene usualmente, ove le Autority agiscono con la competenza territoriale di cui all'art. 55 GDPR o al più, se considerato trattamento transfrontaliero, con la competenza in deroga del 56 comma 2, dunque come interesse unicamente locale-nazionale: non avrebbe senso una deindicizzazione by default in tutta UE da parte di una singola Autority che agisce su base territoriale senza la procedura di cui al capo VI. Se si intende ottenere il delisting su tutti i motori UE è necessario che il provvedimento provenga dal lead per competenza, non dal primo CNIL che agisce in autonomia, pena il mancato coordinamento. Sul punto la sentenza ad una prima lettura mi pare confusa e poco coerente con le regole procedurali. Quanto al punto 72, mi sembra il tocco finale, il "ma anche" che vanifica l'intera pronuncia e manda a pallino l'intero sistema della competenza e del coordinamento. Però forse mi manca qualche passaggio.... CB Il giorno mar 24 set 2019 alle ore 16:05 GC F <gcfrosio(a)gmail.com<mailto:gcfrosio@gmail.com>> ha scritto: In realtà accanto a : (64) It follows that, currently, there is no obligation under EU law, for a search engine operator who grants a request for de-referencing made by a data subject, as the case may be, following an injunction from a supervisory or judicial authority of a Member State, to carry out such a de-referencing on all the versions of its search engine. c'è anche il paragrafo 72 : Lastly, it should be emphasised that, while, as noted in paragraph 64 above, EU law does not currently require that the de-referencing granted concern all versions of the search engine in question, it also does not prohibit such a practice. Accordingly, a supervisory or judicial authority of a Member State remains competent to weigh up, in the light of national standards of protection of fundamental rights (see, to that effect, judgments of 26 February 2013, Åkerberg Fransson, C‑617/10, EU:C:2013:105, paragraph 29, and of 26 February 2013, Melloni, C‑399/11, EU:C:2013:107, paragraph 60), a data subject’s right to privacy and the protection of personal data concerning him or her, on the one hand, and the right to freedom of information, on the other, and, after weighing those rights against each other, to order, where appropriate, the operator of that search engine to carry out a de-referencing concerning all versions of that search engine. Quindi non c'è global de-listing a livello EU ma può essere imposto da autorità nazionali secondo un principio di nazionalità come il CNiL chiedeva. Mi pare a una prima lettura. Giancarlo On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 12:53 PM J.C. DE MARTIN <demartin(a)polito.it<mailto:demartin@polito.it>> wrote: https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-49808208 (Sent from my wireless device; please excuse brevity and typos (if any)) _______________________________________________ nexa mailing list nexa(a)server-nexa.polito.it<mailto:nexa@server-nexa.polito.it> https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa _______________________________________________ nexa mailing list nexa(a)server-nexa.polito.it<mailto:nexa@server-nexa.polito.it> https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa

Sept. 24, 2019

Re: [nexa] Google wins landmark right to be forgotten case - BBC News

by Carlo Blengino

Mi pare che si delineino diversi scenari sia extra UE che IntraUe. La deindicizzazione su tutto il territorio UE presuppone, credo, la procedura di coordinamento/cooperazione (richiamata al punto 68 della sentenza) per i trattamenti transfontalieri, con l'intervento della capofila. Non è ciò che avviene usualmente, ove le Autority agiscono con la competenza territoriale di cui all'art. 55 GDPR o al più, se considerato trattamento transfrontaliero, con la competenza in deroga del 56 comma 2, dunque come interesse unicamente locale-nazionale: non avrebbe senso una deindicizzazione by default in tutta UE da parte di una singola Autority che agisce su base territoriale senza la procedura di cui al capo VI. Se si intende ottenere il delisting su tutti i motori UE è necessario che il provvedimento provenga dal lead per competenza, non dal primo CNIL che agisce in autonomia, pena il mancato coordinamento. Sul punto la sentenza ad una prima lettura mi pare confusa e poco coerente con le regole procedurali. Quanto al punto 72, mi sembra il tocco finale, il "ma anche" che vanifica l'intera pronuncia e manda a pallino l'intero sistema della competenza e del coordinamento. Però forse mi manca qualche passaggio.... CB Il giorno mar 24 set 2019 alle ore 16:05 GC F <gcfrosio(a)gmail.com> ha scritto: > In realtà accanto a : > > (64) It follows that, currently, there is no obligation under EU law, for >> a search engine operator who grants a request for de-referencing made by a >> data subject, as the case may be, following an injunction from a >> supervisory or judicial authority of a Member State, to carry out such a >> de-referencing on all the versions of its search engine. > > > c'è anche il paragrafo 72 : > > Lastly, it should be emphasised that, while, as noted in paragraph 64 >> above, EU law does not currently require that the de-referencing granted >> concern all versions of the search engine in question, it also does not >> prohibit such a practice. Accordingly, *a supervisory or judicial >> authority of a Member State remains competent to* weigh up, in the light >> of national standards of protection of fundamental rights (see, to that >> effect, judgments of 26 February 2013, *Åkerberg Fransson*, C‑617/10, >> EU:C:2013:105, paragraph 29, and of 26 February 2013, *Melloni*, >> C‑399/11, EU:C:2013:107, paragraph 60), a data subject’s right to privacy >> and the protection of personal data concerning him or her, on the one hand, >> and the right to freedom of information, on the other, and, after weighing >> those rights against each other, to *order*, where appropriate, the >> operator of that search engine *to carry out a de-referencing concerning >> all versions of that search engine*. > > > Quindi non c'è global de-listing a livello EU ma può essere imposto da > autorità nazionali secondo un principio di nazionalità come il CNiL > chiedeva. Mi pare a una prima lettura. > > Giancarlo > > On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 12:53 PM J.C. DE MARTIN <demartin(a)polito.it> > wrote: > >> >> https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-49808208 >> >> >> (Sent from my wireless device; please excuse brevity and typos (if any)) >> _______________________________________________ >> nexa mailing list >> nexa(a)server-nexa.polito.it >> https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa >> > _______________________________________________ > nexa mailing list > nexa(a)server-nexa.polito.it > https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa >

Sept. 24, 2019

Re: [nexa] Ethical and Responsible Research (ER2)

by Aldo Pedico

Per chi fosse interessato Cordialità, Aldo ________________________________ From: National Science Foundation Update <nsf-update(a)govdelivery.nsf.gov> Sent: martedì 24 settembre 2019 19:09 To: Aldo Pedico Subject: Ethical and Responsible Research (ER2) You are subscribed to All NSF Program Announcements and Information for National Science Foundation Update. This information has recently been updated, and is now available. Ethical and Responsible Research (ER2)<http://links.govdelivery.com:80/track?type=click&enid=ZWFzPTEmbXNpZD0mYXVpZ…> Available Formats: HTML: https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2019/nsf19609/nsf19609.htm?WT.mc_id=USNSF_25&WT.mc…<http://links.govdelivery.com:80/track?type=click&enid=ZWFzPTEmbXNpZD0mYXVpZ…> PDF: https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2019/nsf19609/nsf19609.pdf?WT.mc_id=USNSF_25&WT.mc…<http://links.govdelivery.com:80/track?type=click&enid=ZWFzPTEmbXNpZD0mYXVpZ…> Document Number: nsf19609 This is an NSF Program Announcements and Information item. ________________________________ This e-mail update was generated automatically based on your subscription to the category listed above. Some updates may belong to more than one category, resulting in duplicate messages. [NSF logo]<http://links.govdelivery.com:80/track?type=click&enid=ZWFzPTEmbXNpZD0mYXVpZ…> Subscriber Services: Manage Preferences / Unsubscribe<http://links.govdelivery.com:80/track?type=click&enid=ZWFzPTEmbXNpZD0mYXVpZ…> | Help<http://links.govdelivery.com:80/track?type=click&enid=ZWFzPTEmbXNpZD0mYXVpZ…> | Contact NSF<http://links.govdelivery.com:80/track?type=click&enid=ZWFzPTEmbXNpZD0mYXVpZ…> Follow NSF: [Follow us on YouTube] <http://links.govdelivery.com:80/track?type=click&enid=ZWFzPTEmbXNpZD0mYXVpZ…> [Follow us on Twitter] <http://links.govdelivery.com:80/track?type=click&enid=ZWFzPTEmbXNpZD0mYXVpZ…> [Follow us on Facebook] <http://links.govdelivery.com:80/track?type=click&enid=ZWFzPTEmbXNpZD0mYXVpZ…> [Follow us on linkedin] <http://links.govdelivery.com:80/track?type=click&enid=ZWFzPTEmbXNpZD0mYXVpZ…> [Follow us on RSS] <http://links.govdelivery.com:80/track?type=click&enid=ZWFzPTEmbXNpZD0mYXVpZ…> [Follow us on email] <http://links.govdelivery.com:80/track?type=click&enid=ZWFzPTEmbXNpZD0mYXVpZ…> [Science360 News Service] <http://links.govdelivery.com:80/track?type=click&enid=ZWFzPTEmbXNpZD0mYXVpZ…> [Science Nation Online Magazine] <http://links.govdelivery.com:80/track?type=click&enid=ZWFzPTEmbXNpZD0mYXVpZ…> ________________________________ This email was sent to a.pedico(a)teleion.it using GovDelivery Communications Cloud on behalf of: National Science Foundation Update · 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314 · 703-292-5111 [GovDelivery logo] <http://links.govdelivery.com:80/track?type=click&enid=ZWFzPTEmbXNpZD0mYXVpZ…>

Sept. 24, 2019

segnalazione ciclo di seminari ISA Istituto Studi Avanzati Università di Bologna

by Marina Caporale

Buonasera, mi permetto di fare circolare il programma di un ciclo di seminari interdisciplinari - ma con una prospettiva principalmente giuridica - che insieme a Corrado Caruso e Matilde Ratti abbiamo organizzato sul concetto di identità e mondo digitale per l'ISA, l'Istituto di Studi Avanzati dell'Università Bologna. Spero lo troviate interessante, a presto, Marina Marina Caporale http://www.unibo.it/docenti/marina.caporale

Sept. 24, 2019

Re: [nexa] Google wins landmark right to be forgotten case - BBC News

by GC F

Condivido anch'io. Tra l'altro l'avevo scritto qui ormai 3 anni fa: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2908993 Giancarlo On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 4:22 PM Oreste Pollicino < oreste.pollicino(a)unibocconi.it> wrote: > Che condivido pienamente. A presto, o > > > > Inviato da smartphone Samsung Galaxy. > > > -------- Messaggio originale -------- > Da: GC F <gcfrosio(a)gmail.com> > Data: 24/09/19 16:05 (GMT+02:00) > A: Center Nexa <nexa(a)server-nexa.polito.it> > Oggetto: Re: [nexa] Google wins landmark right to be forgotten case - BBC > News > > In realtà accanto a : > > (64) It follows that, currently, there is no obligation under EU law, for >> a search engine operator who grants a request for de-referencing made by a >> data subject, as the case may be, following an injunction from a >> supervisory or judicial authority of a Member State, to carry out such a >> de-referencing on all the versions of its search engine. > > > c'è anche il paragrafo 72 : > > Lastly, it should be emphasised that, while, as noted in paragraph 64 >> above, EU law does not currently require that the de-referencing granted >> concern all versions of the search engine in question, it also does not >> prohibit such a practice. Accordingly, *a supervisory or judicial >> authority of a Member State remains competent to* weigh up, in the light >> of national standards of protection of fundamental rights (see, to that >> effect, judgments of 26 February 2013, *Åkerberg Fransson*, C‑617/10, >> EU:C:2013:105, paragraph 29, and of 26 February 2013, *Melloni*, >> C‑399/11, EU:C:2013:107, paragraph 60), a data subject’s right to privacy >> and the protection of personal data concerning him or her, on the one hand, >> and the right to freedom of information, on the other, and, after weighing >> those rights against each other, to *order*, where appropriate, the >> operator of that search engine *to carry out a de-referencing concerning >> all versions of that search engine*. > > > Quindi non c'è global de-listing a livello EU ma può essere imposto da > autorità nazionali secondo un principio di nazionalità come il CNiL > chiedeva. Mi pare a una prima lettura. > > Giancarlo > > On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 12:53 PM J.C. DE MARTIN <demartin(a)polito.it> > wrote: > >> >> https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-49808208 >> >> >> (Sent from my wireless device; please excuse brevity and typos (if any)) >> _______________________________________________ >> nexa mailing list >> nexa(a)server-nexa.polito.it >> https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa >> >

Sept. 24, 2019

Re: [nexa] Google wins landmark right to be forgotten case - BBC News

by Oreste Pollicino

Che condivido pienamente. A presto, o Inviato da smartphone Samsung Galaxy. -------- Messaggio originale -------- Da: GC F <gcfrosio(a)gmail.com> Data: 24/09/19 16:05 (GMT+02:00) A: Center Nexa <nexa(a)server-nexa.polito.it> Oggetto: Re: [nexa] Google wins landmark right to be forgotten case - BBC News In realtà accanto a : (64) It follows that, currently, there is no obligation under EU law, for a search engine operator who grants a request for de-referencing made by a data subject, as the case may be, following an injunction from a supervisory or judicial authority of a Member State, to carry out such a de-referencing on all the versions of its search engine. c'è anche il paragrafo 72 : Lastly, it should be emphasised that, while, as noted in paragraph 64 above, EU law does not currently require that the de-referencing granted concern all versions of the search engine in question, it also does not prohibit such a practice. Accordingly, a supervisory or judicial authority of a Member State remains competent to weigh up, in the light of national standards of protection of fundamental rights (see, to that effect, judgments of 26 February 2013, Åkerberg Fransson, C‑617/10, EU:C:2013:105, paragraph 29, and of 26 February 2013, Melloni, C‑399/11, EU:C:2013:107, paragraph 60), a data subject’s right to privacy and the protection of personal data concerning him or her, on the one hand, and the right to freedom of information, on the other, and, after weighing those rights against each other, to order, where appropriate, the operator of that search engine to carry out a de-referencing concerning all versions of that search engine. Quindi non c'è global de-listing a livello EU ma può essere imposto da autorità nazionali secondo un principio di nazionalità come il CNiL chiedeva. Mi pare a una prima lettura. Giancarlo On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 12:53 PM J.C. DE MARTIN <demartin(a)polito.it<mailto:demartin@polito.it>> wrote: https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-49808208 (Sent from my wireless device; please excuse brevity and typos (if any)) _______________________________________________ nexa mailing list nexa(a)server-nexa.polito.it<mailto:nexa@server-nexa.polito.it> https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa

Sept. 24, 2019

Re: [nexa] Google wins landmark right to be forgotten case - BBC News

by GC F

In realtà accanto a : (64) It follows that, currently, there is no obligation under EU law, for a > search engine operator who grants a request for de-referencing made by a > data subject, as the case may be, following an injunction from a > supervisory or judicial authority of a Member State, to carry out such a > de-referencing on all the versions of its search engine. c'è anche il paragrafo 72 : Lastly, it should be emphasised that, while, as noted in paragraph 64 > above, EU law does not currently require that the de-referencing granted > concern all versions of the search engine in question, it also does not > prohibit such a practice. Accordingly, *a supervisory or judicial > authority of a Member State remains competent to* weigh up, in the light > of national standards of protection of fundamental rights (see, to that > effect, judgments of 26 February 2013, *Åkerberg Fransson*, C‑617/10, > EU:C:2013:105, paragraph 29, and of 26 February 2013, *Melloni*, > C‑399/11, EU:C:2013:107, paragraph 60), a data subject’s right to privacy > and the protection of personal data concerning him or her, on the one hand, > and the right to freedom of information, on the other, and, after weighing > those rights against each other, to *order*, where appropriate, the > operator of that search engine *to carry out a de-referencing concerning > all versions of that search engine*. Quindi non c'è global de-listing a livello EU ma può essere imposto da autorità nazionali secondo un principio di nazionalità come il CNiL chiedeva. Mi pare a una prima lettura. Giancarlo On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 12:53 PM J.C. DE MARTIN <demartin(a)polito.it> wrote: > > https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-49808208 > > > (Sent from my wireless device; please excuse brevity and typos (if any)) > _______________________________________________ > nexa mailing list > nexa(a)server-nexa.polito.it > https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa >

Sept. 24, 2019

My Talk at Microsoft - Richard Stallman

by Giacomo Tesio

https://www.stallman.org/articles/microsoft-talk.html Time will show us whether Microsoft begins to do substantial activities that we can judge as good. Let's encourage that in all prudent ways. Here are the suggestions I gave to Microsoft. - Help keep computers unlocked (no "secure boot" that restricts what systems we can run). Truly secure boot means YOU specify what system is allowed to run in your computer. - Help make peripherals safe — no back doors in their embedded software. This applies to keyboards, cameras, disks and memory sticks, since they contain computers and with preinstalled software that can be replaced through a universal back door. Crackers do that, installing malware into them, which becomes an advanced persistent threat. I can explain more if desired. - Publicly take back Microsoft's attacks on copyleft made in the 2000s. Ballmer called the GPL a "cancer". Allchin called it "un-American". - Encourage copylefting of application and library code, maybe even system and tool code. - Direct GitHub to promote correct and clear use of licenses and the best use of copyleft (GPL version 3-or-later). - Help fight against copyright on interfaces. - Help make the web usable with Javascript deactivated. - Implement an anonymous internet sales platform that doesn't require Javascript, using GNU Taler (taler.net) - Publish the hardware interface of products such as Hololens so we can run them without any nonfree software. Even if our software is years behind, that will be better than not being able to use these devices at all. And one other suggestion, which I made to a vice president but perhaps not in my talk. Release the source code of Windows under the GNU GPL. I know that is a stretch, but from what I heard there. it isn't totally impossible.

Sept. 24, 2019

Re: [nexa] Google wins landmark right to be forgotten case - BBC News

by Giacomo Tesio

Se il principio è generale, decade la protezione che il GDPR garantisce ai cittadini europei che si trovino fuori dal territorio europeo... o sbaglio? > Notably, the ECJ ruling said that delistings must "be > accompanied by measures which effectively prevent > or, at the very least, seriously discourage an internet > user" from being able to access the results from one > of Google's non-EU sites. Il fatto che la ECJ suggerisca di manipolare l'utente è inquietante e pericoloso. Giacomo

Sept. 24, 2019