September 2015 - nexa - server-nexa.polito.it

Blocking Orders due to Copyright Reasons violate Art. 16 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, as well as Art. 11, on freedom of expression and information.

by Fulvio Sarzana

Judgment of the OLG Cologne on network blocking (18 July 2014, 6 U 192/11) The decision of the Appellate Court of Cologne represents the first further development of principles laid down by the CJEU in UPC Telekabel Wien GmbH v. Constantin Film Verleih GmbH. The close assessment of various EU Directives is of particular interest. The close assessment of the various European Directives as well as the well considered balancing of fundamental rights is particularly remarkable. This judgment might pave the way for limiting an over emphasis on copyright to the detriment of the freedom of information and the economic freedom of copyright providers. The Claimants, leading music publishers, requested that the Defendant, a telecommunication service and access provider, block access to certain internet services which allow file sharing, alleging multiple violations of their copyrights. The Defendant denied any liability at which point the Claimants initiated an action to seek a blocking order. The Court Stated that: While the Defendant could be qualified as an intermediary in the sense of Art. 8(3) of Directive 2001/29/EC this would be limited by Art. 15(1) of Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on certain legal aspects of information society services, in particular electronic commerce, in the Internal Market, which provided that Member States should not impose a duty on ISPs to actively examine information which is transmitted through their services and to search for illegal acts Moreover, any such measure would be incompatible with Art. 3 of Directive 2004/48/EC which stipulates that any measures to protect copyrights has to be fair and just. The attempt to harmonise the economic freedom of access providers according to Art. 16 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union as well as Art. 11 of the Charter, namely the freedom of information with copyright, which is protected under Article 17 of the Charter, had to also be based on the fact that the copyright did not constitute a complete right. In addition, the Member States had to ensure that in case of conflicting fundamental rights a balance is struck and the principle of proportionality met. To request that the Defendant block access violated this principle, particularly as it would be difficult to effectively avoid copyright violations by way of introducing such blocking measures. In addition, it would not be possible to differentiate between illegal and completely legal data, and as such the freedom of information would be endangered by too general a set of measures. - See more at: http://www.lidis.it/en/blocking-orders-due-to-copyright-reasons-violate-art- 16-of-the-charter-of-fundamental-rights-of-the-european-union-as-well-as-art -11-on-freedom-of-expression-and-information.htm/#sthash.gMSjtTV0.dpuf --- Questa e-mail è stata controllata per individuare virus con Avast antivirus. https://www.avast.com/antivirus

Sept. 30, 2015

Re: [nexa] Il Registro delle Opposizioni: perché non c'è un'API gratuita?

by Federico Morando

On 26/09/2015 18:21, avv. Monica A. Senor wrote: > Per esperienza professionale posso dirti che sono pochissime le aziende che commissionano una campagna pubblicitaria sulla base dei numeri contenuti negli elenchi telefonici perché sono dati grezzi, privi di qualsiasi minima profilazione. > Se voglio, ad es., promuovere un'auto di grossa cilindrata, infatti, è molto più proficuo chiedere ad un broker (in Italia sono pochissimi!) una lista di numeri di uomini, di età adulta, di buon reddito e, magari, che hanno una berlina ormai datata. Come accennavo, sono ignorante sul tema, anche se mi sto riproponendo di approfondirlo, e questo è un punto su cui avevo grosse lacune. In effetti, il Registro si presenta come interlocutore di chiunque "intende avviare mediante il telefono attività a scopo commerciale, promozionale o ricerche di mercato." Insomma, il distinguo che fai tu rispetto all'origine di questi dati non viene presentato, almeno non molto chiaramente. Immaginavo che l'iscrizione al registro non precludesse i trattamenti dei dati altrimenti acquisiti con esplicito consenso... ma, ad esempio, se uno acquisisse un elenco di numeri di telefono facendo scraping del Web, dovrebbe/potrebbe usare il Registro per verificare se e quali di questi numeri possano essere contattati per offerte commerciali? > Quanto alla tua proposta dell'API, il sistema macchinoso orchestrato per l'RPO (se un'azienda vuole chiamare a scopi pubblicitari numeri trovati in elenco telefonico, deve prima sottoporli alla Fondazione Ugo Bordoni, che entro 24 ore li restituirà scremati di quelli iscritti nel registro; l'elenco è utilizzabile dalle aziende per chiamate pubblicitarie per 15 giorni, dopodiché occorre ripetere la procedura) è giustificato dal fatto che si tratta comunque di un DB, come tale protetto ai sensi del codice privacy: il trattamento dei dati che contiene, giustamente, non può essere effettuato da chiunque. L'API avrebbe l'unico scopo di dire "puoi chiamare", o "hanno chiesto di non disturbare" in risposta ad una chiamata contenente un numero di telefono già noto a chi invoca l'API: il trattamento del DB avverrebbe solo ad opera di chi gestisce il registro, mentre chi fa la chiamata avrebbe lo stesso tipo di informazione che ha oggi: "uno di cui avevi già il numero è iscritto al registro". Personalmente, mi sfugge il vantaggio del modello attuale, se non nel creare artificialmente un mercato per i servizi offerti dal gestore del Registro. Insomma, imho si può fare un'API che rispetti quanto previsto dal Codice Privacy: "modalità tecniche di funzionamento e di accesso al registro mediante interrogazioni selettive che non consentano il trasferimento dei dati presenti nel registro stesso, prevedendo il tracciamento delle operazioni compiute e la conservazione dei dati relativi agli accessi". Comunque appena posso studio un po' di più prima di fare altre domande :-) Grazie, Federico

Sept. 30, 2015

Fwd: Call for Papers | Big data: Big power shifts? | Internet Policy Review | Deadline: Abstracts until 20 October

by J.C. DE MARTIN

-------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: Call for Papers | Big data: Big power shifts? | Internet Policy Review | Deadline: Abstracts until 20 October Resent-Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 12:21:04 +0200 Resent-From: d004620(a)polito.it Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 12:21:02 +0200 From: Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society <newsletter(a)hiig.de> To: Juan Carlos de Martin <demartin(a)polito.it> Big Data: Big Power Shifts? C A L L F O R P A P E R S The Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society cordially invites you to submit your research projects for the Internet Policy Reviews' special issue on /Big data: big power shifts?/ supported by the Vodafone Institute for Society and Communications. Submit Your Abstract <http://policyreview.info/node/374> TOPIC & RELEVANCE Big data has been a major issue in internet-related public debate for several years now and it is yet unclear what impact big data has on societies, politics and markets. We conceive big data as constituted by three components: the automatic generation of very large and diverse data sets which are mainly the result of the digitisation of modern societies, their processing by algorithms and their use for decision-making and regulation, in the private or public sector. This includes purposes such as profiling, monitoring, predictive analysis and risk calculation. Mayer-Schönberger & Cukier claim that big data is a “revolution that will transform how we live, work, and think” (2014). But whereas revolutions imply a profound shift in power relations, there is little scientific evidence about whether and, if so, how big data affects power relations. We understand power as the production, in and through social relations, of effects that shape the capacities of actors to determine their fate. Power opens up or closes off options to act for parties involved and it is multi-dimensional: it is influence over others, empowerment, the capacity to act and to self-discipline. SCOPE OF THE SPECIAL ISSUE The aim of the special issue in the Internet Policy Review is to explore the extent to which big data shapes society by influencing power relations and, in return, how the development of big data-related phenomena is itself shaped by power relations. We welcome proposals that address power relations linked to big data phenomena in various fields, as long as they bear a relevance to European societies and highlight policy implications or make a reference to regulatory debates. Papers can have both a more conceptual or a more empirical focus. This call for papers is open to researchers from the fields of policy studies, sociology, law, philosophy, data, information and technology studies, economics and management and related fields. Emerging scholars are particularly encouraged to submit a proposal. FOCUS OF THE PAPERS As stated above, scientific knowledge about which power relations shape the big data society is still scarce. Yet much has been said about the many promising and worrying aspects of a society built on predictive analysis, machine learning and algorithmic regulation, and various implicit and explicit hypotheses about the power effects of big data have emerged in the academic and public debate. * Empowerment of users/citizens/patients: Will big data empower users, citizens and patients through applications and services (tailored services, e-participation, e-health)? * Power shifts and conflicts over power between actors: o Does big data alter the power relation between states and citizens (‘surveillance society’, ‘governing the poor’, manipulation of voters by individualised election campaigns)? o Do personalised marketing and the monitoring of staff affect the power relations between companies and users or employees? o Do new power relations between companies, political candidates/parties or states arise due to unequal access to big data applications? o Does big data influence the relative importance of scientific disciplines or professions (data analysts versus lawyers and economists)? * Different modes of decision-making and knowledge production: Are current norms and practices threatened by ‘algorithmic regulation’ and the ‘end of theory’? * Power relations shaping big data: How do power relations shape the development of big data and the precise big data related practices, modes of production and application fields? * Narratives: How are big data related power relations addressed, problematized or, on the contrary, masked? * Regulation of big data: What regulations are relevant for big data related power relations? What alternative regulations are proposed? BEST PAPER AWARD In addition to the special issue the authors selected for the best paper award will be invited to speak at the closing lecture of the Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society-lecture series Big data: big power shifts? The lecture is set to be held in Berlin in April 2016 in cooperation with the Vodafone Institute for Society and Communications. IMPORTANT DATES *20 October 2015:* Deadline for expression of interest and abstract submissions (500 word abstracts) via our webpage <http://policyreview.info/node/374> *27 October 2015: *Feedback on abstract submissions *14 December 2015:* Deadline for full text submissions (max. 30 000 characters spaces included). The full text form will be provided on 27 October. All details on text submissions can be found under: http://policyreview.info/authors *March 2016:* Publication of the special issue Special issue editors: Dr. Lena Ulbricht, WZB Berlin Social Science Center (lena.ulbricht(a)wzb.eu <mailto:lena.ulbricht@wzb.eu?subject=Call%20for%20Papers:%20Big%20Data:%20big%20power%20shifts?>) and Maximilian von Grafenstein LL.M., Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (max.grafenstein(a)hiig.de <mailto:max.grafenstein@hiig.de?subject=Call%20for%20Papers:%20Big%20Data:%20big%20power%0Ashifts?>). Big Data: Big Power Shifts? Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society Oberwallstraße 9 | D-10117 | Berlin | Germany | info(a)hiig.de | Unsubscribe <http://www.hiig.de/sugar-landing-page/index.php?entryPoint=removeme&identif…>

Sept. 30, 2015

R: caso Schrems e safe harbor: gli States fanno pressing sull'Europa

by Blengino

Non hanno tutti i torti, e sono anche stati gentili a non rinfacciare le vergognose pratiche che Membri UE hanno o si accingono ad approntare in tema trattamento massivo per law enforcement… Per altro se safeharbour fosse dichiarato inefficace i primi a subir danno sarebbero le imprese europee che utilizzano servizi U.S. based, prima ancora che i grandi provider. C. Da: nexa-bounces(a)server-nexa.polito.it [mailto:nexa-bounces@server-nexa.polito.it] Per conto di Guido Noto La Diega Inviato: mercoledì 30 settembre 2015 11:27 A: Giuseppe Futia Cc: Center Nexa Oggetto: [nexa] caso Schrems e safe harbor: gli States fanno pressing sull'Europa http://useu.usmission.gov/st-09282015.html Safe Harbor Protects Privacy and Provides Trust in Data Flows that Underpin Transatlantic Trade Statement | Brussels, Belgium | September, 28 2015 The United States Government and the European Commission have been engaged in a very productive and substantial dialogue to improve and strengthen the Safe Harbor Framework. The framework has been critically important to the protection of individual privacy and the conduct of commerce on both sides of the Atlantic; it has served and continues to serve as a model around the world for the protection of individual privacy and flow of data across national borders. We are optimistic that our discussions will conclude soon with a positive outcome for both sides. The future of the Safe Harbor Framework, however, has now been called into question by the Advocate General's recent opinion in Maximillian Schrems v. Data Protection Commissioner. We fully respect the European Union's legal process; however, we believe that it is essential to comment in this instance because the Advocate General's opinion rests on numerous inaccurate assertions about intelligence practices of the United States. The Advocate General's opinion notes that it was required to accept the facts as found by the Irish High Court. There was, however, no actual fact-finding in this case; instead, the Irish High Court concluded, on the basis of exhibits to plaintiff's affidavits that the accuracy of his allegations regarding U.S. intelligence practices "is not in dispute." But that is simply not the case, as the public record made clear at the time, and as has been made even clearer in the subsequent two years. The United States does not and has not engaged in indiscriminate surveillance of anyone, including ordinary European citizens. The PRISM program that the Advocate General's opinion discusses is in fact targeted against particular valid foreign intelligence targets, is duly authorized by law, and strictly complies with a number of publicly disclosed controls and limitations. Moreover, the Advocate General's opinion fails to take into account that -- particularly in the last two years - President Obama has taken unprecedented steps to enhance transparency and public accountability regarding U.S. intelligence practices, and to strengthen policies to ensure that all persons are treated with dignity and respect, regardless of their nationality or place of residence. The Advocate General's opinion also errs in inviting the European Court of Justice to conclude that the current Safe Harbor Framework is inadequate because the United States and the European Commission are positively engaged in an effort to strengthen it. On the contrary, the Framework was conceived as a living document, and this is not the first time that the two sides have engaged to improve its operation. On both sides, there has been a strong desire to make sure that we improve the Framework, and these efforts should be encouraged. Moreover, the underlying issue here also goes far beyond the Safe Harbor Framework. The Advocate General's reasoning would undercut the ability of other countries, businesses and citizens to rely upon negotiated arrangements with the European Commission. Given the important privacy and trade benefits that Safe Harbor provides to EU and US citizens and businesses, we will continue to work closely with the European Commission to improve the Safe Harbor Framework. We hope that the final judgment of the European Court of Justice takes note of these efforts, inaccuracies in and far-reaching consequences of the Advocate General's opinion, as well as the significant harm to the protection of individual rights and the free flow of information that would occur if it were to follow the Advocate General's opinion. -- Guido Dr. Guido Noto La Diega <http://www.law.qmul.ac.uk/staff/notoladiega.html> , Postdoctoral Research Assistant in Cloud Computing Law <http://www.cloudlegal.ccls.qmul.ac.uk/project/researchers/index.html> - Queen Mary Universityof London <http://www.mccrc.eu/Pages/Research-Team.aspx> President of Ital-IoT <http://italiot.altervista.org/about-us/> - Centre of Multidisciplinary Research on the Internet of Things Avvocato <http://www.studioperrino.it/intro/index.asp> (Commercial and IP/IT Lawyer) Cultore della materia in Civil Law and Intellectual Property <http://www.unipa.it/persone/docenti/n/guido.notoladiega> - University of Palermo 67-69 Lincoln's Inn Fields London WC2A 3JB <mailto:g.notoladiega@qmul.ac.uk> g.notoladiega(a)qmul.ac.uk +44(0)2078823386 <https://docs.google.com/uc?export=download&id=0ByL4m9T2f4OFU3lrRzlDbF9RNHM&…> @gui_notoladiega <https://docs.google.com/uc?export=download&id=0ByL4m9T2f4OFY3UzY0dtOTREQWc&…> https://it.linkedin.com/pub/guido-noto-la-diega-ph-d/6/614/669 This e-mail and any attachment hereto are strictly confidential and are exclusively intended for the person above identified. Without intended recipient’s entitlement, use, copy and dissemination of this e-mail is prohibited. If you have received it in error, please advice us immediately by telephone and return the documents received to the above address, deleting the files. Thank you. Diese E-Mail enthält vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschützte Informationen. Das unerlaubte Kopieren sowie die unbefugte Weitergabe dieser Mail ist nicht gestaettet. Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind oder diese E-Mail irrtümlich erhalten haben, informieren Sie bitte sofort den Absender und vernichten Sie diese Mail. Danke. Il presente messaggio di posta elettronica ed ogni eventuale allegato contengono informazioni strettamente riservate e sono indirizzati esclusivamente al soggetto sopra indicato. In mancanza di autorizzazione del destinatario, ne sono vietati l’uso, la riproduzione e la divulgazione. Se avete ricevuto questo messaggio per errore, siete pregati di avvisarci immediatamente per telefono e di restituirci i documenti ricevuti all’indirizzo sopra indicato, distruggendo i file. Grazie. BE ECO-FRIENDLY: Unless necessary, please do not print this e-mail

Sept. 30, 2015

Libertà d'espressione: Gli Ordini di blocco per ragioni di copyright vìolano la Carta dei diritti Fondamentali della UE.

by Fulvio Sarzana

Gli Ordini di blocco allaccesso attraverso i DNS, a protezione del diritto dAutore, vìolano gli Art 16 ed 11 della Carta Fondamentale dellUnione Europea, sono contrari alla Direttiva sul Commercio Elettronico, e si pongono in diretta violazione dei principi stabiliti dalla Carta Costituzionale Tedesca. E netta la condanna dei Tribunali Tedeschi sugli ordini di inibizione allaccesso per i propri cittadini a protezione del diritto dautore. Secondo la Corte dappello di Colonia, nel caso 18 july 2014, 6 U 192/11, che riprende integralmente la pronuncia Telekabel della Corte di Giustizia dellUnione Europea, gli ordini di blocco di questo tipo si risolvono in realtà nella violazione dell'art. 15 (1), della direttiva 2000/31/CE. Segue su http://fulviosarzana.nova100.ilsole24ore.com/2015/09/30/liberta-despressione -gli-ordini-di-blocco-per-ragioni-di-copyright-violano-la-carta-dei-diritti- fondamentali-della-ue/ --- Questa e-mail è stata controllata per individuare virus con Avast antivirus. https://www.avast.com/antivirus

Sept. 30, 2015

report sui droni (Air and Space Academy e Association Aéronautique et Astronautique de France)

by Guido Noto La Diega

Vi allego il corposo report sul futuro dei droni a cura della Air and Space Academy e della Association Aéronautique et Astronautique de France -- *Guido* Dr. Guido Noto La Diega <http://www.law.qmul.ac.uk/staff/notoladiega.html>, Postdoctoral Research Assistant in Cloud Computing Law <http://www.cloudlegal.ccls.qmul.ac.uk/project/researchers/index.html> - Queen Mary Universityof London <http://www.mccrc.eu/Pages/Research-Team.aspx> President of Ital-IoT <http://italiot.altervista.org/about-us/> - Centre of Multidisciplinary Research on the Internet of Things Avvocato <http://www.studioperrino.it/intro/index.asp> (Commercial and IP/IT Lawyer) Cultore della materia in Civil Law and Intellectual Property <http://www.unipa.it/persone/docenti/n/guido.notoladiega> - University of Palermo 67-69 Lincoln's Inn Fields London WC2A 3JB g.notoladiega(a)qmul.ac.uk +44(0)2078823386 @gui_notoladiega https://it.linkedin.com/pub/guido-noto-la-diega-ph-d/6/614/669 This e-mail and any attachment hereto are strictly confidential and are exclusively intended for the person above identified. Without intended recipient’s entitlement, use, copy and dissemination of this e-mail is prohibited. If you have received it in error, please advice us immediately by telephone and return the documents received to the above address, deleting the files. Thank you. Diese E-Mail enthält vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschützte Informationen. Das unerlaubte Kopieren sowie die unbefugte Weitergabe dieser Mail ist nicht gestaettet. Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind oder diese E-Mail irrtümlich erhalten haben, informieren Sie bitte sofort den Absender und vernichten Sie diese Mail. Danke. Il presente messaggio di posta elettronica ed ogni eventuale allegato contengono informazioni strettamente riservate e sono indirizzati esclusivamente al soggetto sopra indicato. In mancanza di autorizzazione del destinatario, ne sono vietati l’uso, la riproduzione e la divulgazione. Se avete ricevuto questo messaggio per errore, siete pregati di avvisarci immediatamente per telefono e di restituirci i documenti ricevuti all’indirizzo sopra indicato, distruggendo i file. Grazie. *BE ECO-FRIENDLY: Unless necessary, please do not print this e-mail *

Sept. 30, 2015

Suggestioni da Joy Marino, David Orban

by giorgio.giunchi＠cctld.it

Joy Marino non mantiene blog, ogni tanto butta generosamente la' un pezzo che "allarga il cuore", da vero "nexialist" http://www.doppiozero.com/materiali/terra-mobile/il-cellulare-dispositivo-d… P.S. Joy cita nella selettiva bibliografia Ray Kurzweil, il che mi alza la palla per segnalare, per facile associazione, la produttiva "singolarita' ", sempre a largo spettro, di un blog da tener guardato, secondo me, periodicamente http://www.davidorban.com/it/ giorgio

Sept. 30, 2015

caso Schrems e safe harbor: gli States fanno pressing sull'Europa

by Guido Noto La Diega

http://useu.usmission.gov/st-09282015.html Safe Harbor Protects Privacy and Provides Trust in Data Flows that Underpin Transatlantic TradeStatement | Brussels, Belgium | September, 28 2015 The United States Government and the European Commission have been engaged in a very productive and substantial dialogue to improve and strengthen the Safe Harbor Framework. The framework has been critically important to the protection of individual privacy and the conduct of commerce on both sides of the Atlantic; it has served and continues to serve as a model around the world for the protection of individual privacy and flow of data across national borders. We are optimistic that our discussions will conclude soon with a positive outcome for both sides. The future of the Safe Harbor Framework, however, has now been called into question by the Advocate General's recent opinion in Maximillian Schrems v. Data Protection Commissioner. We fully respect the European Union's legal process; however, we believe that it is essential to comment in this instance because the Advocate General's opinion rests on numerous inaccurate assertions about intelligence practices of the United States. The Advocate General's opinion notes that it was required to accept the facts as found by the Irish High Court. There was, however, no actual fact-finding in this case; instead, the Irish High Court concluded, on the basis of exhibits to plaintiff's affidavits that the accuracy of his allegations regarding U.S. intelligence practices "is not in dispute." But that is simply not the case, as the public record made clear at the time, and as has been made even clearer in the subsequent two years. The United States does not and has not engaged in indiscriminate surveillance of anyone, including ordinary European citizens. The PRISM program that the Advocate General's opinion discusses is in fact targeted against particular valid foreign intelligence targets, is duly authorized by law, and strictly complies with a number of publicly disclosed controls and limitations. Moreover, the Advocate General's opinion fails to take into account that -- particularly in the last two years - President Obama has taken unprecedented steps to enhance transparency and public accountability regarding U.S. intelligence practices, and to strengthen policies to ensure that all persons are treated with dignity and respect, regardless of their nationality or place of residence. The Advocate General's opinion also errs in inviting the European Court of Justice to conclude that the current Safe Harbor Framework is inadequate because the United States and the European Commission are positively engaged in an effort to strengthen it. On the contrary, the Framework was conceived as a living document, and this is not the first time that the two sides have engaged to improve its operation. On both sides, there has been a strong desire to make sure that we improve the Framework, and these efforts should be encouraged. Moreover, the underlying issue here also goes far beyond the Safe Harbor Framework. The Advocate General's reasoning would undercut the ability of other countries, businesses and citizens to rely upon negotiated arrangements with the European Commission. Given the important privacy and trade benefits that Safe Harbor provides to EU and US citizens and businesses, we will continue to work closely with the European Commission to improve the Safe Harbor Framework. We hope that the final judgment of the European Court of Justice takes note of these efforts, inaccuracies in and far-reaching consequences of the Advocate General's opinion, as well as the significant harm to the protection of individual rights and the free flow of information that would occur if it were to follow the Advocate General's opinion. -- *Guido* Dr. Guido Noto La Diega <http://www.law.qmul.ac.uk/staff/notoladiega.html>, Postdoctoral Research Assistant in Cloud Computing Law <http://www.cloudlegal.ccls.qmul.ac.uk/project/researchers/index.html> - Queen Mary Universityof London <http://www.mccrc.eu/Pages/Research-Team.aspx> President of Ital-IoT <http://italiot.altervista.org/about-us/> - Centre of Multidisciplinary Research on the Internet of Things Avvocato <http://www.studioperrino.it/intro/index.asp> (Commercial and IP/IT Lawyer) Cultore della materia in Civil Law and Intellectual Property <http://www.unipa.it/persone/docenti/n/guido.notoladiega> - University of Palermo 67-69 Lincoln's Inn Fields London WC2A 3JB g.notoladiega(a)qmul.ac.uk +44(0)2078823386 @gui_notoladiega https://it.linkedin.com/pub/guido-noto-la-diega-ph-d/6/614/669 This e-mail and any attachment hereto are strictly confidential and are exclusively intended for the person above identified. Without intended recipient’s entitlement, use, copy and dissemination of this e-mail is prohibited. If you have received it in error, please advice us immediately by telephone and return the documents received to the above address, deleting the files. Thank you. Diese E-Mail enthält vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschützte Informationen. Das unerlaubte Kopieren sowie die unbefugte Weitergabe dieser Mail ist nicht gestaettet. Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind oder diese E-Mail irrtümlich erhalten haben, informieren Sie bitte sofort den Absender und vernichten Sie diese Mail. Danke. Il presente messaggio di posta elettronica ed ogni eventuale allegato contengono informazioni strettamente riservate e sono indirizzati esclusivamente al soggetto sopra indicato. In mancanza di autorizzazione del destinatario, ne sono vietati l’uso, la riproduzione e la divulgazione. Se avete ricevuto questo messaggio per errore, siete pregati di avvisarci immediatamente per telefono e di restituirci i documenti ricevuti all’indirizzo sopra indicato, distruggendo i file. Grazie. *BE ECO-FRIENDLY: Unless necessary, please do not print this e-mail *

Sept. 30, 2015

79° Mercoledì di Nexa - 14 ottobre 2015

by Giuseppe Futia

Se non visualizzi correttamente questo messaggio clicca qui <http://nexa.polito.it/mercoledi-79> NEXA 79° Mercoledì di Nexa Mercoledi 14 ottobre 2015, ore 18.00 - 20.00 Via Boggio 65/a, Torino (primo piano) http://nexa.polito.it/mercoledi-79 Diritto di accesso ad Internet in Costituzione. Dall’art. 21-bis al 34-bis passando per l’Internet Bill of Rights Speaker Guido d’Ippolito (Responsabile per l’Innovazione Digitale del think tank Cultura Democratica) Ingresso libero This event will be webcast live: http://nexa.polito.it/upcoming-events In occasione del 79° Mercoledì di Nexa, insieme a *Guido d’Ippolito*, responsabile per l’Innovazione Digitale del think tank Cultura Democratica <http://www.culturademocratica.org/> e autore della proposta di riforma costituzionale sull’art. 34-bis <http://www.art34bis.it/chi-siamo/>, in discussione al Parlamento, esamineremo i rilievi costituzionali di Internet e il rapporto, spesso confuso e basato su falsi miti, tra il fenomeno Internet e il diritto. Dopo uno sguardo al contesto internazionale si tornerà in Italia per esaminare il diritto precondizione all’esercizio di ogni libertà on line: il *diritto di accesso ad Internet*. Le problematiche di un riconoscimento costituzionale di tale diritto saranno esaminate in un dialogo col pubblico sulla base anche di concrete esperienze quali la proposta di Stefano Rodotà di un art. 21-bis, la recente Dichiarazione dei diritti di Internet <http://nexa.polito.it/2015/07/dichiarazione-diritti-internet> e l’attuale disegno di legge Costituzionale sull’art. 34-bis, accesso ad Internet come diritto sociale, in discussione al Senato della Repubblica (Diritto di accesso ad Internet in Italia su Wikipedia <https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diritto_di_accesso_a_Internet>). BIOGRAFIE - e informazioni supplementari [D'Ippolito] GUIDO D'IPPOLITO è Responsabile per l’Innovazione Digitale del think tank di giovani Cultura Democratica e si occupa di innovazione legislativa. In questa veste ha realizzato la proposta di riforma costituzionale sull’art. 34-bis, accesso ad Internet come diritto sociale all’esame del Parlamento (ddl. Cost. 1561/14 al Sento della Repubblica e 2816/15 alla Camera dei Deputati). Digital Champions della città di Roma, si è laureato in Giurisprudenza con una tesi in diritto costituzionale sugli impatti costituzionali di Internet. Letture consigliate e link utili: * Guido Scorza e Alessandro Gilioli, /Meglio se taci <http://www.baldinicastoldi.it/libri/se-taci/>/, Baldini & Castoldi, 2015 * Maurizio Mensi e Pietro Falletta, /Il diritto del web. Casi e materiali <http://www.ibs.it/code/9788813351601/mensi-maurizio/diritto-del-web.html>/, CEDAM, 2015 * Giovanna De Minicio, /Diritti regole e internet/ <http://www.costituzionalismo.it/articoli/393/>. in Costituzionalismo.it oppure Internet regole e anarchia. Jovene Editore 2012 Che cosa sono il Centro Nexa e i cicli di incontri “Mercoledì di Nexa” e “Nexa Lunch Seminar” Il Centro Nexa su Internet & Società del Politecnico di Torino (Dipartimento di Automatica e Informatica) è un centro di ricerca indipendente e interdisciplinare che studia Internet e il suo effetto sulla società. Maggiori informazioni all'indirizzo: http://nexa.polito.it/about. Durante i “*Mercoledì di Nexa*”, che si tengono *ogni 2° mercoledì del mese* alle *ore 18 in punto*, il Centro Nexa su Internet e Società apre le sue porte non solo agli esperti e a tutti coloro i quali lavorano con Internet, ma anche a semplici appassionati e cittadini. Il ciclo di incontri intende approfondire, con un linguaggio preciso ma divulgativo, i temi legati alla Rete: motori di ricerca, Creative Commons, social networks, open source/software libero, neutralità della rete, libertà di espressione, privacy, file sharing, big e open data, smart cities e molto altro. Al centro di quasi tutti gli incontri un ospite pronto a dialogare con i direttori del Centro Nexa, il Prof. Juan Carlos De Martin del Politecnico di Torino e il Prof. Marco Ricolfi dell'Università di Torino, nonché lo staff e i Fellows del Centro Nexa. Maggiori informazioni sui Mercoledì di Nexa, incluso un elenco di tutti i “Mercoledì” passati, sono disponibili all'indirizzo: http://nexa.polito.it/mercoledi. Si segnala inoltre che dal maggio 2012 *ogni 4° mercoledì* del mese *dalle ore 13 alle ore 14* il Centro Nexa organizza anche i "*Nexa Lunch Seminar*". Una lista di tutti i “Lunch Seminar” passati è disponibile all'indirizzo: http://nexa.polito.it/lunch-seminars. See our events calendar <http://nexa.polito.it/events> if you're curious about future luncheons, discussions, lectures, and conferences not listed in this email. Our events are free and open to the public, unless otherwise noted. Maggiori informazioni sui Mercoledì di Nexa e i Nexa Lunch Seminar, sono disponibili all'indirizzo: http://nexa.polito.it/events. Weekly Events Newsletter. Sign up <http://nexa.polito.it/mailing-lists> to receive this newsletter if this email was forwarded to you. To manage your subscription preferences, please click here <https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa>. Connect & get involved: Jobs, internships, and more <http://nexa.polito.it/get-involved> Nexa Center for Internet and Society Newsletter

Sept. 30, 2015

CeDEM16 - Call for papers (Deadline: 7 dicembre 2015)

by Giuseppe Futia

Gentilissimi, abbiamo il piacere di segnalarvi la call for papers promossa in occasione dell'edizione 2016 di "CeDEM - Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government", che coinvolge numerosi temi relativi all'e-democracy ed all'e/open-government. Anche quest'anno la call for papers include una track sull'Open Access coordinata da Federico Morando, Director of Research and Policy del Centro Nexa su Internet & Società. Maggiori dettagli sono disponibili in calce, cordialmente, -- ------------------------------------------------- Giuseppe Futia Communication Manager Nexa Center for Internet & Society Politecnico di Torino - DAUIN Corso Duca degli Abruzzi, 24 - 10129 Torino web: http://nexa.polito.it mail: giuseppe.futia(a)polito.it tel. +39 011 090 7219 ************************************************************************************ CeDEM16 Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government 18-20 May 2016 CeDEM 16 Tracks http://bit.ly/1HgatxV All CeDEM 16 Details www.donau-uni.ac.at/cedem ************************************************************************************ The international Conference for e-Democracy and Open Government brings together e-democracy, e-participation and open government specialists working in academia, politics, government and business to critically analyse the innovations, issues, ideas and challenges in the networked societies of the digital age. We look forward to your submissions (full papers, workshgop proposals, refelctions, PhD papers) and seeing you in Krems! CeDEM16 Tracks: E-Democracy and E-Participation E-Voting Bottom-Up Movements Social and Mobile Media for Public Administration Open Collaborative Government SOcial Media, Public Administration and Citizen Engagement Connected Smart City Open Data, Transparency and Open Innovation Technology and Architecture Self-governance in Complex Networks Rethinking Information Visualization for the People Freedom and Ethics in Digital Societies Design and Co-creation for E-democracy Citizen's Participation in Democratic Governance Processes through ICT in Africa Open Access Emerging Issues in E-Democracy and Open Government Submissions can be made for: Full Papers PhD Colloquium Workshop Proposals Reflections Open Space Important Dates: *Deadline for the submission of all papers, workshop proposals, reflections: 7 December 2015 *Notification of acceptance: 15 February 2016 *Camera-ready paper submission: 7 March 2016

Sept. 30, 2015