March 2016 - nexa - server-nexa.polito.it

Re: [nexa] Powles & Chaparro: "In the wake of Apple v FBI, we need to address some uncomfortable truths"

by Andrea Glorioso

Caro Guido, Grazie per il chiarimento. Saluti acefali, :) Andrea On Thursday, March 31, 2016, Guido Noto La Diega <noto.la.diega(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Caro Andrea, > non era una replica a te (anzi, concordo con quello che dici), quanto > un collegamento tematico all'argomento introdotto dal Co-direttore. > Non credo che ENISA parli a nome dell'UE, notoriamente acefala, > cionondimeno offre un punto di vista qualificato. > Cheers, > Guido > > > 2016-03-31 15:36 GMT+01:00 Andrea Glorioso <andrea(a)digitalpolicy.it > <javascript:;>>: > > Caro Guido, > > > > Non sono sicuro di capire il nesso tra l'articolo, la mia reazione e la > > posizione di ENISA, ma a scanso di equivoci, né io né ENISA parliamo a > nome > > dell'Unione Europea (io perché qui esprimo posizioni personali, ENISA in > > quanto agenzia indipendente il cui ruolo è prevalentemente consultivo, > non > > decisionale - vedi https://www.enisa.europa.eu/about-enisa/activities > per > > ulteriori dettagli). > > > > Per altro anche Andrus Ansip, Vice-Presidente della Commissione Europea, > si > > è ripetutamente espresso pubblicamente contro l'uso di "back-door". Il > > problema è che secondo me ognuno sta usando il termine "back-door" senza > > mettersi d'accordo sulla semantica. :) > > > > Ciao, > > > > Andrea > > > > > > On Thursday, March 31, 2016, Guido Noto La Diega < > noto.la.diega(a)gmail.com <javascript:;>> > > wrote: > >> > >> Grazie per la segnalazione. > >> "ENISA has spoken out against creating backdoors for law enforcement > >> agencies to access encrypted communication..." > >> > >> > http://www.euractiv.com/section/digital/news/eu-cybersecurity-agency-slams-… > >> > >> 2016-03-31 12:32 GMT+01:00 Andrea Glorioso <andrea(a)digitalpolicy.it > <javascript:;>>: > >> > Grazie. Uno dei pochi articoli sensati che abbia letto in queste > >> > settimane. > >> > > >> > Mi chiedo se non sarebbe stato meglio avere una procedura trasparente > e > >> > controllata (è bene ricordare che l'ordine del giudice avrebbe > permesso > >> > ad > >> > Apple di mantenere un controllo notevole sia sul dispositivo, sia sul > >> > sistema operativo modificato, sia sull'intera procedura di accesso ai > >> > dati) > >> > invece di una procedura opaca. > >> > > >> > Ciao, > >> > > >> > Andrea > >> > > >> > > >> > On Wednesday, March 30, 2016, J.C. DE MARTIN <demartin(a)polito.it > <javascript:;>> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> Lettura vivamente raccomandata. > >> >> > >> >> juan carlos > >> >> > >> >> ----------- > >> >> > >> >> In the wake of Apple v FBI, we need to address some uncomfortable > >> >> truths > >> >> > >> >> A temporary truce has emerged in the raging battle between Apple and > >> >> the > >> >> FBI, but technology fragility and corporate power remain unaddressed > >> >> > >> >> Julia Powles and Enrique Chaparro > >> >> > >> >> Tuesday 29 March 2016 21.11 BST > >> >> > >> >> It has been a spectacular six-week showdown – the world’s most > valuable > >> >> brand, Apple, pitted against the powerful American agents of the FBI. > >> >> Two > >> >> titans of spin, locked in a fast-moving battle over a dead > terrorist’s > >> >> smartphone. Now, as dramatically as it exploded, the FBI’s legal > demand > >> >> that > >> >> Apple help it crack the iPhone of one of the San Bernardino killers > has > >> >> evaporated – the agents hacked their way in anyway, assisted by a > >> >> mysterious > >> >> third party. > >> >> > >> >> There was always more to the Apple v FBI case than met the eye – and > it > >> >> is > >> >> true for this latest twist too. The biggest issue is that both sides > >> >> stand > >> >> to gain a lot more from this battle than any of us. With little > >> >> relation to > >> >> reality, and backed by a worryingly partisan chorus, the notoriously > >> >> closed > >> >> Apple is emerging as a champion of users’ rights. Equally > worryingly, a > >> >> government agency is claiming the power to keep to itself a tool that > >> >> can > >> >> potentially break security features on millions of phones, while > >> >> earmarking > >> >> a demand for further judicial or legislative intervention in the > >> >> future. > >> >> Whichever way you look, this feud is far from a road to freedom in > the > >> >> digital environment. > >> >> > >> >> […] > >> >> > >> >> Continua qui: > >> >> > >> >> > http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/mar/29/apple-fbi-encryption-san-… > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > > >> > -- > >> > I speak only for myself. Sometimes I do not even agree with myself. > Keep > >> > it > >> > in mind. > >> > Twitter: @andreaglorioso > >> > Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/andrea.glorioso > >> > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=1749288&trk=tab_pro > >> > > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > nexa mailing list > >> > nexa(a)server-nexa.polito.it <javascript:;> > >> > https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Guido > >> > >> Dr. Guido Noto La Diega > >> Associate Lecturer in Law: Intellectual Property Law - Buckinghamshire > >> New University > >> > >> President of Ital-IoT - Centre of Multidisciplinary Research on the > >> Internet of Things > >> > >> Avvocato (Commercial and IP/IT Lawyer) > >> > >> Cultore della materia in Civil Law and Intellectual Property - > >> University of Palermo > >> > >> Department of Law > >> Queen Alexandra Road > >> High Wycombe > >> Buckinghamshire HP11 2JZ > >> > >> noto.la.diega(a)gmail.com <javascript:;> > >> > >> +44(0)2078823386 > >> > >> @guidonld > >> > >> https://it.linkedin.com/pub/guido-noto-la-diega-ph-d/6/614/669 > >> > >> > >> This e-mail and any attachment hereto are strictly confidential and > >> are exclusively intended for the person above identified. Without > >> intended recipient’s entitlement, use, copy and dissemination of this > >> e-mail is prohibited. If you have received it in error, please advice > >> us immediately by telephone and return the documents received to the > >> above address, deleting the files. Thank you. > >> > >> Diese E-Mail enthält vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschützte > >> Informationen. Das unerlaubte Kopieren sowie die unbefugte Weitergabe > >> dieser Mail ist nicht gestaettet. Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat > >> sind oder diese E-Mail irrtümlich erhalten haben, informieren Sie > >> bitte sofort den Absender und vernichten Sie diese Mail. Danke. > >> > >> Il presente messaggio di posta elettronica ed ogni eventuale allegato > >> contengono informazioni strettamente riservate e sono indirizzati > >> esclusivamente al soggetto sopra indicato. In mancanza di > >> autorizzazione del destinatario, ne sono vietati l’uso, la > >> riproduzione e la divulgazione. Se avete ricevuto questo messaggio per > >> errore, siete pregati di avvisarci immediatamente per telefono e di > >> restituirci i documenti ricevuti all’indirizzo sopra indicato, > >> distruggendo i file. Grazie. > >> > >> BE ECO-FRIENDLY: Unless necessary, please do not print this e-mail > > > > > > > > -- > > > > -- > > I speak only for myself. Sometimes I do not even agree with myself. Keep > it > > in mind. > > Twitter: @andreaglorioso > > Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/andrea.glorioso > > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=1749288&trk=tab_pro > > > > -- > Guido > > Dr. Guido Noto La Diega > Associate Lecturer in Law: Intellectual Property Law - Buckinghamshire > New University > > President of Ital-IoT - Centre of Multidisciplinary Research on the > Internet of Things > > Avvocato (Commercial and IP/IT Lawyer) > > Cultore della materia in Civil Law and Intellectual Property - > University of Palermo > > Department of Law > Queen Alexandra Road > High Wycombe > Buckinghamshire HP11 2JZ > > noto.la.diega(a)gmail.com <javascript:;> > > +44(0)2078823386 > > @guidonld > > https://it.linkedin.com/pub/guido-noto-la-diega-ph-d/6/614/669 > > > This e-mail and any attachment hereto are strictly confidential and > are exclusively intended for the person above identified. Without > intended recipient’s entitlement, use, copy and dissemination of this > e-mail is prohibited. If you have received it in error, please advice > us immediately by telephone and return the documents received to the > above address, deleting the files. Thank you. > > Diese E-Mail enthält vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschützte > Informationen. Das unerlaubte Kopieren sowie die unbefugte Weitergabe > dieser Mail ist nicht gestaettet. Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat > sind oder diese E-Mail irrtümlich erhalten haben, informieren Sie > bitte sofort den Absender und vernichten Sie diese Mail. Danke. > > Il presente messaggio di posta elettronica ed ogni eventuale allegato > contengono informazioni strettamente riservate e sono indirizzati > esclusivamente al soggetto sopra indicato. In mancanza di > autorizzazione del destinatario, ne sono vietati l’uso, la > riproduzione e la divulgazione. Se avete ricevuto questo messaggio per > errore, siete pregati di avvisarci immediatamente per telefono e di > restituirci i documenti ricevuti all’indirizzo sopra indicato, > distruggendo i file. Grazie. > > BE ECO-FRIENDLY: Unless necessary, please do not print this e-mail > -- -- I speak only for myself. Sometimes I do not even agree with myself. Keep it in mind. Twitter: @andreaglorioso Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/andrea.glorioso LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=1749288&trk=tab_pro

March 31, 2016

Re: [nexa] Powles & Chaparro: "In the wake of Apple v FBI, we need to address some uncomfortable truths"

by Guido Noto La Diega

Caro Andrea, non era una replica a te (anzi, concordo con quello che dici), quanto un collegamento tematico all'argomento introdotto dal Co-direttore. Non credo che ENISA parli a nome dell'UE, notoriamente acefala, cionondimeno offre un punto di vista qualificato. Cheers, Guido 2016-03-31 15:36 GMT+01:00 Andrea Glorioso <andrea(a)digitalpolicy.it>: > Caro Guido, > > Non sono sicuro di capire il nesso tra l'articolo, la mia reazione e la > posizione di ENISA, ma a scanso di equivoci, né io né ENISA parliamo a nome > dell'Unione Europea (io perché qui esprimo posizioni personali, ENISA in > quanto agenzia indipendente il cui ruolo è prevalentemente consultivo, non > decisionale - vedi https://www.enisa.europa.eu/about-enisa/activities per > ulteriori dettagli). > > Per altro anche Andrus Ansip, Vice-Presidente della Commissione Europea, si > è ripetutamente espresso pubblicamente contro l'uso di "back-door". Il > problema è che secondo me ognuno sta usando il termine "back-door" senza > mettersi d'accordo sulla semantica. :) > > Ciao, > > Andrea > > > On Thursday, March 31, 2016, Guido Noto La Diega <noto.la.diega(a)gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> Grazie per la segnalazione. >> "ENISA has spoken out against creating backdoors for law enforcement >> agencies to access encrypted communication..." >> >> http://www.euractiv.com/section/digital/news/eu-cybersecurity-agency-slams-… >> >> 2016-03-31 12:32 GMT+01:00 Andrea Glorioso <andrea(a)digitalpolicy.it>: >> > Grazie. Uno dei pochi articoli sensati che abbia letto in queste >> > settimane. >> > >> > Mi chiedo se non sarebbe stato meglio avere una procedura trasparente e >> > controllata (è bene ricordare che l'ordine del giudice avrebbe permesso >> > ad >> > Apple di mantenere un controllo notevole sia sul dispositivo, sia sul >> > sistema operativo modificato, sia sull'intera procedura di accesso ai >> > dati) >> > invece di una procedura opaca. >> > >> > Ciao, >> > >> > Andrea >> > >> > >> > On Wednesday, March 30, 2016, J.C. DE MARTIN <demartin(a)polito.it> wrote: >> >> >> >> Lettura vivamente raccomandata. >> >> >> >> juan carlos >> >> >> >> ----------- >> >> >> >> In the wake of Apple v FBI, we need to address some uncomfortable >> >> truths >> >> >> >> A temporary truce has emerged in the raging battle between Apple and >> >> the >> >> FBI, but technology fragility and corporate power remain unaddressed >> >> >> >> Julia Powles and Enrique Chaparro >> >> >> >> Tuesday 29 March 2016 21.11 BST >> >> >> >> It has been a spectacular six-week showdown – the world’s most valuable >> >> brand, Apple, pitted against the powerful American agents of the FBI. >> >> Two >> >> titans of spin, locked in a fast-moving battle over a dead terrorist’s >> >> smartphone. Now, as dramatically as it exploded, the FBI’s legal demand >> >> that >> >> Apple help it crack the iPhone of one of the San Bernardino killers has >> >> evaporated – the agents hacked their way in anyway, assisted by a >> >> mysterious >> >> third party. >> >> >> >> There was always more to the Apple v FBI case than met the eye – and it >> >> is >> >> true for this latest twist too. The biggest issue is that both sides >> >> stand >> >> to gain a lot more from this battle than any of us. With little >> >> relation to >> >> reality, and backed by a worryingly partisan chorus, the notoriously >> >> closed >> >> Apple is emerging as a champion of users’ rights. Equally worryingly, a >> >> government agency is claiming the power to keep to itself a tool that >> >> can >> >> potentially break security features on millions of phones, while >> >> earmarking >> >> a demand for further judicial or legislative intervention in the >> >> future. >> >> Whichever way you look, this feud is far from a road to freedom in the >> >> digital environment. >> >> >> >> […] >> >> >> >> Continua qui: >> >> >> >> http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/mar/29/apple-fbi-encryption-san-… >> >> >> > >> > >> > -- >> > >> > -- >> > I speak only for myself. Sometimes I do not even agree with myself. Keep >> > it >> > in mind. >> > Twitter: @andreaglorioso >> > Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/andrea.glorioso >> > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=1749288&trk=tab_pro >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > nexa mailing list >> > nexa(a)server-nexa.polito.it >> > https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Guido >> >> Dr. Guido Noto La Diega >> Associate Lecturer in Law: Intellectual Property Law - Buckinghamshire >> New University >> >> President of Ital-IoT - Centre of Multidisciplinary Research on the >> Internet of Things >> >> Avvocato (Commercial and IP/IT Lawyer) >> >> Cultore della materia in Civil Law and Intellectual Property - >> University of Palermo >> >> Department of Law >> Queen Alexandra Road >> High Wycombe >> Buckinghamshire HP11 2JZ >> >> noto.la.diega(a)gmail.com >> >> +44(0)2078823386 >> >> @guidonld >> >> https://it.linkedin.com/pub/guido-noto-la-diega-ph-d/6/614/669 >> >> >> This e-mail and any attachment hereto are strictly confidential and >> are exclusively intended for the person above identified. Without >> intended recipient’s entitlement, use, copy and dissemination of this >> e-mail is prohibited. If you have received it in error, please advice >> us immediately by telephone and return the documents received to the >> above address, deleting the files. Thank you. >> >> Diese E-Mail enthält vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschützte >> Informationen. Das unerlaubte Kopieren sowie die unbefugte Weitergabe >> dieser Mail ist nicht gestaettet. Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat >> sind oder diese E-Mail irrtümlich erhalten haben, informieren Sie >> bitte sofort den Absender und vernichten Sie diese Mail. Danke. >> >> Il presente messaggio di posta elettronica ed ogni eventuale allegato >> contengono informazioni strettamente riservate e sono indirizzati >> esclusivamente al soggetto sopra indicato. In mancanza di >> autorizzazione del destinatario, ne sono vietati l’uso, la >> riproduzione e la divulgazione. Se avete ricevuto questo messaggio per >> errore, siete pregati di avvisarci immediatamente per telefono e di >> restituirci i documenti ricevuti all’indirizzo sopra indicato, >> distruggendo i file. Grazie. >> >> BE ECO-FRIENDLY: Unless necessary, please do not print this e-mail > > > > -- > > -- > I speak only for myself. Sometimes I do not even agree with myself. Keep it > in mind. > Twitter: @andreaglorioso > Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/andrea.glorioso > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=1749288&trk=tab_pro -- Guido Dr. Guido Noto La Diega Associate Lecturer in Law: Intellectual Property Law - Buckinghamshire New University President of Ital-IoT - Centre of Multidisciplinary Research on the Internet of Things Avvocato (Commercial and IP/IT Lawyer) Cultore della materia in Civil Law and Intellectual Property - University of Palermo Department of Law Queen Alexandra Road High Wycombe Buckinghamshire HP11 2JZ noto.la.diega(a)gmail.com +44(0)2078823386 @guidonld https://it.linkedin.com/pub/guido-noto-la-diega-ph-d/6/614/669 This e-mail and any attachment hereto are strictly confidential and are exclusively intended for the person above identified. Without intended recipient’s entitlement, use, copy and dissemination of this e-mail is prohibited. If you have received it in error, please advice us immediately by telephone and return the documents received to the above address, deleting the files. Thank you. Diese E-Mail enthält vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschützte Informationen. Das unerlaubte Kopieren sowie die unbefugte Weitergabe dieser Mail ist nicht gestaettet. Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind oder diese E-Mail irrtümlich erhalten haben, informieren Sie bitte sofort den Absender und vernichten Sie diese Mail. Danke. Il presente messaggio di posta elettronica ed ogni eventuale allegato contengono informazioni strettamente riservate e sono indirizzati esclusivamente al soggetto sopra indicato. In mancanza di autorizzazione del destinatario, ne sono vietati l’uso, la riproduzione e la divulgazione. Se avete ricevuto questo messaggio per errore, siete pregati di avvisarci immediatamente per telefono e di restituirci i documenti ricevuti all’indirizzo sopra indicato, distruggendo i file. Grazie. BE ECO-FRIENDLY: Unless necessary, please do not print this e-mail

March 31, 2016

Re: [nexa] Powles & Chaparro: "In the wake of Apple v FBI, we need to address some uncomfortable truths"

by Andrea Glorioso

Caro Guido, Non sono sicuro di capire il nesso tra l'articolo, la mia reazione e la posizione di ENISA, ma a scanso di equivoci, né io né ENISA parliamo a nome dell'Unione Europea (io perché qui esprimo posizioni personali, ENISA in quanto agenzia indipendente il cui ruolo è prevalentemente consultivo, non decisionale - vedi https://www.enisa.europa.eu/about-enisa/activities per ulteriori dettagli). Per altro anche Andrus Ansip, Vice-Presidente della Commissione Europea, si è ripetutamente espresso pubblicamente contro l'uso di "back-door". Il problema è che secondo me ognuno sta usando il termine "back-door" senza mettersi d'accordo sulla semantica. :) Ciao, Andrea On Thursday, March 31, 2016, Guido Noto La Diega <noto.la.diega(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Grazie per la segnalazione. > "ENISA has spoken out against creating backdoors for law enforcement > agencies to access encrypted communication..." > > http://www.euractiv.com/section/digital/news/eu-cybersecurity-agency-slams-… > > 2016-03-31 12:32 GMT+01:00 Andrea Glorioso <andrea(a)digitalpolicy.it > <javascript:;>>: > > Grazie. Uno dei pochi articoli sensati che abbia letto in queste > settimane. > > > > Mi chiedo se non sarebbe stato meglio avere una procedura trasparente e > > controllata (è bene ricordare che l'ordine del giudice avrebbe permesso > ad > > Apple di mantenere un controllo notevole sia sul dispositivo, sia sul > > sistema operativo modificato, sia sull'intera procedura di accesso ai > dati) > > invece di una procedura opaca. > > > > Ciao, > > > > Andrea > > > > > > On Wednesday, March 30, 2016, J.C. DE MARTIN <demartin(a)polito.it > <javascript:;>> wrote: > >> > >> Lettura vivamente raccomandata. > >> > >> juan carlos > >> > >> ----------- > >> > >> In the wake of Apple v FBI, we need to address some uncomfortable truths > >> > >> A temporary truce has emerged in the raging battle between Apple and the > >> FBI, but technology fragility and corporate power remain unaddressed > >> > >> Julia Powles and Enrique Chaparro > >> > >> Tuesday 29 March 2016 21.11 BST > >> > >> It has been a spectacular six-week showdown – the world’s most valuable > >> brand, Apple, pitted against the powerful American agents of the FBI. > Two > >> titans of spin, locked in a fast-moving battle over a dead terrorist’s > >> smartphone. Now, as dramatically as it exploded, the FBI’s legal demand > that > >> Apple help it crack the iPhone of one of the San Bernardino killers has > >> evaporated – the agents hacked their way in anyway, assisted by a > mysterious > >> third party. > >> > >> There was always more to the Apple v FBI case than met the eye – and it > is > >> true for this latest twist too. The biggest issue is that both sides > stand > >> to gain a lot more from this battle than any of us. With little > relation to > >> reality, and backed by a worryingly partisan chorus, the notoriously > closed > >> Apple is emerging as a champion of users’ rights. Equally worryingly, a > >> government agency is claiming the power to keep to itself a tool that > can > >> potentially break security features on millions of phones, while > earmarking > >> a demand for further judicial or legislative intervention in the future. > >> Whichever way you look, this feud is far from a road to freedom in the > >> digital environment. > >> > >> […] > >> > >> Continua qui: > >> > http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/mar/29/apple-fbi-encryption-san-… > >> > > > > > > -- > > > > -- > > I speak only for myself. Sometimes I do not even agree with myself. Keep > it > > in mind. > > Twitter: @andreaglorioso > > Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/andrea.glorioso > > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=1749288&trk=tab_pro > > > > _______________________________________________ > > nexa mailing list > > nexa(a)server-nexa.polito.it <javascript:;> > > https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa > > > > > > -- > Guido > > Dr. Guido Noto La Diega > Associate Lecturer in Law: Intellectual Property Law - Buckinghamshire > New University > > President of Ital-IoT - Centre of Multidisciplinary Research on the > Internet of Things > > Avvocato (Commercial and IP/IT Lawyer) > > Cultore della materia in Civil Law and Intellectual Property - > University of Palermo > > Department of Law > Queen Alexandra Road > High Wycombe > Buckinghamshire HP11 2JZ > > noto.la.diega(a)gmail.com <javascript:;> > > +44(0)2078823386 > > @guidonld > > https://it.linkedin.com/pub/guido-noto-la-diega-ph-d/6/614/669 > > > This e-mail and any attachment hereto are strictly confidential and > are exclusively intended for the person above identified. Without > intended recipient’s entitlement, use, copy and dissemination of this > e-mail is prohibited. If you have received it in error, please advice > us immediately by telephone and return the documents received to the > above address, deleting the files. Thank you. > > Diese E-Mail enthält vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschützte > Informationen. Das unerlaubte Kopieren sowie die unbefugte Weitergabe > dieser Mail ist nicht gestaettet. Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat > sind oder diese E-Mail irrtümlich erhalten haben, informieren Sie > bitte sofort den Absender und vernichten Sie diese Mail. Danke. > > Il presente messaggio di posta elettronica ed ogni eventuale allegato > contengono informazioni strettamente riservate e sono indirizzati > esclusivamente al soggetto sopra indicato. In mancanza di > autorizzazione del destinatario, ne sono vietati l’uso, la > riproduzione e la divulgazione. Se avete ricevuto questo messaggio per > errore, siete pregati di avvisarci immediatamente per telefono e di > restituirci i documenti ricevuti all’indirizzo sopra indicato, > distruggendo i file. Grazie. > > BE ECO-FRIENDLY: Unless necessary, please do not print this e-mail > -- -- I speak only for myself. Sometimes I do not even agree with myself. Keep it in mind. Twitter: @andreaglorioso Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/andrea.glorioso LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=1749288&trk=tab_pro

March 31, 2016

Re: [nexa] Powles & Chaparro: "In the wake of Apple v FBI, we need to address some uncomfortable truths"

by Guido Noto La Diega

Grazie per la segnalazione. "ENISA has spoken out against creating backdoors for law enforcement agencies to access encrypted communication..." http://www.euractiv.com/section/digital/news/eu-cybersecurity-agency-slams-… 2016-03-31 12:32 GMT+01:00 Andrea Glorioso <andrea(a)digitalpolicy.it>: > Grazie. Uno dei pochi articoli sensati che abbia letto in queste settimane. > > Mi chiedo se non sarebbe stato meglio avere una procedura trasparente e > controllata (è bene ricordare che l'ordine del giudice avrebbe permesso ad > Apple di mantenere un controllo notevole sia sul dispositivo, sia sul > sistema operativo modificato, sia sull'intera procedura di accesso ai dati) > invece di una procedura opaca. > > Ciao, > > Andrea > > > On Wednesday, March 30, 2016, J.C. DE MARTIN <demartin(a)polito.it> wrote: >> >> Lettura vivamente raccomandata. >> >> juan carlos >> >> ----------- >> >> In the wake of Apple v FBI, we need to address some uncomfortable truths >> >> A temporary truce has emerged in the raging battle between Apple and the >> FBI, but technology fragility and corporate power remain unaddressed >> >> Julia Powles and Enrique Chaparro >> >> Tuesday 29 March 2016 21.11 BST >> >> It has been a spectacular six-week showdown – the world’s most valuable >> brand, Apple, pitted against the powerful American agents of the FBI. Two >> titans of spin, locked in a fast-moving battle over a dead terrorist’s >> smartphone. Now, as dramatically as it exploded, the FBI’s legal demand that >> Apple help it crack the iPhone of one of the San Bernardino killers has >> evaporated – the agents hacked their way in anyway, assisted by a mysterious >> third party. >> >> There was always more to the Apple v FBI case than met the eye – and it is >> true for this latest twist too. The biggest issue is that both sides stand >> to gain a lot more from this battle than any of us. With little relation to >> reality, and backed by a worryingly partisan chorus, the notoriously closed >> Apple is emerging as a champion of users’ rights. Equally worryingly, a >> government agency is claiming the power to keep to itself a tool that can >> potentially break security features on millions of phones, while earmarking >> a demand for further judicial or legislative intervention in the future. >> Whichever way you look, this feud is far from a road to freedom in the >> digital environment. >> >> […] >> >> Continua qui: >> http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/mar/29/apple-fbi-encryption-san-… >> > > > -- > > -- > I speak only for myself. Sometimes I do not even agree with myself. Keep it > in mind. > Twitter: @andreaglorioso > Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/andrea.glorioso > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=1749288&trk=tab_pro > > _______________________________________________ > nexa mailing list > nexa(a)server-nexa.polito.it > https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa > -- Guido Dr. Guido Noto La Diega Associate Lecturer in Law: Intellectual Property Law - Buckinghamshire New University President of Ital-IoT - Centre of Multidisciplinary Research on the Internet of Things Avvocato (Commercial and IP/IT Lawyer) Cultore della materia in Civil Law and Intellectual Property - University of Palermo Department of Law Queen Alexandra Road High Wycombe Buckinghamshire HP11 2JZ noto.la.diega(a)gmail.com +44(0)2078823386 @guidonld https://it.linkedin.com/pub/guido-noto-la-diega-ph-d/6/614/669 This e-mail and any attachment hereto are strictly confidential and are exclusively intended for the person above identified. Without intended recipient’s entitlement, use, copy and dissemination of this e-mail is prohibited. If you have received it in error, please advice us immediately by telephone and return the documents received to the above address, deleting the files. Thank you. Diese E-Mail enthält vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschützte Informationen. Das unerlaubte Kopieren sowie die unbefugte Weitergabe dieser Mail ist nicht gestaettet. Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind oder diese E-Mail irrtümlich erhalten haben, informieren Sie bitte sofort den Absender und vernichten Sie diese Mail. Danke. Il presente messaggio di posta elettronica ed ogni eventuale allegato contengono informazioni strettamente riservate e sono indirizzati esclusivamente al soggetto sopra indicato. In mancanza di autorizzazione del destinatario, ne sono vietati l’uso, la riproduzione e la divulgazione. Se avete ricevuto questo messaggio per errore, siete pregati di avvisarci immediatamente per telefono e di restituirci i documenti ricevuti all’indirizzo sopra indicato, distruggendo i file. Grazie. BE ECO-FRIENDLY: Unless necessary, please do not print this e-mail

March 31, 2016

5 splendidi ebook gratis (SOLO OGGI)

by J.C. DE MARTIN

Buon downloading! juan carlos ----- http://www.versobooks.com/blogs/2575-psst-downloading-isn-t-stealing-for-to… *The Boy Who Could Change the World: The Writings of Aaron Swartz* [not available in North America - sorry!] by Aaron Swartz. Introduction by Lawrence Lessig *Inventing the Future: Postcapitalism and a World Without Work* by Nick Srnicek and Alex Williams *Revolution in the Age of Social Media: The Egyptian Popular Insurrection and the Internet* by Linda Herrera *Hacker, Hoaxer, Whistleblower, Spy: The Many Faces of Anonymous* by Gabriella Coleman *The WikiLeaks Files: The World According to US Empire* by WikiLeaks. Introduction by Julian Assange *In the Flow* by Boris Groys

March 31, 2016

Report: "Digitalisation of the economy and its impact on labour markets"

by J.C. DE MARTIN

*Digitalisation of the economy** **and its impact on labour markets* — Christophe Degryse Working Paper 2016.02 81 pagine european trade union institute ---- /This working paper gives an overview of the new possibilities opened up by the 4th industrial revolution and tackles some specific questions in relation to its effects on the labour market, including on the status of employees, on working conditions and on training. It examines the role that trade unions can play in the digital economy and the main initiatives already proposed at European trade union level in this context./ Download PDF: http://j.mp/ETUIMar16-2

March 31, 2016

Re: [nexa] Powles & Chaparro: "In the wake of Apple v FBI, we need to address some uncomfortable truths"

by Andrea Glorioso

Grazie. Uno dei pochi articoli sensati che abbia letto in queste settimane. Mi chiedo se non sarebbe stato meglio avere una procedura trasparente e controllata (è bene ricordare che l'ordine del giudice avrebbe permesso ad Apple di mantenere un controllo notevole sia sul dispositivo, sia sul sistema operativo modificato, sia sull'intera procedura di accesso ai dati) invece di una procedura opaca. Ciao, Andrea On Wednesday, March 30, 2016, J.C. DE MARTIN <demartin(a)polito.it> wrote: > Lettura vivamente raccomandata. > > juan carlos > > > *----------- * > > *In the wake of Apple v FBI, we need to address some uncomfortable truths* > > *A temporary truce has emerged in the raging battle between Apple and the > FBI, but technology fragility and corporate power remain unaddressed* > > Julia Powles and Enrique Chaparro > > Tuesday 29 March 2016 21.11 BST > > It has been a spectacular six-week showdown – the world’s most valuable > brand, Apple <http://www.theguardian.com/technology/apple>, pitted > against the powerful American agents of the FBI. Two titans of spin > <http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/feb/28/fbi-surveillance-cyber…>, > locked in a fast-moving battle over a dead terrorist’s smartphone. Now, as > dramatically as it exploded, the FBI’s legal demand > <http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/feb/17/apple-ordered-to-hack-iphone…> > that Apple help it crack the iPhone > <https://medium.com/@thegrugq/feeble-noise-pollution-627acb5931a2#.fe9moeyrk> > of one of the San Bernardino killers > <http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/live/2015/dec/02/san-bernardino-shooting…> > has evaporated – the agents hacked their way in anyway, assisted by a > mysterious third party > <http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/mar/28/apple-fbi-case-dropped-sa…> > . > > There was always more to the Apple v FBI case > <http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/feb/20/apple-fbi-iphone-explaine…> > than met the eye – and it is true for this latest twist too. The biggest > issue is that both sides stand to gain a lot more from this battle > <http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/21/opinion/sunday/in-the-government-vs-apple…> > than any of us > <http://concurringopinions.com/archives/2016/03/a-social-theory-of-surveilla…>. > With little relation > <http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2016/03/the-digital-security-…> > to reality > <http://blog.cryptographyengineering.com/2016/03/attack-of-week-apple-imessa…>, > and backed by a worryingly partisan chorus, the notoriously closed Apple is > emerging as a champion of users’ rights. Equally worryingly, a government > agency is claiming the power to keep to itself a tool that can potentially > break security features on millions of phones, while earmarking a demand > for further judicial or legislative intervention in the future. Whichever > way you look <http://fortune.com/2016/03/29/apple-fbi-tim-cook-2/>, this > feud is far from a road to freedom in the digital environment. > > […] > > Continua qui: > http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/mar/29/apple-fbi-encryption-san-… > > -- -- I speak only for myself. Sometimes I do not even agree with myself. Keep it in mind. Twitter: @andreaglorioso Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/andrea.glorioso LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=1749288&trk=tab_pro

March 31, 2016

Book launch Poster - The Internet and Constitutional Law

by Marco Bassini

Cari tutti, Per conto di Oreste Pollicino, vi invio il flyer di presentazione del libro, da lui curato, "The Internet and Constitutional Law" del 4 aprile pv a Haifa, insieme a un anteprima del volume a questo link Cari saluti, Marco Marco Bassini via iPad <blockquote> </blockquote> <blockquote> </blockquote> <blockquote> </blockquote>

March 31, 2016

Why the fight between Apple and the FBI is just getting started

by Alberto Cammozzo

<https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2016/03/29/why-the-fight-…> The Justice Department has called off a high-profile legal battle with Apple after it was able to unlock an iPhone used by one of the San Bernardino, Calif., shooters without the company's help. But rather than resolve the fight, this latest development is likely to motivate Apple and other companies to strengthen the security of their devices even more and force the government to keep up with any new security measures, technology executives and security analysts said. "They're in an arms race," said Matthew Blaze, a cryptography researcher and professor at the University of Pennsylvania. "The FBI is trying to find new ways in, and Apple is trying to find new ways to defend against that." [...] Stewart Baker, a former Department of Homeland Security senior policy official and now a partner at Steptoe & Johnson, argues that Apple's stance in the San Bernardino case gives the government little incentive to tell the company how it was able to break in. "If Apple's position is, 'We aren't going to help you, and as soon as you tell us about a problem we're going to lock you out again,' you're basically saying the FBI should be complicit in locking themselves out of the phones," he said. But the government also must consider keeping Americans' tech safe from other adversaries, including hostile hackers working on behalf of foreign intelligence agencies and cybercriminals, Blaze said. "This vulnerability helped them get into this particular handset, but now they need to be thinking about who else could potentially use it to do the same thing," he said. Blaze and Baker agree on one point: This isn't the end of the issue. "This is a conflict that's going to happen," Baker said.

March 31, 2016

New Yorker: "The Strange Origins of TrueCrypt, ISIS’s Favored Encryption Tool"

by J.C. DE MARTIN

March 30, 2016 *The Strange Origins of TrueCrypt, ISIS’s Favored Encryption Tool** * By Evan Ratliff On Tuesday, the Times reporter Rukmini Callimachi published the latest in a series of blockbuster stories about the inner workings of the Islamic State. The piece focussed on the logistics of the group’s deployment of terrorists in Europe, but also included a significant revelation in an ongoing debate about encryption. In ISIS’s training and operational planning, Callimachi reported, the group appeared to routinely use a piece of software called TrueCrypt. When one would-be bomber was dispatched from Syria to France, Callimachi writes, “an Islamic State computer specialist handed him a USB key. It contained CCleaner, a program used to erase a user’s online history on a given computer, as well as TrueCrypt, an encryption program that was widely available at the time and that experts say has not yet been cracked.” […] Continua qui: http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/the-strange-origins-of-truecrypt-is…

March 31, 2016