February 2016 - nexa - server-nexa.polito.it

Re: [nexa] EU Commission and United States agree on new framework for transatlantic data flows: EU-US Privacy Shield

by Stefano Quintarelli

per come e' scritto il CS, mi sembrerebbe un buon risultato. On 02/02/2016 18:29, Alessandro Mantelero wrote: > European Commission - Press release > EU Commission and United States agree on new framework for transatlantic > data flows: EU-US Privacy Shield > > Strasbourg, 2 February 2016 > > The European Commission and the United States have agreed on a new > framework for transatlantic data flows: the EU-US Privacy Shield. > > Today, the College of Commissioners approved the political agreement > reached and has mandated Vice-President Ansip and Commissioner Jourová > to prepare the necessary steps to put in place the new arrangement. This > new framework will protect the fundamental rights of Europeans where > their data is transferred to the United States and ensure legal > certainty for businesses. > > The EU-US Privacy Shield reflects the requirements set out by the > European Court of Justice in its ruling on 6 October 2015, which > declared the old Safe Harbour framework invalid. The new arrangement > will provide stronger obligations on companies in the U.S. to protect > the personal data of Europeans and stronger monitoring and enforcement > by the U.S. Department of Commerce and Federal Trade Commission (FTC), > including through increased cooperation with European Data Protection > Authorities. The new arrangement includes commitments by the U.S. that > possibilities under U.S. law for public authorities to access personal > data transferred under the new arrangement will be subject to clear > conditions, limitations and oversight, preventing generalised access. > Europeans will have the possibility to raise any enquiry or complaint in > this context with a dedicated new Ombudsperson. > > Vice-President Ansip said: "We have agreed on a new strong framework on > data flows with the US. Our people can be sure that their personal data > is fully protected. Our businesses, especially the smallest ones, have > the legal certainty they need to develop their activities across the > Atlantic. We have a duty to check and we will closely monitor the new > arrangement to make sure it keeps delivering. Today's decision helps us > build a Digital Single Market in the EU, a trusted and dynamic online > environment; it further strengthens our close partnership with the US. > We will work now to put it in place as soon as possible." > > Commissioner Jourová said: "The new EU-US Privacy Shield will protect > the fundamental rights of Europeans when their personal data is > transferred to U.S. companies. For the first time ever, the United > States has given the EU binding assurances that the access of public > authorities for national security purposes will be subject to clear > limitations, safeguards and oversight mechanisms. Also for the first > time, EU citizens will benefit from redress mechanisms in this area. In > the context of the negotiations for this agreement, the US has assured > that it does not conduct mass or indiscriminate surveillance of > Europeans. We have established an annual joint review in order to > closely monitor the implementation of these commitments." > > The new arrangement will include the following elements: > > Strong obligations on companies handling Europeans' personal data > and robust enforcement: U.S. companies wishing to import personal data > from Europe will need to commit to robust obligations on how personal > data is processed and individual rights are guaranteed. The Department > of Commerce will monitor that companies publish their commitments, which > makes them enforceable under U.S. law by the US. Federal Trade > Commission. In addition, any company handling human resources data from > Europe has to commit to comply with decisions by European DPAs. > > Clear safeguards and transparency obligations on U.S. government > access: For the first time, the US has given the EU written assurances > that the access of public authorities for law enforcement and national > security will be subject to clear limitations, safeguards and oversight > mechanisms. These exceptions must be used only to the extent necessary > and proportionate. The U.S. has ruled out indiscriminate mass > surveillance on the personal data transferred to the US under the new > arrangement. To regularly monitor the functioning of the arrangement > there will be an annual joint review, which will also include the issue > of national security access. The European Commission and the U.S. > Department of Commerce will conduct the review and invite national > intelligence experts from the U.S. and European Data Protection > Authorities to it. > > Effective protection of EU citizens' rights with several redress > possibilities: Any citizen who considers that their data has been > misused under the new arrangement will have several redress > possibilities. Companies have deadlines to reply to complaints. European > DPAs can refer complaints to the Department of Commerce and the Federal > Trade Commission. In addition, Alternative Dispute resolution will be > free of charge. For complaints on possible access by national > intelligence authorities, a new Ombudsperson will be created. > > Next steps > > The College has today mandated Vice-President Ansip and Commissioner > Jourová to prepare a draft "adequacy decision" in the coming weeks, > which could then be adopted by the College after obtaining the advice of > the Article 29 Working Party and after consulting a committee composed > of representatives of the Member States. In the meantime, the U.S. side > will make the necessary preparations to put in place the new framework, > monitoring mechanisms and new Ombudsman. > > Background > > On 6 October, the Court of Justice declared in the Schrems case that > Commission’s Decision on the Safe Harbour arrangement was invalid. The > judgment confirmed the Commission's approach since November 2013 to > review the Safe Harbour arrangement, to ensure in practice a sufficient > level of data protection as required by EU law. > > On 15 October, Vice-President Ansip, Commissioners Oettinger and Jourová > met business and industry representatives who asked for a clear and > uniform interpretation of the ruling, as well as more clarity on the > instruments they could use to transfer data. > > On 16 October, the 28 national data protection authorities (Article 29 > Working Party) issued a statement on the consequences of the judgment. > > On 6 November, the Commission issued guidance for companies on the > possibilities of transatlantic data transfers following the ruling until > a new framework is put in place. > > On 2 December, the College of Commissioners discussed the progress of > the negotiations. Commissioner Jourová received a mandate to pursue the > negotiations on a renewed and safe framework with the US. > > > > > > > > -- > Prof. Avv. Alessandro Mantelero > Politecnico di Torino > > Nexa Center for Internet and Society | Director of Privacy > Politecnico di Torino–Tongji University| Coordinator, Double Degree > program in Management and IP Law > Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology | Part-time > Expert, School of Public Administration > European Data Protection Law Review | Associate Editor > > http://staff.polito.it/alessandro.mantelero > > EMAIL POLICY: twice a day (Mon-Fri) > _______________________________________________ > nexa mailing list > nexa(a)server-nexa.polito.it > https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa > > > ----- > Nessun virus nel messaggio. > Controllato da AVG - www.avg.com > Versione: 2016.0.7357 / Database dei virus: 4522/11539 - Data di > rilascio: 02/02/2016

Feb. 2, 2016

EU Commission and United States agree on new framework for transatlantic data flows: EU-US Privacy Shield

by Alessandro Mantelero

European Commission - Press release EU Commission and United States agree on new framework for transatlantic data flows: EU-US Privacy Shield Strasbourg, 2 February 2016 The European Commission and the United States have agreed on a new framework for transatlantic data flows: the EU-US Privacy Shield. Today, the College of Commissioners approved the political agreement reached and has mandated Vice-President Ansip and Commissioner Jourová to prepare the necessary steps to put in place the new arrangement. This new framework will protect the fundamental rights of Europeans where their data is transferred to the United States and ensure legal certainty for businesses. The EU-US Privacy Shield reflects the requirements set out by the European Court of Justice in its ruling on 6 October 2015, which declared the old Safe Harbour framework invalid. The new arrangement will provide stronger obligations on companies in the U.S. to protect the personal data of Europeans and stronger monitoring and enforcement by the U.S. Department of Commerce and Federal Trade Commission (FTC), including through increased cooperation with European Data Protection Authorities. The new arrangement includes commitments by the U.S. that possibilities under U.S. law for public authorities to access personal data transferred under the new arrangement will be subject to clear conditions, limitations and oversight, preventing generalised access. Europeans will have the possibility to raise any enquiry or complaint in this context with a dedicated new Ombudsperson. Vice-President Ansip said: "We have agreed on a new strong framework on data flows with the US. Our people can be sure that their personal data is fully protected. Our businesses, especially the smallest ones, have the legal certainty they need to develop their activities across the Atlantic. We have a duty to check and we will closely monitor the new arrangement to make sure it keeps delivering. Today's decision helps us build a Digital Single Market in the EU, a trusted and dynamic online environment; it further strengthens our close partnership with the US. We will work now to put it in place as soon as possible." Commissioner Jourová said: "The new EU-US Privacy Shield will protect the fundamental rights of Europeans when their personal data is transferred to U.S. companies. For the first time ever, the United States has given the EU binding assurances that the access of public authorities for national security purposes will be subject to clear limitations, safeguards and oversight mechanisms. Also for the first time, EU citizens will benefit from redress mechanisms in this area. In the context of the negotiations for this agreement, the US has assured that it does not conduct mass or indiscriminate surveillance of Europeans. We have established an annual joint review in order to closely monitor the implementation of these commitments." The new arrangement will include the following elements: Strong obligations on companies handling Europeans' personal data and robust enforcement: U.S. companies wishing to import personal data from Europe will need to commit to robust obligations on how personal data is processed and individual rights are guaranteed. The Department of Commerce will monitor that companies publish their commitments, which makes them enforceable under U.S. law by the US. Federal Trade Commission. In addition, any company handling human resources data from Europe has to commit to comply with decisions by European DPAs. Clear safeguards and transparency obligations on U.S. government access: For the first time, the US has given the EU written assurances that the access of public authorities for law enforcement and national security will be subject to clear limitations, safeguards and oversight mechanisms. These exceptions must be used only to the extent necessary and proportionate. The U.S. has ruled out indiscriminate mass surveillance on the personal data transferred to the US under the new arrangement. To regularly monitor the functioning of the arrangement there will be an annual joint review, which will also include the issue of national security access. The European Commission and the U.S. Department of Commerce will conduct the review and invite national intelligence experts from the U.S. and European Data Protection Authorities to it. Effective protection of EU citizens' rights with several redress possibilities: Any citizen who considers that their data has been misused under the new arrangement will have several redress possibilities. Companies have deadlines to reply to complaints. European DPAs can refer complaints to the Department of Commerce and the Federal Trade Commission. In addition, Alternative Dispute resolution will be free of charge. For complaints on possible access by national intelligence authorities, a new Ombudsperson will be created. Next steps The College has today mandated Vice-President Ansip and Commissioner Jourová to prepare a draft "adequacy decision" in the coming weeks, which could then be adopted by the College after obtaining the advice of the Article 29 Working Party and after consulting a committee composed of representatives of the Member States. In the meantime, the U.S. side will make the necessary preparations to put in place the new framework, monitoring mechanisms and new Ombudsman. Background On 6 October, the Court of Justice declared in the Schrems case that Commission’s Decision on the Safe Harbour arrangement was invalid. The judgment confirmed the Commission's approach since November 2013 to review the Safe Harbour arrangement, to ensure in practice a sufficient level of data protection as required by EU law. On 15 October, Vice-President Ansip, Commissioners Oettinger and Jourová met business and industry representatives who asked for a clear and uniform interpretation of the ruling, as well as more clarity on the instruments they could use to transfer data. On 16 October, the 28 national data protection authorities (Article 29 Working Party) issued a statement on the consequences of the judgment. On 6 November, the Commission issued guidance for companies on the possibilities of transatlantic data transfers following the ruling until a new framework is put in place. On 2 December, the College of Commissioners discussed the progress of the negotiations. Commissioner Jourová received a mandate to pursue the negotiations on a renewed and safe framework with the US. -- Prof. Avv. Alessandro Mantelero Politecnico di Torino Nexa Center for Internet and Society | Director of Privacy Politecnico di Torino–Tongji University| Coordinator, Double Degree program in Management and IP Law Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology | Part-time Expert, School of Public Administration European Data Protection Law Review | Associate Editor http://staff.polito.it/alessandro.mantelero EMAIL POLICY: twice a day (Mon-Fri)

Feb. 2, 2016

R: Safe Harbour: fumata nera... per ora

by Rossi, Stefano

Mi pare che la Commissione tratti il tema della sicurezza nazionale solo dal lato US, in termini di verifica che il trattamento dei dati di cittadini europei da parte delle autorità US per ragioni di sicurezza nazionale (statunitense) sia legale. Si propone di creare un "functionally independent body who will answer individual complaints from Europeans if they fear that their personal information has been used in an unlawful way by U.S. authorities in the area of national security. A body that has access to the information from the national security bodies" Quando parla di "two legal system" si riferisce, in generale, a quello UE e quello US relativo alla protezione dei dati personali (sotto il profilo del trasferimento UE --> US), senza implicazioni sui sistemi di sicurezza nazionale dei singoli paesi membri. Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 16:23:57 +0100 From: "Blengino" <blengino(a)penalistiassociati.it<mailto:blengino@penalistiassociati.it>> To: "'Marco Ciurcina'" <ciurcina(a)studiolegale.it<mailto:ciurcina@studiolegale.it>>, "'Alessandro Mantelero'" <alessandro.mantelero(a)polito.it<mailto:alessandro.mantelero@polito.it>> Cc: nexa(a)server-nexa.polito.it<mailto:nexa@server-nexa.polito.it> Subject: [nexa] R: Safe Harbour: fumata nera... per ora Message-ID: <003301d15dcd$bdf0aa80$39d1ff80$@it> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Conterei di più sull'aggressività dei francesi del CNIL che sulla (condivisibile) moderazione del nostro Garante in tema SH. Ciò che continuo a chiedermi è come possa la Commissione trattare il tema della sicurezza nazionale, che è materia esclusa a monte dal TUE ed è espressamente riservata ai singoli Stati Membri. Quando nel comunicato V?ra Jourová scrive <<...It is not an easy task to build a strong bridge between two legal systems which have some major differences >> mi chiedo in materia di sicurezza nazionale a quale dei 27 paesi si riferisca. Osservazione che credo sia stata sollevata anche dagli US, giustamente. ________________________________ Questo messaggio e i relativi allegati sono riservati e destinati esclusivamente al destinatario. Ai sensi del codice penale e del codice per la protezione dei dati personali, qualsiasi uso, copia o diffusione delle informazioni contenute in questo messaggio è vietato a soggetti diversi dal destinatario. Se questa comunicazione Vi è pervenuta per errore, Vi preghiamo di informarci rispondendo a questo messaggio di posta elettronica e quindi cancellare il messaggio e gli allegati dal Vostro sistema informatico. This communication and its attachments are confidential and addressed only to the intended recipients. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, copy or distribution of this message is prohibited under criminal and data protection law. If you have received this message by mistake, please notify us by replying to this email and delete this message and its attachments from your system.

Feb. 2, 2016

Re: [nexa] R: Safe Harbour: fumata nera... per ora

by Marco Ciurcina

In data martedì 2 febbraio 2016 16:23:57, hai scritto: > la (condivisibile) moderazione del nostro Garante in tema SH. perchè condivisibile? > > Ciò che continuo a chiedermi è come possa la Commissione trattare il tema > della sicurezza nazionale, che è materia esclusa a monte dal TUE ed è > espressamente riservata ai singoli Stati Membri. Concordo. La Commissione non può negoziare le regole sulla sicurezza nazionale negli USA (nè nei paesi membri). Tocca ai Garanti nazionali prendere atto che le norme USA violano i diritti fondamentali dei cittadini europei e quindi non offrono garanzie d'adeguatezza per il trasferimento dei dati dei cittadini europei. m.c.

Feb. 2, 2016

R: Safe Harbour: fumata nera... per ora

by Blengino

Conterei di più sull'aggressività dei francesi del CNIL che sulla (condivisibile) moderazione del nostro Garante in tema SH. Ciò che continuo a chiedermi è come possa la Commissione trattare il tema della sicurezza nazionale, che è materia esclusa a monte dal TUE ed è espressamente riservata ai singoli Stati Membri. Quando nel comunicato Věra Jourová scrive <<...It is not an easy task to build a strong bridge between two legal systems which have some major differences >> mi chiedo in materia di sicurezza nazionale a quale dei 27 paesi si riferisca. Osservazione che credo sia stata sollevata anche dagli US, giustamente. -----Messaggio originale----- Da: nexa-bounces(a)server-nexa.polito.it [mailto:nexa-bounces@server-nexa.polito.it] Per conto di Marco Ciurcina Inviato: martedì 2 febbraio 2016 14:40 A: Alessandro Mantelero Cc: nexa(a)server-nexa.polito.it Oggetto: Re: [nexa] Safe Harbour: fumata nera... per ora Soro come la pensa? m.c. In data martedì 2 febbraio 2016 12:58:07, Alessandro Mantelero ha scritto: > una minoranza fra i garanti ha questa idea in effetti > > On Tue, 02 Feb 2016 12:54:36 +0100 > > Marco Ciurcina <ciurcina(a)studiolegale.it> wrote: > > Io, fossi in loro, inizierei qualche indagine su qualche > > > >impresa USA. > > > > Giusto per far vedere che non sono solo "chiacchere e > > > >distintivo". > > > > Stiamo a vedere.. > > m.c. > > > > > > In data martedì 2 febbraio 2016 12:41:22, Alessandro > > > >Mantelero ha scritto: > >> i garanti EU si dovrebbero riunire oggi, vederemo cosa accade > >> > >> Una previsione di cui si parlava la settimana scorsa a Bruxelles è > >> quella secondo cui i garanti potrebbero pendere atto dei passi > >> avanti fatti verso un > >> > >>rafforzamento > >> > >> delle tutele in US e quindi non passare subito alle sanzioni. > >> Avrebbe un senso, mi pare. Ma aspettiamo... > >> > >> AM > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On Tue, 02 Feb 2016 12:33:19 +0100 > >> > >> Marco Ciurcina <ciurcina(a)studiolegale.it> wrote: > >> > A questo punto, le imprese UE che usano servizi di > >> > > >> >imprese USA per trattare > >> > > >> > dati personali devono fare attenzione: i Garanti > >> > >>avevano > >> > >> >concesso moratoria > >> > > >> > fino a fine gennaio, se non ricordo male. > >> > m.c. > >> > > >> > > >> > In data lunedì 1 febbraio 2016 22:47:10, Alessandro > >> > > >> >Mantelero ha scritto: > >> >> qui il testo del comunicato della Commissaria Jourová > >> > >>http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_SPEECH-16-208_en.htm > >> > >> >> "Dati personali fuori dall’EU. Quali soluzioni e prospettive per > >> >> le imprese dopo il venir meno > >> >> > >> >>dell’accordo > >> >> > >> >> Safe Harbour?", ne avevamo parlato a Nexa, v. qui: > >> >> https://nexa.polito.it/mercoledi-81 > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> -- > >> >> Prof. Avv. Alessandro Mantelero > >> >> Politecnico di Torino > >> >> > >> >> Nexa Center for Internet and Society | Director of > >> >> > >> >>Privacy > >> >> > >> >> Politecnico di Torino–Tongji University| Coordinator, Double > >> >> Degree program in Management and IP Law Nanjing University of > >> >> Information Science and > >> > >>Technology > >> > >> >> Part-time Expert, School of Public Administration European Data > >> >> Protection Law Review | Associate > >> > >>Editor > >> > >> >> http://staff.polito.it/alessandro.mantelero > >> >> > >> >> EMAIL POLICY: twice a day (Mon-Fri) > >> >> _______________________________________________ > >> >> nexa mailing list > >> >> nexa(a)server-nexa.polito.it > >> > >>https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa > >> > >> -- > >> Prof. Avv. Alessandro Mantelero > >> Politecnico di Torino > >> > >> Nexa Center for Internet and Society | Director of > >> > >>Privacy > >> > >> Politecnico di Torino–Tongji University| Coordinator, Double Degree > >> program in Management and IP Law Nanjing University of Information > >> Science and Technology > >> > >> Part-time Expert, School of Public Administration European Data > >> Protection Law Review | Associate Editor > >> > >> http://staff.polito.it/alessandro.mantelero > >> > >> EMAIL POLICY: twice a day (Mon-Fri) > > -- > Prof. Avv. Alessandro Mantelero > Politecnico di Torino > > Nexa Center for Internet and Society | Director of Privacy Politecnico > di Torino–Tongji University| Coordinator, Double Degree program in > Management and IP Law Nanjing University of Information Science and > Technology | Part-time Expert, School of Public Administration > European Data Protection Law Review | Associate Editor > > http://staff.polito.it/alessandro.mantelero > > EMAIL POLICY: twice a day (Mon-Fri) _______________________________________________ nexa mailing list nexa(a)server-nexa.polito.it https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa

Feb. 2, 2016

Avviso: aggiornamento server-nexa

by Davide Allavena

Buongiorno, vi comunico che giovedì 4 Febbraio, tra le ore 17 e le ore 19, verrà eseguito un importante aggiornamento sul server del Centro Nexa. Durante questo periodo di tempo, il sito nexa.polito.it e gli altri siti ospitati sul server potrebbero non essere raggiungibili e potrebbero verificarsi problemi nell'utilizzo della mailing list. Sono disponibile per ulteriori chiarimenti. Buona giornata, -- Davide Allavena IT Manager & Research Fellow Nexa Center for Internet and Society DAUIN - Politecnico di Torino https://nexa.polito.it/people/dallavena

Feb. 2, 2016

Re: [nexa] Safe Harbour: fumata nera... per ora

by Marco Ciurcina

Soro come la pensa? m.c. In data martedì 2 febbraio 2016 12:58:07, Alessandro Mantelero ha scritto: > una minoranza fra i garanti ha questa idea in effetti > > On Tue, 02 Feb 2016 12:54:36 +0100 > > Marco Ciurcina <ciurcina(a)studiolegale.it> wrote: > > Io, fossi in loro, inizierei qualche indagine su qualche > > > >impresa USA. > > > > Giusto per far vedere che non sono solo "chiacchere e > > > >distintivo". > > > > Stiamo a vedere.. > > m.c. > > > > > > In data martedì 2 febbraio 2016 12:41:22, Alessandro > > > >Mantelero ha scritto: > >> i garanti EU si dovrebbero riunire oggi, vederemo cosa > >> accade > >> > >> Una previsione di cui si parlava la settimana scorsa a > >> Bruxelles è quella secondo cui i garanti potrebbero > >> pendere atto dei passi avanti fatti verso un > >> > >>rafforzamento > >> > >> delle tutele in US e quindi non passare subito alle > >> sanzioni. > >> Avrebbe un senso, mi pare. Ma aspettiamo... > >> > >> AM > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On Tue, 02 Feb 2016 12:33:19 +0100 > >> > >> Marco Ciurcina <ciurcina(a)studiolegale.it> wrote: > >> > A questo punto, le imprese UE che usano servizi di > >> > > >> >imprese USA per trattare > >> > > >> > dati personali devono fare attenzione: i Garanti > >> > >>avevano > >> > >> >concesso moratoria > >> > > >> > fino a fine gennaio, se non ricordo male. > >> > m.c. > >> > > >> > > >> > In data lunedì 1 febbraio 2016 22:47:10, Alessandro > >> > > >> >Mantelero ha scritto: > >> >> qui il testo del comunicato della Commissaria Jourová > >> > >>http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_SPEECH-16-208_en.htm > >> > >> >> "Dati personali fuori dall’EU. Quali soluzioni e > >> >> prospettive per le imprese dopo il venir meno > >> >> > >> >>dell’accordo > >> >> > >> >> Safe Harbour?", ne avevamo parlato a Nexa, v. qui: > >> >> https://nexa.polito.it/mercoledi-81 > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> -- > >> >> Prof. Avv. Alessandro Mantelero > >> >> Politecnico di Torino > >> >> > >> >> Nexa Center for Internet and Society | Director of > >> >> > >> >>Privacy > >> >> > >> >> Politecnico di Torino–Tongji University| Coordinator, > >> >> Double Degree program in Management and IP Law > >> >> Nanjing University of Information Science and > >> > >>Technology > >> > >> >> Part-time Expert, School of Public Administration > >> >> European Data Protection Law Review | Associate > >> > >>Editor > >> > >> >> http://staff.polito.it/alessandro.mantelero > >> >> > >> >> EMAIL POLICY: twice a day (Mon-Fri) > >> >> _______________________________________________ > >> >> nexa mailing list > >> >> nexa(a)server-nexa.polito.it > >> > >>https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa > >> > >> -- > >> Prof. Avv. Alessandro Mantelero > >> Politecnico di Torino > >> > >> Nexa Center for Internet and Society | Director of > >> > >>Privacy > >> > >> Politecnico di Torino–Tongji University| Coordinator, > >> Double Degree program in Management and IP Law > >> Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology > >> > >> Part-time Expert, School of Public Administration > >> European Data Protection Law Review | Associate Editor > >> > >> http://staff.polito.it/alessandro.mantelero > >> > >> EMAIL POLICY: twice a day (Mon-Fri) > > -- > Prof. Avv. Alessandro Mantelero > Politecnico di Torino > > Nexa Center for Internet and Society | Director of Privacy > Politecnico di Torino–Tongji University| Coordinator, > Double Degree program in Management and IP Law > Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology | > Part-time Expert, School of Public Administration > European Data Protection Law Review | Associate Editor > > http://staff.polito.it/alessandro.mantelero > > EMAIL POLICY: twice a day (Mon-Fri)

Feb. 2, 2016

Re: [nexa] Safe Harbour: fumata nera... per ora

by Alessandro Mantelero

una minoranza fra i garanti ha questa idea in effetti On Tue, 02 Feb 2016 12:54:36 +0100 Marco Ciurcina <ciurcina(a)studiolegale.it> wrote: > Io, fossi in loro, inizierei qualche indagine su qualche >impresa USA. > Giusto per far vedere che non sono solo "chiacchere e >distintivo". > Stiamo a vedere.. > m.c. > > > In data martedì 2 febbraio 2016 12:41:22, Alessandro >Mantelero ha scritto: >> i garanti EU si dovrebbero riunire oggi, vederemo cosa >> accade >> >> Una previsione di cui si parlava la settimana scorsa a >> Bruxelles è quella secondo cui i garanti potrebbero >> pendere atto dei passi avanti fatti verso un >>rafforzamento >> delle tutele in US e quindi non passare subito alle >> sanzioni. >> Avrebbe un senso, mi pare. Ma aspettiamo... >> >> AM >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, 02 Feb 2016 12:33:19 +0100 >> >> Marco Ciurcina <ciurcina(a)studiolegale.it> wrote: >> > A questo punto, le imprese UE che usano servizi di >> > >> >imprese USA per trattare >> > >> > dati personali devono fare attenzione: i Garanti >>avevano >> > >> >concesso moratoria >> > >> > fino a fine gennaio, se non ricordo male. >> > m.c. >> > >> > >> > In data lunedì 1 febbraio 2016 22:47:10, Alessandro >> > >> >Mantelero ha scritto: >> >> qui il testo del comunicato della Commissaria Jourová >> >> >> >> >>http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_SPEECH-16-208_en.htm >> >> >> >> "Dati personali fuori dall’EU. Quali soluzioni e >> >> prospettive per le imprese dopo il venir meno >> >> >> >>dell’accordo >> >> >> >> Safe Harbour?", ne avevamo parlato a Nexa, v. qui: >> >> https://nexa.polito.it/mercoledi-81 >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Prof. Avv. Alessandro Mantelero >> >> Politecnico di Torino >> >> >> >> Nexa Center for Internet and Society | Director of >> >> >> >>Privacy >> >> >> >> Politecnico di Torino–Tongji University| Coordinator, >> >> Double Degree program in Management and IP Law >> >> Nanjing University of Information Science and >>Technology >> >> >> >> Part-time Expert, School of Public Administration >> >> European Data Protection Law Review | Associate >>Editor >> >> >> >> http://staff.polito.it/alessandro.mantelero >> >> >> >> EMAIL POLICY: twice a day (Mon-Fri) >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> nexa mailing list >> >> nexa(a)server-nexa.polito.it >> >> >>https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa >> >> -- >> Prof. Avv. Alessandro Mantelero >> Politecnico di Torino >> >> Nexa Center for Internet and Society | Director of >>Privacy >> Politecnico di Torino–Tongji University| Coordinator, >> Double Degree program in Management and IP Law >> Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology >>| >> Part-time Expert, School of Public Administration >> European Data Protection Law Review | Associate Editor >> >> http://staff.polito.it/alessandro.mantelero >> >> EMAIL POLICY: twice a day (Mon-Fri) > -- Prof. Avv. Alessandro Mantelero Politecnico di Torino Nexa Center for Internet and Society | Director of Privacy Politecnico di Torino–Tongji University| Coordinator, Double Degree program in Management and IP Law Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology | Part-time Expert, School of Public Administration European Data Protection Law Review | Associate Editor http://staff.polito.it/alessandro.mantelero EMAIL POLICY: twice a day (Mon-Fri)

Feb. 2, 2016

Re: [nexa] Safe Harbour: fumata nera... per ora

by Marco Ciurcina

Io, fossi in loro, inizierei qualche indagine su qualche impresa USA. Giusto per far vedere che non sono solo "chiacchere e distintivo". Stiamo a vedere.. m.c. In data martedì 2 febbraio 2016 12:41:22, Alessandro Mantelero ha scritto: > i garanti EU si dovrebbero riunire oggi, vederemo cosa > accade > > Una previsione di cui si parlava la settimana scorsa a > Bruxelles è quella secondo cui i garanti potrebbero > pendere atto dei passi avanti fatti verso un rafforzamento > delle tutele in US e quindi non passare subito alle > sanzioni. > Avrebbe un senso, mi pare. Ma aspettiamo... > > AM > > > > > On Tue, 02 Feb 2016 12:33:19 +0100 > > Marco Ciurcina <ciurcina(a)studiolegale.it> wrote: > > A questo punto, le imprese UE che usano servizi di > > > >imprese USA per trattare > > > > dati personali devono fare attenzione: i Garanti avevano > > > >concesso moratoria > > > > fino a fine gennaio, se non ricordo male. > > m.c. > > > > > > In data lunedì 1 febbraio 2016 22:47:10, Alessandro > > > >Mantelero ha scritto: > >> qui il testo del comunicato della Commissaria Jourová > >> > >> http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_SPEECH-16-208_en.htm > >> > >> "Dati personali fuori dall’EU. Quali soluzioni e > >> prospettive per le imprese dopo il venir meno > >> > >>dell’accordo > >> > >> Safe Harbour?", ne avevamo parlato a Nexa, v. qui: > >> https://nexa.polito.it/mercoledi-81 > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Prof. Avv. Alessandro Mantelero > >> Politecnico di Torino > >> > >> Nexa Center for Internet and Society | Director of > >> > >>Privacy > >> > >> Politecnico di Torino–Tongji University| Coordinator, > >> Double Degree program in Management and IP Law > >> Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology > >> > >> Part-time Expert, School of Public Administration > >> European Data Protection Law Review | Associate Editor > >> > >> http://staff.polito.it/alessandro.mantelero > >> > >> EMAIL POLICY: twice a day (Mon-Fri) > >> _______________________________________________ > >> nexa mailing list > >> nexa(a)server-nexa.polito.it > >> https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa > > -- > Prof. Avv. Alessandro Mantelero > Politecnico di Torino > > Nexa Center for Internet and Society | Director of Privacy > Politecnico di Torino–Tongji University| Coordinator, > Double Degree program in Management and IP Law > Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology | > Part-time Expert, School of Public Administration > European Data Protection Law Review | Associate Editor > > http://staff.polito.it/alessandro.mantelero > > EMAIL POLICY: twice a day (Mon-Fri)

Feb. 2, 2016

Re: [nexa] Safe Harbour: fumata nera... per ora

by Alessandro Mantelero

i garanti EU si dovrebbero riunire oggi, vederemo cosa accade Una previsione di cui si parlava la settimana scorsa a Bruxelles è quella secondo cui i garanti potrebbero pendere atto dei passi avanti fatti verso un rafforzamento delle tutele in US e quindi non passare subito alle sanzioni. Avrebbe un senso, mi pare. Ma aspettiamo... AM On Tue, 02 Feb 2016 12:33:19 +0100 Marco Ciurcina <ciurcina(a)studiolegale.it> wrote: > A questo punto, le imprese UE che usano servizi di >imprese USA per trattare > dati personali devono fare attenzione: i Garanti avevano >concesso moratoria > fino a fine gennaio, se non ricordo male. > m.c. > > > In data lunedì 1 febbraio 2016 22:47:10, Alessandro >Mantelero ha scritto: >> qui il testo del comunicato della Commissaria Jourová >> >> http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_SPEECH-16-208_en.htm >> >> "Dati personali fuori dall’EU. Quali soluzioni e >> prospettive per le imprese dopo il venir meno >>dell’accordo >> Safe Harbour?", ne avevamo parlato a Nexa, v. qui: >> https://nexa.polito.it/mercoledi-81 >> >> >> -- >> Prof. Avv. Alessandro Mantelero >> Politecnico di Torino >> >> Nexa Center for Internet and Society | Director of >>Privacy >> Politecnico di Torino–Tongji University| Coordinator, >> Double Degree program in Management and IP Law >> Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology >>| >> Part-time Expert, School of Public Administration >> European Data Protection Law Review | Associate Editor >> >> http://staff.polito.it/alessandro.mantelero >> >> EMAIL POLICY: twice a day (Mon-Fri) >> _______________________________________________ >> nexa mailing list >> nexa(a)server-nexa.polito.it >> https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa > -- Prof. Avv. Alessandro Mantelero Politecnico di Torino Nexa Center for Internet and Society | Director of Privacy Politecnico di Torino–Tongji University| Coordinator, Double Degree program in Management and IP Law Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology | Part-time Expert, School of Public Administration European Data Protection Law Review | Associate Editor http://staff.polito.it/alessandro.mantelero EMAIL POLICY: twice a day (Mon-Fri)

Feb. 2, 2016