February 2016 - nexa - server-nexa.polito.it

Re: [nexa] Milano, seminario sul controllo dei lavoratori 19 febbraio 2016- Università Bocconi

by Marco Bassini

Grazie, ne approfitto per allegarvi la versione definitiva della locandina. Cari saluti, Marco ----- Messaggio originale ----- Da: "Mauro Alovisio" <mauro.alovisio(a)gmail.com> A: "nexa" <nexa(a)server-nexa.polito.it> Inviato: Giovedì, 4 febbraio 2016 11:45:19 Oggetto: [nexa] Milano, seminario sul controllo dei lavoratori 19 febbraio 2016- Università Bocconi Gent.me/mi segnalo seminario gratuito di interesse il prossimo 19 febbraio 20'16 all'Università Bocconi sulla modifica dell'articolo 4 dello Statuto dei lavoratori, privacy e controlli. Aula seminari 1-‐C3-‐01, ore 10 Relatori: il prof Maurizio Del Conte, Maurio Erminio Malagnino (Autorità Garante per la Privacy) e Raffaele Zallone. Introdurrà il prof. Oreste Pollicino, concluderà i lavori il prof. Giuseppe Ferrari per programma completo: http://www.studiozallone.it/newsletter/it Cordiali saluti Mauro Alovisio _______________________________________________ nexa mailing list nexa(a)server-nexa.polito.it https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa

Feb. 4, 2016

Milano, seminario sul controllo dei lavoratori 19 febbraio 2016- Università Bocconi

by Mauro Alovisio

Gent.me/mi segnalo seminario gratuito di interesse il prossimo 19 febbraio 20'16 all'Università Bocconi sulla modifica dell'articolo 4 dello Statuto dei lavoratori, privacy e controlli. Aula seminari 1-‐C3-‐01, ore 10 Relatori: il prof Maurizio Del Conte, Maurio Erminio Malagnino (Autorità Garante per la Privacy) e Raffaele Zallone. Introdurrà il prof. Oreste Pollicino, concluderà i lavori il prof. Giuseppe Ferrari per programma completo: http://www.studiozallone.it/newsletter/it Cordiali saluti Mauro Alovisio

Feb. 4, 2016

Facebook Is Throttling Nonprofits and Activists

by J.C. DE MARTIN

http://valleywag.gawker.com/facebook-is-throttling-nonprofits-and-activists… (Sent from my wireless device; please excuse brevity and typos (if any))

Feb. 4, 2016

Re: [nexa] EU-US nuovo accordo Safe Harbour . Considerazioni ART29WP

by Alessandro Mantelero

E' ipotizzabile che vi siano criticità nell'accordo, come è ipotizzabile che esso sia una sorta di "ponte" verso un regime migliore. Negli US ci sono infatti diversi provvedimenti in discussione, in primis il Consumer Privacy Bill of Rights Act, così come una crescente pressione politico-economico-sociale per una maggior tutela dei dati. Alla vigilia delle elezioni presidenziali, non mi pare però realistico un significativo mutamento delle leggi sulla sorveglianza. L'accordo sblocca la situazione e permette ai vari attori (DPAs, Commissione, società civile, corti) di contribuire al miglioramento del quadro e, stante la posizione dell'ART29WP, rappresenta anche un'occasione per allargare la riflessione agli altri strumenti di legittimazione dei flussi dati (SCCs, BCRs). Detto questo, posto che nemmeno l'ART29WP ha ricevuto il testo dell'accordo, mi pare poco meditato esprimere giudizi su qualcosa di ancora ignoto, a meno che tutti questi soggetti non abbiano il testo approvato e allora sarebbe bene lo rendessero pubblico. AM On Wed, 3 Feb 2016 23:56:38 +0100 Alberto Cammozzo <ac+nexa(a)zeromx.net> wrote: > Anche Intercept è critico, citando fonti di parlamento >UE e diritti civili... > > <https://theintercept.com/2016/02/03/new-safe-harbor-data-deal-may-be-more-p…> > > Jan Philipp Albrecht, a member of the European >Parliament serving on the Committee on Civil Liberties, >Justice, and Home Affairs,quickly ><http://www.greens-efa.eu/eu-us-data-protectionsafe-harbour-15127.html>lashed >out at the deal, calling it “an affront to the European >Court of Justice” that “foresees no legally binding >improvements” to American or European spying laws. > > “There has only been a political agreement on the >general framework” of the data-sharing arrangement, >Albrecht told me in a telephone interview. “The deadline >has passed, and they have not delivered. This is not >really improving the legal situation of European citizens >— there’s not any change in the legal text foreseen.” He >said the U.S. was only required to “make a promise that >everything’s fine” and appoint “an ombudsman, who is just >the messenger for answers that are the same” about U.S. >policy. > > Estelle Masse, a policy analyst for the Brussels-based >rights group Access Now, also thought the deal was built >more on politics than a genuine intention to reform. > > “For months the negotiators were having political >discussion about a legal question,” she wrote in an email >to/The Intercept/. “The discussions were about whether >the ruling was ‘anti-American’ or if the EU was rejecting >the U.S. as a democracy. This is neither the case nor the >point. As a result, what we have today is an attempt at a >political fix.” > > European Digital Rights plainly described Tuesday’s >announcement as Europe’s “plans to back down from >defending the European Court’s ruling and accept a new >badly flawed arrangement.” Joe McNamee, the rights >group’s executive director, predicted that the deal would >be a short term stop gap: “Today’s announcement means >that European citizens and businesses on both sides of >the Atlantic face an extended period of uncertainty while >waiting for this new stop-gap solution to fail.” > > Businesses and trade groups, while feverishly releasing >congratulatory press releases as the deal was announced, >worried privately that they may soon be right back in the >same uncertain position. > > “Any risk of legal challenge is unsettling for >business,” said Mike Uehlein, a spokesperson for the >Direct Marketing Association, during a phone call >with/The Intercept./While he emphasized that the trade >group is “excited [negotiators have] continued to make >this a priority,” he told me that a second European Court >of Justice challenge would put “everyone back in the >sticky situation, wondering what’s going to happen. It >has not been fun.” > > Daniel Castro, a vice president at the Information, >Technology, and Innovation Foundation, agreed that >“uncertainty is always bad for business” but expressed >optimism that good faith efforts to arrive at an >agreement would likely continue. “The agreement shows >that U.S. and EU policymakers are deeply committed to >finding an interoperable solution.” > > [...] > > “The Redress Act doesn’t deal with any of the >surveillance concerns in the Schrems case,” said Amie >Stepanovich, U.S. policy manager for Access Now, over the >phone on Tuesday. “We do think it is really important >that substantive surveillance reform be put into place >before [the agreement] can survive challenge. And EU >member states need to take a look at their own >surveillance practices.” > > > > Alberto > > > > > On 03/02/2016 16:16, Alessandro Mantelero wrote: >> STATEMENT OF THE ARTICLE 29 WORKING PARTY >> ON THE CONSEQUENCES OF THE SCHREMS JUDGMENT >> >> http://ec.europa.eu/justice/data-protection/article-29/press-material/press… >> >> >> On Wed, 03 Feb 2016 16:09:11 +0100 >> "Alessandro Mantelero" <alessandro.mantelero(a)polito.it> >>wrote: >>> ecco l'attesa risposta dell'ART29WP sull'EU-US Privacy >>>Shield >>> >>> https://scic.ec.europa.eu/streaming/article-29-subgroup-implementation-of-t… >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Prof. Avv. Alessandro Mantelero >>> Politecnico di Torino >>> >>> Nexa Center for Internet and Society | Director of >>>Privacy >>> Politecnico di Torino–Tongji University| Coordinator, >>>Double Degree program in Management and IP Law >>> Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology >>>| Part-time Expert, School of Public Administration >>> European Data Protection Law Review | Associate Editor >>> >>> http://staff.polito.it/alessandro.mantelero >>> >>> EMAIL POLICY: twice a day (Mon-Fri) >>> _______________________________________________ >>> nexa mailing list >>> nexa(a)server-nexa.polito.it >>> https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa >> >> -- >> Prof. Avv. Alessandro Mantelero >> Politecnico di Torino >> >> Nexa Center for Internet and Society | Director of >>Privacy >> Politecnico di Torino–Tongji University| Coordinator, >>Double Degree program in Management and IP Law >> Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology >>| Part-time Expert, School of Public Administration >> European Data Protection Law Review | Associate Editor >> >> http://staff.polito.it/alessandro.mantelero >> >> EMAIL POLICY: twice a day (Mon-Fri) >> _______________________________________________ >> nexa mailing list >> nexa(a)server-nexa.polito.it >> https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa > > _______________________________________________ > nexa mailing list > nexa(a)server-nexa.polito.it > https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa -- Prof. Avv. Alessandro Mantelero Politecnico di Torino Nexa Center for Internet and Society | Director of Privacy Politecnico di Torino–Tongji University| Coordinator, Double Degree program in Management and IP Law Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology | Part-time Expert, School of Public Administration European Data Protection Law Review | Associate Editor http://staff.polito.it/alessandro.mantelero EMAIL POLICY: twice a day (Mon-Fri)

Feb. 4, 2016

Re: [nexa] EU-US nuovo accordo Safe Harbour . Considerazioni ART29WP

by Alberto Cammozzo

Anche Intercept è critico, citando fonti di parlamento UE e diritti civili... <https://theintercept.com/2016/02/03/new-safe-harbor-data-deal-may-be-more-p…> Jan Philipp Albrecht, a member of the European Parliament serving on the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice, and Home Affairs,quickly <http://www.greens-efa.eu/eu-us-data-protectionsafe-harbour-15127.html>lashed out at the deal, calling it “an affront to the European Court of Justice” that “foresees no legally binding improvements” to American or European spying laws. “There has only been a political agreement on the general framework” of the data-sharing arrangement, Albrecht told me in a telephone interview. “The deadline has passed, and they have not delivered. This is not really improving the legal situation of European citizens — there’s not any change in the legal text foreseen.” He said the U.S. was only required to “make a promise that everything’s fine” and appoint “an ombudsman, who is just the messenger for answers that are the same” about U.S. policy. Estelle Masse, a policy analyst for the Brussels-based rights group Access Now, also thought the deal was built more on politics than a genuine intention to reform. “For months the negotiators were having political discussion about a legal question,” she wrote in an email to/The Intercept/. “The discussions were about whether the ruling was ‘anti-American’ or if the EU was rejecting the U.S. as a democracy. This is neither the case nor the point. As a result, what we have today is an attempt at a political fix.” European Digital Rights plainly described Tuesday’s announcement as Europe’s “plans to back down from defending the European Court’s ruling and accept a new badly flawed arrangement.” Joe McNamee, the rights group’s executive director, predicted that the deal would be a short term stop gap: “Today’s announcement means that European citizens and businesses on both sides of the Atlantic face an extended period of uncertainty while waiting for this new stop-gap solution to fail.” Businesses and trade groups, while feverishly releasing congratulatory press releases as the deal was announced, worried privately that they may soon be right back in the same uncertain position. “Any risk of legal challenge is unsettling for business,” said Mike Uehlein, a spokesperson for the Direct Marketing Association, during a phone call with/The Intercept./While he emphasized that the trade group is “excited [negotiators have] continued to make this a priority,” he told me that a second European Court of Justice challenge would put “everyone back in the sticky situation, wondering what’s going to happen. It has not been fun.” Daniel Castro, a vice president at the Information, Technology, and Innovation Foundation, agreed that “uncertainty is always bad for business” but expressed optimism that good faith efforts to arrive at an agreement would likely continue. “The agreement shows that U.S. and EU policymakers are deeply committed to finding an interoperable solution.” [...] “The Redress Act doesn’t deal with any of the surveillance concerns in the Schrems case,” said Amie Stepanovich, U.S. policy manager for Access Now, over the phone on Tuesday. “We do think it is really important that substantive surveillance reform be put into place before [the agreement] can survive challenge. And EU member states need to take a look at their own surveillance practices.” Alberto On 03/02/2016 16:16, Alessandro Mantelero wrote: > STATEMENT OF THE ARTICLE 29 WORKING PARTY > ON THE CONSEQUENCES OF THE SCHREMS JUDGMENT > > http://ec.europa.eu/justice/data-protection/article-29/press-material/press… > > > > On Wed, 03 Feb 2016 16:09:11 +0100 > "Alessandro Mantelero" <alessandro.mantelero(a)polito.it> wrote: >> ecco l'attesa risposta dell'ART29WP sull'EU-US Privacy Shield >> >> https://scic.ec.europa.eu/streaming/article-29-subgroup-implementation-of-t… >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Prof. Avv. Alessandro Mantelero >> Politecnico di Torino >> >> Nexa Center for Internet and Society | Director of Privacy >> Politecnico di Torino–Tongji University| Coordinator, Double Degree >> program in Management and IP Law >> Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology | Part-time >> Expert, School of Public Administration >> European Data Protection Law Review | Associate Editor >> >> http://staff.polito.it/alessandro.mantelero >> >> EMAIL POLICY: twice a day (Mon-Fri) >> _______________________________________________ >> nexa mailing list >> nexa(a)server-nexa.polito.it >> https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa > > -- > Prof. Avv. Alessandro Mantelero > Politecnico di Torino > > Nexa Center for Internet and Society | Director of Privacy > Politecnico di Torino–Tongji University| Coordinator, Double Degree > program in Management and IP Law > Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology | Part-time > Expert, School of Public Administration > European Data Protection Law Review | Associate Editor > > http://staff.polito.it/alessandro.mantelero > > EMAIL POLICY: twice a day (Mon-Fri) > _______________________________________________ > nexa mailing list > nexa(a)server-nexa.polito.it > https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa

Feb. 3, 2016

Call for Papers: "Freedom and Control of Expression in the Digital Aftermath of the 2015 Paris Attacks" (Deadline: 1 April)

by J.C. DE MARTIN

Freedom and Control of Expression in the Digital Aftermath of the 2015 Paris Attacks Organizers : Jen Schradie, Nikos Smyrnaios, Sandra Vera Zambrano After the Charlie Hebdo newspaper offices were attacked in January 2015, debate and discussion flourished about freedom of expression, in France and abroad. This debate intensified after the Paris attacks of November 13th. At the epicenter is the role of the Internet and free speech. An enormous wave of worldwide indignation expressed itself after both events, including a deluge of hashtag solidarity. But this social media storm eventually revealed cultural, political and social divides inside France, as well as globally. Much like after the 9/11 attacks, France passed laws allowing state surveillance of online communication. At the same time, social media censored posts about the attacks that were considered to be provocative or shocking. The variety of reactions, including indifference or, on the contrary, the expression of very different points of view – sometimes even surveilled or censored – showed that one hashtag is neither unifying nor a universal view shared by everyone. This event magnified the notion that the digital public sphere is a conflicting arena of not just what is being said (or kept quiet) online but also what the limits are. Undoubtedly, the Internet is the main means of massive public expression for millions. Yet it is still the result of a complex set of power relations established between professional media, amateur content producing communities, which sometimes defend particular interests, as well as corporate intermediaries. The resulting online content embodies rival editorial, political and industrial strategies. Recently, scholars have begun to question the idea of digital participatory democracy in terms of a level playing field. This workshop aims to progress this debate by addressing the following central question: *Who controls freedom of expression and online content in the digital era, and how?* Embedded in this question are the challenges and constraints of expression, such as the tension between a bottom-up or top-down digital public sphere or who is left out as a digital player. Also central to this question are the role of three broad actors: the state, market and civil society. Possible topics for submissions include the following *State* – What is the government’s role - from subsidizing digital participation to censorship and surveillance? What is the role of political ideology, broadly defined, in freedom of expression? What is the relationship between media institutions and the state when it comes to online free speech? *Market* - What is the interplay of market dominance, algorithms, censorship and Big Data? How are transformations in news production and consumption, especially in terms of platforms like Facebook, shaping freedom of expression? How do different types of capitalist economic systems shape freedom of expression? How do market constraints upon corporate media, and mainstream journalism shape freedom of expression? *Civil society* – Who is creating content, and if so, who is listening, watching and clicking? How does race, class, ethnicity and gender factor in? Who is marginalized? How effective is Internet use as an extension or part of activist and social movement practices vis-à-vis political expression. What is the role of alternative, independent and citizen media in this digital era of online expression? *Target Audience and Scholars: *This is an interdisciplinary workshop but geared toward sociologists, anthropologists, political scientists, economists and communication scholars. Scholars at all levels are encouraged to participate. A small number of travel grants may be available to permit outstanding junior scholars (under 35 years at the date of the conference) to attend. Please state in your paper submission whether you wish to apply for such a travel grant. *Dates:* October 13 & 14, 2016 *Format: *The workshop will feature speakers, panels and paper presentations. *Submissions:* Full paper submissions based on empirical research of conference topics (maximum 25 pages including references and tables/figures) due by Friday, April 1. Theoretical papers will also be considered. Please submit papers to https://easychair.org/conferences/?conf=fceda15pa. We will notify you of acceptance by May 6. You will have to create an account in Easychair in order to submit. *Registration:* Register for the conference by September 15. Space is limited. Registration information coming soon. *Cost: *Free *Location:* Institute for Advanced Study in Toulouse, Toulouse School of Economics, Toulouse, France. *Organizers:* Jen Schradie (IAST), Sandra Vera Zambrano (Sciences Po Toulouse - LASSP), Nikos Smyrnaios (University of Toulouse – LERASS). *Email*: freedomcontrol.conf(a)iast.fr <mailto:freedomcontrol.conf@iast.fr?subject=Conference%20%22Freedom%22>

Feb. 3, 2016

83° Mercoledì di Nexa - 10 febbraio 2016

by Giuseppe Futia

Se non visualizzi correttamente questo messaggio clicca qui <http://nexa.polito.it/mercoledi-83> NEXA 83° Mercoledì di Nexa Mercoledi 10 febbraio 2016, ore 18.00 - 20.00 Via Boggio 65/a, Torino (primo piano) http://nexa.polito.it/mercoledi-83 Linking liability: from copyright to data protection Speaker Miquel Peguera, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (Barcelona, Spain) Ingresso libero This event will be webcast live: http://nexa.polito.it/upcoming-events Under EU law, there is no specific protection from liability for those providing hyperlinks to third-party content. The 2000 E-Commerce Directive chose not to establish a safe harbour for links, or more generally for information location tools. This lack of protection prompted the discussion of whether providers of links could nonetheless be shielded from liability under other provisions of the Directive. In any event, the current safe harbour scheme might prove elusive to deal with linking, particularly in the fields of copyright and data protection, where linking may be considered an illicit activity in itself if it lacks authorization. In the field of data protection, the CJEU has considered search engines controllers of, and thus fully responsible for, the processing of personal data contained in the webpages they link to. In the field of copyright, the CJEU holds that providing a link amounts to a ‘communication’ of the linked content. In the cases decided so far, the court found that such a communication was not made to a ‘new public’ and thus it did not need authorization. Nonetheless, other cases are pending before the court, and it may end up holding that linking to unauthorized content constitutes a communication to a new public, and therefore a direct infringement. This presentation will examine the status of the linking activities in those fields, particularly in view of the new General Data Protection Regulation and of the ongoing reform of EU copyright law. It will also consider the interplay of those legal frameworks and case law with the intermediary liability provisions in the E-Commerce Directive. BIOGRAFIA - e informazioni supplementari [Peguera] MIQUEL PIGUERA is an Associate Professor of Law at the Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (UOC) (Barcelona, Spain). Affiliate Scholar, Stanford Center for Internet & Society (2014-2016). PhD in Law, University of Barcelona (2006), with a dissertation on the liability of Internet intermediaries. Visiting Scholar at the University of Columbia School of Law (2007-08). His research focuses on the legal aspects of the information society, and particularly on Intermediary liability. His publications include articles and book chapters on copyright, trade marks and data protection. He is a Co-editor of the Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and E-Commerce Law (jipitec.eu). Before joining the academia, he worked as a lawyer in Barcelona. More information can be found at https://ispliability.wordpress.com/about Letture consigliate e link utili: * Mira Burri (2014): Permission to Link: Making Available via Hyperlinks in the European Union after Svensson <http://www.jipitec.eu/issues/jipitec-5-3-2014/4098>, JIPITEC Vol 5(3), 245-255. * Miquel Peguera (2016, forthcoming): The Shaky Ground of the Right to Be Delisted <http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2641876>, 18 Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law. Che cosa sono il Centro Nexa e i cicli di incontri “Mercoledì di Nexa” e “Nexa Lunch Seminar” Il Centro Nexa su Internet & Società del Politecnico di Torino (Dipartimento di Automatica e Informatica) è un centro di ricerca indipendente e interdisciplinare che studia Internet e il suo effetto sulla società. Maggiori informazioni all'indirizzo: http://nexa.polito.it/about. Durante i “*Mercoledì di Nexa*”, che si tengono *ogni 2° mercoledì del mese* alle *ore 18 in punto*, il Centro Nexa su Internet e Società apre le sue porte non solo agli esperti e a tutti coloro i quali lavorano con Internet, ma anche a semplici appassionati e cittadini. Il ciclo di incontri intende approfondire, con un linguaggio preciso ma divulgativo, i temi legati alla Rete: motori di ricerca, Creative Commons, social networks, open source/software libero, neutralità della rete, libertà di espressione, privacy, file sharing, big e open data, smart cities e molto altro. Al centro di quasi tutti gli incontri un ospite pronto a dialogare con i direttori del Centro Nexa, il Prof. Juan Carlos De Martin del Politecnico di Torino e il Prof. Marco Ricolfi dell'Università di Torino, nonché lo staff e i Fellows del Centro Nexa. Maggiori informazioni sui Mercoledì di Nexa, incluso un elenco di tutti i “Mercoledì” passati, sono disponibili all'indirizzo: http://nexa.polito.it/mercoledi. Si segnala inoltre che dal maggio 2012 *ogni 4° mercoledì* del mese *dalle ore 13 alle ore 14* il Centro Nexa organizza anche i "*Nexa Lunch Seminar*". Una lista di tutti i “Lunch Seminar” passati è disponibile all'indirizzo: http://nexa.polito.it/lunch-seminars. See our events calendar <http://nexa.polito.it/events> if you're curious about future luncheons, discussions, lectures, and conferences not listed in this email. Our events are free and open to the public, unless otherwise noted. Maggiori informazioni sui Mercoledì di Nexa e i Nexa Lunch Seminar, sono disponibili all'indirizzo: http://nexa.polito.it/events. Weekly Events Newsletter. Sign up <http://nexa.polito.it/mailing-lists> to receive this newsletter if this email was forwarded to you. To manage your subscription preferences, please click here <https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa>. Connect & get involved: Jobs, internships, and more <http://nexa.polito.it/get-involved> Nexa Center for Internet and Society Newsletter

Feb. 3, 2016

Safe Harbour ora i garanti potrebbero sanzionare

by Alessandro Mantelero

Le imprese che non hanno adottato le Standard Contractual Clauses o le Binding Corporate Rules, potranno ora essere soggetti a verifiche dei garanti europei min 36:41 https://scic.ec.europa.eu/streaming/article-29-subgroup-implementation-of-t… -- Prof. Avv. Alessandro Mantelero Politecnico di Torino Nexa Center for Internet and Society | Director of Privacy Politecnico di Torino–Tongji University| Coordinator, Double Degree program in Management and IP Law Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology | Part-time Expert, School of Public Administration European Data Protection Law Review | Associate Editor http://staff.polito.it/alessandro.mantelero EMAIL POLICY: twice a day (Mon-Fri)

Feb. 3, 2016

Re: [nexa] EU-US nuovo accordo Safe Harbour . Considerazioni ART29WP

by Alessandro Mantelero

STATEMENT OF THE ARTICLE 29 WORKING PARTY ON THE CONSEQUENCES OF THE SCHREMS JUDGMENT http://ec.europa.eu/justice/data-protection/article-29/press-material/press… On Wed, 03 Feb 2016 16:09:11 +0100 "Alessandro Mantelero" <alessandro.mantelero(a)polito.it> wrote: > ecco l'attesa risposta dell'ART29WP sull'EU-US Privacy >Shield > > https://scic.ec.europa.eu/streaming/article-29-subgroup-implementation-of-t… > > > > -- > Prof. Avv. Alessandro Mantelero > Politecnico di Torino > > Nexa Center for Internet and Society | Director of >Privacy > Politecnico di Torino–Tongji University| Coordinator, >Double Degree program in Management and IP Law > Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology >| Part-time Expert, School of Public Administration > European Data Protection Law Review | Associate Editor > > http://staff.polito.it/alessandro.mantelero > > EMAIL POLICY: twice a day (Mon-Fri) > _______________________________________________ > nexa mailing list > nexa(a)server-nexa.polito.it > https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa -- Prof. Avv. Alessandro Mantelero Politecnico di Torino Nexa Center for Internet and Society | Director of Privacy Politecnico di Torino–Tongji University| Coordinator, Double Degree program in Management and IP Law Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology | Part-time Expert, School of Public Administration European Data Protection Law Review | Associate Editor http://staff.polito.it/alessandro.mantelero EMAIL POLICY: twice a day (Mon-Fri)

Feb. 3, 2016

EU-US nuovo accordo Safe Harbour . Considerazioni ART29WP

by Alessandro Mantelero

ecco l'attesa risposta dell'ART29WP sull'EU-US Privacy Shield https://scic.ec.europa.eu/streaming/article-29-subgroup-implementation-of-t… -- Prof. Avv. Alessandro Mantelero Politecnico di Torino Nexa Center for Internet and Society | Director of Privacy Politecnico di Torino–Tongji University| Coordinator, Double Degree program in Management and IP Law Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology | Part-time Expert, School of Public Administration European Data Protection Law Review | Associate Editor http://staff.polito.it/alessandro.mantelero EMAIL POLICY: twice a day (Mon-Fri)

Feb. 3, 2016