September 2015 - nexa - server-nexa.polito.it

Master thesis: "Cross-Border Copyfight: European Libraries Re-Thinking the InfoSoc Directive"

by J.C. DE MARTIN

*Cross-Border Copyfight: European Libraries Re-Thinking the InfoSoc Directive* Posted by Papers on June 2, 2015 Author: Karolina Andersdotter http://infojustice.org/archives/34528 Abstract: This master’s thesis focuses on the argumentation of library organisations and European national libraries in their contributions to the European Commission’s public consultation on the review of the EU copyright rules. This study aims to explain how the debate around copyright limitations and exceptions is constructed in library stakeholders’ contributions. The construction is explained through argumentation analysis and a theoretical framework of the relations between structural, instrumental, and discursive power. The main findings are that library stakeholders in general are strongly supportive of a EU copyright reform, arguing that democratic values as well as the EU Single Market would benefit. There are also library stakeholders who argue against legislative change, either suggesting extended collective licences, or arguing that the Member States’ sovereignity is more important than a pan-European copyright legislation. Furthermore, many library stakeholders propose either a general ”fair use” exception in EU copyright law, or adding several specific exceptions, e.g. for text and data mining, e-lending, publicly funded research openly available, and that contracts and technical protection measures cannot override limitations and exceptions. National libraries and library organisations from the Central and Eastern European Member States’ are more supportive of a copyright reform than their Western European counterparts. They do not mention licences as a possible solution. In general, the library stakeholders agree that the interoperability, exchange and cooperation in activities and projects involving several EU Member States suffers from the current copyright legislation. Full Text: Uppsala University Publications: http://uu.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A814857&dswid=-555

Sept. 5, 2015

perché è lecito pubblicare un'immagine shock

by Carlo Melzi d'Eril

Carissimi, mi permetto di segnalare un pezzetto su un tema davvero difficilissimo. Carlo http://www.ilsole24ore.com/art/mondo/2015-09-04/la-foto-bimbo-bodrum-perche… avv. Carlo Melzi d'Eril ACCMS STUDIO LEGALE via Podgora 13 20122 Milano t. +39 02 54107715 f. +39 02 54114827 <mailto:carlo.melzi@accms.it> carlo.melzi(a)accms.it carlo.melzideril(a)cert.ordineavvocatimilano.it …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… Nota di riservatezza : Il presente messaggio e gli eventuali allegati contengono informazioni strettamente riservate. Esso è riservato esclusivamente al destinatario sopra indicato, il quale è l'unico autorizzato ad usarlo, copiarlo e, sotto la propria responsabilità, diffonderlo. Si segnala, a chiunque ricevesse questo messaggio per errore o comunque ne avesse conoscenza senza averne titolo, che trattenerlo o divulgarlo a persone diverse dal destinatario è proibito. Grazie.

Sept. 5, 2015

Wireless car updates to save billions, transform service experience, IHS predicts

by J.C. DE MARTIN

http://www.autonews.com/article/20150904/OEM06/150909920 (Sent from my wireless device; please excuse brevity and typos (if any))

Sept. 4, 2015

Re: [nexa] EFF: "Finally! DOJ Reverses Course and Requires Warrants for Stingrays!"

by Guido Noto La Diega

Very interesting! The main problem is that when local and state agencies autonomously investigate, this rules do not apply. Also, the policy "applies to all instances in which Department components use cell-site simulators in support of other Federal agencies and/or State and Local law enforcement agencies." This wording makes me think that even when the Department of Justice collaborates with state and local agencies, the policy does not apply inasmuch as the cell-site simulators are used by the latter (and not by the DOJ itself). 2015-09-04 10:01 GMT+01:00 J.C. DE MARTIN <demartin(a)polito.it>: > SEPTEMBER 3, 2015 | BY NATE CARDOZO > > *Finally! DOJ Reverses Course and Requires Warrants for Stingrays!* > > > https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2015/09/finally-doj-reverses-course-and-will-… > > At long last, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) has announced a slew of > much-needed policy changes regarding the use of cell-site simulators. Most > importantly, starting today all federal law enforcement agencies—and all > state and local agencies working with the federal government—will be > required to obtain a search warrant supported by probable cause before they > are allowed to use cell-site simulators. EFF welcomes these policy changes > as long overdue. > > Colloquially known as “Stingrays” after Harris Corporation’s brand name > for a common model, cell-site simulators masquerade as legitimate cell > phone towers, tricking phones nearby into connecting to them. This allows > agents to learn the unique identifying number for each phone in the area of > the device and to track a phone’s location in real time. But Stingrays can > get a lot more than just identifying numbers and location data—by virtue of > the way they work, all mobile traffic (voice, data, and text) from every > phone in the area could be routed through the Stingray, giving the operator > the option to do anything from recording entire calls and texts, to > selectively denying service to particular phones. > > Until recently, law enforcement’s use of Stingrays has been shrouded in an > inexplicable and indefensible level of secrecy. At the behest of the FBI, > state law enforcement agencies have been bound by non-disclosure agreements > intended to shield from public scrutiny all details about the technical > capabilities and even model numbers of the devices. Law enforcement has > gone to extreme lengths to protect even the most basic information about > them, even dropping charges rather than answering judges’ questions about > them. Although today’s policy changes don’t directly affect the > non-disclosure agreements already in place, the tone of the announcement, > along with a clarification from May, gives us hope that more transparency > is on the way. > > *What today’s changes do:* > > Federal law enforcement agents will be required to obtain a search warrant > supported by probable cause prior to using a cell-site simulator in a law > enforcement context. A search warrant requires a showing by the agent, > under oath, that meets one of the highest standards in federal law. This > incredibly important change is precisely what EFF has been asking for. > Agents will only be allowed to use Stingrays in “pen register” mode, > meaning the devices will collect only the basic location of the phone and > the numbers of incoming and outgoing calls and texts. Agents will not be > allowed to collect the content of your communications -- like your emails > or text messages -- even if the cell-site simulator is capable of such > collection. > Finally, Agencies must delete data on users not targeted in either 24 > hours or 30 days, depending on context. > > *What today’s changes don’t do:* > > The new policy isn’t law and doesn’t provide any remedy to people whose > data is swept up by Stingrays operated without a warrant. Indeed, it won’t > even act to keep evidence collected in violation of the policy out of court > (this is known as suppression). > The policy doesn’t apply to the use of Stingrays outside of the criminal > investigation context. For instance, when federal agents use cell-site > simulators for “national security” purposes, they won’t be required to > obtain a warrant by the terms of this policy. > There are two enumerated exceptions to the warrant requirement in today’s > guidance. The first is the traditional “exigent circumstances” exception, > common to all warrant requirements and not particularly worrisome. But the > second exception listed in today’s policy for undefined “exceptional > circumstances” is potentially problematic. We have no idea what that means, > so we’re waiting to see if and how the exception will be used. > > *What more is needed:* > > While we’re pleasantly surprised by this long-needed first step to bring > Stingrays out of the shadows and into compliance with the Fourth > Amendment’s warrant requirement, more is needed. > > First and foremost, without a statute or court decision giving this > voluntary policy the force of law, there will be no consequences if law > enforcement agents flout its terms and continue using Stingrays as they > have—without warrants. With only this policy shielding us, there’s nothing > keeping warrantless Stingray evidence out of court, and therefore nothing > to deter agents from behaving badly. > > And finally, we need to extend this warrant requirement to all state and > local law enforcement agencies around the country. Some states (such as > Washington) already have such laws in place. It’s time to make the message > clear to cops in all 50 states: if you want to use a Stingray, get a > warrant! > > Files > > doj_cell_site_simulator_policy_9-3-15.pdf > > _______________________________________________ > nexa mailing list > nexa(a)server-nexa.polito.it > https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa > > -- *Guido* Dr. Guido Noto La Diega <http://www.law.qmul.ac.uk/staff/notoladiega.html>, Postdoctoral Research Assistant in Cloud Computing Law <http://www.cloudlegal.ccls.qmul.ac.uk/project/researchers/index.html> - Queen Mary Universityof London <http://www.mccrc.eu/Pages/Research-Team.aspx> President of Ital-IoT <http://italiot.altervista.org/about-us/> - Centre of Multidisciplinary Research on the Internet of Things Avvocato <http://www.studioperrino.it/intro/index.asp> (Commercial and IP/IT Lawyer) Cultore della materia in Civil Law and Intellectual Property <http://www.unipa.it/persone/docenti/n/guido.notoladiega> - University of Palermo 67-69 Lincoln's Inn Fields London WC2A 3JB g.notoladiega(a)qmul.ac.uk +44(0)2078823386 @gui_notoladiega https://it.linkedin.com/pub/guido-noto-la-diega-ph-d/6/614/669 This e-mail and any attachment hereto are strictly confidential and are exclusively intended for the person above identified. Without intended recipient’s entitlement, use, copy and dissemination of this e-mail is prohibited. If you have received it in error, please advice us immediately by telephone and return the documents received to the above address, deleting the files. Thank you. Diese E-Mail enthält vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschützte Informationen. Das unerlaubte Kopieren sowie die unbefugte Weitergabe dieser Mail ist nicht gestaettet. Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind oder diese E-Mail irrtümlich erhalten haben, informieren Sie bitte sofort den Absender und vernichten Sie diese Mail. Danke. Il presente messaggio di posta elettronica ed ogni eventuale allegato contengono informazioni strettamente riservate e sono indirizzati esclusivamente al soggetto sopra indicato. In mancanza di autorizzazione del destinatario, ne sono vietati l’uso, la riproduzione e la divulgazione. Se avete ricevuto questo messaggio per errore, siete pregati di avvisarci immediatamente per telefono e di restituirci i documenti ricevuti all’indirizzo sopra indicato, distruggendo i file. Grazie. LIK DŐR

Sept. 4, 2015

EFF: "Finally! DOJ Reverses Course and Requires Warrants for Stingrays!"

by J.C. DE MARTIN

SEPTEMBER 3, 2015 | BY NATE CARDOZO *Finally! DOJ Reverses Course and Requires Warrants for Stingrays!* https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2015/09/finally-doj-reverses-course-and-will-… At long last, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) has announced a slew of much-needed policy changes regarding the use of cell-site simulators. Most importantly, starting today all federal law enforcement agencies—and all state and local agencies working with the federal government—will be required to obtain a search warrant supported by probable cause before they are allowed to use cell-site simulators. EFF welcomes these policy changes as long overdue. Colloquially known as “Stingrays” after Harris Corporation’s brand name for a common model, cell-site simulators masquerade as legitimate cell phone towers, tricking phones nearby into connecting to them. This allows agents to learn the unique identifying number for each phone in the area of the device and to track a phone’s location in real time. But Stingrays can get a lot more than just identifying numbers and location data—by virtue of the way they work, all mobile traffic (voice, data, and text) from every phone in the area could be routed through the Stingray, giving the operator the option to do anything from recording entire calls and texts, to selectively denying service to particular phones. Until recently, law enforcement’s use of Stingrays has been shrouded in an inexplicable and indefensible level of secrecy. At the behest of the FBI, state law enforcement agencies have been bound by non-disclosure agreements intended to shield from public scrutiny all details about the technical capabilities and even model numbers of the devices. Law enforcement has gone to extreme lengths to protect even the most basic information about them, even dropping charges rather than answering judges’ questions about them. Although today’s policy changes don’t directly affect the non-disclosure agreements already in place, the tone of the announcement, along with a clarification from May, gives us hope that more transparency is on the way. *What today’s changes do:* Federal law enforcement agents will be required to obtain a search warrant supported by probable cause prior to using a cell-site simulator in a law enforcement context. A search warrant requires a showing by the agent, under oath, that meets one of the highest standards in federal law. This incredibly important change is precisely what EFF has been asking for. Agents will only be allowed to use Stingrays in “pen register” mode, meaning the devices will collect only the basic location of the phone and the numbers of incoming and outgoing calls and texts. Agents will not be allowed to collect the content of your communications -- like your emails or text messages -- even if the cell-site simulator is capable of such collection. Finally, Agencies must delete data on users not targeted in either 24 hours or 30 days, depending on context. *What today’s changes don’t do:* The new policy isn’t law and doesn’t provide any remedy to people whose data is swept up by Stingrays operated without a warrant. Indeed, it won’t even act to keep evidence collected in violation of the policy out of court (this is known as suppression). The policy doesn’t apply to the use of Stingrays outside of the criminal investigation context. For instance, when federal agents use cell-site simulators for “national security” purposes, they won’t be required to obtain a warrant by the terms of this policy. There are two enumerated exceptions to the warrant requirement in today’s guidance. The first is the traditional “exigent circumstances” exception, common to all warrant requirements and not particularly worrisome. But the second exception listed in today’s policy for undefined “exceptional circumstances” is potentially problematic. We have no idea what that means, so we’re waiting to see if and how the exception will be used. *What more is needed:** * While we’re pleasantly surprised by this long-needed first step to bring Stingrays out of the shadows and into compliance with the Fourth Amendment’s warrant requirement, more is needed. First and foremost, without a statute or court decision giving this voluntary policy the force of law, there will be no consequences if law enforcement agents flout its terms and continue using Stingrays as they have—without warrants. With only this policy shielding us, there’s nothing keeping warrantless Stingray evidence out of court, and therefore nothing to deter agents from behaving badly. And finally, we need to extend this warrant requirement to all state and local law enforcement agencies around the country. Some states (such as Washington) already have such laws in place. It’s time to make the message clear to cops in all 50 states: if you want to use a Stingray, get a warrant! Files doj_cell_site_simulator_policy_9-3-15.pdf

Sept. 4, 2015

Crawford: "The Phone Company and the Feds — a Buddy Movie from Hell"

by J.C. DE MARTIN

*The Phone Company and the Feds — a Buddy Movie from Hell* /For over 65 years, this private-public alliance has partnered in surveillance, changing the laws when they seemed to get in the way. Will this story ever change?/ by Susan Crawford This month’s news that AT&T has evidenced “extreme willingness to help” the NSA collect, filter, analyze, and disseminate billions of communications by Americans wasn’t particularly surprising. After all, the giant phone company has been tightly involved with America’s national security operations for decades. The obvious next question: Who will get to boss whom around? I offer three data points that may help us find an answer. […] Continua qui: https://medium.com/backchannel/the-phone-company-and-the-feds-a-buddy-movie…

Sept. 3, 2015

10 e 11 settembre 2015 giornate di approfondimento sul cloud a Roma con Agid

by Mauro Alovisio

Gent.me/mi segnalo dal sito Agid http://www.agid.gov.it/notizie/2015/09/02/due-giorni-approfondimento-confro… Due giorni di approfondimento e confronto sul procurement innovativo dei servizi Cloud *da Giovedì, 10 Settembre, 2015 a Venerdì, 11 Settembre, 2015* Il 10 e l’11 settembre 2015 presso la sede dell'Agenzia per l'Italia Digitale la cerimonia di annuncio dell’aggiudicazione della gara Cloud for Europe [image: Due giorni di approfondimento e confronto sul procurement innovativo dei servizi Cloud] L’Agenzia per l’Italia Digitale, che svolge il ruolo di centrale di committenza pre-commerciale per Cloud for Europe, ospita due giornate di approfondimento sui temi del Cloud, al quale parteciperanno aziende, centri di ricerca, università e tutti i soggetti europei, pubblici e privati, interessati a sviluppo e adozione di soluzioni innovative per la realizzazione di piattaforme Cloud. L’agenda delle due giornate: *Cloud for Europe: “Results announcement ceremony” – 10:30/15:00, giovedì 10 settembre 2015* Il progetto “Cloud for Europe” verrà presentato grazie al contributo dei committenti e delle aziende fornitrici, durante la mattinata verranno annunciati i risultati e i soggetti aggiudicatari della fase I. *Cloud for Europe: “Kick off esecuzione Cloud for Europe” – 15:00/18:00, giovedì 10 settembre 2015* Sessione riservata ai fornitori e alle amministrazioni appaltanti. *Cloud for Europe: “Certification workshop” – 09:00-13:00, venerdì 11 settembre 2015* L’intera giornata sarà dedicata ad approfondire il tema della certificazione, della sicurezza, della privacy e del vendor lock-in negli ambienti Cloud. Per informazioni e accrediti: info(a)eema.org (link sends e-mail) <info(a)eema.org> Maggiori informazioni sul sito www.cloudforeurope.eu (link is external) <http://www.cloudforeurope.eu> Tag: Cloud for Europe <http://www.agid.gov.it/tags/cloud-europe> Pagina interna sull'argomento: Cloud for Europe Tender <http://www.agid.gov.it/cloudforeurope> Approfondimenti: Innovazione del mercato <http://www.agid.gov.it/agenda-digitale/innovazione-del-mercato> Cordiali saluti Mauro Alovisio

Sept. 3, 2015

78° Mecoledì di Nexa - 9 settembre 2015

by Giuseppe Futia

Se non visualizzi correttamente questo messaggio clicca qui <http://nexa.polito.it/mercoledi-78> NEXA 78° Mercoledì di Nexa Mercoledi 9 settembre 2015, ore 18.00 - 20.00 Via Boggio 65/a, Torino (primo piano) http://nexa.polito.it/mercoledi-78 Sicurezza e sorveglianza sulla rete: spunti dal caso Hacking Team Speakers Fabio Chiusi (Giornalista, Fellow Centro Nexa), Claudio Agosti (Ricercatore e sviluppatore) Ingresso libero This event will be webcast live: http://nexa.polito.it/upcoming-events Una massiccia intrusione informatica ai danni di *Hacking Team* - azienda milanese specializzata in software per la sorveglianza - ha reso pubblici almeno *400 gigabyte di materiale riservato*, dal quale emergerebbero, tra l’altro, rapporti commerciali con istituzioni di stati non democratici, da cui potenziali *violazioni di diritti fondamentali* dei loro cittadini. Tra le numerose implicazioni di questa vicenda, vi è anche il possibile impatto dell'attacco sui software in corso di utilizzo dai clienti di Hacking Team, a loro volta a rischio di intrusione. Obiettivo del 78° Mercoledì di Nexa sarà quello di ricostruire la vicenda, anche per tentare di comprendere quali fatti - tra i molti oggetto di analisi in queste settimane - siano effettivamente comprovati. Più in generale, si rifletterà sull’*attuale grado di opacità del settore della sorveglianza*; ma anche sulle modalità e sulle conseguenze, positive e/o negative, di leaks di tale portata strategica. Ci si chiederà, inoltre, quali *modelli regolatori* possano garantire trasparenza e tutela dei diritti umani nei rapporti dell'industria della sorveglianza con i governi, o con soggetti privati. A tale fine, il Centro Nexa ospiterà gli interventi di *Fabio Chiusi*, giornalista e fellow del Centro Nexa, e di *Claudio Agosti*, ricercatore e sviluppatore di software per la protezione dei diritti umani digitali, ai quali seguirà una discussione pubblica. BIOGRAFIE - e informazioni supplementari [Chiusi - Agosti] FABIO CHIUSI <http://nexa.polito.it/people/fchiusi> è fellow del Centro Nexa, giornalista freelance (Wired, L'Espresso, Repubblica) e blogger (ilNichilista <http://ilnichilista.com/>, Chiusi nella Rete <http://chiusinellarete-messaggeroveneto.blogautore.repubblica.it/>) che scrive regolarmente di censura e sorveglianza su Internet, analizzando il complesso rapporto tra tecnologie digitali, politica e società. Ha conseguito un "Master of Science" in Filosofia della Scienza presso la London School of Economics. È autore di /Critica della democrazia digitale. La politica 2.0 alla prova dei fatti/ (Codice Edizioni). CLAUDIO AGOSTI è uno sviluppatore di software e un promotore dell'autodifesa digitale. Dopo un'esperienza professionale nel mondo della sicurezza dei computer e delle reti, si è dedicato a quella degli utenti online: molto più sensibili, molto meno prevedibili. Lavora in due organizzazioni: Il centro studi Hermes e TacticalTech. Da metà degli anni 90 si è formato come autodidatta. Purtroppo la rete non elargisce titoli da mettere nelle biografie e non ho mai scritto libri, solo codice, al massimo articoli tecnologici per tecnologhi e naturalmente qualche piano per conquistare il mondo (delle libertà digitali). Letture consigliate e link utili: * Claudio Agosti, /I worked at #HackingTeam, my emails were leaked to WikiLeaks and I’m ok with that <https://stories.expost-news.com/i-worked-at-hackingteam-my-emails-were-leak…>/, expost magazine * Carlo Blengino, /Qual è il problema? <http://www.ilpost.it/carloblengino/2015/08/04/il-problema-hackingteam/>/, Il Post, 4 agosto 2015 * Fabio Chiusi, /Hacking Team: "I clienti che abusano del nostro software vengono cancellati" <http://www.repubblica.it/tecnologia/sicurezza/2015/07/08/news/il_portavoce_…>/, La Repubblica, 8 luglio 2015 * Fabio Chiusi, /Dopo l'Hacking Team? "Un mondo con regole chiare e trasparenti" <http://www.repubblica.it/tecnologia/sicurezza/2015/07/15/news/intervista_ka…>/, La Repubblica, 15 luglio 2015 * Carola Frediani, /“Così Hacking Team e altre aziende vendono sorveglianza in Colombia” <http://www.lastampa.it/2015/09/02/tecnologia/hacking-team-e-il-puma-della-c…>/, La Stampa, 2 settembre 2015 Che cosa sono il Centro Nexa e i cicli di incontri “Mercoledì di Nexa” e “Nexa Lunch Seminar” Il Centro Nexa su Internet & Società del Politecnico di Torino (Dipartimento di Automatica e Informatica) è un centro di ricerca indipendente e interdisciplinare che studia Internet e il suo effetto sulla società. Maggiori informazioni all'indirizzo: http://nexa.polito.it/about. Durante i “*Mercoledì di Nexa*”, che si tengono *ogni 2° mercoledì del mese* alle *ore 18 in punto*, il Centro Nexa su Internet e Società apre le sue porte non solo agli esperti e a tutti coloro i quali lavorano con Internet, ma anche a semplici appassionati e cittadini. Il ciclo di incontri intende approfondire, con un linguaggio preciso ma divulgativo, i temi legati alla Rete: motori di ricerca, Creative Commons, social networks, open source/software libero, neutralità della rete, libertà di espressione, privacy, file sharing, big e open data, smart cities e molto altro. Al centro di quasi tutti gli incontri un ospite pronto a dialogare con i direttori del Centro Nexa, il Prof. Juan Carlos De Martin del Politecnico di Torino e il Prof. Marco Ricolfi dell'Università di Torino, nonché lo staff e i Fellows del Centro Nexa. Maggiori informazioni sui Mercoledì di Nexa, incluso un elenco di tutti i “Mercoledì” passati, sono disponibili all'indirizzo: http://nexa.polito.it/mercoledi. Si segnala inoltre che dal maggio 2012 *ogni 4° mercoledì* del mese *dalle ore 13 alle ore 14* il Centro Nexa organizza anche i "*Nexa Lunch Seminar*". Una lista di tutti i “Lunch Seminar” passati è disponibile all'indirizzo: http://nexa.polito.it/lunch-seminars. See our events calendar <http://nexa.polito.it/events> if you're curious about future luncheons, discussions, lectures, and conferences not listed in this email. Our events are free and open to the public, unless otherwise noted. Maggiori informazioni sui Mercoledì di Nexa e i Nexa Lunch Seminar, sono disponibili all'indirizzo: http://nexa.polito.it/events. Weekly Events Newsletter. Sign up <http://nexa.polito.it/mailing-lists> to receive this newsletter if this email was forwarded to you. To manage your subscription preferences, please click here <https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa>. Connect & get involved: Jobs, internships, and more <http://nexa.polito.it/get-involved> Nexa Center for Internet and Society Newsletter

Sept. 3, 2015

by Simone Aliprandi

Cogliendo l'interessante spunto agostano di Carlo, ho fatto qualche riflessione su questa deriva verso il continuo restringimento delle libere utilizzazioni, citando anche i recenti dibattiti sulla "proteggibilità" delle posizioni dello yoga e sulla eccessiva tutela riservata al film Pixels. http://www.mysolutionpost.it/blogs/it-law/piana/2015/09/copyright-senza-con… Un cordiale saluto. -- Simone Aliprandi - http://www.aliprandi.org | http://www.array.eu

Sept. 2, 2015

In libreria: "Qu'est-ce que le digital labor ?"

by Antonio Casilli

Buondì, a coloro che leggono il francese (e agli altri) ho il piacere di annunciare la pubblicazione del mio nuovo libello "Qu'est-ce que le digital labor ?", co-scritto con Dominique Cardon, per i tipi delle Editions de l'INA. Il comunicato stampa è sul sito dell'editore: http://www.institut-national-audiovisuel.fr/presse/pdf/1128.pdf E, se non vi capita di venire in Francia, il libro è disponibile su un noto marketplace: http://www.amazon.fr/dp/2869382294/ref=cm_sw_r_tw_dp_ljB5vb0JZRWEN Chi fosse interessato a recensirlo o adottarlo come libro di testo, può richiedere una copia a: Marie Borgen (INA Institut National de l'Audiovisuel) mborgen(a)ina.fr Buona lettura, -- Antonio A. Casilli Associate Professor, Telecom ParisTech Research Fellow Edgar-Morin Center (EHESS)

Sept. 1, 2015