April 2015 - nexa - server-nexa.polito.it

linee guida nazionali del Miur su bullismo e cyberbullismo

by Mauro Alovisio

gent.me/mi segnalo che il Miur questa mattina durante convegno presso le aule del Senato ha presentato le linee guida nazionali del Miur in materia di bullismo e cyberbullismo per le scuole http://www.repubblica.it/tecnologia/social-network/2015/04/13/news/bullismo… Ci aggiorniamo quando pubblicano il testo del provvedimento Cordiali saluti Mauro Alovisio Il giorno 6 marzo 2015 10:44, Anna Masera <masera_a(a)camera.it> ha scritto: > Adesso deve approdare alla Camera e passare in Aula a @Montecitorio... > Speriamo che l'Intergruppo Innovazione sia vigile :) > > Inviato da iPhone > > > Il giorno 06/mar/2015, alle ore 10:08, "avv. Monica A. Senor " < > senor(a)penalistiassociati.it> ha scritto: > > > > La Commissione affari costituzionali del Senato ha approvato il disegno > di legge S.1261 sul cyber-bullismo. > > Qui la notizia: > > > http://www.quotidianodiritto.ilsole24ore.com/art/parlamento-e-giustizia/201… > > Qui il testo: > > http://www.senato.it/leg/17/BGT/Schede/Ddliter/43814.htm > > > > Un caro saluto, > > Monica > > _______________________________________________ > > nexa mailing list > > nexa(a)server-nexa.polito.it > > https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa > _______________________________________________ > nexa mailing list > nexa(a)server-nexa.polito.it > https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa >

April 13, 2015

Fwd: [DPEU] Doorgest.: [globalpriv-discussion] Letter regarding EU Data Protection Regulation

by Alessandro Mantelero

Segnalo di seguito questa significativa presa di posizione da parte di alcune importati associazioni internazionali a tutela della privacy, in relazione alla proposta di riforma in discussione a livello comunitario. -- Avv. Alessandro Mantelero Aggregate Professor, Politecnico di Torino Director of Privacy and Faculty Fellow, Nexa Center for Internet and Society Coordinator, Double Degree program in Management and IP Law, Politecnico di Torino–Tongji University of Shanghai http://staff.polito.it/alessandro.mantelero http://nexa.polito.it/people/amantelero EMAIL POLICY: twice a day (Mon-Fri) --- segue il messaggio inoltrato (the forwarded message follows) ---

April 13, 2015

il CONI disapplica (deliberatamente) la legge sulla fattura elettronica

by Simone Aliprandi

Il CONI di autoconcede una proroga di qualche mese sulla fatturazione elettronica, decidendo di disapplicare una legge dello stato in vigore da 8 anni. E' ora di finirla con i casi in cui le leggi sono cogenti solo per i cittadini e non per le pubbliche amministrazioni. http://www.apogeonline.com/webzine/2015/04/13/fatturare-cosi-per-sport Un caro saluto. -- Simone Aliprandi - http://www.aliprandi.org | http://www.array.eu

April 13, 2015

"What is intellectual privacy, and how yours is being violated "

by J.C. DE MARTIN

Riprendendo un tema echeggiato di recente su questa lista. juan carlos *What is intellectual privacy, and how yours is being violated* /It's the notion that in a free society, anyone should be able to read, learn, and debate without being monitored and recorded. Americans have long cherished this freedom, but author Neil Richards says it's being threatened by pervasive online tracking of digital habits and social media discussions. / By Evan Selinger, Columnist February 25, 2015 Privacy may be one of the biggest casualties of the Digital Age. If it's not the government that's storing records of cellphone calls, it's advertisers tracking our every online clicks. While limiting government and corporate snooping is now a matter of heated debate, the notion of guarding intellectual privacy has yet to generate much fuss. Yet, according to Neil Richards, this basic American value to "read and think freely without surveillance" is in peril. Without it, he said, we'll become less willing to test new ideas, challenge common assumptions, and engage in rigorous debate. I recently spoke to Mr. Richards, a professor of law at Washington University, about his new book, "Intellectual Privacy: Rethinking Civil Liberties in the Digital Age." Edited excerpts follow. […] Continua qui: http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Passcode/Passcode-Voices/2015/0225/What-is-i…

April 12, 2015

Traditional books on paper open a new chapter of success | Books | The Guardian

by J.C. DE MARTIN

http://www.theguardian.com/books/2015/apr/11/traditional-books-new-chapter-… (Sent from my wireless device; please excuse brevity and typos (if any))

April 11, 2015

The FTC is worried about algorithmic transparency, and you should be too | ITworld

by J.C. DE MARTIN

http://www.itworld.com/article/2908375/the-ftc-is-worried-about-algorithmic… (Sent from my wireless device; please excuse brevity and typos (if any))

April 9, 2015

Ebook Gratuito. Un anno di Regolamento AGCOM sul diritto D'autore. Numeri e costi.

by Fulvio Sarzana

<http://www.fulviosarzana.it/blog/ebook-gratuito-un-anno-di-regolamento-agco m-sul-diritto-dautore-al-festival-internazionale-del-giornalismo/> EBOOK GRATUITO. UN ANNO DI REGOLAMENTO AGCOM SUL DIRITTO DAUTORE,. AL FESTIVAL INTERNAZIONALE DEL GIORNALISMO. <http://www.fulviosarzana.it/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Immaginesaettasarzan a.jpg> ImmaginesaettasarzanaI numeri e i costi di un anno di Regolamento AGCOM sul diritto dAutore. Quant è costato alle imprese italiane di telecomunicazione ed agli Internet Service Providers il Regolamento AGCOM sul diritto dautore Ed ai consumatori? Quali sono i costi Amministrativi del Regolamento? Le Associazioni di tutela del diritto dautore contribuiscono ai costi dellAttività dellAGCOM? Chi beneficia del Regolamento e chi ne è escluso. Che impatto, se di impatto può parlarsi, ha determinato sulla cd pirateria il Regolamento AGCOM sul diritto dautore? Il Regolamento ha riguardato anche lattività Giornalistica? Quali sono gli impatti del Blocco attraverso i DNS sui contenuti leciti degli Utenti? Ci si può difendere e come? Sono i temi che Bruno Saetta e il sottoscritto hanno trattato nellEBOOK gratuito che verrà distribuito il giorno 16 aprile alle ore 14 e 30, nellambito del Seminario su Copyright e libertà despressione, che si terrà a Perugia nellambito del Festival Internazionale del Giornalismo. Il Seminario, come lebook, è gratuito. 1 4:00 15:00 giovedì 16/04/2015 Hotel Brufani Sala Priori http://www.festivaldelgiornalismo.com/programme/2015/copyright-and-freedom-o f-expression-online.-in-remembrance-of-lost-liberty --- Questa e-mail è stata controllata per individuare virus con Avast antivirus. http://www.avast.com

April 9, 2015

Re: [nexa] USA Executive Order -- "Blocking the Property of Certain Persons Engaging in Significant Malicious Cyber-Enabled Activities"

by Andrea Glorioso

Caro Arturo, Prima di tutto mi dispiace per i problemi di salute, che spero si risolvano presto. Grazie per gli articoli, che parlano di questioni che seguo da molto vicino ("ce campo" :). Sicuramente sarebbe interessante dibattere sull'attuale forma del CISA e sulla causa contro l'NSA, ma mi sfugge la connessione diretta con l'ordine esecutivo di cui stavamo parlando. Spero riusciremo a discuterne in maniera più estesa quanto prima. A presto, Andrea On Thursday, April 9, 2015, A Dicorinto <arturo.dicorinto(a)uniroma1.it> wrote: > Andrea- > apprezzo molto le tue argomentazioni e in parte le condivido. non posso > argomentare in questo momento visto che scrivo con una mano sola perchè > ingessato. tuttavia ti dico che gli usa esagerano. appena posso proverò a > scriverti perchè. > nel frattempo, se hai piacere leggiti questi articoli per cominiciare... > > ----------------------- > > Alla Commissione Intelligence del Senato passa la versione definitiva del > Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act. Prevista anche la "licenza di > hacking" per neutralizzare ogni potenziale minaccia alla sicurezza digitale > > > *di ARTURO DI CORINTO* > http://www.repubblica.it/tecnologia/sicurezza/2015/03/17/news/licenza_di_ha… > > Wikimedia, insieme a una serie di associazioni per i diritti civili e per > la privacy, ha fatto causa alla National Security Agency (Nsa) per aver > violato i diritti dei suoi utenti attraverso forme massicce di > sorveglianza. Lo spionaggio, effettuato senza uno specifico mandato, come > ha rivelato Edward Snowden, riguarderebbe le email, i siti visitati e anche > l'uso dei motori di ricerca > *di ARTURO DI CORINTO* > > > *http://www.repubblica.it/tecnologia/2015/03/11/news/wikipedia_porta_la_nsa_in_tribunale-109243434/ > <http://www.repubblica.it/tecnologia/2015/03/11/news/wikipedia_porta_la_nsa_…>* > > 2015-04-09 3:07 GMT+02:00 Andrea Glorioso <andrea(a)digitalpolicy.it > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','andrea(a)digitalpolicy.it');>>: > >> Caro Juan Carlos, >> Premesso che, a scanso di equivoci, parlo a titolo puramente personale >> ecc. ecc. :), non direi che si tratti di un atto di ordinaria >> amministrazione, dato che comunque parliamo della possibilità di sanzioni >> potenzialmente molto pesanti. >> >> Al tempo stesso, il commento di Arturo - senz'altro sintetico, e per >> questo chiedevo maggiori spiegazioni - mi sembra alquanto "tranchant", non >> fosse altro perché lo strumento delle sanzioni non è certamente nuovo. >> >> Credo che il problema fondamentale è che permane una visione di Internet >> e delle tecnologie ad esso collegate come se fossimo ancora nei primi anni >> di sviluppo e uso. Oggi come oggi interi paesi dipendono in maniera quasi >> totale dalle suddette tecnologie, e in un panorama internazionale in cui >> gli attacchi informatici (siano essi a scopo distruttivo o di spionaggio) >> sono una realtà, è inevitabile che chi è responsabile della sicurezza di >> una nazione adotti ogni possibile misura atta a mantenere la medesima. >> >> Ciò non significa ovviamente che tali misure siano quelle corrette in >> ogni caso; o che si debbano o possano ignorare altre considerazioni, legate >> per esempio al diritto al contraddittorio nel caso in cui si sia soggetti a >> tali sanzioni (la Corte di Giustizia Europea ha una giurisprudenza >> interessante in merito, relativamente alle sanzioni adottate dal Consiglio >> di Sicurezza dell'ONU); o che alcuni paesi si trovino a dover adottare >> questo genere di misure perché sono stati i primi a scegliere un approccio >> securitario fondamentalmente unilaterale, ragion per cui ora devono >> scegliere la strada delle potenziali sanzioni perché difficilmente >> troveranno interlocutori disponibili a qualche sorta di "détente". >> >> Ma da qui a parlare di "abominio", il passo a me pare un po' lungo. :) >> >> Ciao, >> >> Andrea >> >> On Apr 7, 2015 1:46 PM, "J.C. DE MARTIN" <demartin(a)polito.it> wrote: >> >>> Caro Andrea, >>> >>> in attesa dei commenti di Arturo, ci dici tu cosa ne pensi? >>> Ovviamente a titolo personale, ecc. ecc. >>> >>> E' una non notizia, ovvero, un atto di ordinaria ammistrazione, >>> come sembrebbero indicare le tue parole, o ci sono profili >>> inediti che vale la pena commentare? >>> >>> Grazie! >>> >>> juan carlos >>> >>> >>> >>> On 04/04/15 14:47, Andrea Glorioso wrote: >>> >>> Caro Arturo, >>> >>> Puoi elaborare il tuo commento? Lo strumento delle sanzioni, al di là >>> delle valutazioni sulla loro efficacia, è utilizzato ampiamente in molti >>> settori delle relazioni internazionali. >>> >>> Grazie, ciao, >>> >>> Andrea >>> >>> On Thursday, April 2, 2015, A Dicorinto <arturo.dicorinto(a)uniroma1.it> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Che abominio. Alla faccia della libertà. >>>> >>>> 2015-04-01 17:54 GMT+02:00 J.C. DE MARTIN <demartin(a)polito.it>: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2015/04/01/executive-order-bloc… >>>>> >>>>> The White House >>>>> >>>>> Office of the Press Secretary >>>>> For Immediate Release >>>>> April 01, 2015 >>>>> Executive Order -- "Blocking the Property of Certain Persons >>>>> Engaging in Significant Malicious Cyber-Enabled Activities" >>>>> >>>>> EXECUTIVE ORDER >>>>> >>>>> - - - - - - - >>>>> >>>>> BLOCKING THE PROPERTY OF CERTAIN PERSONS ENGAGING IN >>>>> >>>>> SIGNIFICANT MALICIOUS CYBER-ENABLED ACTIVITIES >>>>> >>>>> By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the >>>>> laws of the United States of America, including the International Emergency >>>>> Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) (IEEPA), the National >>>>> Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.) (NEA), section 212(f) of the >>>>> Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (8 U.S.C. 1182(f)), and section 301 >>>>> of title 3, United States Code, >>>>> >>>>> I, BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States of America, find that >>>>> the increasing prevalence and severity of malicious cyber-enabled >>>>> activities originating from, or directed by persons located, in whole or in >>>>> substantial part, outside the United States constitute an unusual and >>>>> extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy >>>>> of the United States. I hereby declare a national emergency to deal with >>>>> this threat. >>>>> >>>>> Accordingly, I hereby order: >>>>> >>>>> *Section 1*. (a) All property and interests in property that are in >>>>> the United States, that hereafter come within the United States, or that >>>>> are or hereafter come within the possession or control of any United States >>>>> person of the following persons are blocked and may not be transferred, >>>>> paid, exported, withdrawn, or otherwise dealt in: >>>>> >>>>> (i) any person determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, in >>>>> consultation with the Attorney General and the Secretary of State, to be >>>>> responsible for or complicit in, or to have engaged in, directly or >>>>> indirectly, cyber-enabled activities originating from, or directed by >>>>> persons located, in whole or in substantial part, outside the United States >>>>> that are reasonably likely to result in, or have materially contributed to, >>>>> a significant threat to the national security, foreign policy, or economic >>>>> health or financial stability of the United States and that have the >>>>> purpose or effect of: >>>>> >>>>> (A) harming, or otherwise significantly compromising the provision of >>>>> services by, a computer or network of computers that support one or more >>>>> entities in a critical infrastructure sector; >>>>> >>>>> (B) significantly compromising the provision of services by one or >>>>> more entities in a critical infrastructure sector; >>>>> >>>>> (C) causing a significant disruption to the availability of a computer >>>>> or network of computers; or >>>>> >>>>> (D) causing a significant misappropriation of funds or economic >>>>> resources, trade secrets, personal identifiers, or financial information >>>>> for commercial or competitive advantage or private financial gain; or >>>>> >>>>> (ii) any person determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, in >>>>> consultation with the Attorney General and the Secretary of State: >>>>> >>>>> (A) to be responsible for or complicit in, or to have engaged in, the >>>>> receipt or use for commercial or competitive advantage or private financial >>>>> gain, or by a commercial entity, outside the United States of trade secrets >>>>> misappropriated through cyber-enabled means, knowing they have been >>>>> misappropriated, where the misappropriation of such trade secrets is >>>>> reasonably likely to result in, or has materially contributed to, a >>>>> significant threat to the national security, foreign policy, or economic >>>>> health or financial stability of the United States; >>>>> >>>>> (B) to have materially assisted, sponsored, or provided financial, >>>>> material, or technological support for, or goods or services in support of, >>>>> any activity described in subsections (a)(i) or (a)(ii)(A) of this section >>>>> or any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant >>>>> to this order; >>>>> >>>>> (C) to be owned or controlled by, or to have acted or purported to act >>>>> for or on behalf of, directly or indirectly, any person whose property and >>>>> interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order; or >>>>> >>>>> (D) to have attempted to engage in any of the activities described in >>>>> subsections (a)(i) and (a)(ii)(A)-(C) of this section. >>>>> >>>>> (b) The prohibitions in subsection (a) of this section apply except to >>>>> the extent provided by statutes, or in regulations, orders, directives, or >>>>> licenses that may be issued pursuant to this order, and notwithstanding any >>>>> contract entered into or any license or permit granted prior to the >>>>> effective date of this order. >>>>> >>>>> *Sec. 2*. I hereby determine that the making of donations of the type >>>>> of articles specified in section 203(b)(2) of IEEPA (50 U.S.C. 1702(b)(2)) >>>>> by, to, or for the benefit of any person whose property and interests in >>>>> property are blocked pursuant to section 1 of this order would seriously >>>>> impair my ability to deal with the national emergency declared in this >>>>> order, and I hereby prohibit such donations as provided by section 1 of >>>>> this order. >>>>> >>>>> *Sec. 3*. The prohibitions in section 1 of this order include but are >>>>> not limited to: >>>>> >>>>> (a) the making of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or >>>>> services by, to, or for the benefit of any person whose property and >>>>> interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order; and >>>>> >>>>> (b) the receipt of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or >>>>> services from any such person. >>>>> >>>>> *Sec. 4*. I hereby find that the unrestricted immigrant and >>>>> nonimmigrant entry into the United States of aliens determined to meet one >>>>> or more of the criteria in section 1(a) of this order would be detrimental >>>>> to the interests of the United States, and I hereby suspend entry into the >>>>> United States, as immigrants or nonimmigrants, of such persons. Such >>>>> persons shall be treated as persons covered by section 1 of Proclamation >>>>> 8693 of July 24, 2011 (Suspension of Entry of Aliens Subject to United >>>>> Nations Security Council Travel Bans and International Emergency Economic >>>>> Powers Act Sanctions). >>>>> >>>>> *Sec. 5*. (a) Any transaction that evades or avoids, has the purpose >>>>> of evading or avoiding, causes a violation of, or attempts to violate any >>>>> of the prohibitions set forth in this order is prohibited. >>>>> >>>>> (b) Any conspiracy formed to violate any of the prohibitions set forth >>>>> in this order is prohibited. >>>>> >>>>> *Sec. 6*. For the purposes of this order: >>>>> >>>>> (a) the term "person" means an individual or entity; >>>>> >>>>> (b) the term "entity" means a partnership, association, trust, joint >>>>> venture, corporation, group, subgroup, or other organization; >>>>> >>>>> (c) the term "United States person" means any United States citizen, >>>>> permanent resident alien, entity organized under the laws of the United >>>>> States or any jurisdiction within the United States (including foreign >>>>> branches), or any person in the United States; >>>>> >>>>> (d) the term "critical infrastructure sector" means any of the >>>>> designated critical infrastructure sectors identified in Presidential >>>>> Policy Directive 21; and >>>>> >>>>> (e) the term "misappropriation" includes any taking or obtaining by >>>>> improper means, without permission or consent, or under false pretenses. >>>>> >>>>> *Sec. 7*. For those persons whose property and interests in property >>>>> are blocked pursuant to this order who might have a constitutional presence >>>>> in the United States, I find that because of the ability to transfer funds >>>>> or other assets instantaneously, prior notice to such persons of measures >>>>> to be taken pursuant to this order would render those measures ineffectual. >>>>> I therefore determine that for these measures to be effective in addressing >>>>> the national emergency declared in this order, there need be no prior >>>>> notice of a listing or determination made pursuant to section 1 of this >>>>> order. >>>>> >>>>> *Sec. 8*. The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the >>>>> Attorney General and the Secretary of State, is hereby authorized to take >>>>> such actions, including the promulgation of rules and regulations, and to >>>>> employ all powers granted to the President by IEEPA as may be necessary to >>>>> carry out the purposes of this order. The Secretary of the Treasury may >>>>> redelegate any of these functions to other officers and agencies of the >>>>> United States Government consistent with applicable law. All agencies of >>>>> the United States Government are hereby directed to take all appropriate >>>>> measures within their authority to carry out the provisions of this order. >>>>> >>>>> *Sec. 9*. The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the >>>>> Attorney General and the Secretary of State, is hereby authorized to submit >>>>> the recurring and final reports to the Congress on the national emergency >>>>> declared in this order, consistent with section 401(c) of the NEA (50 >>>>> U.S.C. 1641(c)) and section 204(c) of IEEPA (50 U.S.C. 1703(c)). >>>>> >>>>> *Sec. 10*. This order is not intended to, and does not, create any >>>>> right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in >>>>> equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, >>>>> or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person. >>>>> >>>>> BARACK OBAMA >>>>> >>>>> THE WHITE HOUSE, >>>>> April 1, 2015. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> nexa mailing list >>>>> nexa(a)server-nexa.polito.it >>>>> https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> Arturo Di Corinto >>>> www.dicorinto.it >>>> ---------------------------------> >>>> >>>> AVVERTENZE AI SENSI DEL D.Lgs. 196/2003 Le informazioni contenute in >>>> questo messaggio di posta elettronica e/o nel/i file/s allegato/i sono da >>>> considerarsi strettamente riservate. Il loro utilizzo è consentito >>>> esclusivamente al destinatario del messaggio, per le finalità indicate nel >>>> messaggio stesso. Qualora riceviate questo messaggio senza esserne il >>>> destinatario, Vi preghiamo cortesemente di darcene notizia via e-mail e di >>>> procedere alla distruzione del messaggio stesso, cancellandolo dal Vostro >>>> sistema. Conservare il messaggio stesso, divulgarlo anche in parte, >>>> distribuirlo ad altri soggetti, copiarlo, od utilizzarlo per finalità >>>> diverse, costituisce comportamento contrario ai principi dettati dal D.Lgs. >>>> 196/2003 >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> -- >>> I speak only for myself. Sometimes I do not even agree with myself. Keep >>> it in mind. >>> Twitter: @andreaglorioso >>> Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/andrea.glorioso >>> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=1749288&trk=tab_pro >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> nexa mailing list >>> nexa(a)server-nexa.polito.it >>> https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa >>> >>> >> >> -- >> >> -- >> I speak only for myself. Sometimes I do not even agree with myself. Keep >> it in mind. >> Twitter: @andreaglorioso >> Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/andrea.glorioso >> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=1749288&trk=tab_pro >> >> _______________________________________________ >> nexa mailing list >> nexa(a)server-nexa.polito.it >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','nexa(a)server-nexa.polito.it');> >> https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa >> >> > > > -- > > Arturo Di Corinto > www.dicorinto.it > ---------------------------------> > > AVVERTENZE AI SENSI DEL D.Lgs. 196/2003 Le informazioni contenute in > questo messaggio di posta elettronica e/o nel/i file/s allegato/i sono da > considerarsi strettamente riservate. Il loro utilizzo è consentito > esclusivamente al destinatario del messaggio, per le finalità indicate nel > messaggio stesso. Qualora riceviate questo messaggio senza esserne il > destinatario, Vi preghiamo cortesemente di darcene notizia via e-mail e di > procedere alla distruzione del messaggio stesso, cancellandolo dal Vostro > sistema. Conservare il messaggio stesso, divulgarlo anche in parte, > distribuirlo ad altri soggetti, copiarlo, od utilizzarlo per finalità > diverse, costituisce comportamento contrario ai principi dettati dal D.Lgs. > 196/2003 > -- -- I speak only for myself. Sometimes I do not even agree with myself. Keep it in mind. Twitter: @andreaglorioso Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/andrea.glorioso LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=1749288&trk=tab_pro

April 9, 2015

Re: [nexa] USA Executive Order -- "Blocking the Property of Certain Persons Engaging in Significant Malicious Cyber-Enabled Activities"

by A Dicorinto

Andrea- apprezzo molto le tue argomentazioni e in parte le condivido. non posso argomentare in questo momento visto che scrivo con una mano sola perchè ingessato. tuttavia ti dico che gli usa esagerano. appena posso proverò a scriverti perchè. nel frattempo, se hai piacere leggiti questi articoli per cominiciare... ----------------------- Alla Commissione Intelligence del Senato passa la versione definitiva del Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act. Prevista anche la "licenza di hacking" per neutralizzare ogni potenziale minaccia alla sicurezza digitale *di ARTURO DI CORINTO* http://www.repubblica.it/tecnologia/sicurezza/2015/03/17/news/licenza_di_ha… Wikimedia, insieme a una serie di associazioni per i diritti civili e per la privacy, ha fatto causa alla National Security Agency (Nsa) per aver violato i diritti dei suoi utenti attraverso forme massicce di sorveglianza. Lo spionaggio, effettuato senza uno specifico mandato, come ha rivelato Edward Snowden, riguarderebbe le email, i siti visitati e anche l'uso dei motori di ricerca *di ARTURO DI CORINTO* *http://www.repubblica.it/tecnologia/2015/03/11/news/wikipedia_porta_la_nsa_in_tribunale-109243434/ <http://www.repubblica.it/tecnologia/2015/03/11/news/wikipedia_porta_la_nsa_…>* 2015-04-09 3:07 GMT+02:00 Andrea Glorioso <andrea(a)digitalpolicy.it>: > Caro Juan Carlos, > Premesso che, a scanso di equivoci, parlo a titolo puramente personale > ecc. ecc. :), non direi che si tratti di un atto di ordinaria > amministrazione, dato che comunque parliamo della possibilità di sanzioni > potenzialmente molto pesanti. > > Al tempo stesso, il commento di Arturo - senz'altro sintetico, e per > questo chiedevo maggiori spiegazioni - mi sembra alquanto "tranchant", non > fosse altro perché lo strumento delle sanzioni non è certamente nuovo. > > Credo che il problema fondamentale è che permane una visione di Internet e > delle tecnologie ad esso collegate come se fossimo ancora nei primi anni di > sviluppo e uso. Oggi come oggi interi paesi dipendono in maniera quasi > totale dalle suddette tecnologie, e in un panorama internazionale in cui > gli attacchi informatici (siano essi a scopo distruttivo o di spionaggio) > sono una realtà, è inevitabile che chi è responsabile della sicurezza di > una nazione adotti ogni possibile misura atta a mantenere la medesima. > > Ciò non significa ovviamente che tali misure siano quelle corrette in ogni > caso; o che si debbano o possano ignorare altre considerazioni, legate per > esempio al diritto al contraddittorio nel caso in cui si sia soggetti a > tali sanzioni (la Corte di Giustizia Europea ha una giurisprudenza > interessante in merito, relativamente alle sanzioni adottate dal Consiglio > di Sicurezza dell'ONU); o che alcuni paesi si trovino a dover adottare > questo genere di misure perché sono stati i primi a scegliere un approccio > securitario fondamentalmente unilaterale, ragion per cui ora devono > scegliere la strada delle potenziali sanzioni perché difficilmente > troveranno interlocutori disponibili a qualche sorta di "détente". > > Ma da qui a parlare di "abominio", il passo a me pare un po' lungo. :) > > Ciao, > > Andrea > > On Apr 7, 2015 1:46 PM, "J.C. DE MARTIN" <demartin(a)polito.it> wrote: > >> Caro Andrea, >> >> in attesa dei commenti di Arturo, ci dici tu cosa ne pensi? >> Ovviamente a titolo personale, ecc. ecc. >> >> E' una non notizia, ovvero, un atto di ordinaria ammistrazione, >> come sembrebbero indicare le tue parole, o ci sono profili >> inediti che vale la pena commentare? >> >> Grazie! >> >> juan carlos >> >> >> >> On 04/04/15 14:47, Andrea Glorioso wrote: >> >> Caro Arturo, >> >> Puoi elaborare il tuo commento? Lo strumento delle sanzioni, al di là >> delle valutazioni sulla loro efficacia, è utilizzato ampiamente in molti >> settori delle relazioni internazionali. >> >> Grazie, ciao, >> >> Andrea >> >> On Thursday, April 2, 2015, A Dicorinto <arturo.dicorinto(a)uniroma1.it> >> wrote: >> >>> Che abominio. Alla faccia della libertà. >>> >>> 2015-04-01 17:54 GMT+02:00 J.C. DE MARTIN <demartin(a)polito.it>: >>> >>>> >>>> https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2015/04/01/executive-order-bloc… >>>> >>>> The White House >>>> >>>> Office of the Press Secretary >>>> For Immediate Release >>>> April 01, 2015 >>>> Executive Order -- "Blocking the Property of Certain Persons Engaging >>>> in Significant Malicious Cyber-Enabled Activities" >>>> >>>> EXECUTIVE ORDER >>>> >>>> - - - - - - - >>>> >>>> BLOCKING THE PROPERTY OF CERTAIN PERSONS ENGAGING IN >>>> >>>> SIGNIFICANT MALICIOUS CYBER-ENABLED ACTIVITIES >>>> >>>> By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the >>>> laws of the United States of America, including the International Emergency >>>> Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) (IEEPA), the National >>>> Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.) (NEA), section 212(f) of the >>>> Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (8 U.S.C. 1182(f)), and section 301 >>>> of title 3, United States Code, >>>> >>>> I, BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States of America, find that >>>> the increasing prevalence and severity of malicious cyber-enabled >>>> activities originating from, or directed by persons located, in whole or in >>>> substantial part, outside the United States constitute an unusual and >>>> extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy >>>> of the United States. I hereby declare a national emergency to deal with >>>> this threat. >>>> >>>> Accordingly, I hereby order: >>>> >>>> *Section 1*. (a) All property and interests in property that are in >>>> the United States, that hereafter come within the United States, or that >>>> are or hereafter come within the possession or control of any United States >>>> person of the following persons are blocked and may not be transferred, >>>> paid, exported, withdrawn, or otherwise dealt in: >>>> >>>> (i) any person determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, in >>>> consultation with the Attorney General and the Secretary of State, to be >>>> responsible for or complicit in, or to have engaged in, directly or >>>> indirectly, cyber-enabled activities originating from, or directed by >>>> persons located, in whole or in substantial part, outside the United States >>>> that are reasonably likely to result in, or have materially contributed to, >>>> a significant threat to the national security, foreign policy, or economic >>>> health or financial stability of the United States and that have the >>>> purpose or effect of: >>>> >>>> (A) harming, or otherwise significantly compromising the provision of >>>> services by, a computer or network of computers that support one or more >>>> entities in a critical infrastructure sector; >>>> >>>> (B) significantly compromising the provision of services by one or more >>>> entities in a critical infrastructure sector; >>>> >>>> (C) causing a significant disruption to the availability of a computer >>>> or network of computers; or >>>> >>>> (D) causing a significant misappropriation of funds or economic >>>> resources, trade secrets, personal identifiers, or financial information >>>> for commercial or competitive advantage or private financial gain; or >>>> >>>> (ii) any person determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, in >>>> consultation with the Attorney General and the Secretary of State: >>>> >>>> (A) to be responsible for or complicit in, or to have engaged in, the >>>> receipt or use for commercial or competitive advantage or private financial >>>> gain, or by a commercial entity, outside the United States of trade secrets >>>> misappropriated through cyber-enabled means, knowing they have been >>>> misappropriated, where the misappropriation of such trade secrets is >>>> reasonably likely to result in, or has materially contributed to, a >>>> significant threat to the national security, foreign policy, or economic >>>> health or financial stability of the United States; >>>> >>>> (B) to have materially assisted, sponsored, or provided financial, >>>> material, or technological support for, or goods or services in support of, >>>> any activity described in subsections (a)(i) or (a)(ii)(A) of this section >>>> or any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant >>>> to this order; >>>> >>>> (C) to be owned or controlled by, or to have acted or purported to act >>>> for or on behalf of, directly or indirectly, any person whose property and >>>> interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order; or >>>> >>>> (D) to have attempted to engage in any of the activities described in >>>> subsections (a)(i) and (a)(ii)(A)-(C) of this section. >>>> >>>> (b) The prohibitions in subsection (a) of this section apply except to >>>> the extent provided by statutes, or in regulations, orders, directives, or >>>> licenses that may be issued pursuant to this order, and notwithstanding any >>>> contract entered into or any license or permit granted prior to the >>>> effective date of this order. >>>> >>>> *Sec. 2*. I hereby determine that the making of donations of the type >>>> of articles specified in section 203(b)(2) of IEEPA (50 U.S.C. 1702(b)(2)) >>>> by, to, or for the benefit of any person whose property and interests in >>>> property are blocked pursuant to section 1 of this order would seriously >>>> impair my ability to deal with the national emergency declared in this >>>> order, and I hereby prohibit such donations as provided by section 1 of >>>> this order. >>>> >>>> *Sec. 3*. The prohibitions in section 1 of this order include but are >>>> not limited to: >>>> >>>> (a) the making of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or >>>> services by, to, or for the benefit of any person whose property and >>>> interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order; and >>>> >>>> (b) the receipt of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or >>>> services from any such person. >>>> >>>> *Sec. 4*. I hereby find that the unrestricted immigrant and >>>> nonimmigrant entry into the United States of aliens determined to meet one >>>> or more of the criteria in section 1(a) of this order would be detrimental >>>> to the interests of the United States, and I hereby suspend entry into the >>>> United States, as immigrants or nonimmigrants, of such persons. Such >>>> persons shall be treated as persons covered by section 1 of Proclamation >>>> 8693 of July 24, 2011 (Suspension of Entry of Aliens Subject to United >>>> Nations Security Council Travel Bans and International Emergency Economic >>>> Powers Act Sanctions). >>>> >>>> *Sec. 5*. (a) Any transaction that evades or avoids, has the purpose >>>> of evading or avoiding, causes a violation of, or attempts to violate any >>>> of the prohibitions set forth in this order is prohibited. >>>> >>>> (b) Any conspiracy formed to violate any of the prohibitions set forth >>>> in this order is prohibited. >>>> >>>> *Sec. 6*. For the purposes of this order: >>>> >>>> (a) the term "person" means an individual or entity; >>>> >>>> (b) the term "entity" means a partnership, association, trust, joint >>>> venture, corporation, group, subgroup, or other organization; >>>> >>>> (c) the term "United States person" means any United States citizen, >>>> permanent resident alien, entity organized under the laws of the United >>>> States or any jurisdiction within the United States (including foreign >>>> branches), or any person in the United States; >>>> >>>> (d) the term "critical infrastructure sector" means any of the >>>> designated critical infrastructure sectors identified in Presidential >>>> Policy Directive 21; and >>>> >>>> (e) the term "misappropriation" includes any taking or obtaining by >>>> improper means, without permission or consent, or under false pretenses. >>>> >>>> *Sec. 7*. For those persons whose property and interests in property >>>> are blocked pursuant to this order who might have a constitutional presence >>>> in the United States, I find that because of the ability to transfer funds >>>> or other assets instantaneously, prior notice to such persons of measures >>>> to be taken pursuant to this order would render those measures ineffectual. >>>> I therefore determine that for these measures to be effective in addressing >>>> the national emergency declared in this order, there need be no prior >>>> notice of a listing or determination made pursuant to section 1 of this >>>> order. >>>> >>>> *Sec. 8*. The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the >>>> Attorney General and the Secretary of State, is hereby authorized to take >>>> such actions, including the promulgation of rules and regulations, and to >>>> employ all powers granted to the President by IEEPA as may be necessary to >>>> carry out the purposes of this order. The Secretary of the Treasury may >>>> redelegate any of these functions to other officers and agencies of the >>>> United States Government consistent with applicable law. All agencies of >>>> the United States Government are hereby directed to take all appropriate >>>> measures within their authority to carry out the provisions of this order. >>>> >>>> *Sec. 9*. The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the >>>> Attorney General and the Secretary of State, is hereby authorized to submit >>>> the recurring and final reports to the Congress on the national emergency >>>> declared in this order, consistent with section 401(c) of the NEA (50 >>>> U.S.C. 1641(c)) and section 204(c) of IEEPA (50 U.S.C. 1703(c)). >>>> >>>> *Sec. 10*. This order is not intended to, and does not, create any >>>> right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in >>>> equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, >>>> or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person. >>>> >>>> BARACK OBAMA >>>> >>>> THE WHITE HOUSE, >>>> April 1, 2015. >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> nexa mailing list >>>> nexa(a)server-nexa.polito.it >>>> https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Arturo Di Corinto >>> www.dicorinto.it >>> ---------------------------------> >>> >>> AVVERTENZE AI SENSI DEL D.Lgs. 196/2003 Le informazioni contenute in >>> questo messaggio di posta elettronica e/o nel/i file/s allegato/i sono da >>> considerarsi strettamente riservate. Il loro utilizzo è consentito >>> esclusivamente al destinatario del messaggio, per le finalità indicate nel >>> messaggio stesso. Qualora riceviate questo messaggio senza esserne il >>> destinatario, Vi preghiamo cortesemente di darcene notizia via e-mail e di >>> procedere alla distruzione del messaggio stesso, cancellandolo dal Vostro >>> sistema. Conservare il messaggio stesso, divulgarlo anche in parte, >>> distribuirlo ad altri soggetti, copiarlo, od utilizzarlo per finalità >>> diverse, costituisce comportamento contrario ai principi dettati dal D.Lgs. >>> 196/2003 >>> >> >> >> -- >> >> -- >> I speak only for myself. Sometimes I do not even agree with myself. Keep >> it in mind. >> Twitter: @andreaglorioso >> Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/andrea.glorioso >> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=1749288&trk=tab_pro >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> nexa mailing list >> nexa(a)server-nexa.polito.it >> https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa >> >> > > -- > > -- > I speak only for myself. Sometimes I do not even agree with myself. Keep > it in mind. > Twitter: @andreaglorioso > Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/andrea.glorioso > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=1749288&trk=tab_pro > > _______________________________________________ > nexa mailing list > nexa(a)server-nexa.polito.it > https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa > > -- Arturo Di Corinto www.dicorinto.it ---------------------------------> AVVERTENZE AI SENSI DEL D.Lgs. 196/2003 Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio di posta elettronica e/o nel/i file/s allegato/i sono da considerarsi strettamente riservate. Il loro utilizzo è consentito esclusivamente al destinatario del messaggio, per le finalità indicate nel messaggio stesso. Qualora riceviate questo messaggio senza esserne il destinatario, Vi preghiamo cortesemente di darcene notizia via e-mail e di procedere alla distruzione del messaggio stesso, cancellandolo dal Vostro sistema. Conservare il messaggio stesso, divulgarlo anche in parte, distribuirlo ad altri soggetti, copiarlo, od utilizzarlo per finalità diverse, costituisce comportamento contrario ai principi dettati dal D.Lgs. 196/2003

April 9, 2015

Re: [nexa] Voce.info: "Ma la scuola 2.0 è buona scuola?"

by Giuseppe Attardi

On 4/8/2015 15:40, nexa-request(a)server-nexa.polito.it wrote: > Ciò si manifesta - nonostante i molti tentativi svolti e l'importante > ruolo svolto dal GARR - di avere tutte le scuole dotate di una buona > connessione alla rete, affidabile e sicura, in grado di accedere ai > servizi offerti dal GARR stesso e condizione necessaria per poter > realizzare tutto ciò possa andare nella direzione di formare persone più > preparate, consapevoli, curiose e desiderose di conoscenza (siano essere > le flipped classroom o l'introduzione del coding dalle primarie o - la > mia preferita - il superamento dell'apprendimento per silos verticali). Il GARR cerca di intervenire in tutti i modi possibili, ma bisogna tenere conto che il GARR è un consorzio tra Università ed enti di ricerca, i quali condividono tra loro i costi di infrastruttura e servizi. Per il collegamento delle scuole il GARR non riceve alcun contributo dal MIUR, pertanto i costi ricadono attualmente sulle scuole stesse. Il GARR offre accessi alle scuole da un minimo di 100Mbps simmetrici, a seconda del tipo di collegamento fisico disponibile. In alcuni casi il GARR cerca di sfruttare finanziamenti da altre fonti, es. fondi europei infrastrutturali, per realizzare i collegamanenti, come sta avvenendo col progetto GARR-X Progress in 4 regioni del sud. La regione Emilia Romagna sta intervenendo tramite Lepida, anche se le scuole non sarebbero di competenza della regione. In altri casi, come si sta facendo a Pisa, il cablaggio sta venendo realizzato attraverso una collaborazione tra Università, Comune e Provincia. In sostanza, per il momento bisogna ingegnarsi, in attesa di un vero piano generale. Aggiungo poi la solita considerazione che la rete è solo un fattore abilitante, ma non è la soluzione. BTW, vi racconto un episodio indicativo della situazione. Pochi giorni dopo che avevamo realizzato il collegamento in fibra con uno dei licei di Pisa, per il brutto tempo è crollato un controsoffitto, rendendo inagibile per mesi il piano dove si trovano le aule informatiche. -- Beppe

April 9, 2015