October 2015 - nexa - server-nexa.polito.it

BBC: "MPs' communications 'not protected', tribunal rules"

by J.C. DE MARTIN

Evvai! juan carlos *MPs' communications 'not protected', tribunal rules* MPs have no protection from having their communications read by UK security agencies, a tribunal has said. Green Party politicians Caroline Lucas MP and Baroness Jenny Jones argued a long-standing doctrine protecting MPs' communications was being breached. But in a landmark decision the Investigatory Powers Tribunal said the so-called "Wilson Doctrine" was no bar to the incidental collection of data. Ms Lucas said the decision was a "body blow" for democracy. […] Continua qui: http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-34527242

Oct. 14, 2015

Re: [nexa] che ne pensiamo ?

by Stefano Quintarelli

(arturo, anche per te,.. ;-) On 14/10/2015 12:03, Giuseppe Attardi wrote: > Non sarà il costo della banda una discriminante sufficiente per scegliere un operatore rispetto a un altro, anche perché gli OTT farebbero accordi con tutti gli operatori, sarebbero scemi a legarsi con uno solo, e quindi tornerebbero ad essere tutti alla pari. non ci giurerei.. posso immaginiarmi che ci sia pippoFIlm best effort per tutti e pippoFilm+ con tecnologia "noJitter (tm)" solo con l'operatore plutonet poi c'e 'un altro effetto piu' insidioso, IMHO supponiamo che tu prenda (nomi a caso) MobileOpX con "dropbox++" solo che il tuo nome account su tropbox++ e' Beppe.MobileOpX e che lo perdi se non usi piu' MobileOpX la conseguenza e' un lockin dell'utente sull'operatore mobile con effetti negativi ssulla concorrenza. abbiamo fatto molto per inserire la concorrenza negli operatori con la garanzia di portabilità data dalla gestione procompettitiva della numerazione, con il tying di un servizio deregolamentato la portabilita' (e quindi la contendibilita' degli utenti) potrebbe venire meno. con conseguente riduzione della concorrenza. per questo nella nostra proposta l'idea e' che "servizi non internet" (ovvero servizi specifici) siano acquistabili liberamente dall'utente con un cpntratto aggiuntivo e separato dall'accesso best effort. > In altre parole gli operatori finirebbero per agire come agenti commerciali degli OTT, senza risolvere alcuno dei loro problemi. > > — Beppe ciao, s.

Oct. 14, 2015

Re: [nexa] R: Decisione Corte di giustizia europea invalida Safe Harbor

by Guido Noto La Diega

Further to its initial public statement regarding the ECJ Safe Harbor judgement, the Austrian DPA has released an update, clarifying its position that, for the time being, the Austrian DPA will accept EU Model Clauses or Binding Corporate Rules as basis for transfers of personal data to the USA. Wheras the use of both EU Model Clauses or Binding Corporate Rules requires an approval of the DPA for the specific case of data transfer, there is at least clarity now that EU Model Clauses and Binding Corporate Rules are accepted as legal basis for obtaining approval in Austria. http://www.technologyslegaledge.com/2015/10/13/austria-update-by-the-dpa-re… Sent from my iPhone > On 11/ott/2015, at 15:57, Alessandro Mantelero <alessandro.mantelero(a)polito.it> wrote: > > Marco, il mio era un discorso generale sull'art. 25 e sul permanere (a mio parere) della sua rilevanza nel sistema di data protection. Questo in risposta al rilievo di Guido. > Non era dunque riferito alla specifica eventualità di una nuova decisione sui flussi EU-US, che comunque è in fase avanzata di discussione. > > AM > > > > On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 16:29:21 +0200 > Marco Ciurcina <ciurcina(a)studiolegale.it> wrote: >> In data sabato 10 ottobre 2015 18:45:04, Alessandro Mantelero ha scritto: >>> Se la Commissione adotta una decisione ai sensi del 25(6) solo la ECJ potrà dichiararla invalida, aprendo la strada poi alla valutazione di adeguatezza delle DPAs (garanti). La via dunque, in presenza di decisione, non è così breve. >> Mi domando se sia probabile che la Commissione adotti una nuova decisione che non sia più che solidissima. >> Mi domando anche se, secondo gli orientamenti giurisprudenziali della Corte UE, si possa dimostrare che dalla illegittima decisione 2000/520/CE è derivato un danno per i cittadini europei e se ci siano gli estremi perchè questi promuovano un'azione di risarcimento nei confronti della Commissione Europea. >> m.c. > > -- > Prof. Avv. Alessandro Mantelero > Politecnico di Torino > > Nexa Center for Internet and Society | Director of Privacy > Politecnico di Torino–Tongji University| Coordinator, Double Degree program in Management and IP Law > Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology | Part-time Expert, School of Public Administration > > http://staff.polito.it/alessandro.mantelero > @mantelero > > EMAIL POLICY: twice a day (Mon-Fri)

Oct. 14, 2015

Re: [nexa] che ne pensiamo ?

by Giuseppe Attardi

Sullo zero-rating sono più disponibile che sulla Net Neutrality. Se, e ripeto se, un operatore riesce ad implementare zero-rating senza violare la Net Neutrality, non sarei contrario. Si potrebbe considerare come una pratica commerciale legittima, come gli sconti o le promozioni. Qualcosa di simile avviene con le offerte di pacchetti come Fibra+Skype. Se la disponibilità di banda continua ad aumentare a parità di prezzo, non ci dovrebbe essere molta trippa per gatti, intesi come operatori intenzionati a spillare quattrini agli OTT. Non sarà il costo della banda una discriminante sufficiente per scegliere un operatore rispetto a un altro, anche perché gli OTT farebbero accordi con tutti gli operatori, sarebbero scemi a legarsi con uno solo, e quindi tornerebbero ad essere tutti alla pari. In altre parole gli operatori finirebbero per agire come agenti commerciali degli OTT, senza risolvere alcuno dei loro problemi. — Beppe > Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 19:41:06 +0200 > From: Stefano Quintarelli <stefano(a)quintarelli.it> > To: "nexa(a)server-nexa.polito.it" <nexa(a)server-nexa.polito.it> > Subject: [nexa] che ne pensiamo ? > Message-ID: <561D4232.7060202(a)quintarelli.it> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed > > Ciao, > > re. Roaming and open internet rules adopted by the Council > http://goo.gl/6irYWd > > (e.g. net neutrality e nel punto in particolare sullo zero rating) > che ne pensiamo ? > > [a fine ottobre il parlamento vota e non percepisco nessuna agitazione > su questo punto...] > > ciao, s. > -- > meet me at http://me.quintarelli.it > blog: http://blog.quintarelli.it > web clips: http://clips.quintarelli.it > tumblr: http://stefanoquintarelli.tumblr.com >

Oct. 14, 2015

Fwd: [New post] Student’s View of Use of Computers in a High School (Audrey Mullen)

by J.C. DE MARTIN

Il punto di vista di una studentessa. juan carlos -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: [New post] Student’s View of Use of Computers in a High School (Audrey Mullen) Resent-Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 10:02:39 +0200 Resent-From: d004620(a)polito.it Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 08:02:14 +0000 From: Larry Cuban on School Reform and Classroom Practice <comment-reply(a)wordpress.com> Reply-To: Larry Cuban on School Reform and Classroom Practice <comment+l_3v54wy45ujolms5q85hh(a)comment.wordpress.com> To: demartin(a)polito.it WordPress.com larrycuban posted: "Audrey Mullen is a sophomore at Presentation High School in San Jose, CA. "She started Kite Reviews, an all-student consulting service that provides user reviews of your edtech products. She’s worked with Brainpop, All Can Code, and Readorium." Her opinio" Respond to this post by replying above this line New post on *Larry Cuban on School Reform and Classroom Practice* <https://larrycuban.wordpress.com/author/larrycuban/> Student’s View of Use of Computers in a High School (Audrey Mullen) <https://larrycuban.wordpress.com/2015/10/14/students-view-of-use-of-compute…> by larrycuban <https://larrycuban.wordpress.com/author/larrycuban/> *Audrey Mullen is a sophomore at Presentation High School in San Jose, CA. "She started Kite Reviews, an all-student consulting service that provides user reviews of your edtech products. She’s worked with Brainpop, All Can Code, and Readorium." Her opinions about teacher and student use of iPads and software offer one person’s on-the-ground view. Rare to get such perspectives. This appeared in /EdSurge/'s weekly post <https://www.edsurge.com/news/2015-09-25-a-cat-is-not-a-dog-and-other-advice…> September 25, 2015.* regular_photo.PNG-1442278822 <https://larrycuban.files.wordpress.com/2015/09/regular_photo-png-1442278822…> The Good *Teachers Do Some Walking* I sit in the back of class when I can. As result, I see everyone’s iPad screens. Every day around the tenth minute of class, the screens start switching to social media. I see photos of friends at the beach or ugly selfies. You think we’re taking notes because we don’t look up and we seem serious. But we’re Snapchatting across the room or even the world. It’s like yawning; one person starts and soon everyone is doing it. *Teachers:* Walk around during class. Stroll to the back of the room. If you could see what I see . . . *Give Us Games (aka, Make Learning Fun)* It is the final round of Jeopardy in Ms. T’s sixth period biology class. Winner takes all. It’s getting heated. With two minutes until the bell rings, it all comes down to the final question. “Cells” for 200 points or “Human Body Systems” for 250? We choose to go big. As Ms. T asks the question, our hearts race. She asks, we answer . . . we win! The bell rings, and we leave the room knowing no other class that day will be as fun or educational. And I think it’s educational specifically because it’s fun. *Teachers:* If you make our hearts race, even a little bit, you are doing something very, very right. Come up with creative and engaging games. I Googled for ideas. There are millions <https://www.google.com/search?q=classroom+learning+games&oq=classroom+learn…>. *Be Crazy, Hyper-Organized With Your Technology And We Will Love You For It* Mrs. C. was no one’s favorite teacher. She wasn’t nice, she wasn’t mean. She just didn’t have much personality. I probably would have forgotten her by now except for one thing: SHE WAS ORGANIZED LIKE NO ONE YOU’VE EVER MET. Mrs. C. was an Organization Queen. She put the entire semester on the calendar. Most teachers at my school do it by unit. Then . . . this was incredible . . . she put EVERYTHING on Canvas <https://canvas.iu.edu/lms-prd/app>. I love Canvas; we all LOVE Canvas (see below). This seemed impossible: All the homework assignments, all the grades, everything was always right there. The challenge for students is that some teachers rely on technology; others refuse to use it. We’re caught in the middle. Most teachers are in-between and it gets confusing very fast. But in this class, there were never any surprises. I was and still am grateful. *Teachers:* Keep all your information in one place. Don’t go scattering it around in different apps. Whether it is Canvas or another learning tool, please make sure you know how to use all the features to assign work. *The Bad* *A Cat Is Not a Dog; An iPad Is NOT A Computer* The iPad is a wonderful thing. But here’s what drives me crazy: Teachers expect it to replace the computer. Have you ever typed directly on an iPad? Kill me. Almost every word is a typo. Then those typos get auto-corrected. You end up with Marie Antoinette saying, “Let’s then ray bake You see my issue. And don’t get me started on keyboards that connect to the iPad. The only good ones are super expensive, and they get destroyed in your backpack. Remember, even with all the cool new tech in schools, you still have me carry 45 lbs of books over my shoulder. Last year, my Logitech keyboard lasted 3 weeks before keys started to fall off. My Dad said it was my fault and wouldn’t get me a new one. After every other keystroke, “[ “ would appear. Sentences looked like, “Marie[ Antoinette, s[aid[[, let th[[em eat[ cak[e.” It was possibly the most frustrating thing ever. Did my teachers care? Not a bit. *Teachers:* On behalf of millions of students everywhere, I beg: Don’t make us type on an iPad. *Pick Your Poison! Stop Juggling between Paper and Digital* What gets my goat? When teachers can’t decide between distributing online copies or physical copies. Make a decision. Stick with it. Be strong. Do I need a physical binder for this class, or not? Is last week’s assignment sitting on Google Drive, or is it in my backpack, where things go to die? I understand when a digital-first teacher gives me a hard-copy study guide; it’s because this specific test won’t be online. But when teachers constantly and randomly alternate between worksheets that are digital and paper, Audrey no buena. I had this teacher, Mrs. F. She would make us do all our homework online. We would download it off Google Drive, then fill it out using Notability <http://gingerlabs.com/>. This was all good. Until we had to turn it in. She had us print it out . . . every day, every assignment. See, Mrs. F. didn’t like grading online. Which is fine, but then you should make the commitment to only do paper and limit online. *Teachers:* Don’t flip between online and hard copies. It’s hard enough to manage in one class, and a disaster when half my teachers do it. *When Good Personalization Goes Bad: R.I.P. Collaboration?* I went to ISTE 2015 <https://www.isteconference.org/2015/> in Philadelphia, where I participated on a panel called “Youth Voices in Edtech.” <http://www.eschoolnews.com/2015/07/07/students-ed-tech-383/> My biggest takeaway from this huge teacher conference was the focus on individualized and personalized learning. It’s not something we students think about. It sounds great for the most part, until you realize that everyone is off doing their own thing. Whatever happened to good old-fashioned group work? There have been times where I have nearly murdered my fellow group mates while doing a project. In most projects there is always one person in the group who doesn’t do any of the work and everyone else has to overcompensate to make up for it. These are “work anchors”. But with each work anchor you learn a little more. A little about teamwork and cooperation. More than if you were working by yourself. It is crazy how we as students are losing the life skill of working together as each solo activity is assigned. *Teachers:* I’m not exactly sure why this worries me. It is pretty deep. If you spend too much time trying to individualize my learning, will I stop knowing how to work with others? My goodness, at home we don’t even watch TV together. My sister and I go to our bedrooms, and binge on our own Netflix shows. Kids are already living individualized experiences. What I think we need more of are skills to collaborate. *Put Away the Phone* I was born in the age of technology, in the heart of it, in Silicon Valley. Technology is inseparable from my life. Most of us got phones as sixth grade started. We noticed it quickly got to the point where we were no longer hanging out together; we were just checking our social medias in the same room. So we hacked a solution. Now at lunch, we stack our phones like a Jenga <http://www.jenga.com/> puzzle. Whoever grabs hers first has to buy everyone ice cream. It’s a win-win situation. *Teachers: *Save us from ourselves. Don’t go crazy with phone rules and regulations because we won’t follow them. Instead just stick with the basics--no phones during school hours. *More Please: Four Tools That Save My Life* There are some iPad apps that are simply horrible. (I’m talking to you, Google Slides). But others have been sent by God himself to help students learn. Here are four examples of the best of classroom tech. Khan Academy: <https://www.khanacademy.org/> I have friends who don’t see eye to eye with me on Khan Academy. They still believe it’s the same math-only website their teacher made them use four years ago in sixth grade. Guys, please join us in 2015. Khan Academy has science, language arts, programming, and much more. I like to think of it as my partner in school. If a teacher’s lecture is hard to understand, I pop onto Khan. Often I only need 30 seconds. I visit the website maybe 20 times a week. I think I need to credit Khan Academy for 0.5 points of my 4.2 GPA (shameless bragging). Quizlet: <https://quizlet.com/> No one puts down Quizlet. Ever. It’s a life saver. We have the ability to share “quizlets” (short practice tests and flash card sets) with any other student, which makes our lives 1,000,000 times easier. It’s fast and simple. (Note to programmers: Make it simple! I don’t want to think about your technology; I want to be using it.). For my bio final last spring, a classmate made two quizlets and shared them with everyone. One had all the test questions we saw during the semester. The other was a vocabulary review. She was our hero. Canvas: <http://www.canvaslms.com/> Have you ever seen the average high-school kid’s backpack? It is where Hope goes to die. Papers flying everywhere, sticky food wrappers crumpled at the bottom. Then there’s Canvas, which is the opposite of the dark hole of my backpack. Canvas makes life easier. Last year, three of my seven teachers used it. This year, it’s six out of seven, and I heard the school is making it mandatory second semester. Everyone hopes so. Teachers, if you are still using Google Docs to turn in assignments, please remove yourself from the last decade and join 2015. It is efficient, easy and incredibly organized. Ten out of ten kids will recommend it. Notability: <http://gingerlabs.com/> And then God said, “let there be Notability.” Notability is possibly my favorite edtech app of all time, and that is saying something. Notability is an app that’s sole purpose is to be an easy and organized place to take notes (shocking). Unlike Google Docs, with Notability you can write the notes with your own handwriting--which makes it a great tool to fill out worksheets with. Also it syncs up with Canvas and Google Drive so that it is super easy to turn in home work. *larrycuban <https://larrycuban.wordpress.com/author/larrycuban/>* | October 14, 2015 at 1:00 am | Tags: classroom practice, <https://larrycuban.wordpress.com/tag/classroom-practice/>, technology <https://larrycuban.wordpress.com/tag/technology/> | Categories: Uncategorized <https://larrycuban.wordpress.com/category/uncategorized/> | URL: http://wp.me/pBm7c-2y3 Comment <https://larrycuban.wordpress.com/2015/10/14/students-view-of-use-of-compute…> See all comments <https://larrycuban.wordpress.com/2015/10/14/students-view-of-use-of-compute…> Like <https://larrycuban.wordpress.com/2015/10/14/students-view-of-use-of-compute…> Unsubscribe <https://subscribe.wordpress.com/?key=09d7a255d99383274f22b1cd01afdbc5&email…> to no longer receive posts from Larry Cuban on School Reform and Classroom Practice. Change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions <https://subscribe.wordpress.com/?key=09d7a255d99383274f22b1cd01afdbc5&email…>. *Trouble clicking?* Copy and paste this URL into your browser: https://larrycuban.wordpress.com/2015/10/14/students-view-of-use-of-compute… Thanks for flying with WordPress.com <http://wordpress.com>

Oct. 14, 2015

Re: [nexa] che ne pensiamo ?

by Luca De Biase

Neanche io.. Ecco vecchi e meno vecchi post.. http://blog.debiase.com/2015/10/02/europa-zero-rating-e-neutralita-della-re… http://blog.debiase.com/2015/09/25/zuckerberg-buon-pastore-internet-org-si-… http://blog.debiase.com/2015/06/30/update-zero-rating-sarebbe-consentito-eu… > Il giorno 13/ott/2015, alle ore 19:41, Stefano Quintarelli <stefano(a)quintarelli.it> ha scritto: > > Ciao, > > re. Roaming and open internet rules adopted by the Council > http://goo.gl/6irYWd > > (e.g. net neutrality e nel punto in particolare sullo zero rating) > che ne pensiamo ? > > [a fine ottobre il parlamento vota e non percepisco nessuna agitazione su questo punto...] > > ciao, s. > -- > meet me at http://me.quintarelli.it > blog: http://blog.quintarelli.it > web clips: http://clips.quintarelli.it > tumblr: http://stefanoquintarelli.tumblr.com > _______________________________________________ > nexa mailing list > nexa(a)server-nexa.polito.it > https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa

Oct. 13, 2015

che ne pensiamo ?

by Stefano Quintarelli

Ciao, re. Roaming and open internet rules adopted by the Council http://goo.gl/6irYWd (e.g. net neutrality e nel punto in particolare sullo zero rating) che ne pensiamo ? [a fine ottobre il parlamento vota e non percepisco nessuna agitazione su questo punto...] ciao, s. -- meet me at http://me.quintarelli.it blog: http://blog.quintarelli.it web clips: http://clips.quintarelli.it tumblr: http://stefanoquintarelli.tumblr.com

Oct. 13, 2015

Convegno: “The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership Negotiations” - Campus Luigi Einaudi, UNITO (23 ottobre)

by Giuseppe Futia

Gentilissimi, siamo lieti di informarvi che venerdì 23 ottobre 2015 alle ore 14.45, presso il Campus Luigi Einaudi dell'Università degli Studi di Torino (Lungo Dora Siena, 100), si svolgerà il convegno: "The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership Negotiations". Al convegno parteciperà, tra gli altri, il Prof. Marco Ricolfi con un intervento dal titolo: "IPRs and Geographical Indications (GIs) in TTIP". Maggiori dettagli sono disponibili nella locandina disponibile in allegato. Cordialmente, -- ------------------------------------------------- Giuseppe Futia Communication Manager Nexa Center for Internet & Society Politecnico di Torino - DAUIN Corso Duca degli Abruzzi, 24 - 10129 Torino web: http://nexa.polito.it mail: giuseppe.futia(a)polito.it tel. +39 011 090 7219

Oct. 13, 2015

Re: [nexa] 79° Mercoledì di Nexa - 14 ottobre 2015

by Giuseppe Futia

*REMINDER*: vi ricordiamo che domani mercoledì 14 ottobre 2015, dalle ore 18 alle ore 20, si svolgerà il 79° Mercoledì di Nexa, con un incontro dal titolo: "*Diritto di accesso ad Internet in Costituzione. Dall’art. 21-bis al 34-bis passando per l’Internet Bill of Rights*". Ospite dell'incontro *Guido d’Ippolito* (Responsabile per l’Innovazione Digitale del think tank Cultura Democratica). Ingresso libero, webcast live all'indirizzo: http://nexa.polito.it/upcoming-events. Maggiori informazioni sono disponibili all'indirizzo: http://nexa.polito.it/mercoledi-79. Cordiali saluti, Giuseppe Il giorno 30 settembre 2015 10:06, Giuseppe Futia <giuseppe.futia(a)polito.it> ha scritto: > Se non visualizzi correttamente questo messaggio clicca qui > <http://nexa.polito.it/mercoledi-79> [image: NEXA] > > 79° Mercoledì di Nexa > Mercoledi 14 ottobre 2015, ore 18.00 - 20.00 > > Via Boggio 65/a, Torino (primo piano) > > <http://nexa.polito.it/mercoledi-79>http://nexa.polito.it/mercoledi-79 > Diritto di accesso ad Internet in Costituzione. Dall’art. 21-bis al 34-bis > passando per l’Internet Bill of Rights > > Speaker > Guido d’Ippolito (Responsabile per l’Innovazione Digitale del think tank > Cultura Democratica) > > Ingresso libero > > This event will be webcast live: <http://nexa.polito.it/upcoming-events> > http://nexa.polito.it/upcoming-events > > In occasione del 79° Mercoledì di Nexa, insieme a *Guido d’Ippolito*, > responsabile per l’Innovazione Digitale del think tank Cultura Democratica > <http://www.culturademocratica.org/> e autore della proposta di riforma > costituzionale sull’art. 34-bis <http://www.art34bis.it/chi-siamo/>, in > discussione al Parlamento, esamineremo i rilievi costituzionali di Internet > e il rapporto, spesso confuso e basato su falsi miti, tra il fenomeno > Internet e il diritto. > > Dopo uno sguardo al contesto internazionale si tornerà in Italia per > esaminare il diritto precondizione all’esercizio di ogni libertà on line: > il *diritto di accesso ad Internet*. Le problematiche di un > riconoscimento costituzionale di tale diritto saranno esaminate in un > dialogo col pubblico sulla base anche di concrete esperienze quali la > proposta di Stefano Rodotà di un art. 21-bis, la recente Dichiarazione > dei diritti di Internet > <http://nexa.polito.it/2015/07/dichiarazione-diritti-internet> e > l’attuale disegno di legge Costituzionale sull’art. 34-bis, accesso ad > Internet come diritto sociale, in discussione al Senato della Repubblica (Diritto > di accesso ad Internet in Italia su Wikipedia > <https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diritto_di_accesso_a_Internet>). > > BIOGRAFIE - e informazioni supplementari > > [image: [D'Ippolito]] > > GUIDO D'IPPOLITO è Responsabile per l’Innovazione Digitale del think tank > di giovani Cultura Democratica e si occupa di innovazione legislativa. In > questa veste ha realizzato la proposta di riforma costituzionale sull’art. > 34-bis, accesso ad Internet come diritto sociale all’esame del Parlamento > (ddl. Cost. 1561/14 al Sento della Repubblica e 2816/15 alla Camera dei > Deputati). Digital Champions della città di Roma, si è laureato in > Giurisprudenza con una tesi in diritto costituzionale sugli impatti > costituzionali di Internet. > > Letture consigliate e link utili: > > - Guido Scorza e Alessandro Gilioli, *Meglio se taci > <http://www.baldinicastoldi.it/libri/se-taci/>*, Baldini & Castoldi, > 2015 > - Maurizio Mensi e Pietro Falletta, *Il diritto del web. Casi e > materiali > <http://www.ibs.it/code/9788813351601/mensi-maurizio/diritto-del-web.html>*, > CEDAM, 2015 > - Giovanna De Minicio, *Diritti regole e internet* > <http://www.costituzionalismo.it/articoli/393/>. in > Costituzionalismo.it oppure Internet regole e anarchia. Jovene Editore 2012 > > > > > Che cosa sono il Centro Nexa e i cicli di incontri “Mercoledì di Nexa” e > “Nexa Lunch Seminar” > > Il Centro Nexa su Internet & Società del Politecnico di Torino > (Dipartimento di Automatica e Informatica) è un centro di ricerca > indipendente e interdisciplinare che studia Internet e il suo effetto sulla > società. Maggiori informazioni all'indirizzo: http://nexa.polito.it/about. > > Durante i “*Mercoledì di Nexa*”, che si tengono *ogni 2° mercoledì del > mese* alle *ore 18 in punto*, il Centro Nexa su Internet e Società apre > le sue porte non solo agli esperti e a tutti coloro i quali lavorano con > Internet, ma anche a semplici appassionati e cittadini. Il ciclo di > incontri intende approfondire, con un linguaggio preciso ma divulgativo, i > temi legati alla Rete: motori di ricerca, Creative Commons, social > networks, open source/software libero, neutralità della rete, libertà di > espressione, privacy, file sharing, big e open data, smart cities e molto > altro. > > Al centro di quasi tutti gli incontri un ospite pronto a dialogare con i > direttori del Centro Nexa, il Prof. Juan Carlos De Martin del Politecnico > di Torino e il Prof. Marco Ricolfi dell'Università di Torino, nonché lo > staff e i Fellows del Centro Nexa. > > Maggiori informazioni sui Mercoledì di Nexa, incluso un elenco di tutti i > “Mercoledì” passati, sono disponibili all'indirizzo: > http://nexa.polito.it/mercoledi. > > Si segnala inoltre che dal maggio 2012 *ogni 4° mercoledì* del mese *dalle > ore 13 alle ore 14* il Centro Nexa organizza anche i "*Nexa Lunch Seminar*". > Una lista di tutti i “Lunch Seminar” passati è disponibile all'indirizzo: > http://nexa.polito.it/lunch-seminars. > > See our events calendar <http://nexa.polito.it/events> if you're curious > about future luncheons, discussions, lectures, and conferences not listed > in this email. Our events are free and open to the public, unless otherwise > noted. > > Maggiori informazioni sui Mercoledì di Nexa e i Nexa Lunch Seminar, sono > disponibili all'indirizzo: <http://nexa.polito.it/events> > http://nexa.polito.it/events. Weekly Events Newsletter. Sign up > <http://nexa.polito.it/mailing-lists> to receive this newsletter if this > email was forwarded to you. To manage your subscription preferences, please click > here <https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa>. > > Connect & get involved: Jobs, internships, and more > <http://nexa.polito.it/get-involved> > > _______________________________________________ > nexa mailing list > nexa(a)server-nexa.polito.it > https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa > >

Oct. 13, 2015

Hofmann: "The Netzpolitik.org affair: a turning point"

by J.C. DE MARTIN

Di inizio agosto, mi era sfuggito. juan carlos The Netzpolitik.org affair: a turning point 01 Aug 2015 by Jeanette Hofmann <http://policyreview.info/users/jeanette-hofmann> on Chilling effect <http://policyreview.info/tags/chilling-effect> After more than 50 years, the issue of treason has returned with a bang onto Germany's public agenda. At first glance, this may seem a domestic story. Yet, it touches upon an increasingly contested relationship between freedom of expression, democracy and national security that affects not only this country but all digital societies. On 30 July 2015, the German Federal Public Prosecutor notified two prominent journalists about an investigation on suspicion of treason against them. The journalists run Netzpolitik.org, one of the oldest and most appreciated German language blogs with a focus on internet politics. It covers and uncovers relevant European policy issues and legislative actions. Last year, in 2014, the editors received a prestigious media award (Grimme Online Award), and this year, they won a prize in the "Land of Ideas” competition, ironically co-sponsored by the German government. Popular topics on the blog are net neutrality, telecommunication regulation, data protection and, obviously, surveillance. Many journalists use it as a source for their work. Internet researchers like me, too. Creating public awareness by leaking secret documents of relevance to the digital society is part of Netzpolitik.org's mission. The website's editors regard Netzpolitik.org as a hybrid of a news channel and an NGO advocating digital freedom and openness. […] Continua qui: http://policyreview.info/articles/news/netzpolitikorg-affair-turning-point/…

Oct. 13, 2015