June 2012 - nexa - server-nexa.polito.it

Final LAPSI-EVPSI meeting (Turin, 9th and 10th July)

by Cristiana Sappa

Cari tutti, Con la presente Vi ricordo l'appuntamento torinese del 9 e 10 luglio: incontro finale dei progetti LAPSI ed EVPSI. I dettagli sull'incontro si trovano sul sito ufficiale dei progetti LAPSI ed EVPSI. In particolare: A. Trovate il programma dell'incontro qui: http://www.lapsi-project.eu/meeting9jule L'incontro si svolgerà in inglese ed in italiano, con servizio di traduzione simultanea dall'una all'altra lingua. B. La partecipazione è gratuita. Tuttavia è necessario registrarsi qui: http://lapsi-final.eventbrite.com/ C. L'incontro è accreditato dall'Ordine degli Avvocati di Torino (per gli interessati v. domanda specifica nel modulo di registrazione). D. Il 9 luglio sera organizzeremo anche delle cene tematiche a carico di ciascuno dei commensali. Se avete piacere di partecipare potete registrarvi qui: http://www.lapsi-project.eu/wiki/index.php/July_9th_2012 oppure contattare turinfinal(a)lapsi-project.eu prima del 5 luglio. Non esitate a far circolare questo messaggio presso chiunque possa essere interessato. Nell'attesa di incontrarVi al convegno il 9 e 10 luglio, rimango a disposizione per ogni informazione supplementare. Cordiali saluti, Cristiana Sappa Project Manager, LAPSI, www.lapsi-project.eu, and EVPSI, www.evpsi.org Postdoctoral Researcher, Torino Law School Research Fellow, Nexa Center for Internet and Society, http://nexa.polito.it

June 3, 2012

La Germania resiste alla normativa europea su data storage

by Leslie CameronCurry

Forse è già girata e mi è sfuggita. EU to take hard line on German resistance to data storage Germany faces legal action for not implementing EU rules http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/05/29/eu-dataprivacy-idUSL5E8GTE4C20120… http://www.linux-magazine.com/Online/News/Germany-Going-to-Court-over-Telec… Buona giornata. Leslie Cameron-Curry leslie.cameroncurry(a)gmail.com ========================

June 3, 2012

A key piece of Peter Suber on Open Access with libre reuse terms

by Philippe Aigrain

http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/newsletter/06-02-12.htm

June 2, 2012

Seminario con Henry Jenkins - 5 giugno, Circolo dei lettori

by J.C. DE MARTIN

Segnalo questa splendida occasione di incontrare, grazie all'iniziativa del prof. Peppino Ortoleva, il grande studioso Henry Jenkins. Martedi' a Torino al Circolo dei Lettori (locandina in allegato). juan carlos -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Intorno ai media - Seminario con Henry Jenkins - 5 giugno, Circolo dei lettori Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 15:59:08 +0200 (CEST) From: Storia dei Media <storiadeimedia.ds(a)unito.it> To: undisclosed-recipients:; I docenti e i ricercatori in Storia e Teoria dei Media dell'Università di Torino vi invitano al prossimo seminario della serie ?Intorno ai media ? Scambi e discussioni?. "Shall We Play?" - Martedì 5 giugno 2012 ore 16.30 presso il Cicolo dei Lettori - Via Bogino 9, Torino Interverranno Henry Jenkins, University of Southern California Juan Carlos de Martin, Politecnico di Torino Aldo Grasso, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milano e Peppino Ortoleva, Università di Torino Henry Jenkins, docente della University of Southern California, autore di saggi sul digitale, fra cui "Cultura convergente" (Apogeo), propone un modello alternativo di insegnamento che inserisca il binomio gioco e apprendimento nel sistema dei media. Seminario del ciclo Intorno ai media promosso dalla Cattedra di Storia e teoria dei media - Università di Torino e di Smart City Festival. In allegato l'invito all'evento -- Il Suo/Vostro indirizzo è stato inserito nella mailing list dei Seminari organizzati dalla cattedra di Storia dei Media dell'Università di Torino perché il Suo/Vostro lavoro ci interessa e vorremmo che questi seminari fossero occasione per una ampia condivisione di esperienze e prospettive. Per la cancellazione dalla mailing list è sufficiente scrivere a storiadeimedia.ds(a)unito.it indicando in oggetto CANCELLA.

June 1, 2012

Re: [nexa] Fwd: [ NNSquad ] Saving the Internet, Ourselves, and the Future

by J.C. DE MARTIN

[1] http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/martin-luther-kings-speech-dream-full-text/s… On 01/06/12 18:41, J.C. DE MARTIN wrote: > Caro Andrea, > > I respectfully disagree: un testo, infatti, non può essere tutto > contemporaneamente. "I have a dream" (uso questo esempio perchè > universalmente noto [1]) non può essere un discorso di ispirazione, > intessuto di valori e di speranza, e allo stesso tempo un articolato di > proposta di legge sull'integrazione razziale, o > un libro bianco sul problema dei neri in Nord-America. > E neanche un cauto bilanciamento di pro e di contro di tutti > gli aspetti di un problema. E' un discorso politico-etico > volto a motivare e a dare un'identità più forte > a milioni di persone. Niente di più e niente di meno. > > Che come genere letterario possa dar fastidio a chi, come te, > si confronta con le mille difficoltà del policy making reale, > di tutti i giorni, lo capisco e lo rispetto. > > Ma la politica è fatta anche (e ripeto: _anche_) di discorsi e di testi > di quel tipo, che secondo me è politicamente importante che ci siano, > altro che "urla al vento". > > Se poi la poltica si riducesse *solo* a quel genere di comunicazione, > è ovvio che non si andrebbe lontano. > Ma non credo che nessuno lo sostenga. > > Ciao, > > juan carlos > > > > > On 01/06/12 14:38, Andrea Glorioso wrote: >> Caro Juan Carlos, >> >> sono d'accordo con te: l'elemento "motivazionale" e` importante. Per >> questo ho detto che dal punto di vista retorico - termine che ho usato >> in senso letterale, senza alcun velato intento polemico - il testo di >> Lauren Weinstein e` ben fatto. >> >> Il problema e` che praticamente le stesse cose le diceva John Perry >> Barlow in un altro testo di cui riconosco sia la bellezza retorica >> (d'altronde, come aspettarsi di meno dal paroliere dei Grateful >> Dead?), sia la semi totale assenza di pragmatica, ovvero la >> "Declaration of Independence of Cyberspace" del 1996. Cioe` 12 anni >> fa. Con la differenza che 12 anni fa l'impatto di Internet era ben >> piu` limitato di oggi e dunque tale assenza era da un lato scusabile e >> dall'altro, tutto sommato, ininfluente. >> >> Ma che dopo 12 anni la "classe intellettuale" di Internet - categoria >> nella quale includo sia Barlow che Weinstein, senza per questo >> desumerne che le loro posizioni siano le uniche meritevoli di essere >> considerate "intellettuali", anzi - si esprima ancora con testi che >> sono al 99% retorica e all'1% (e mi sento generoso :) pragmatica, mi >> desta preoccupazione. Perche` significa che non siamo collettivamente >> ancora riusciti, come societa`, ad uscire del tutto da un paradigma >> iper-semplificatorio di cosa rappresenti Internet e di come affrontare >> le innumerevoli contraddizioni che esso genera; incluso l'aspetto >> "etico" che, mi permetto di osservare, e` ben piu` complesso >> dell'immagine che Barlow, Weinstein e altri "evangelisti di Internet" >> amano promuovere. >> >> Per carita`, i paletti, le chiamate alle armi, le visioni >> escatologiche e salvifiche servono a mobilitare le persone, spesso per >> fini nobili - ce lo insegna la storia. Cosi` come ci (o almeno mi) >> insegna che senza un ancoraggio reale nella pragmatica tali visioni >> possono trasformarsi nel migliore dei casi in urla al vento. >> >> Ciao, >> >> Andrea >> >> On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 1:14 PM, J.C. DE MARTIN<demartin(a)polito.it> wrote: >>> Caro Andrea, >>> >>> non so se tu sia cinico o meno, lo lascio dire a te (ma conoscendoti >>> mi sembra difficile :-)), ma mi sembra che le tue parole tradiscano >>> un quanto meno temporaneo mancato apprezzamento di un aspetto >>> importante della società civile (e, quindi, per esteso, della politica, >>> almeno in democrazie come le nostre). >>> >>> Mi riferisco in particolare al fatto che molti esseri umani, molti ordinari >>> cittadini si iniziano a interessare di determinati temi di pubblico >>> interesse >>> non perchè fulminati sulla strada di Damasco da, chessò?, >>> un rapporto tecnico BEREC o un foglio di calcolo Eurostat. >>> >>> Molto più probabilmente iniziano, meritoriamente, a incuriosirsi di temi >>> di policy perchè qualcuno ha parlato loro di determinate questioni >>> facendo appello a valori, a una visione del mondo, a doveri >>> verso la collettività o verso le generazioni future, e così via. >>> >>> Base etica che col tempo lascerà, almeno per qualcuno, sempre più >>> spazio a una comprensione oggettiva e analitica dei problemi, ma che >>> non potrà mai scomparire del tutto perchè solo con una motivazione >>> etica di base le persone della società civile possono giustificare >>> - innanzittutto con se stesse - il tempo, le energie e a volte il denaro >>> spesi per questioni che non solo non solo personali, ma che assai >>> spesso finiscono in sconfitte (o successi solo parziali). >>> >>> Testi come quelli di Lauren, quindi, a mio avviso servono allo stesso >>> modo in cui sono sempre serviti discorsi "motivazionali", o di visione >>> generale. Il chè non vuol dire che poi magari la stessa persona non >>> sia capace di pragmatici negoziati in una commissione parlamentare >>> o di produrre un documento oggettivo e ricco di sfumature. >>> >>> Ma hanno importanza, a seconda del momento e dell'audience, >>> sia gli "I have a dream", sia le analisi pragmatiche. >>> >>> My 2 cents. >>> >>> Ciao, >>> >>> juan carlos >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On 1/6/12 10:53 AM, Andrea Glorioso wrote: >>>> Perdonatemi il cinismo. >>>> >>>> Bellissima (oddio, io la trovo eccessiva, ma "de gustibus"..) >>>> retorica, zero pragmatica. In questo modo non si va molto lontano. >>>> >>>> Ciao, >>>> >>>> Andrea >>>> >>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 8:57 AM, J.C. DE MARTIN<demartin(a)polito.it> wrote: >>>>> Memorabile post di Lauren Weinstein, >>>>> che penso echeggi i pensieri di molti. >>>>> >>>>> JC >>>>> >>>>> Begin forwarded message: >>>>> >>>>> From: Lauren Weinstein<lauren(a)vortex.com> >>>>> Date: 01 giugno 2012 02:55:42 CEST >>>>> To:nnsquad@nnsquad.org >>>>> Subject: [ NNSquad ] Saving the Internet, Ourselves, and the Future >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Saving the Internet, Ourselves, and the Future >>>>> >>>>> http://lauren.vortex.com/archive/000963.html >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Since its birth as the U.S. Department of Defense ARPANET research >>>>> project, the Internet has faced various threats -- some technical, >>>>> some in the policy realm, and some purely political. >>>>> >>>>> Recently we've seen the SOPA and PIPA legislation. Make no mistake >>>>> about it -- the Hollywood content giants have not given up on their >>>>> desires to reshape the Internet in their own traditional images. >>>>> >>>>> We now face CISPA and its cyber-scaremongering, with cyberwar >>>>> profiteering threatening to undermine decades of privacy protection >>>>> legislation. >>>>> >>>>> Everything in the vast repertoire of mankind is finding its way onto >>>>> the Net in various guises, from wonders sublime and beautiful, to >>>>> horrors of the most crass and demeaning. >>>>> >>>>> There are marvels of generosity, cooperation and good will to be found >>>>> all over the Net. >>>>> >>>>> But there is also blatant exploitation by those who see the Internet >>>>> and its technologies merely as a "gold rush" to be exploited, the best >>>>> interests of the community at large be damned -- organizations >>>>> explicitly entrusted with the well-being of the Net sometimes joining >>>>> the dark side in the enablement of obscene profits. >>>>> >>>>> Our overall unwillingness -- especially as technologists -- to "play >>>>> the game" the way the "big boys" play has allowed entities with less >>>>> than admirable motives to gain sway over many aspects of the Net. >>>>> >>>>> In the U.S., net neutrality and service quality have languished as a >>>>> few dominant ISPs have reached their pinnacles through exploitation of >>>>> original monopoly grants, cherry picking deployments of broadband, and >>>>> outright lying to communities -- not to mention outright political >>>>> chicanery to help kill off effective competition. >>>>> >>>>> We have allowed relatively minor issues such as arguments about Web >>>>> cookies to become political pawns, diverting us while governments plan >>>>> and deploy vast schemes to control and censor the Internet, turning >>>>> the Net from a tool that could greatly enhance individual rights, into >>>>> a mechanism to muzzle and control. >>>>> >>>>> Fear that efforts to find new, innovative ways to solve the Net's >>>>> problems might not succeed, have resulted in a continuing panicked >>>>> embrace of organizations and policies of demonstrated failures, >>>>> creating ever broadening wedges between the wide variety of Internet >>>>> stakeholders around the planet. >>>>> >>>>> And now, as the United Nations (UN) and International Telecommunications >>>>> Union (ITU) contemplate a horrific takeover of many aspects of the >>>>> Internet, we reap what we have sowed through our long complacency >>>>> and unwillingness to use all tools at our disposal to fight >>>>> for Internet freedoms. >>>>> (http://j.mp/KhOR8m [Vint Cerf Congressional Testimony {PDF}] Lauren's >>>>> Blog >>>>> ) >>>>> >>>>> We may yet still have time to turn the tide for many of these issues. >>>>> But every day the odds loom larger against us, and the image of Don >>>>> Quixote stabbing uselessly at windmills is increasingly difficult to >>>>> banish from one's mind. >>>>> >>>>> When I started working on the ARPANET decades ago, most of the other >>>>> students at UCLA were confined to using keypunches and IBM punch >>>>> cards. >>>>> >>>>> I've watched as computational power that used to fill rooms has been >>>>> vastly outstripped by a tiny box hanging on my belt, and even smaller >>>>> devices still. >>>>> >>>>> Communications capabilities hardly even dreamed of decades ago are now >>>>> commonplace. Even the masters of classical science fiction mostly had >>>>> a blind spot to coming technological magic like smartphones and other >>>>> personal communications devices. >>>>> >>>>> To see so much of what we have jointly created being put at risk >>>>> today, for the sake of government suppression and the almighty dollar, >>>>> is frankly nothing short of being quintessentially depressing. >>>>> >>>>> I'm not one of those persons who had an organized "plan" for my life. >>>>> I never intended to become deeply involved in technology policy issues >>>>> as I am now, and I morphed into that role gradually from a more >>>>> traditional code hacking environment. >>>>> >>>>> In retrospect, I might well have been happier if I had stayed more >>>>> completely in the software engineering realm. Conceptual >>>>> "satisfaction" seems much easier to derive from deployed system >>>>> metrics than from seemingly intractable public policy dilemmas. >>>>> >>>>> And yet, one does what one can, and I've endeavored to be scrupulously >>>>> honest in the process. Over the years my various attempts at >>>>> commentary and analysis have at one time or another upset just about >>>>> all points on the spectrum. Perhaps this means I've struck an >>>>> appropriate balance in the long run. Perhaps it means I struck out >>>>> entirely. All I've ever tried to do in these regards is call the >>>>> issues as I see them, suggest where I thought matters were awry and >>>>> how they might be improved, and let folks make their own judgments. >>>>> >>>>> But as the saying goes, all that plus a dollar will buy you a cup of >>>>> cheap coffee these days. >>>>> >>>>> The future will look back on what we're doing now -- right now -- >>>>> towards protecting Internet freedoms. They may peer back with >>>>> gratitude for what we achieved, or they may curse us in our graves for >>>>> opportunities lost. >>>>> >>>>> That aspect of the future is still ultimately under our control, today. >>>>> >>>>> I grew up along with the Internet, and I like to think helping it in >>>>> my own small ways -- watching it evolve into the technology >>>>> infrastructure and communications foundation of the world. >>>>> >>>>> We are now at a moment, a crossroad in history and time, where the >>>>> decisions we make about the Internet, and its importance to our lives >>>>> and freedoms, will have lasting effects for many years, decades, or >>>>> perhaps far longer. >>>>> >>>>> Will the Internet be sucked completely into the pit of oppression, >>>>> censorship, and greed, or will we have the moral fortitude to say, >>>>> "No! Not to our Internet. Not to what we worked so long and hard to >>>>> achieve in the name of freedom, humanity, and community." >>>>> >>>>> Quixotic or not, the quest for the best possible Internet for everyone >>>>> is an effort in which I've been honored to be engaged. To lose this >>>>> battle, this war, is potentially to lose so much else that will matter >>>>> to your children, and to their children, and potentially to many more >>>>> generations yet to come. >>>>> >>>>> It's about so much more than bits and bytes, disks and fiber, CPUs and >>>>> JavaScript. The Internet is humanity. We are the Internet. >>>>> >>>>> If we lose the Internet, we lose ourselves. >>>>> >>>>> Take care, all. And thanks. >>>>> >>>>> --Lauren-- >>>>> Lauren Weinstein (lauren@vortex.com):http://www.vortex.com/lauren >>>>> Co-Founder: People For Internet Responsibility:http://www.pfir.org >>>>> Founder: >>>>> - Data Wisdom Explorers League:http://www.dwel.org >>>>> - Network Neutrality Squad:http://www.nnsquad.org >>>>> - Global Coalition for Transparent Internet Performance: >>>>> http://www.gctip.org >>>>> - PRIVACY Forum:http://www.vortex.com >>>>> Member: ACM Committee on Computers and Public Policy >>>>> Lauren's Blog:http://lauren.vortex.com >>>>> Google+:http://vortex.com/g+lauren / Twitter:http://vortex.com/t-lauren >>>>> Tel: +1 (818) 225-2800 / Skype: vortex.com >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> nnsquad mailing list >>>>> http://lists.nnsquad.org/mailman/listinfo/nnsquad >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> nexa mailing list >>>>> nexa(a)server-nexa.polito.it >>>>> https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa >>>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> nexa mailing list >>> nexa(a)server-nexa.polito.it >>> https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa >> > > > _______________________________________________ > nexa mailing list > nexa(a)server-nexa.polito.it > https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa

June 1, 2012

Re: [nexa] Fwd: [ NNSquad ] Saving the Internet, Ourselves, and the Future

by J.C. DE MARTIN

Caro Andrea, I respectfully disagree: un testo, infatti, non può essere tutto contemporaneamente. "I have a dream" (uso questo esempio perchè universalmente noto [1]) non può essere un discorso di ispirazione, intessuto di valori e di speranza, e allo stesso tempo un articolato di proposta di legge sull'integrazione razziale, o un libro bianco sul problema dei neri in Nord-America. E neanche un cauto bilanciamento di pro e di contro di tutti gli aspetti di un problema. E' un discorso politico-etico volto a motivare e a dare un'identità più forte a milioni di persone. Niente di più e niente di meno. Che come genere letterario possa dar fastidio a chi, come te, si confronta con le mille difficoltà del policy making reale, di tutti i giorni, lo capisco e lo rispetto. Ma la politica è fatta anche (e ripeto: _anche_) di discorsi e di testi di quel tipo, che secondo me è politicamente importante che ci siano, altro che "urla al vento". Se poi la poltica si riducesse *solo* a quel genere di comunicazione, è ovvio che non si andrebbe lontano. Ma non credo che nessuno lo sostenga. Ciao, juan carlos On 01/06/12 14:38, Andrea Glorioso wrote: > Caro Juan Carlos, > > sono d'accordo con te: l'elemento "motivazionale" e` importante. Per > questo ho detto che dal punto di vista retorico - termine che ho usato > in senso letterale, senza alcun velato intento polemico - il testo di > Lauren Weinstein e` ben fatto. > > Il problema e` che praticamente le stesse cose le diceva John Perry > Barlow in un altro testo di cui riconosco sia la bellezza retorica > (d'altronde, come aspettarsi di meno dal paroliere dei Grateful > Dead?), sia la semi totale assenza di pragmatica, ovvero la > "Declaration of Independence of Cyberspace" del 1996. Cioe` 12 anni > fa. Con la differenza che 12 anni fa l'impatto di Internet era ben > piu` limitato di oggi e dunque tale assenza era da un lato scusabile e > dall'altro, tutto sommato, ininfluente. > > Ma che dopo 12 anni la "classe intellettuale" di Internet - categoria > nella quale includo sia Barlow che Weinstein, senza per questo > desumerne che le loro posizioni siano le uniche meritevoli di essere > considerate "intellettuali", anzi - si esprima ancora con testi che > sono al 99% retorica e all'1% (e mi sento generoso :) pragmatica, mi > desta preoccupazione. Perche` significa che non siamo collettivamente > ancora riusciti, come societa`, ad uscire del tutto da un paradigma > iper-semplificatorio di cosa rappresenti Internet e di come affrontare > le innumerevoli contraddizioni che esso genera; incluso l'aspetto > "etico" che, mi permetto di osservare, e` ben piu` complesso > dell'immagine che Barlow, Weinstein e altri "evangelisti di Internet" > amano promuovere. > > Per carita`, i paletti, le chiamate alle armi, le visioni > escatologiche e salvifiche servono a mobilitare le persone, spesso per > fini nobili - ce lo insegna la storia. Cosi` come ci (o almeno mi) > insegna che senza un ancoraggio reale nella pragmatica tali visioni > possono trasformarsi nel migliore dei casi in urla al vento. > > Ciao, > > Andrea > > On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 1:14 PM, J.C. DE MARTIN<demartin(a)polito.it> wrote: >> Caro Andrea, >> >> non so se tu sia cinico o meno, lo lascio dire a te (ma conoscendoti >> mi sembra difficile :-)), ma mi sembra che le tue parole tradiscano >> un quanto meno temporaneo mancato apprezzamento di un aspetto >> importante della società civile (e, quindi, per esteso, della politica, >> almeno in democrazie come le nostre). >> >> Mi riferisco in particolare al fatto che molti esseri umani, molti ordinari >> cittadini si iniziano a interessare di determinati temi di pubblico >> interesse >> non perchè fulminati sulla strada di Damasco da, chessò?, >> un rapporto tecnico BEREC o un foglio di calcolo Eurostat. >> >> Molto più probabilmente iniziano, meritoriamente, a incuriosirsi di temi >> di policy perchè qualcuno ha parlato loro di determinate questioni >> facendo appello a valori, a una visione del mondo, a doveri >> verso la collettività o verso le generazioni future, e così via. >> >> Base etica che col tempo lascerà, almeno per qualcuno, sempre più >> spazio a una comprensione oggettiva e analitica dei problemi, ma che >> non potrà mai scomparire del tutto perchè solo con una motivazione >> etica di base le persone della società civile possono giustificare >> - innanzittutto con se stesse - il tempo, le energie e a volte il denaro >> spesi per questioni che non solo non solo personali, ma che assai >> spesso finiscono in sconfitte (o successi solo parziali). >> >> Testi come quelli di Lauren, quindi, a mio avviso servono allo stesso >> modo in cui sono sempre serviti discorsi "motivazionali", o di visione >> generale. Il chè non vuol dire che poi magari la stessa persona non >> sia capace di pragmatici negoziati in una commissione parlamentare >> o di produrre un documento oggettivo e ricco di sfumature. >> >> Ma hanno importanza, a seconda del momento e dell'audience, >> sia gli "I have a dream", sia le analisi pragmatiche. >> >> My 2 cents. >> >> Ciao, >> >> juan carlos >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On 1/6/12 10:53 AM, Andrea Glorioso wrote: >>> Perdonatemi il cinismo. >>> >>> Bellissima (oddio, io la trovo eccessiva, ma "de gustibus"..) >>> retorica, zero pragmatica. In questo modo non si va molto lontano. >>> >>> Ciao, >>> >>> Andrea >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 8:57 AM, J.C. DE MARTIN<demartin(a)polito.it> wrote: >>>> Memorabile post di Lauren Weinstein, >>>> che penso echeggi i pensieri di molti. >>>> >>>> JC >>>> >>>> Begin forwarded message: >>>> >>>> From: Lauren Weinstein<lauren(a)vortex.com> >>>> Date: 01 giugno 2012 02:55:42 CEST >>>> To: nnsquad(a)nnsquad.org >>>> Subject: [ NNSquad ] Saving the Internet, Ourselves, and the Future >>>> >>>> >>>> Saving the Internet, Ourselves, and the Future >>>> >>>> http://lauren.vortex.com/archive/000963.html >>>> >>>> >>>> Since its birth as the U.S. Department of Defense ARPANET research >>>> project, the Internet has faced various threats -- some technical, >>>> some in the policy realm, and some purely political. >>>> >>>> Recently we've seen the SOPA and PIPA legislation. Make no mistake >>>> about it -- the Hollywood content giants have not given up on their >>>> desires to reshape the Internet in their own traditional images. >>>> >>>> We now face CISPA and its cyber-scaremongering, with cyberwar >>>> profiteering threatening to undermine decades of privacy protection >>>> legislation. >>>> >>>> Everything in the vast repertoire of mankind is finding its way onto >>>> the Net in various guises, from wonders sublime and beautiful, to >>>> horrors of the most crass and demeaning. >>>> >>>> There are marvels of generosity, cooperation and good will to be found >>>> all over the Net. >>>> >>>> But there is also blatant exploitation by those who see the Internet >>>> and its technologies merely as a "gold rush" to be exploited, the best >>>> interests of the community at large be damned -- organizations >>>> explicitly entrusted with the well-being of the Net sometimes joining >>>> the dark side in the enablement of obscene profits. >>>> >>>> Our overall unwillingness -- especially as technologists -- to "play >>>> the game" the way the "big boys" play has allowed entities with less >>>> than admirable motives to gain sway over many aspects of the Net. >>>> >>>> In the U.S., net neutrality and service quality have languished as a >>>> few dominant ISPs have reached their pinnacles through exploitation of >>>> original monopoly grants, cherry picking deployments of broadband, and >>>> outright lying to communities -- not to mention outright political >>>> chicanery to help kill off effective competition. >>>> >>>> We have allowed relatively minor issues such as arguments about Web >>>> cookies to become political pawns, diverting us while governments plan >>>> and deploy vast schemes to control and censor the Internet, turning >>>> the Net from a tool that could greatly enhance individual rights, into >>>> a mechanism to muzzle and control. >>>> >>>> Fear that efforts to find new, innovative ways to solve the Net's >>>> problems might not succeed, have resulted in a continuing panicked >>>> embrace of organizations and policies of demonstrated failures, >>>> creating ever broadening wedges between the wide variety of Internet >>>> stakeholders around the planet. >>>> >>>> And now, as the United Nations (UN) and International Telecommunications >>>> Union (ITU) contemplate a horrific takeover of many aspects of the >>>> Internet, we reap what we have sowed through our long complacency >>>> and unwillingness to use all tools at our disposal to fight >>>> for Internet freedoms. >>>> ( http://j.mp/KhOR8m [Vint Cerf Congressional Testimony {PDF}] Lauren's >>>> Blog >>>> ) >>>> >>>> We may yet still have time to turn the tide for many of these issues. >>>> But every day the odds loom larger against us, and the image of Don >>>> Quixote stabbing uselessly at windmills is increasingly difficult to >>>> banish from one's mind. >>>> >>>> When I started working on the ARPANET decades ago, most of the other >>>> students at UCLA were confined to using keypunches and IBM punch >>>> cards. >>>> >>>> I've watched as computational power that used to fill rooms has been >>>> vastly outstripped by a tiny box hanging on my belt, and even smaller >>>> devices still. >>>> >>>> Communications capabilities hardly even dreamed of decades ago are now >>>> commonplace. Even the masters of classical science fiction mostly had >>>> a blind spot to coming technological magic like smartphones and other >>>> personal communications devices. >>>> >>>> To see so much of what we have jointly created being put at risk >>>> today, for the sake of government suppression and the almighty dollar, >>>> is frankly nothing short of being quintessentially depressing. >>>> >>>> I'm not one of those persons who had an organized "plan" for my life. >>>> I never intended to become deeply involved in technology policy issues >>>> as I am now, and I morphed into that role gradually from a more >>>> traditional code hacking environment. >>>> >>>> In retrospect, I might well have been happier if I had stayed more >>>> completely in the software engineering realm. Conceptual >>>> "satisfaction" seems much easier to derive from deployed system >>>> metrics than from seemingly intractable public policy dilemmas. >>>> >>>> And yet, one does what one can, and I've endeavored to be scrupulously >>>> honest in the process. Over the years my various attempts at >>>> commentary and analysis have at one time or another upset just about >>>> all points on the spectrum. Perhaps this means I've struck an >>>> appropriate balance in the long run. Perhaps it means I struck out >>>> entirely. All I've ever tried to do in these regards is call the >>>> issues as I see them, suggest where I thought matters were awry and >>>> how they might be improved, and let folks make their own judgments. >>>> >>>> But as the saying goes, all that plus a dollar will buy you a cup of >>>> cheap coffee these days. >>>> >>>> The future will look back on what we're doing now -- right now -- >>>> towards protecting Internet freedoms. They may peer back with >>>> gratitude for what we achieved, or they may curse us in our graves for >>>> opportunities lost. >>>> >>>> That aspect of the future is still ultimately under our control, today. >>>> >>>> I grew up along with the Internet, and I like to think helping it in >>>> my own small ways -- watching it evolve into the technology >>>> infrastructure and communications foundation of the world. >>>> >>>> We are now at a moment, a crossroad in history and time, where the >>>> decisions we make about the Internet, and its importance to our lives >>>> and freedoms, will have lasting effects for many years, decades, or >>>> perhaps far longer. >>>> >>>> Will the Internet be sucked completely into the pit of oppression, >>>> censorship, and greed, or will we have the moral fortitude to say, >>>> "No! Not to our Internet. Not to what we worked so long and hard to >>>> achieve in the name of freedom, humanity, and community." >>>> >>>> Quixotic or not, the quest for the best possible Internet for everyone >>>> is an effort in which I've been honored to be engaged. To lose this >>>> battle, this war, is potentially to lose so much else that will matter >>>> to your children, and to their children, and potentially to many more >>>> generations yet to come. >>>> >>>> It's about so much more than bits and bytes, disks and fiber, CPUs and >>>> JavaScript. The Internet is humanity. We are the Internet. >>>> >>>> If we lose the Internet, we lose ourselves. >>>> >>>> Take care, all. And thanks. >>>> >>>> --Lauren-- >>>> Lauren Weinstein (lauren(a)vortex.com) http://www.vortex.com/lauren >>>> Co-Founder: People For Internet Responsibility: http://www.pfir.org >>>> Founder: >>>> - Data Wisdom Explorers League: http://www.dwel.org >>>> - Network Neutrality Squad: http://www.nnsquad.org >>>> - Global Coalition for Transparent Internet Performance: >>>> http://www.gctip.org >>>> - PRIVACY Forum: http://www.vortex.com >>>> Member: ACM Committee on Computers and Public Policy >>>> Lauren's Blog: http://lauren.vortex.com >>>> Google+: http://vortex.com/g+lauren / Twitter: http://vortex.com/t-lauren >>>> Tel: +1 (818) 225-2800 / Skype: vortex.com >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> nnsquad mailing list >>>> http://lists.nnsquad.org/mailman/listinfo/nnsquad >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> nexa mailing list >>>> nexa(a)server-nexa.polito.it >>>> https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa >>>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> nexa mailing list >> nexa(a)server-nexa.polito.it >> https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa > >

June 1, 2012

Neubot 0.4.12 released

by Simone Basso

Neubot 0.4.12 released http://neubot.org/neubot-0.4.12 Version 0.4.12 is the latest generally-available stable release of Neubot, distributed for Ubuntu >= 10.04, MacOSX >= 10.6, Windows >= XP SP3, FreeBSD and ArchLinux, as well as in source format. Here's what changed in less than 140 characters: IPv6 support, robustness wrt master server failure, ArchLinux package, preparatory work for more tests, cleanups, and bugfixes. Install, upgrade instructions at <http://www.neubot.org/download>. Read on for more details. This release contains 181 commits by 6 authors. The diffstat says: 129 changed files with 3,193 additions and 2,191 deletions. Here is the list of what changed and why: - IPv6 support. A lot of work has been performed to get Neubot ready for World IPv6 day <http://www.worldipv6launch.org/>. I'm still a bit skeptic that "this time is for real". Anyway working to prepare Neubot for that has been really challenging. Thanks to the M-Lab folks for prodding and discussion, and thank you also to ipv6.polito.it folks, that provided me with an IPv6 machine. - Support for ArchLinux. Written and contributed by Davide Allavena, with tweaks from Roberto D'Auria. Packages should be made available via AUR <http://aur.archlinux.org/> soon. - Robustness with respect to master server failure. Waiting for more radical changes that will make Neubot fully distributed, I've tweaked the code to rely on two master servers: the traditional one ("master.neubot.org") and a new backup ("master2.neubot.org"). Hence, if the master is down for some reason, the backup could be used. - Preparatory work for more tests. In the interest of making tests fully comparable, I've tweaked BitTorrent and speedtest test engines to allow for more, different tests. The BitTorrent engine now implements one version of the test (version "2") that looks like an HTTP download, and another version (version "3") that sends one request at a time, hence being more similar, in behavior, to a typical BitTorrent client (which typically does not pipeline requests to the same peer, as the current test does). Similarly, I've started working on the speedtest engine. Tweaking it to run a test similar to BitTorrent version "2". The piece that is missing is to implement into speedtest engine something similar to BitTorrent version "3" above. This is something I am working on, and hopefully it will be ready in one or two releases. Since this is experimental work, it is disabled by default: test engines behave exactly as they behaved before this change was implemented. Nonetheless, I decided to commit this piece of work, so that I can run experiments more easily. When this piece of work will be ready, Neubot will routinely run different versions of each test. And will offer comparison between versions that are specifically designed to be compared, e.g. version 2 of speedtest with version 2 of BitTorrent. - Enhancements. - Unify /api/bittorrent and /api/speedtest into /api/results. Written and contributed by Marco Scopesi. This is part of an ongoing effort to specify more clearly the API and refactor the web user interface. In particular, the refactoring will allow to autogenerate on-the-fly the result page for each test. In turn, this will be particularly relevant when more than one version of each test will be available, as mentioned above. - Improve the wording of update.html. Written by Felipe Busnello. The page text now clarifies that autoupdates for Windows are available but disabled by default. (They are disabled by default because signature verification of updates it not implemented yet. See the release announce of 0.4.11 for more information on this topic.) - Many log.py cleanups. Quest pursued by Marco Scopesi, who is performing a great work at simplifying and rationalizing the logger subsystem. Pieces of this work have been committed in this release, while other pieces are still under testing and will be likely included in next release. - Fix for IE8 plot bug. Joint work with Alessio Palmero Aprosio. With a bit of patience we found a development version of jqplot that works both with Internet Explorer 8 and decent web browsers (including Internet Explorer 9, who seems to be much better than its ancestor). - Merged more documentation into FAQs. Work done in part by me and in part by Davide Allavena. The ongoing effort in this area is to merge all existing documentation into the FAQs. Having everything in one single place allows for easier maintenance. - More bug fixes, enhancements and cleanups. Thanks to Roberto D'Auria, who is helping me to keep complexity in the sources tree under control. Full change log available here: https://raw.github.com/neubot/neubot/0.4.12/ChangeLog Diff since previous version here: https://github.com/neubot/neubot/compare/0.4.11...0.4.12 Commit history here: https://github.com/neubot/neubot/commits/0.4.12 SHA256sums here: https://github.com/neubot/neubot/wiki/sha256 Errata here: https://github.com/neubot/neubot/wiki/errata Data here: http://www.neubot.org/data Short-term roadmap here: https://github.com/neubot/neubot/wiki/todo Long-term roadmap here: https://github.com/neubot/neubot/wiki/roadmap -- Simone <http://www.neubot.org/people#basso>

June 1, 2012

Re: [nexa] Fwd: [ NNSquad ] Saving the Internet, Ourselves, and the Future

by Andrea Glorioso

Caro Juan Carlos, sono d'accordo con te: l'elemento "motivazionale" e` importante. Per questo ho detto che dal punto di vista retorico - termine che ho usato in senso letterale, senza alcun velato intento polemico - il testo di Lauren Weinstein e` ben fatto. Il problema e` che praticamente le stesse cose le diceva John Perry Barlow in un altro testo di cui riconosco sia la bellezza retorica (d'altronde, come aspettarsi di meno dal paroliere dei Grateful Dead?), sia la semi totale assenza di pragmatica, ovvero la "Declaration of Independence of Cyberspace" del 1996. Cioe` 12 anni fa. Con la differenza che 12 anni fa l'impatto di Internet era ben piu` limitato di oggi e dunque tale assenza era da un lato scusabile e dall'altro, tutto sommato, ininfluente. Ma che dopo 12 anni la "classe intellettuale" di Internet - categoria nella quale includo sia Barlow che Weinstein, senza per questo desumerne che le loro posizioni siano le uniche meritevoli di essere considerate "intellettuali", anzi - si esprima ancora con testi che sono al 99% retorica e all'1% (e mi sento generoso :) pragmatica, mi desta preoccupazione. Perche` significa che non siamo collettivamente ancora riusciti, come societa`, ad uscire del tutto da un paradigma iper-semplificatorio di cosa rappresenti Internet e di come affrontare le innumerevoli contraddizioni che esso genera; incluso l'aspetto "etico" che, mi permetto di osservare, e` ben piu` complesso dell'immagine che Barlow, Weinstein e altri "evangelisti di Internet" amano promuovere. Per carita`, i paletti, le chiamate alle armi, le visioni escatologiche e salvifiche servono a mobilitare le persone, spesso per fini nobili - ce lo insegna la storia. Cosi` come ci (o almeno mi) insegna che senza un ancoraggio reale nella pragmatica tali visioni possono trasformarsi nel migliore dei casi in urla al vento. Ciao, Andrea On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 1:14 PM, J.C. DE MARTIN <demartin(a)polito.it> wrote: > Caro Andrea, > > non so se tu sia cinico o meno, lo lascio dire a te (ma conoscendoti > mi sembra difficile :-)), ma mi sembra che le tue parole tradiscano > un quanto meno temporaneo mancato apprezzamento di un aspetto > importante della società civile (e, quindi, per esteso, della politica, > almeno in democrazie come le nostre). > > Mi riferisco in particolare al fatto che molti esseri umani, molti ordinari > cittadini si iniziano a interessare di determinati temi di pubblico > interesse > non perchè fulminati sulla strada di Damasco da, chessò?, > un rapporto tecnico BEREC o un foglio di calcolo Eurostat. > > Molto più probabilmente iniziano, meritoriamente, a incuriosirsi di temi > di policy perchè qualcuno ha parlato loro di determinate questioni > facendo appello a valori, a una visione del mondo, a doveri > verso la collettività o verso le generazioni future, e così via. > > Base etica che col tempo lascerà, almeno per qualcuno, sempre più > spazio a una comprensione oggettiva e analitica dei problemi, ma che > non potrà mai scomparire del tutto perchè solo con una motivazione > etica di base le persone della società civile possono giustificare > - innanzittutto con se stesse - il tempo, le energie e a volte il denaro > spesi per questioni che non solo non solo personali, ma che assai > spesso finiscono in sconfitte (o successi solo parziali). > > Testi come quelli di Lauren, quindi, a mio avviso servono allo stesso > modo in cui sono sempre serviti discorsi "motivazionali", o di visione > generale. Il chè non vuol dire che poi magari la stessa persona non > sia capace di pragmatici negoziati in una commissione parlamentare > o di produrre un documento oggettivo e ricco di sfumature. > > Ma hanno importanza, a seconda del momento e dell'audience, > sia gli "I have a dream", sia le analisi pragmatiche. > > My 2 cents. > > Ciao, > > juan carlos > > > > > > > > > > > On 1/6/12 10:53 AM, Andrea Glorioso wrote: >> >> Perdonatemi il cinismo. >> >> Bellissima (oddio, io la trovo eccessiva, ma "de gustibus"..) >> retorica, zero pragmatica. In questo modo non si va molto lontano. >> >> Ciao, >> >> Andrea >> >> On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 8:57 AM, J.C. DE MARTIN<demartin(a)polito.it> wrote: >>> >>> Memorabile post di Lauren Weinstein, >>> che penso echeggi i pensieri di molti. >>> >>> JC >>> >>> Begin forwarded message: >>> >>> From: Lauren Weinstein<lauren(a)vortex.com> >>> Date: 01 giugno 2012 02:55:42 CEST >>> To: nnsquad(a)nnsquad.org >>> Subject: [ NNSquad ] Saving the Internet, Ourselves, and the Future >>> >>> >>> Saving the Internet, Ourselves, and the Future >>> >>> http://lauren.vortex.com/archive/000963.html >>> >>> >>> Since its birth as the U.S. Department of Defense ARPANET research >>> project, the Internet has faced various threats -- some technical, >>> some in the policy realm, and some purely political. >>> >>> Recently we've seen the SOPA and PIPA legislation. Make no mistake >>> about it -- the Hollywood content giants have not given up on their >>> desires to reshape the Internet in their own traditional images. >>> >>> We now face CISPA and its cyber-scaremongering, with cyberwar >>> profiteering threatening to undermine decades of privacy protection >>> legislation. >>> >>> Everything in the vast repertoire of mankind is finding its way onto >>> the Net in various guises, from wonders sublime and beautiful, to >>> horrors of the most crass and demeaning. >>> >>> There are marvels of generosity, cooperation and good will to be found >>> all over the Net. >>> >>> But there is also blatant exploitation by those who see the Internet >>> and its technologies merely as a "gold rush" to be exploited, the best >>> interests of the community at large be damned -- organizations >>> explicitly entrusted with the well-being of the Net sometimes joining >>> the dark side in the enablement of obscene profits. >>> >>> Our overall unwillingness -- especially as technologists -- to "play >>> the game" the way the "big boys" play has allowed entities with less >>> than admirable motives to gain sway over many aspects of the Net. >>> >>> In the U.S., net neutrality and service quality have languished as a >>> few dominant ISPs have reached their pinnacles through exploitation of >>> original monopoly grants, cherry picking deployments of broadband, and >>> outright lying to communities -- not to mention outright political >>> chicanery to help kill off effective competition. >>> >>> We have allowed relatively minor issues such as arguments about Web >>> cookies to become political pawns, diverting us while governments plan >>> and deploy vast schemes to control and censor the Internet, turning >>> the Net from a tool that could greatly enhance individual rights, into >>> a mechanism to muzzle and control. >>> >>> Fear that efforts to find new, innovative ways to solve the Net's >>> problems might not succeed, have resulted in a continuing panicked >>> embrace of organizations and policies of demonstrated failures, >>> creating ever broadening wedges between the wide variety of Internet >>> stakeholders around the planet. >>> >>> And now, as the United Nations (UN) and International Telecommunications >>> Union (ITU) contemplate a horrific takeover of many aspects of the >>> Internet, we reap what we have sowed through our long complacency >>> and unwillingness to use all tools at our disposal to fight >>> for Internet freedoms. >>> ( http://j.mp/KhOR8m [Vint Cerf Congressional Testimony {PDF}] Lauren's >>> Blog >>> ) >>> >>> We may yet still have time to turn the tide for many of these issues. >>> But every day the odds loom larger against us, and the image of Don >>> Quixote stabbing uselessly at windmills is increasingly difficult to >>> banish from one's mind. >>> >>> When I started working on the ARPANET decades ago, most of the other >>> students at UCLA were confined to using keypunches and IBM punch >>> cards. >>> >>> I've watched as computational power that used to fill rooms has been >>> vastly outstripped by a tiny box hanging on my belt, and even smaller >>> devices still. >>> >>> Communications capabilities hardly even dreamed of decades ago are now >>> commonplace. Even the masters of classical science fiction mostly had >>> a blind spot to coming technological magic like smartphones and other >>> personal communications devices. >>> >>> To see so much of what we have jointly created being put at risk >>> today, for the sake of government suppression and the almighty dollar, >>> is frankly nothing short of being quintessentially depressing. >>> >>> I'm not one of those persons who had an organized "plan" for my life. >>> I never intended to become deeply involved in technology policy issues >>> as I am now, and I morphed into that role gradually from a more >>> traditional code hacking environment. >>> >>> In retrospect, I might well have been happier if I had stayed more >>> completely in the software engineering realm. Conceptual >>> "satisfaction" seems much easier to derive from deployed system >>> metrics than from seemingly intractable public policy dilemmas. >>> >>> And yet, one does what one can, and I've endeavored to be scrupulously >>> honest in the process. Over the years my various attempts at >>> commentary and analysis have at one time or another upset just about >>> all points on the spectrum. Perhaps this means I've struck an >>> appropriate balance in the long run. Perhaps it means I struck out >>> entirely. All I've ever tried to do in these regards is call the >>> issues as I see them, suggest where I thought matters were awry and >>> how they might be improved, and let folks make their own judgments. >>> >>> But as the saying goes, all that plus a dollar will buy you a cup of >>> cheap coffee these days. >>> >>> The future will look back on what we're doing now -- right now -- >>> towards protecting Internet freedoms. They may peer back with >>> gratitude for what we achieved, or they may curse us in our graves for >>> opportunities lost. >>> >>> That aspect of the future is still ultimately under our control, today. >>> >>> I grew up along with the Internet, and I like to think helping it in >>> my own small ways -- watching it evolve into the technology >>> infrastructure and communications foundation of the world. >>> >>> We are now at a moment, a crossroad in history and time, where the >>> decisions we make about the Internet, and its importance to our lives >>> and freedoms, will have lasting effects for many years, decades, or >>> perhaps far longer. >>> >>> Will the Internet be sucked completely into the pit of oppression, >>> censorship, and greed, or will we have the moral fortitude to say, >>> "No! Not to our Internet. Not to what we worked so long and hard to >>> achieve in the name of freedom, humanity, and community." >>> >>> Quixotic or not, the quest for the best possible Internet for everyone >>> is an effort in which I've been honored to be engaged. To lose this >>> battle, this war, is potentially to lose so much else that will matter >>> to your children, and to their children, and potentially to many more >>> generations yet to come. >>> >>> It's about so much more than bits and bytes, disks and fiber, CPUs and >>> JavaScript. The Internet is humanity. We are the Internet. >>> >>> If we lose the Internet, we lose ourselves. >>> >>> Take care, all. And thanks. >>> >>> --Lauren-- >>> Lauren Weinstein (lauren(a)vortex.com) http://www.vortex.com/lauren >>> Co-Founder: People For Internet Responsibility: http://www.pfir.org >>> Founder: >>> - Data Wisdom Explorers League: http://www.dwel.org >>> - Network Neutrality Squad: http://www.nnsquad.org >>> - Global Coalition for Transparent Internet Performance: >>> http://www.gctip.org >>> - PRIVACY Forum: http://www.vortex.com >>> Member: ACM Committee on Computers and Public Policy >>> Lauren's Blog: http://lauren.vortex.com >>> Google+: http://vortex.com/g+lauren / Twitter: http://vortex.com/t-lauren >>> Tel: +1 (818) 225-2800 / Skype: vortex.com >>> _______________________________________________ >>> nnsquad mailing list >>> http://lists.nnsquad.org/mailman/listinfo/nnsquad >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> nexa mailing list >>> nexa(a)server-nexa.polito.it >>> https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa >>> >> >> > _______________________________________________ > nexa mailing list > nexa(a)server-nexa.polito.it > https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa -- -- I speak only for myself. Sometimes I do not even agree with myself. Keep it in mind. Twitter: @andreaglorioso Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/andrea.glorioso LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=1749288&trk=tab_pro

June 1, 2012

Re: [nexa] Fwd: [ NNSquad ] Saving the Internet, Ourselves, and the Future

by J.C. DE MARTIN

Caro Andrea, non so se tu sia cinico o meno, lo lascio dire a te (ma conoscendoti mi sembra difficile :-)), ma mi sembra che le tue parole tradiscano un quanto meno temporaneo mancato apprezzamento di un aspetto importante della società civile (e, quindi, per esteso, della politica, almeno in democrazie come le nostre). Mi riferisco in particolare al fatto che molti esseri umani, molti ordinari cittadini si iniziano a interessare di determinati temi di pubblico interesse non perchè fulminati sulla strada di Damasco da, chessò?, un rapporto tecnico BEREC o un foglio di calcolo Eurostat. Molto più probabilmente iniziano, meritoriamente, a incuriosirsi di temi di policy perchè qualcuno ha parlato loro di determinate questioni facendo appello a valori, a una visione del mondo, a doveri verso la collettività o verso le generazioni future, e così via. Base etica che col tempo lascerà, almeno per qualcuno, sempre più spazio a una comprensione oggettiva e analitica dei problemi, ma che non potrà mai scomparire del tutto perchè solo con una motivazione etica di base le persone della società civile possono giustificare - innanzittutto con se stesse - il tempo, le energie e a volte il denaro spesi per questioni che non solo non solo personali, ma che assai spesso finiscono in sconfitte (o successi solo parziali). Testi come quelli di Lauren, quindi, a mio avviso servono allo stesso modo in cui sono sempre serviti discorsi "motivazionali", o di visione generale. Il chè non vuol dire che poi magari la stessa persona non sia capace di pragmatici negoziati in una commissione parlamentare o di produrre un documento oggettivo e ricco di sfumature. Ma hanno importanza, a seconda del momento e dell'audience, sia gli "I have a dream", sia le analisi pragmatiche. My 2 cents. Ciao, juan carlos On 1/6/12 10:53 AM, Andrea Glorioso wrote: > Perdonatemi il cinismo. > > Bellissima (oddio, io la trovo eccessiva, ma "de gustibus"..) > retorica, zero pragmatica. In questo modo non si va molto lontano. > > Ciao, > > Andrea > > On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 8:57 AM, J.C. DE MARTIN<demartin(a)polito.it> wrote: >> Memorabile post di Lauren Weinstein, >> che penso echeggi i pensieri di molti. >> >> JC >> >> Begin forwarded message: >> >> From: Lauren Weinstein<lauren(a)vortex.com> >> Date: 01 giugno 2012 02:55:42 CEST >> To: nnsquad(a)nnsquad.org >> Subject: [ NNSquad ] Saving the Internet, Ourselves, and the Future >> >> >> Saving the Internet, Ourselves, and the Future >> >> http://lauren.vortex.com/archive/000963.html >> >> >> Since its birth as the U.S. Department of Defense ARPANET research >> project, the Internet has faced various threats -- some technical, >> some in the policy realm, and some purely political. >> >> Recently we've seen the SOPA and PIPA legislation. Make no mistake >> about it -- the Hollywood content giants have not given up on their >> desires to reshape the Internet in their own traditional images. >> >> We now face CISPA and its cyber-scaremongering, with cyberwar >> profiteering threatening to undermine decades of privacy protection >> legislation. >> >> Everything in the vast repertoire of mankind is finding its way onto >> the Net in various guises, from wonders sublime and beautiful, to >> horrors of the most crass and demeaning. >> >> There are marvels of generosity, cooperation and good will to be found >> all over the Net. >> >> But there is also blatant exploitation by those who see the Internet >> and its technologies merely as a "gold rush" to be exploited, the best >> interests of the community at large be damned -- organizations >> explicitly entrusted with the well-being of the Net sometimes joining >> the dark side in the enablement of obscene profits. >> >> Our overall unwillingness -- especially as technologists -- to "play >> the game" the way the "big boys" play has allowed entities with less >> than admirable motives to gain sway over many aspects of the Net. >> >> In the U.S., net neutrality and service quality have languished as a >> few dominant ISPs have reached their pinnacles through exploitation of >> original monopoly grants, cherry picking deployments of broadband, and >> outright lying to communities -- not to mention outright political >> chicanery to help kill off effective competition. >> >> We have allowed relatively minor issues such as arguments about Web >> cookies to become political pawns, diverting us while governments plan >> and deploy vast schemes to control and censor the Internet, turning >> the Net from a tool that could greatly enhance individual rights, into >> a mechanism to muzzle and control. >> >> Fear that efforts to find new, innovative ways to solve the Net's >> problems might not succeed, have resulted in a continuing panicked >> embrace of organizations and policies of demonstrated failures, >> creating ever broadening wedges between the wide variety of Internet >> stakeholders around the planet. >> >> And now, as the United Nations (UN) and International Telecommunications >> Union (ITU) contemplate a horrific takeover of many aspects of the >> Internet, we reap what we have sowed through our long complacency >> and unwillingness to use all tools at our disposal to fight >> for Internet freedoms. >> ( http://j.mp/KhOR8m [Vint Cerf Congressional Testimony {PDF}] Lauren's Blog >> ) >> >> We may yet still have time to turn the tide for many of these issues. >> But every day the odds loom larger against us, and the image of Don >> Quixote stabbing uselessly at windmills is increasingly difficult to >> banish from one's mind. >> >> When I started working on the ARPANET decades ago, most of the other >> students at UCLA were confined to using keypunches and IBM punch >> cards. >> >> I've watched as computational power that used to fill rooms has been >> vastly outstripped by a tiny box hanging on my belt, and even smaller >> devices still. >> >> Communications capabilities hardly even dreamed of decades ago are now >> commonplace. Even the masters of classical science fiction mostly had >> a blind spot to coming technological magic like smartphones and other >> personal communications devices. >> >> To see so much of what we have jointly created being put at risk >> today, for the sake of government suppression and the almighty dollar, >> is frankly nothing short of being quintessentially depressing. >> >> I'm not one of those persons who had an organized "plan" for my life. >> I never intended to become deeply involved in technology policy issues >> as I am now, and I morphed into that role gradually from a more >> traditional code hacking environment. >> >> In retrospect, I might well have been happier if I had stayed more >> completely in the software engineering realm. Conceptual >> "satisfaction" seems much easier to derive from deployed system >> metrics than from seemingly intractable public policy dilemmas. >> >> And yet, one does what one can, and I've endeavored to be scrupulously >> honest in the process. Over the years my various attempts at >> commentary and analysis have at one time or another upset just about >> all points on the spectrum. Perhaps this means I've struck an >> appropriate balance in the long run. Perhaps it means I struck out >> entirely. All I've ever tried to do in these regards is call the >> issues as I see them, suggest where I thought matters were awry and >> how they might be improved, and let folks make their own judgments. >> >> But as the saying goes, all that plus a dollar will buy you a cup of >> cheap coffee these days. >> >> The future will look back on what we're doing now -- right now -- >> towards protecting Internet freedoms. They may peer back with >> gratitude for what we achieved, or they may curse us in our graves for >> opportunities lost. >> >> That aspect of the future is still ultimately under our control, today. >> >> I grew up along with the Internet, and I like to think helping it in >> my own small ways -- watching it evolve into the technology >> infrastructure and communications foundation of the world. >> >> We are now at a moment, a crossroad in history and time, where the >> decisions we make about the Internet, and its importance to our lives >> and freedoms, will have lasting effects for many years, decades, or >> perhaps far longer. >> >> Will the Internet be sucked completely into the pit of oppression, >> censorship, and greed, or will we have the moral fortitude to say, >> "No! Not to our Internet. Not to what we worked so long and hard to >> achieve in the name of freedom, humanity, and community." >> >> Quixotic or not, the quest for the best possible Internet for everyone >> is an effort in which I've been honored to be engaged. To lose this >> battle, this war, is potentially to lose so much else that will matter >> to your children, and to their children, and potentially to many more >> generations yet to come. >> >> It's about so much more than bits and bytes, disks and fiber, CPUs and >> JavaScript. The Internet is humanity. We are the Internet. >> >> If we lose the Internet, we lose ourselves. >> >> Take care, all. And thanks. >> >> --Lauren-- >> Lauren Weinstein (lauren(a)vortex.com) http://www.vortex.com/lauren >> Co-Founder: People For Internet Responsibility: http://www.pfir.org >> Founder: >> - Data Wisdom Explorers League: http://www.dwel.org >> - Network Neutrality Squad: http://www.nnsquad.org >> - Global Coalition for Transparent Internet Performance: >> http://www.gctip.org >> - PRIVACY Forum: http://www.vortex.com >> Member: ACM Committee on Computers and Public Policy >> Lauren's Blog: http://lauren.vortex.com >> Google+: http://vortex.com/g+lauren / Twitter: http://vortex.com/t-lauren >> Tel: +1 (818) 225-2800 / Skype: vortex.com >> _______________________________________________ >> nnsquad mailing list >> http://lists.nnsquad.org/mailman/listinfo/nnsquad >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> nexa mailing list >> nexa(a)server-nexa.polito.it >> https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa >> > >

June 1, 2012

Celebrazione del Pubblico Dominio 2012, Conferenza spettacolo - 5 giugno 2012

by Giuseppe Futia

Celebrazione del Pubblico Dominio 2012 *Conferenza spettacolo* *Martedì 5 giugno 2012, ore 17.30* *Salone d'Onore, Castello del Valentino -- Viale Mattioli, 39, Torino* Il Sistema Bibliotecario del Politecnico di Torino <http://www.biblio.polito.it/>, il Centro Nexa su Internet & Società del Politecnico di Torino (DAUIN) <http://nexa.polito.it/> , MuseoTorino <http://www.museotorino.it/>, Biblioteche Civiche Torinesi <http://www.comune.torino.it/cultura/biblioteche/index/index.shtml> e Fondazione Teatro Nuovo Torino <http://www.teatronuovo.torino.it/> presentano una conferenza-spettacolo, evento conclusivo delle iniziative promosse per la celebrazione del Pubblico Dominio 2012. Si tratta dell'ultima tappa di una collaborazione che ha visto i giovani attori del Liceo teatrale e del Corso Professionale Attori della Fondazione Teatro Nuovo presentare agli studenti del Politecnico*la rivisitazione dei testi di James Joyce, Gaetano Mosca, Virginia Woolf, Luigi Natoli e Amalia Guglielminetti, alcuni dei grandi scrittori entrati quest'anno nel pubblico dominio, ai settant'anni dalla loro scomparsa*. Gli spettacoli sono stati proposti con la modalità del flash mob in biblioteca: una sorpresa che ha destato curiosità e interesse tra i ragazzi impegnati tra appunti e tesine. *Nell'evento del 5 giugno verranno riproposti 4 dei 7 corti teatrali realizzati*: due corti tratti da opere della Woolf e di Natoli, l'interpretazione della favola di Joice "Il gatto e il diavolo" e "Che cosa è la mafia" di Gaetano Mosca, scritto del 1900 ma ancora molto attuale, anche alla luce dei recenti fatti di cronaca e del ventennale delle stragi di mafia. *Verranno inoltre proiettati i trailer dei video girati durante i flash mob*. Per condividere i risultati e lo spirito dell'iniziativa, è stato creato un sito internet visitabile alla pagina http://www.biblio.polito.it/eventi/flashmob/, in cui è possibile consultare le biografie e le bibliografie di scrittori e artisti in pubblico dominio nel 2012, accedere a link in cui trovare materiale gratuito scaricabile online, visitare il catalogo del Sistema bibliotecario del Politecnico per sapere dove trovare i volumi degli autori. Sono stati inoltre caricati video e fotografie delle performance rappresentate e materiale di altre iniziative in tema. *Programma*: 17.30 Benvenuto delle autorità 17.45 Presentazione dell'incontro: Prof. Sergio Pace 18.00 Corti teatrali a cura della Fondazione Teatro Nuovo Torino tratti da scritti di: Virginia Woolf, James Joice, Gaetano Mosca e Luigi Natoli 19.00 Conclusioni

June 1, 2012