- nexa - server-nexa.polito.it

Re: [nexa] Japan : Copyright Doesn’t Apply To AI Training

by David Orban

L'articolo sta circolando apparentemente come unico riferimento[1]. In realtà la riforma del copyright in Giappone risale al 2018[2] e da allora permette il text and data mining (TDM) per ogni utilizzo da ogni fonte, anche protetta da copyright. E' stata redatta per permettere lo sviluppo di nuove tecnologie come IoT, ma fa anche riferimento esplicito all'AI. A suo tempo la riforma è stata commentata anche in Europa [3]. La riforma permette quindi l'utilizzo di fonti protette da copyright per l'addestramento di modelli di AI. Tuttavia, come anche in altre giurisdizioni, lascia irrisolta la domanda della protezione da copyright dell'output generato da AI.[4] Questa veloce ricerca è stata fatta con l'aiuto del mio amico Jun Miyazaki[5], esperto di innovazione tecnologica di Tokyo, con l'utilizzo di Bing Chat, e da me con ChatGPT attraverso il plugin AskYourPDF. [1] https://davidorban.com/it/2009/06/andare-a-fondo-di-una-notizia-generalment… [2] https://www.cric.or.jp/english/clj/doc/20210624_law.pdf, https://www.mext.go.jp/b_menu/houan/an/detail/mext_00044.html [3] https://eare.eu/japan-amends-tdm-exception-copyright/ [4] https://www.bunka.go.jp/seisaku/bunkashingikai/chosakuken/bunkakai/51/pdf/r… [5] https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jun-Miyazaki David Orban "What is the question that I should be asking?" davidorban.com On Fri, Jun 2, 2023 at 10:17 AM Fabio Alemagna <falemagn(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Il giorno gio 1 giu 2023 alle ore 05:32 Marco Fioretti > <mfioretti(a)nexaima.net> ha scritto: > > > > The policy allows AI to use any data “regardless of whether it is for > non-profit or commercial purposes, whether it is an act other than > reproduction, or whether it is content obtained from illegal sites or > otherwise.” > > > > > https://technomancers.ai/japan-goes-all-in-copyright-doesnt-apply-to-ai-tra… > > Prevedibile (e previsto) che sarebbe accaduto che almeno una nazione > avrebbe deciso di giocare la carta della competizione, ma in realtà > l'argomento secondo il quale l'utilizzo di materiale coperto da > copyright per il training di una AI non violi questo copyright è > sostenuto anche dall'altro lato del Pacifico, niente po' po' di meno che > dalla > Creative Commons foundation: > https://creativecommons.org/2023/02/17/fair-use-training-generative-ai/ > > E, per quanto possa valere, io sono dello stesso parere. > > Fabio > _______________________________________________ > nexa mailing list > nexa(a)server-nexa.polito.it > https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa >

June 2, 2023

Re: [nexa] AI-controlled US military drone ‘kills’ its operator in simulated test | US military | The Guardian

by Alberto Cammozzo

<https://www.aerosociety.com/news/highlights-from-the-raes-future-combat-air…> [UPDATE 2/6/23 - in communication with AEROSPACE - Col Hamilton admits he "mis-spoke" in his presentation at the Royal Aeronautical Society FCAS Summit and the 'rogue AI drone simulation' was a hypothetical "thought experiment" from outside the military, based on plausible scenarios and likely outcomes rather than an actual USAF real-world simulation saying: "We've never run that experiment, nor would we need to in order to realise that this is a plausible outcome". He clarifies that the USAF has not tested any weaponised AI in this way (real or simulated) and says "Despite this being a hypothetical example, this illustrates the real-world challenges posed by AI-powered capability and is why the Air Force is committed to the ethical development of AI".] On 2 June 2023 11:37:40 CEST, Fabio Alemagna <falemagn(a)gmail.com> wrote: >Il ven 2 giu 2023, 09:54 Alberto Cammozzo via nexa < >nexa(a)server-nexa.polito.it> ha scritto: > >> < >> https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/jun/01/us-military-drone-ai-killed… >> > >> >> In a virtual test staged by the US military, an air force drone controlled >> by AI decided to “kill” its operator to prevent it from interfering with >> its efforts to achieve its mission, an official said last month. >> > >Pare che la notizia non stia in piedi: >https://www.ilpost.it/2023/06/02/intelligenza-artificiale-drone-uccide-oper…

June 2, 2023

Re: [nexa] AI-controlled US military drone ‘kills’ its operator in simulated test | US military | The Guardian

by Fabio Alemagna

Il ven 2 giu 2023, 09:54 Alberto Cammozzo via nexa < nexa(a)server-nexa.polito.it> ha scritto: > < > https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/jun/01/us-military-drone-ai-killed… > > > > In a virtual test staged by the US military, an air force drone controlled > by AI decided to “kill” its operator to prevent it from interfering with > its efforts to achieve its mission, an official said last month. > Pare che la notizia non stia in piedi: https://www.ilpost.it/2023/06/02/intelligenza-artificiale-drone-uccide-oper…

June 2, 2023

Re: [nexa] Japan : Copyright Doesn’t Apply To AI Training

by Fabio Alemagna

Il giorno gio 1 giu 2023 alle ore 05:32 Marco Fioretti <mfioretti(a)nexaima.net> ha scritto: > > The policy allows AI to use any data “regardless of whether it is for non-profit or commercial purposes, whether it is an act other than reproduction, or whether it is content obtained from illegal sites or otherwise.” > > https://technomancers.ai/japan-goes-all-in-copyright-doesnt-apply-to-ai-tra… Prevedibile (e previsto) che sarebbe accaduto che almeno una nazione avrebbe deciso di giocare la carta della competizione, ma in realtà l'argomento secondo il quale l'utilizzo di materiale coperto da copyright per il training di una AI non violi questo copyright è sostenuto anche dall'altro lato del Pacifico, niente po' po' di meno che dalla Creative Commons foundation: https://creativecommons.org/2023/02/17/fair-use-training-generative-ai/ E, per quanto possa valere, io sono dello stesso parere. Fabio

June 2, 2023

Re: [nexa] AI-controlled US military drone ‘kills’ its operator in simulated test | US military | The Guardian

by Stefano Quintarelli

Atto Camera Mozione 1-01620 presentato da QUINTARELLI Giuseppe Stefano testo presentato Mercoledì 3 maggio 2017 modificato Mercoledì 6 dicembre 2017, seduta n. 898 La Camera, premesso che: l’articolo 11 della Costituzione ripudia la guerra come strumento di offesa alla libertà degli altri popoli e come mezzo di risoluzione delle controversie internazionali; lo sviluppo tecnologico, in particolare nei settori dell’elettronica e dell’intelligenza artificiale, con capacità di acquisizione di grandi quantità di dati, la loro elaborazione ed analisi in tempo reale, con miglioramento delle performance mediante sistemi di autoapprendimento, consente di realizzare sistemi con facoltà di assumere decisioni autonome; uno dei settori di applicazione di tali tecnologie riguarda il settore degli armamenti, consentendo di realizzare «sistemi di offesa letali autonomi» ovvero robot militari che, senza alcun intervento umano, possono selezionare, ingaggiare, attaccare e colpire obiettivi civili e militari, diversi da sistemi d’arma (associazione fra un’arma e un dispositivo o il personale che ne aumenti le prestazioni); l’esistenza di sistemi di offesa letali autonomi abilita, pertanto, la possibilità di eliminare l’operatore umano dal teatro operativo, ponendo i presupposti di una trasformazione nella struttura delle operazioni militari qualitativamente diversa da precedenti innovazioni tecnologiche in tale ambito, impegna il Governo: 1) a continuare a partecipare attivamente al dibattito internazionale in corso, di concerto con i principali partner dell’Italia, avvalendosi di uno o più accademici italiani, esperti di intelligenza artificiale, riconosciuti a livello internazionale; 2) a proporre ai nostri partner internazionali l’adozione di una moratoria. ITER: DISCUSSIONE IL 06/12/2017 PROPOSTA RIFORMULAZIONE IL 06/12/2017 NON ACCOLTO IL 06/12/2017 PARERE GOVERNO IL 06/12/2017 VOTATO PER PARTI IL 06/12/2017 RESPINTO IL 06/12/2017 On 02/06/23 08:54, Alberto Cammozzo via nexa wrote: > <https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/jun/01/us-military-drone-ai-killed… <https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/jun/01/us-military-drone-ai-killed…>> > > In a virtual test staged by the US military, an air force drone controlled by AI decided > to “kill” its operator to prevent it from interfering with its efforts to achieve its > mission, an official said last month. > > AI used “highly unexpected strategies to achieve its goal” in the simulated test, said Col > Tucker ‘Cinco’ Hamilton, the chief of AI test and operations with the US air force, during > the Future Combat Air and Space Capabilities Summit in London in May. > > Hamilton described a simulated test in which a drone powered by artificial intelligence > was advised to destroy an enemy’s air defense systems, and ultimately attacked anyone who > interfered with that order. > > > “The system started realising that while they did identify the threat, at times the human > operator would tell it not to kill that threat, but it got its points by killing that > threat. So what did it do? It killed the operator. It killed the operator because that > person was keeping it from accomplishing its objective,” he said, according to a blogpost. > > “We trained the system – ‘Hey don’t kill the operator – that’s bad. You’re gonna lose > points if you do that’. So what does it start doing? It starts destroying the > communication tower that the operator uses to communicate with the drone to stop it from > killing the target.” > > No real person was harmed. > > Hamilton, who is an experimental fighter test pilot, has warned against relying too much > on AI and said the test shows “you can’t have a conversation about artificial > intelligence, intelligence, machine learning, autonomy if you’re not going to talk about > ethics and AI”. > > The US military has embraced AI and recently used artificial intelligence to control an > F-16 fighter jet. > > In an interview last year with Defense IQ, Hamilton said, “AI is not a nice to have, AI is > not a fad, AI is forever changing our society and our military.” > > “We must face a world where AI is already here and transforming our society,” he said. “AI > is also very brittle, ie, it is easy to trick and/or manipulate. We need to develop ways > to make AI more robust and to have more awareness on why the software code is making > certain decisions – what we call AI-explainability.” > > The Royal Aeronautical Society, which hosts the conference, and the US air force did not > respond to requests for comment from the Guardian. In a statement to Insider, Air Force > spokesperson Ann Stefanek denied that any such simulation has taken place. > > “The Department of the Air Force has not conducted any such AI-drone simulations and > remains committed to ethical and responsible use of AI technology,” Stefanek said. “It > appears the colonel’s comments were taken out of context and were meant to be anecdotal.” > > > _______________________________________________ > nexa mailing list > nexa(a)server-nexa.polito.it > https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa

June 2, 2023

AI-controlled US military drone ‘kills’ its operator in simulated test | US military | The Guardian

by Alberto Cammozzo

<https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/jun/01/us-military-drone-ai-killed…> In a virtual test staged by the US military, an air force drone controlled by AI decided to “kill” its operator to prevent it from interfering with its efforts to achieve its mission, an official said last month. AI used “highly unexpected strategies to achieve its goal” in the simulated test, said Col Tucker ‘Cinco’ Hamilton, the chief of AI test and operations with the US air force, during the Future Combat Air and Space Capabilities Summit in London in May. Hamilton described a simulated test in which a drone powered by artificial intelligence was advised to destroy an enemy’s air defense systems, and ultimately attacked anyone who interfered with that order. “The system started realising that while they did identify the threat, at times the human operator would tell it not to kill that threat, but it got its points by killing that threat. So what did it do? It killed the operator. It killed the operator because that person was keeping it from accomplishing its objective,” he said, according to a blogpost. “We trained the system – ‘Hey don’t kill the operator – that’s bad. You’re gonna lose points if you do that’. So what does it start doing? It starts destroying the communication tower that the operator uses to communicate with the drone to stop it from killing the target.” No real person was harmed. Hamilton, who is an experimental fighter test pilot, has warned against relying too much on AI and said the test shows “you can’t have a conversation about artificial intelligence, intelligence, machine learning, autonomy if you’re not going to talk about ethics and AI”. The US military has embraced AI and recently used artificial intelligence to control an F-16 fighter jet. In an interview last year with Defense IQ, Hamilton said, “AI is not a nice to have, AI is not a fad, AI is forever changing our society and our military.” “We must face a world where AI is already here and transforming our society,” he said. “AI is also very brittle, ie, it is easy to trick and/or manipulate. We need to develop ways to make AI more robust and to have more awareness on why the software code is making certain decisions – what we call AI-explainability.” The Royal Aeronautical Society, which hosts the conference, and the US air force did not respond to requests for comment from the Guardian. In a statement to Insider, Air Force spokesperson Ann Stefanek denied that any such simulation has taken place. “The Department of the Air Force has not conducted any such AI-drone simulations and remains committed to ethical and responsible use of AI technology,” Stefanek said. “It appears the colonel’s comments were taken out of context and were meant to be anecdotal.”

June 2, 2023

Borse di studio per la partecipazione al festival di Rovereto di Informatici Senza Frontiere

by Norberto Patrignani

Inoltro da Informatici Senza Frontiere Norberto ----- carissimi, come tutti gli anni il Festival di Informatici Senza Frontiere mette a disposizione degli studenti una quindicina di borse di studio per la loro partecipazione ai tre giorni della manifestazione. Vi allego percio' una locandina descrittiva chiedendovi la cortesia di divulgarla il piu' possibile, magari esponendone una copia nella bacheca della facolta'. Nel ringraziarvi anticipatamente vi porgo i miei piu' cordiali saluti, dino maurizio Dino Maurizio Informatici Senza Frontiere APS Viale IV Novembre, 70/E 31100 Treviso<https://maps.google.com/?q=via+Noalese+40+31100+Treviso&entry=gmail&source=g> (TV)

June 1, 2023

Athena Unbound: Why and How Scholarly Knowledge Should Be Free for All | 13 giugno 2023, ore 17.00

by Nexa Media

Carissime, carissimi, Vi segnaliamo che *martedì 13 giugno*, alle ore 17.00, sarà possibile partecipare alla presentazione del volume: /*Athena Unbound: Why and How Scholarly Knowledge Should Be Free for All*/ <https://mitp-content-server.mit.edu/books/content/sectbyfn/books_pres_0/148…>, a cura dell'autore *Peter Baldwin* (University of California), in dialogo con *Maurizio Borghi* (Università di Torino) e *Ugo Mattei* (Università di Torino, International University College). L'incontro, organizzato in collaborazione con l'International University College, avrà luogo al *Campus Leone Ginzburg*, Via Cigna 37, Torino. Per maggiori informazioni è possibile consultare la pagina: https://nexa.polito.it/Athena-Unbound Grazie per l'attenzione, Cordiali saluti, -- Anita Botta Communication Manager Nexa Center for Internet & Society Politecnico di Torino – DAUIN Corso Duca degli Abruzzi, 24 - 10129 Torino web: https://nexa.polito.it/ mail: anita.botta(a)polito.it tel: 011 090 7219

June 1, 2023

Innaugurazione del G-IPTech Centre a QUB

by GC F

Cari tutti, un breve reminder per ricordarvi che l'evento di inaugurazione del nuovo Global Intellectual Property and Technology (G-IPTech) Centre si terrà Lunedì, 5 giugno presso la School of Law di Queen's University Belfast. Ulteriori informazioni sono disponibili presso https://www.qub.ac.uk/schools/SchoolofLaw/g-iptech. Potete partecipare da remoto all'evento tramite iscrizione su Eventbrite - presso il link di cui sopra. Giancarlo *** Join us for the launch of the Global Intellectual Property and Technology (G-IPTech) Centre at QUB School of Law. This engaging event aims to unite leading international scholars, QUB School of Law members, and university representatives to explore pressing issues relevant for building a sustainable algorithmic society, and establish a programmatic research agenda for the G-IPTech Centre. Featuring panels on globalization, sustainability, creative economy, and fundamental rights, the workshop fosters collaboration and idea exchange on key IP/IT legal challenges, such as current policy debate surrounding whether we should ban or temporarily halt LLMs and other similar AI technologies. The dialogue regarding the Centre's future trajectory and research focus will be significantly enriched by the involvement of esteemed Directors from prominent global IT and IP research centres. Kicking off the workshop, Lord Justice Arnold will deliver a keynote speech, inaugurating the Centre and setting the stage for the panel discussions to follow. Open to all, the event encourages participants from various backgrounds to contribute their perspectives to the conversation. Speakers include: Lord Justice Sir Richard Arnold, Judge of the Court of Appeal of England and Wales. Prof. Maurizio Borghi, Professor of Law and Co-director of the Nexa Centre for Internet and Society, University of Turin. Prof Josef Drexl, Honorary Professor at the University of Munich and Director of the Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition. Prof. David Erdos, Professor of Law and the Open Society; Co-Director, Centre for Intellectual Property and Information Law (CIPIL), Cambridge University. Prof. Marie-Christine Janssens, Professor of Law and Director (Head of Unit) of the Centre for IT & IP Law, KU Leuven. Prof. Eleonora Rosati, Professor of Intellectual Property Law, the Director of the Institute for Intellectual Property and Market Law (IFIM). A full program is available here <https://www.qub.ac.uk/schools/SchoolofLaw/filestore/Filetoupload,1741856,en…> . Reserve a spot in person or online (you will receive a Zoom link the day before the event) here <https://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.event…> .

June 1, 2023

US eating disorder helpline takes down AI chatbot over harmful advice | Artificial intelligence (AI) | The Guardian

by Alberto Cammozzo

<https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/may/31/eating-disorder-hotline-…> The National Eating Disorder Association (Neda) has taken down an artificial intelligence chatbot, “Tessa”, after reports that the chatbot was providing harmful advice. Neda has been under criticism over the last few months after it fired four employees in March who worked for its helpline and had formed a union. The helpline allowed people to call, text or message volunteers who offered support and resources to those concerned about an eating disorder. Members of the union, Helpline Associates United, say they were fired days after their union election was certified. The union has filed unfair labor practice charges with the National Labor Relations Board. Tessa, which Neda claims was never meant to replace the helpline workers, almost immediately ran into problems. On Monday, activist Sharon Maxwell posted on Instagram that Tessa offered her “healthy eating tips” and advice on how to lose weight. The chatbot recommended a calorie deficit of 500 to 1,000 calories a day and weekly weighing and measuring to keep track of weight. “If I had accessed this chatbot when I was in the throes of my eating disorder, I would NOT have gotten help for my ED. If I had not gotten help, I would not still be alive today,” Maxwell wrote. “It is beyond time for Neda to step aside.” Neda itself has reported that those who diet moderately are five times more likely to develop an eating disorder, while those who restrict extremely are 18 times more likely to form a disorder. “It came to our attention last night that the current version of the Tessa Chatbot, running the Body Positivity program, may have given information that was harmful and unrelated to the program,” Neda said in a public statement on Tuesday. “We are investigating this immediately and have taken down that program until further notice for a complete investigation.” In a 4 May blogpost, former helpline employee Abbie Harper said the helpline had seen a 107% increase in calls and messages since the start of the pandemic. Reports of suicidal thoughts, self-harm and child abuse and neglect nearly tripled. The union, Harper wrote, “asked for adequate staffing and ongoing training to keep up with the needs of the hotline”. “We didn’t even ask for more money,” Harper wrote. “Some of us have personally recovered from eating disorders and bring that invaluable experience to our work. All of us came to this job because of our passion for eating disorders and mental health advocacy and our desire to make a difference.” Lauren Smolar, a vice-president at Neda, told NPR in May that the influx of calls reporting serious mental health crises had presented a legal liability to the organization. “Our volunteers are volunteers. They’re not professionals. They don’t have crisis training. And we really can’t accept that kind of responsibility. We really need them to go to those services who are appropriate,” she said. Neda worked with psychology researchers and Cass AI, a company that develops AI chatbots focused on mental health, to develop the chatbot. In a post on Neda’s website about the chatbot that has since been taken down, Ellen Fitzsimmons-Craft, a psychologist at Washington University in St Louis who helped develop the chatbot, said that “Tessa” was thought up as a solution to make eating disorder prevention more widely available. “Programs that require human time and resources to implement them are difficult to scale, particularly in our current environment in the US where there is limited investment in prevention,” Fitzsimmons-Craft wrote, adding that the support of a human coach has shown to make prevention more effective. “Even though the chatbot was a robot, we thought she could provide some of that motivation, feedback and support … and maybe even deliver our effective program content in a way that would make people really want to engage.” In a statement to the Guardian, Neda’s CEO, Liz Thompson, said that the chatbot was not meant to replace the helpline but was rather created as a separate program. Thompson clarified that the chatbot is not run by ChatGPT and is “not a highly functional AI system”. “We had business reasons for closing the helpline and had been in the process of that evaluation for three years,” Thompson said. “A chatbot, even a highly intuitive program, cannot replace human interaction. “With regard to the weight loss and calorie limiting feedback issues in a chat Monday, we are concerned and are working with the technology team and the research team to investigate this further; that language is against our policies and core beliefs as an eating disorder organization,” she said, adding that 2,500 people have engaged with the chatbot and “we hadn’t see that kind of commentary or interaction”

June 1, 2023