- nexa - server-nexa.polito.it

Users' Patronage: The Return of the Gift in the "Crowd Society"

by GC F

My last article available on ssrn. Please have a look. Any suggestion is welcome! http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2659659 Giancarlo

Sept. 15, 2015

2nd CFP: Workshop Bridging the Gap between HRI and Robot Ethics Research @ ICSR2015

by Ugo Pagallo

Nel caso possa interessare a qualcuno in lista ************************************************************************ *2nd CFP: Workshop Bridging the Gap between HRI and Robot Ethics Research* In conjuction with the 7th International Conference on Social Robotics (ICSR 2015) http://www.icsoro.org/icsr2015/ *Workshop*: October 30, 2015, Paris, France *Submission Deadline*: September 20, 2015 https://bridgingthegapbetweenhriandrobotethicsresearch.wordpress.com/ ************************************************************************ *Introduction* ------------------ Robot ethics is a relatively new domain in which various scholars explore the ethical issues facing computer scientists, engineers, programmers, developers, ethicists and philosophers. There are many different approaches for addressing the ethical issues related to robots (e.g., in both retrospective and prospective manners) as well as many different approaches to what ethics means in relation to robots (e.g., addressing quality of life issues versus usability and acceptance issues). Social robotics researchers need to address legal, societal and ethical issues before robots become widespread within our society. Not only should researchers focus on preventing undesired outcomes, but they also need to investigate the social roles that robots can (not) or should (not) perform in the future according to the opinions of potential future users and in the light of the ethical and societal values at stake. When ordinary people start using autonomous technologies, such as robots, in their everyday lives, robotics researchers need to map all possible interaction scenarios and their potential consequences for both individual users and society as a whole. If the rise of robotics is similar to that of personal computers a few decades ago, we can expect some important legal, societal and ethical issues to emerge from robotics as well. Therefore, robotics researchers need to attend to these issues if we want to anticipate the potential (negative) consequences of the ubiquitous use of robots in our society as well as to design robots that foster our preferred ethical and societal values. *Aim of the workshop* ------------------ This workshop aims to bring together HRI scholars from multiple disciplines to stress the need to incorporate the users’ needs not only from a usability perspective but also from an ethical perspective. We therefore believe it is vital to involve prospective users as active testers in the design process. Their opinions and perceptions help researchers, designers, and engineers to create social robots that fit the special needs and demands of potential future users. We believe that also philosophers, legal scholars, policy makers should be involved in the deliberation process about the design of future robots. *Call for papers* ------------------ Participants are invited to submit a short paper (max. 2 pages) on their ideas for the most pressing issues to address in robot ethics in the next decade including at least one case or scenario. The best ideas will be asked to give a 5 minute pitch during the workshop day to open new discussion topics. Please use the ICSR conference style when preparing your paper. The following list reflects (but is not limited to these) possible topics for the papers: § Lessons learned / Critical reflection on robot ethics in the last 20 years § New methods for discovering, communicating, ethical issues in robot ethics § Evaluations of ethical reflections and resulting technologies § The role of stakeholders (and stakeholder involvement) in robot ethics § Successful methods to pursue § (Ethical) evaluation of potential future applications for social robots § The (societal) impact of social robots in a specific domain § Bridging between academic research and industrial applications § Revealing areas and opportunities for future directions Please send a PDF version of your paper to 3TUrobotics(a)gmail.com. *Organizers* ------------------ *Organizing Committee* Maartje de Graaf, University of Twente, The Netherlands Aimee van Wynsberghe, University of Twente, The Netherlands Filippo Santoni de Sio, Delft University, The Netherlands *Program Committee* Peter Asaro, The New School, USA Charles Ess, University of Oslo, Norway Vanessa Evers, University of Twente, The Netherlands Kevin Macnish, Leeds University, UK AJung Moon, University of British Columbia, Canada Ugo Pagallo, University of Toronto, Italy Tom Sorell, University of Warwick, UK Amanda Sharkey, University of Sheffield, UK Noel Sharkey, University of Sheffield, UK *Important Dates* -------------------------------------- § 20 September 2015: Submission deadline § 1 October 2015: Notification of acceptance § 30 October 2015: Workshop ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- *UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE.* Maartje de Graaf, PhD Postdoctoral Researcher Media, Communication & Organization Faculty of Behavioral Sciences University of Twente | Drienerlolaan 5 | 7522 NB Enschede Building Cubicus, Room C219 053 489 6094 | 06 8322 5064 053 489 3299 (secretary) http://robonarratives.wordpress.com

Sept. 15, 2015

Berkman Center Webcast live oggi ore 18 - When online is offline: the case for hyperlocal webservers and networks

by Giuseppe Futia

When online is offline: the case for hyperlocal webservers and networks https://cyber.law.harvard.edu/events/luncheon/2015/09/Griffey *Berkman Fellow, Jason Griffey* Today, 6.00 pm Webcast live:http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/interactive/webcast <http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/interactive/webcast> http://nexa.polito.it/berkman-webcast-live <http://nexa.polito.it/berkman-webcast-live> The LibraryBox Project (along with other emerging projects like PirateBox, occupy.here, IdeasBox, and others) is an attempt at bridging the divide in delivery of digital information in areas where there is a lack of communications infrastructure or where that infrastructure has been damaged or is overly monitored or controlled. As self-contained, non-connected portable servers, these devices can be used to circumvent governmental firewalls, distribute information in areas of political upheaval, reach the most remote areas to deliver healthcare information, and help recovery efforts after natural disasters. This presentation will be an overview of the LibraryBox project and its current state, goals and development roadmap, and a discussion of possible next directions and needs. About Jason Jason Griffey is the founder and principal at Evenly Distributed (http://evenlydistributed.net) a technology consulting and creation firm for libraries, museums, education, and other non-profits. Jason is a Fellow at the Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University, where he studies hyperlocal micronetworks such as his LibraryBox project. He has written extensively on libraries and technology, most recently a chapter in The Top Technologies Every Librarian Needs to Know: A LITA Guide. His previous book, Mobile Technology and Libraries, is a part of the award-winning Tech Set series. Named a Library Journal Mover & Shaker in 2009, Griffey has written and spoken internationally on topics such as the future of technology and libraries, personal electronics in the library, privacy, copyright, and intellectual property. A full list of his publications and presentations can be found on his CV. He is one of eight winners of the Knight Foundation News Challenge for Libraries for the Measure the Future project (measurethefuture.net) an open hardware project designed to provide actionable use metrics for library spaces. Griffey is the creator and director of The LibraryBox Project (librarybox.us), an open source portable digital file distribution system. He can be stalked obsessively online, and spends his free time with his daughter Eliza, reading, obsessing over gadgets, and preparing for the inevitable zombie uprising.

Sept. 15, 2015

"How open data became proprietary in the European Court of Justice" (Prof. Maria Bottis, Ionian University) - 24 settembre 2015

by Giuseppe Futia

Se non visualizzi correttamente questo messaggio clicca qui <http://nexa.polito.it/2015/09/mbottis> NEXA Giovedì 24 settembre 2015, ore 16.00 - 18.00 Via Boggio 65/a, Torino (primo piano) http://nexa.polito.it/2015/09/mbottis How open data became proprietary in the European Court of Justice Speaker Maria Bottis (Attorney-at-law and Assistant Professor, Ionian University) Ingresso libero This event will be webcast live: http://nexa.polito.it/upcoming-events The presentation deals with the legal protection of databases in Europe. An unfair competition model, as proposed before the enactment of the databases Directive 96/9 turned into a clear copyright model, with the difference that this time, a new sui generis right was instituted to protect not original works of the mind but data collections. The cases that came before the ECJ on the interpretation of the Directive gave the chance to “domesticate”, as Professor Hugenholtz has aptly described, this unruly database right. The Court for a long time limited the application of the Directive to cases where unfair use was truly present. But in 2015, with Ryanair, the Court took an abrupt step to the entirely wrong direction: towards rendering proprietary, at any terms, data that never before one would deem possible to be enclosed as such. The choice is now ours: either we fight, as quickly as we can, to negate the results of this manifestly wrong decision, or we decide that in the EU, there can be no open data, public data, anymore. BIOGRAFIA - e informazioni supplementari [Maria Bottis] MARIA BOTTIS is an Attorney-at-law and an Assistant Professor, School of Information Science and Informatics, DALMS, Ionian University. She graduated from Arsakeion High School of Patras with High Honors (20/20 graduation certificate, first of class) and had been under full tuition scholarship throughout high school. In 1985, she topped the Greek National examinations for entrance in all Universities/all disciplines with 1998 points over 2000, and entered in Athens Law School first. She is a Honors graduate of Athens Law School (graduated first of class). She is a holder of a LL.M degree (Cambridge Law School UK) a LL.M degree from Yale Law School and a PhD on medical information law and ethics from the University of Athens. More information available at: http://nexa.polito.it/2015/09/mbottis. Letture consigliate e link utili: * M.J, Davison and P.B. Hugenholtz, /Football fixtures, horse races and spin-offs: the ECJ domesticates the database right <http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/947>/, EIPR 113 at 115, 2005 * F. De Santis, /ECJ clarifies Database Directive scope in screen scraping case <http://www.globallegalpost.com/blogs/global-view/ecj-clarifies-database-dir…> /, The Global Legal Post, 27 February 2015 Che cosa sono il Centro Nexa e i cicli di incontri “Mercoledì di Nexa” e “Nexa Lunch Seminar” Il Centro Nexa su Internet & Società del Politecnico di Torino (Dipartimento di Automatica e Informatica) è un centro di ricerca indipendente e interdisciplinare che studia Internet e il suo effetto sulla società. Maggiori informazioni all'indirizzo: http://nexa.polito.it/about. Durante i “*Mercoledì di Nexa*”, che si tengono *ogni 2° mercoledì del mese* alle *ore 18 in punto*, il Centro Nexa su Internet e Società apre le sue porte non solo agli esperti e a tutti coloro i quali lavorano con Internet, ma anche a semplici appassionati e cittadini. Il ciclo di incontri intende approfondire, con un linguaggio preciso ma divulgativo, i temi legati alla Rete: motori di ricerca, Creative Commons, social networks, open source/software libero, neutralità della rete, libertà di espressione, privacy, file sharing, big e open data, smart cities e molto altro. Al centro di quasi tutti gli incontri un ospite pronto a dialogare con i direttori del Centro Nexa, il Prof. Juan Carlos De Martin del Politecnico di Torino e il Prof. Marco Ricolfi dell'Università di Torino, nonché lo staff e i Fellows del Centro Nexa. Maggiori informazioni sui Mercoledì di Nexa, incluso un elenco di tutti i “Mercoledì” passati, sono disponibili all'indirizzo: http://nexa.polito.it/mercoledi. Si segnala inoltre che dal maggio 2012 *ogni 4° mercoledì* del mese *dalle ore 13 alle ore 14* il Centro Nexa organizza anche i "*Nexa Lunch Seminar*". Una lista di tutti i “Lunch Seminar” passati è disponibile all'indirizzo: http://nexa.polito.it/lunch-seminars. See our events calendar <http://nexa.polito.it/events> if you're curious about future luncheons, discussions, lectures, and conferences not listed in this email. Our events are free and open to the public, unless otherwise noted. Maggiori informazioni sui Mercoledì di Nexa e i Nexa Lunch Seminar, sono disponibili all'indirizzo: http://nexa.polito.it/events. Weekly Events Newsletter. Sign up <http://nexa.polito.it/mailing-lists> to receive this newsletter if this email was forwarded to you. To manage your subscription preferences, please click here <https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa>. Connect & get involved: Jobs, internships, and more <http://nexa.polito.it/get-involved> Nexa Center for Internet and Society Newsletter

Sept. 15, 2015

Privacy dei bambini: pesanti violazioni da siti e app

by Mauro Alovisio

Gent.me/mi segnalo dal sito del garante privacy pubblicazione dei risultati dell'indagine svolta dal Garante della privacy italiano in collaborazione con le altre Autorità internazionali http://www.garanteprivacy.it/web/guest/home/docweb/-/docweb-display/docweb/… a presto Mauro Alovisio

Sept. 15, 2015

Call for Papers - special issue "ICTs, Citizens and Governance of Smart Cities"

by Enrico Masala

Segnalo questa call per articoli in una special issue riguardante ICTs, Citizens and Governance of Smart Cities, editors sono colleghi presso l'Istituto Boella. Cordialmente, Enrico Masala [Apologies if you got multiple copies of this email.] Submission Due Date 15 Dec 2015 Guest Editors Andrea Vesco, Istituto Superiore Mario Boella, Italy Valeria Caiati, Istituto Superiore Mario Boella, Italy Andrea Pacifici, Istituto Superiore Mario Boella, Italy Francesco Ferrero, Istituto Superiore Mario Boella, Italy Introduction Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) are changing the evolution of cities. The applications of ICTs could support the city’s governing body in enabling new models of sustainable development. Moreover the ICTs are instrumental for the city’s governing body to engage with their citizens and listen to their needs when developing the city. In other words, the Internet paradigm is compelling the local governments to consider the use of ICTs to make the governance of a city more inclusive, collaborative, efficient and effective. Indeed this is a right path toward the development of Smart Cities. Objective In this Special Issue on ICTs, Citizens and Governance of Smart Cities, we aim to explore the role of ICTs to foster the citizens engagement and to improve the governance of Smart Cities, by calling for theoretical and empirical research studies on developed and developing countries worldwide. Recommended Topics Topics to be discussed in this special issue include (but are not limited to) the following: ICT to Improve government accountability, transparency and responsiveness in the Smart City ICT to Enable the democratic control in the Smart City ICT to Promote citizens self-empowerment, social participation and engagement ICT to Build the next generation of empowered civil servants of the Smart City ICT to Fostering innovation, efficiency and effectiveness in government of the Smart City ICT as game changer of public policy design and implementation ICT to Create value for the economy and businesses of the Smart City ICT as catalyst of new form of impact driven entrepreneurship in Smart City ICT as purveyor of bottom-up funding schemes in Smart Cities Open Government Data to precipitate the smart evolution of Cities Citizens’ acceptance and adoption of e-government initiatives Policy and regulation for ICT in the governance of Smart Cities Submission Procedure Researchers and practitioners are invited to submit papers for this special theme issue on or before December 15, 2015 to http://bit.ly/1NrqJ1r (third CFP from the top). All submissions must be original and may not be under review by another publication. INTERESTED AUTHORS SHOULD CONSULT THE JOURNAL’S GUIDELINES FOR MANUSCRIPT SUBMISSIONS at http://www.igi-global.com/publish/contributor-resources/before-you-write/. All submitted papers will be reviewed on a double-blind, peer review basis. Papers must follow APA style for reference citations. Submission Dates and Deadlines Full article due: December 15, 2015. Peer review results: February 15, 2016. Final revised article due: March 15, 2016. Notification of final acceptance: April 15, 2016. All submissions and inquiries should be directed to the attention of: Dr. Andrea Vesco Guest Editor The International Journal of Public Administration in the Digital Age (IJPADA) E-mail: vesco(a)ismb.it

Sept. 14, 2015

Re: [nexa] nuova opinion dell'European Data Protection Supervisor su digital ethics

by J.C. DE MARTIN

Grazie, Alessandro! jc On 14/09/15 09:30, Alessandro Mantelero wrote: > Pubblicata la nuova opinion dell'European Data Protection Supervisor > dal titolo "Towards a new digital ethics: Data, Dignity and Technology" > > https://secure.edps.europa.eu/EDPSWEB/webdav/site/mySite/shared/Documents/C… > > > > Per chi volesse approfondire il tema sotto diverse angolature: > > Cohen, ‘What Privacy is For’ (2013) 126 Harv. L. Rev. 1904,1925 > http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2175406 > > David Wright, ‘A framework for the ethical impact assessment of > information technology’ (2011) 13(3) Ethics Inf Technol. 222. > http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10676-010-9242-6 > > Floridi, The 4TH Revolution. How the Infosphere is Reshaping Human > Reality (OUP 2014) > http://www.philosophyofinformation.net/books/the-fourth-revolution-how-the-… > > > Paul M. Schwartz, ‘Data Protection Law and the Ethical Use of > Analytics’ (2011) > http://www.huntonfiles.com/files/webupload/CIPL_Ethical_Undperinnings_of_An… > > > Rayan M. Calo, ‘Consumer Subject Review Boards: A Thought Experiment’ > (2013) 66 Stan. L. Rev. Online 97 > http://www.stanfordlawreview.org/online/privacy-and-big-data/consumer-subje… > > > > > -- > Avv. Alessandro Mantelero > Full-Tenured Aggregate Professor, Politecnico di Torino > Director of Privacy and Faculty Fellow, Nexa Center for Internet and > Society > Coordinator, Double Degree program in Management and IP Law, > Politecnico di Torino–Tongji University of Shanghai > Visiting Professor, Internet Interdisciplinary Institute - Universitat > Oberta de Catalunya > > http://staff.polito.it/alessandro.mantelero > http://nexa.polito.it/people/amantelero > > EMAIL POLICY: twice a day (Mon-Fri) > _______________________________________________ > nexa mailing list > nexa(a)server-nexa.polito.it > https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa

Sept. 14, 2015

nuova opinion dell'European Data Protection Supervisor su digital ethics

by Alessandro Mantelero

Pubblicata la nuova opinion dell'European Data Protection Supervisor dal titolo "Towards a new digital ethics: Data, Dignity and Technology" https://secure.edps.europa.eu/EDPSWEB/webdav/site/mySite/shared/Documents/C… Per chi volesse approfondire il tema sotto diverse angolature: Cohen, ‘What Privacy is For’ (2013) 126 Harv. L. Rev. 1904,1925 http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2175406 David Wright, ‘A framework for the ethical impact assessment of information technology’ (2011) 13(3) Ethics Inf Technol. 222. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10676-010-9242-6 Floridi, The 4TH Revolution. How the Infosphere is Reshaping Human Reality (OUP 2014) http://www.philosophyofinformation.net/books/the-fourth-revolution-how-the-… Paul M. Schwartz, ‘Data Protection Law and the Ethical Use of Analytics’ (2011) http://www.huntonfiles.com/files/webupload/CIPL_Ethical_Undperinnings_of_An… Rayan M. Calo, ‘Consumer Subject Review Boards: A Thought Experiment’ (2013) 66 Stan. L. Rev. Online 97 http://www.stanfordlawreview.org/online/privacy-and-big-data/consumer-subje… -- Avv. Alessandro Mantelero Full-Tenured Aggregate Professor, Politecnico di Torino Director of Privacy and Faculty Fellow, Nexa Center for Internet and Society Coordinator, Double Degree program in Management and IP Law, Politecnico di Torino–Tongji University of Shanghai Visiting Professor, Internet Interdisciplinary Institute - Universitat Oberta de Catalunya http://staff.polito.it/alessandro.mantelero http://nexa.polito.it/people/amantelero EMAIL POLICY: twice a day (Mon-Fri)

Sept. 14, 2015

Re: [nexa] U.S. Judge Rules Microsoft Must Produce Emails Held Abroad

by Alberto Cammozzo

Ancora sulla questione che definirà la "territorialità " dei dati in rete, almeno per gli US. Un interessante commento sulle attuali posizioni: <https://www.justsecurity.org/25901/microsoft-warrant-case-policy-issues/> [] If Microsoft wins, governments will be incentivized to require that their citizens and residents store their data locally, so as to ensure jurisdiction over—and thus access to—the data. If successful, this will have significant costs to the efficiency and effectiveness of the Internet as a whole. Conversely, the government’s position is also flawed, arguably creating more problems than it solves. It marks the beginning to the end of sovereign control over privacy within its borders. The United States is not the only government asserting broad authority to compel data, wherever located. The United Kingdom says that it can compel companies to produce data, wherever located, so long as the company is operating in its jurisdiction. Brazil has considered similar legislation, and other nations are following suit. While United States’ law currently prohibits U.S.-based companies from complying with such foreign government requests when content, such as the substance of one’s emails, is involved, it contains no similar restrictions on foreign government access to non-content information—such as subscriber information, time and duration of sessions, to/from lines on emails, and IP addresses. Transparency reporting indicates the governments receive, and respond to, tens of thousands of requests for such non-content information from foreign governments every year. As our lives become increasingly digitalized, the volume of such requests will only increase over time. As will the scope of information that can be learned from such data.[] Pressione sul legislatore anche da parte dei magistrati: <http://thehill.com/policy/technology/253197-appeals-judge-goads-congress-du…> E una proposta di legge US in discussione: The Law Enforcement Access to Data Stored Abroad Act <https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/114/s512/text> []This Act authorizes the use of search warrants extraterritorially only where the Government seeks to obtain the contents of electronic communications belonging to a United States person.[] ciao, Alberto On 11/09/2015 09:14, Alberto Cammozzo wrote: > La questione prende spessore: > > Microsoft case: DoJ says it can demand every email from any US-based > provider > > <http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/sep/09/microsoft-court-case-hotm…> > > > The United States government has the right to demand the emails of > anyone in the world from any email provider headquartered within US > borders, Department of Justice (DoJ) lawyers told a federal appeals > court on Wednesday. > The case being heard in the second circuit court of appeals is between > the US and Microsoft and concerns a search warrant that the government > argues should compel Microsoft to retrieve emails held on a Hotmail > server in Ireland. > Microsoft contends that the DoJ has exceeded its authority with > potentially dangerous consequences. Organizations including Apple, the > government of Ireland, Fox News, NPR and the Guardian have filed > amicus briefs with the court, arguing the case could set a precedent > for governments around the world to seize information held in the > cloud. Judges have ruled against the tech company twice. > Counsel for Microsoft contends that the US search warrant should not > have been used to compel it to hand over emails stored in Ireland. > “This is an execution of law enforcement seizure on their land,” > Joshua Rosenkranz, counsel for Microsoft, told the court. “We would go > crazy if China did this to us.” > > The DoJ contends that emails should be treated as the business records > of the company hosting them, by which definition only a search warrant > would be needed in order to compel the provision of access to them no > matter where they are stored. Microsoft argues the emails are the > customers’ personal documents and a US warrant does not carry the > authority needed to compel the company to hand it over. > > “This notion of the government’s that private emails are Microsoft’s > business records is very scary,” Rosenkranz told the court. > [...] > > > > ciao > > Alberto > > -- > http://cammozzo.com > http://www.tagMeNot.info > @donttag > > > > > On 31/07/2014 22:33, Alessandro Mantelero wrote: >> U.S. Judge Rules Microsoft Must Produce Emails Held Abroad >> Judge Rules Company Must Comply With a U.S. Warrant for Email Stored >> at Data Center in Ireland >> >> Microsoft must comply with a U.S. warrant for customer email stored >> in a company data center in Ireland, a federal judge ruled Thursday. >> The search warrant was issued as part of a criminal investigation >> whose details remain secret. It is unclear whether the customer >> targeted by the Justice Department is located in the U.S. >> The company's lawyers had argued that the Justice Department needed >> to obtain the emails through a legal treaty with Ireland, and that >> forcing Microsoft to retrieve them without the country's consent >> violated Irish sovereignty and international law. >> But Chief U.S. District Judge Loretta Preska in Manhattan federal >> court ruled that the location of the email was irrelevant, because >> Microsoft controlled it from the U.S. >> Microsoft General Counsel Brad Smith said Thursday, "The only issue >> that was certain this morning was that the District Court's decision >> would not represent the final step in this process. >> "We will appeal promptly and continue to advocate that people's email >> deserves strong privacy protection in the U.S. and around the world," >> he added. >> >> continua qui: >> http://online.wsj.com/articles/u-s-judge-rules-microsoft-must-produce-email… >> >> >> >> -- >> Avv. Alessandro Mantelero, PhD >> Aggregate Professor, Politecnico di Torino >> Director of Privacy and Faculty Fellow, Nexa Center for Internet and >> Society >> >> Visiting Fellow, Oxford Internet Institute >> >> Research Consultant, Sino-Italian Research Center for Internet Torts >> at Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology >> >> Programme Coordinator, Double Degree program in Management and IP >> Law, Politecnico di Torino–Tongji University of Shanghai >> >> http://staff.polito.it/alessandro.mantelero >> >> Politecnico di Torino >> Corso Duca degli Abruzzi, 24 >> 10129 Torino - Italy >> >> in libertate fortitudo >> _______________________________________________ >> nexa mailing list >> nexa(a)server-nexa.polito.it >> https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa > > _______________________________________________ > nexa mailing list > nexa(a)server-nexa.polito.it > https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa

Sept. 14, 2015

LiquidFeedback-like tool di Google

by fiorella de cindio

Carlo Brancati mi ha segnalato una notizia che trovo molto interessante e su cui ho scritto un breve commento che magari vi interessa. La trovate qui http://codicidellademocrazia.partecipate.it/infodiscs/view/199 Vostri eventuali e graditi commenti, se possibile in pubblico sul sito di Codici. E ... fate girare (il link al post c'è anche sulla mia pagina Facebook) un saluto -- fiorella

Sept. 13, 2015