- nexa - server-nexa.polito.it

ancora sui non-testi
by maurizio lana May 23, 2025

May 23, 2025

da un'email pubblicata in mailing list Humanist, Smithers, Tim. «[Humanist] 39.21: repetition vs intelligence», maggio 2025. https://dhhumanist.org/volume/39/21/. > Text is the marks left by some human writing, and, now-a-days, often > printed or screen rendered using suitable well designed font(s) and > typographical designs. Text is not the same as words. The words > involved were formed in the head of the author and remain there. > Writing words to say something involves encoding the chosen words in > some shared alphabet and shared spelling and grammar. This results in > the marks we call text. Text is thus a sequence of signs, and it must > be read, by, of course, something that can read these signs, to > re-form the words of the author. These again formed words are formed > in the reader's head, they are not found and somehow picked out of the > text; the signs are not the words, they are signs for words. This > notion of "picking up the words" is not what reading is, though this > is how it might seem to us, and how we often talk about it being. This > confusion -- the text is the words -- was harmless when we [just > about] only had text from human writing, but now we have, thanks to > things like ChatGPT, automated text generation systems, and lots of > text which is not the result of any kind of writing. Just because we > can read this automatically generated text, and form words in our > heads from this reading, words which mean something to us, and thus > give us the impression that the text is about something, does not > mean, nor necessarily make, the generator of this text a writer. To be > a writer requires the author to be a reader of the written text, and, > or course, lots of other text. And it requires the writer to have a > mind in which they form words to say something with. ChatGPT, and > other Generative AI systems like it, do not read anything. ChatGPT > does no reading of your [so called] prompt. The text you make by > writing your prompt is simply chopped into a sequence of text tokens > which are, in turn, used to build a sequence of vector encodings, > together with quite a lot of other stuff added to your prompt text by > the always hidden prompt processing ChatGPT has to do. (ChatGPT is not > just an LLM, it has plenty of other machinery needed to make it do > what it does.) ma tutto il msg merita una lettura, secondo me Maurizio ------------------------------------------------------------------------ che faresti se vivessi così? mau mau, con chi fugge ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Maurizio Lana

4 10

Il lavoro digitale che genera l'intelligenza artificiale
by de petra giulio May 23, 2025

May 23, 2025

Segnalo, in particolare ai nexiani di passaggio a Roma, il nuovo incontro organizzato dalla Scuola critica del digitale del CRS in collaborazione con la Fondazione Di Vittorio della CGIL sul tema: *"Soggetti, forme e conflitti del 'lavoro digitale' al tempo della intelligenza artificiale”* ne parlerà *Antonio Casilli* autore di "Waiting for Robots. The Hired Hands of Automation" (University of Chicago Press, 2025) A questo indirizzo si può trovare la descrizione dell'incontro https://centroriformastato.it/iniziativa/soggetti-forme-e-conflitti-del-lav… L'incontro si svolgerà a *Roma, mercoledì 28 maggio, in via Gaetano Donizetti 7b, **a partire dalle 16.* Sarà possibile partecipare anche a distanza, collegandosi tramite il link https://us02web.zoom.us/j/88206272748?pwd=yAh7iXok5iS56QacPNOOnzsQETF6bV.1 Per chi non potrà partecipare alle ore 16 o per chi vorrà proseguire la discussione segnalo che sarà possibile *continuare l'incontro con Antonio Casilli, sempre il 28 maggio alle ore 18,30 a ESC Atelier in via dei Volsci 159* *« Da anni analizzo le condizioni di lavoro di milioni di operai invisibili dell'IA in più di venti paesi. Alcuni insegnano agli autovelox a leggere automaticamente le targhe dei veicoli, altri analizzano brevi estratti audio per verificare la corretta interpretazione degli assistenti vocali e altri ancora decidono se un contenuto sui social debba essere raccomandato o filtrato. Tutte funzioni semplici, come leggere una cifra in un'immagine scattata da una telecamera, ascoltare una frase captata da uno smartphone o giudicare se un'immagine su internet è adatta a un certo pubblico, che sono fondamentali per far funzionare app, assistenti vocali, postazioni elettroniche eccetera. * *Essere pagati per realizzare microtasks per produrre servizi di IA è sempre più frequente, soprattutto in paesi con tutele lavorative deboli. Le retribuzioni oscillano tra salari orari minimi e cottimo, spesso insufficienti come unica fonte di reddito. Anche se alcune persone riescono a guadagnare fino a 15 euro all'ora nei paesi più ricchi, nel Sud globale si incontrano frequentemente casi di persone pagate qualche centesimo per task. E questa fonte di reddito può scomparire da un giorno all'altro, senza garanzia. »*

1 0

"Microsoft Bans the Word “Palestine” in Internal Emails"
by J.C. DE MARTIN May 22, 2025

May 22, 2025

*Microsoft Bans the Word “Palestine” in Internal Emails * /After days of disruption by pro-Palestine activists at its Build developer conference, No Azure for Apartheid said, Microsoft made it impossible to send emails containing "Palestine" or "Gaza." / Waqas Ahmed and Murtaza Hussain Microsoft has quietly implemented a policy blocking employee emails containing the words “Palestine,” “Gaza,” or “genocide” on its internal Exchange servers, according to No Azure for Apartheid, a group of pro-Palestine Microsoft employees. The automated filter, which silently prevents such emails from reaching recipients was first detected on Wednesday—just after Microsoft’s Build developer conference faced repeated disruptions by the activist group. Microsoft has been rocked by internal dissent over its collaboration with the Israeli military and government amid the ongoing assault on Gaza. The company has faced disruptions to its events, including protests from employees over its provision of cloud services and other critical infrastructure used by the Israeli military. [...] cont: https://www.dropsitenews.com/p/microsoft-word-palestine-banned-internal-ema…

1 0

How humans can hold the line against AI hype
by J.C. DE MARTIN May 21, 2025

May 21, 2025

How humans can hold the line against AI hype By Alan Boyle ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Don’t call ChatGPT <https://www.geekwire.com/tag/chatgpt/> a chatbot. Call it a conversation simulator. Don’t think of DALL-E <https://openai.com/index/dall-e-3/> as a creator of artistic imagery. Instead, think of it as a synthetic media extruding machine. In fact, avoid thinking that what generative AI does is actually artificial intelligence. That’s part of the prescription for countering the hype over artificial intelligence, from the authors of a new book titled “The AI Con.” <https://thecon.ai/> [...] continua qui: https://cosmiclog.com/2025/05/19/how-to-hold-the-line-against-ai-hype/

2 1

Pubblicazione report relativo al progetto "Development of Generative Artificial Intelligence from a Copyright Perspective"
by Nexa - Media May 21, 2025

May 21, 2025

Gentilissime, gentilissimi, È con piacere che vi informiamo che è stato recentemente pubblicato un nuovo studio relativo al progetto EUIPO (European Union Intellectual Property Office) dal titolo "Development of Generative Artificial Intelligence from a Copyright Perspective". Lo studio, elaborato dal Centro Nexa su Internet & Società e dal Dipartimento di Giurisprudenza dell'Università di Torino, esplora gli sviluppi dell'Intelligenza Artificiale generativa alla luce della normativa europea sul diritto d'autore, evidenziando l'importanza di garantire l'accesso alle informazioni essenziali riguardo all'origine delle opere e agli usi consentiti, al fine di assicurare un'applicazione corretta, equa e trasparente della disciplina vigente. Il testo completo del report, insieme a maggiori informazioni in merito al progetto, è disponibile al seguente link: https://nexa.polito.it/development-of-generative-ai-from-copyright-perspect… Di seguito la pagina dedicata alla pubblicazione sul sito di EUIPO: https://www.euipo.europa.eu/it/publications/genai-from-a-copyright-perspect… Vi ringraziamo per l'attenzione. Cordiali saluti, -- Valeria Bergantino Communication Manager Nexa Center for Internet & Society Politecnico di Torino - DAUIN Via Pier Carlo Boggio, 65/A - 10138 Torino web: https://nexa.polito.it/ mail: valeria.bergantino(a)polito.it<mailto:valeria.bergantino@polito.it> tel: 3473443585

1 0

IMPORTANTE, Aggiornamento su pratiche oscure di Copytrack, /Re: [COPYTRACK GmbH] Re: Details regarding your copyright infringment
by M. Fioretti May 19, 2025

May 19, 2025

Buonasera a tutti (e grazie per i consigli ricevuti finora) Riassunto: copytrack e' una compagnia tedesca che, per conto di vari clienti, manda automaticamente e arbitrariamente richieste di risarcimento per violazione di copyright a chiunque i loro software ritengano potenziale violatore, per importi senza giustificazione apparente. Ne hanno gia' parlato altri, a proposito dello stesso cliente che avrei danneggiato io (e questi sono solo alcuni dei link):: https://benjaminspider.com/understanding-federico-caputos-copytrack-claims/ https://gioxx.org/2023/12/19/copytrack-racconto-di-unazione-discutibile/ https://www.angryjerk.net/wp/2024/02/14/ajnet-vs-copytrack/ Il 30 aprile copytrack ha scritto anche a me, pretendendo quasi 400 Euro per una immagine di Caputo che piu' di cinque anni fa avrei inserito in un mio post senza autorizzazione. Dopo la mia prima richiesta di informazioni, sono immediamente scesi a 200, SENZA fornire alcuna informazione. AL momento le cose stanno come potete leggere sotto, mancano solo URL e case number. La mia posizione? 1) io non me lo ricordo proprio dove presi quell'immagine 5 anni e mezzo fa, perche' scrivo tantissimo. Ma se una volta ho effettivamente, INAVVERTITAMENTE violato il copyright di qualcuno, in maniera che gli ha EFFETTIVAMENTE causato un danno di 200 Euro, paghero' quella cifra a chi ne ha diritto... 2) ma il modo di procedere di Copytrack e Caputo e' davvero insopportabile. Di lui non ho trovato nessun contatto, ma quello e' il meno. A parte tono e procedure di copytrack, quell'immagine che mi contestano si trova su tanti altri post online (che avranno sicuramente acquistato licenza)... ma non su Shutterstock e simili. Cioe' non si trova nessuna prova, ne' tramite motori di ricerca ne' da Copytrack, che quell'immagine era effettivamente in vendita, dove e a quale prezzo. Fra l'altro, ho notato su quegli altri siti che loro hanno una versione piu' grande. Ovvero, se anche avessi copiato qualcosa senza autorizzazione, sarebbe un thumbnail, non l'immagine effettivamente in vendita. E' indecente o no? Grazie per la pazienza, per altri consigli e anche a chi volesse rappresentarmi pro-bono se mai si andasse in tribunale per questa farsa. Il rispetto del copyright e' una cosa seria, ma questa pesca a strascico di sicuro non lo e'. Sarebbe bello se gli artisti seri imparassero a star lontani da chi li "protegge" in questo modo. Marco ----- Forwarded message from Marco Fioretti ----- Subject: Re: [COPYTRACK GmbH] Re: Details regarding your copyright infringment From: Marco Fioretti Date: Mon, 19 May 2025 18:28:51 +0200 To: COPYTRACK GmbH <proof(a)copytrack.com> To whom it may concern: you write that "we can not lower the compensation in this case more". I think there is a big misunderstanding going on. Please understand that the problem is NOT the AMOUNT you now ask for compensation, that is 200 Euros. If I ACTUALLY DID cause that amount of damage to your client, I will pay it. What I asked, and still ask, is ONLY REAL, FORMAL evidence/guarantees: 1) that I did cause that amount of damage (see below), and 2) that paying 200 Euros WILL definitely close this matter, without you or Mr. Caputo ever asking anymore for further compensation, about Germany and any other country About point 1, I will be glad to pay as soon as I WILL have evidence of, besides the guarantee that this will definitely close this matter: 1. Proof of copyright ownership for the image in question, including documentation of substantial human input to justify a copyright claim. 2. Mr. Caputo’s license history. 3. The location(s) where Mr. Caput has the image you are claiming compensation for. 4. The sales history of that image. 5. The location(s) where the image is available for sale. Surely you can provide this information quickly, and I confirm that providing it will be enough, as far as I am concerned, to close this matter in the fastest and less expensive ways for all parties involved. Marco Fioretti Il giorno sab 17 mag 2025 alle ore 16:17 COPYTRACK GmbH <proof(a)copytrack.com> ha scritto: ##- Please type your reply above this line -## Your request (XXXXXX) has been updated. To add additional comments, reply to this email. Conversation CCs (if any): M. Fioretti Copytrack Z (COPYTRACK GmbH) May 17, 2025, 16:17 GMT+2 Dear Sir or Madam, Thank you for your message However, as I mentioned before we can not lower the compensation in this case more. Please be reminded that discounted offer will expire within the next 7 days, and then we will be forced to hand this case over to our partners, and they will take further actions. It will also lead to higher settlement costs, since the discounted offer will expire Best regards Legal Department COPYTRACK GmbH Saarbrücker Straße 18, 10405 Berlin Germany Phone: +49 - 30 – 809 33 29 10 Fax: +49 - 30 – 809 33 29 99 Registry: AG Berlin Charlottenburg HRB 173269 B Domicile: Dresdener Str. 31, 10179 Berlin CEO: Marcus Schmitt VAT-ID: DE305466114 Marco Fioretti May 12, 2025, 06:07 GMT+2 To whom it may concern: Dear sirs, please allow me to formally remind you of what I said in my first answer (for details, please see my original answer): First, I'm not even sure I did ever use the original image. Second, I can demonstrate that the "profit" of my WHOLE blog since 2020, not the single post you refer to, has been less than what you asked. Third, and most important: you are now demanding 200 Euros for settlement. Quoting myself, I confirm that "I am willing to discuss an amicable and fair solution [as long as you can] DEMONSTRATE that using a (reduced) copy of that image caused concrete damage to your client, and the AMOUNT of that damage, explaining how you came to that conclusion." In your request I see no such proofs. Besides, in order to settle this matter, please note that in order to pay any sum, I would also need FORMAL, official documentation (e.g. copy of signed contracts, signed statements from your company etc) that: 1) you do have all the authorizations from your client to bind him to any agreement we may reach, to exclude any further claims through any other agent, now or in the future 2) regardless of the amount, any payment would DEFINITELY settle this matter, with no further requests for any reason, that it would DEFINITELY settle it not just in Germany, but also in every other country Summing up, I CONFIRM that I am willing to reach an amicable and fair solution. However, regardless of the amount, I simply cannot pay any sum without the actual evidence and guarantees that I request. Waiting for them, Best Regards, Marco Fioretti Il giorno dom 11 mag 2025 alle ore 17:01 COPYTRACK GmbH < proof(a)copytrack.com> ha scritto: Copytrack Z (COPYTRACK GmbH) May 8, 2025, 16:12 GMT+2 Dear Sir or Madam, Thank you for your message. As we are interested in solving this matter amicably with you, our client is willing to offer you a settlement payment of 200 EUR to cover the compensation costs for your copyright infringement. This is the maximum we can offer. The reduced compensation costs can be paid securely at https:// portal.copytrack.com/ by entering your case ID XXXXXXXXXXXX. Once you have made the payment, we can close your copyright infringement case. Best of regards, Legal Department COPYTRACK GmbH Saarbrücker Straße 18, 10405 Berlin Germany Phone: +49 - 30 – 809 33 29 10 Fax: +49 - 30 – 809 33 29 99 Registry: AG Berlin Charlottenburg HRB 173269 B Domicile: Dresdener Str. 31, 10179 Berlin CEO: Marcus Schmitt VAT-ID: DE305466114 Marco Fioretti May 1, 2025, 18:32 GMT+2 (I am sending this also from my backup Gmail address, to make sure that this message comes through) To whom it may concern: I am very surprised to receive this request. I do not think I am guilty or responsible of what you are stating, and of the kind of damage you claim it caused. To begin with, I am almost sure that I only used a partial screenshot, possibly downsized at reduced resolution, because that's what I've done other times I thought some image would be a good fit for something I posted. Above all, I can guarantee you that, albeit I do welcome donations, my audience has always been so small that the profits of the WHOLE blog (currently more than 2300 posts) in the last five years have been WAY less than the amount you ask for ONE image in ONE post. In other words, assuming that it exists and could be calculated, the fraction of that profit coming from THAT specific image in ONE post would surely be much less than ONE Euro. This said, I am willing to discuss an amicable and fair solution. However, in order to do that, I have to ask you to DEMONSTRATE that using a (reduced) copy of that image caused concrete damage to your client, and the AMOUNT of that damage, explaining how you came to that conclusion. Best Regards, Marco Fioretti On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 15:35:50 PM +0000, COPYTRACK wrote: > [copytrack-] > > Sent via email to mfioretti(a)nexaima.net on April 22, 2025 > Authorization request / Unauthorized image use - Case no: XXXXXXX > Dear Marco Fioretti, > We, COPYTRACK, are writing to you on behalf of our client Federico Caputo, who > has assigned us the monitoring and protection of their licenses and image > rights. On April 17, 2025 we have been informed that Marco Fioretti is likely > using an image without permission and the client has exclusively commissioned > us with the clarification, administration of the image rights for the territory > of the Federal Republic of Germany and, if necessary, the enforcement of any > copyright infringement through our partner lawyers. Images are protected by > copyright law almost worldwide and infringements are actionable under the > respective national law. Please see the attachment below for details. > On behalf of our client, we must first determine if you have a valid license to > use the images in question in the territory of the Federal Republic of Germany. > If you have a valid license or any other legal justification to use these > images, please reply to this email and include proof of license purchase and/or > any other necessary information to validate the usage. > > Please note that you are obliged to provide the necessary information about the > usage of the image to allow our client and us to verify the lawfulness of such > usage. > > Please respond to this letter no later than May 2, 2025. > > If this is not the case, your use of the image material most likely constitutes > a copyright infringement within the territory of the Federal Republic of > Germany. If no settlement can be reached, we as Copytrack are directly > instructed to enforce these rights for the territory in the Federal Republic of > Germany through our German partner lawyers and, in addition, to instruct our > respective partner lawyers in other countries to examine and, if necessary, > enforce the infringement of the rights in the respective countries. You could > then be legally obligated to compensate our client for the damage caused by > this copyright infringement. > Rights Federico Caputo > holder > Image found https://stop.zona-m.net/2019/12/... > Since > > 3 steps to solving your case > > In order to resolve this case amicably with you, we request your cooperation. > Please complete the following steps to close this case: > > 1. Check > Review the evidence on this case by going to https://portal.copytrack.com > and entering CASE ID XXXXXXXXXXX > 2. Proof > Show us proof of your license by uploading it or providing any other legal > justification to use these images and if it is valid, we will close your > case immediately; > > If you do not have a valid license or any other valid justification: > > 3. Compensation / License > You now have the following 2 options: > □ Option 1: Purchase of a subsequent image license (includes past and > future use for one year after purchase). > □ Option 2: Compensation (includes the previous use and requires the > immediate deletion of the image). > > Image license (valid for 1 year from date of purchase) 389.59 € > Compensation costs (past usage) 350.00 € > Payment is due by May 21, 2025 > > Payments for both options can be made securely online at https:// > portal.copytrack.com by entering CASE ID XXXXXXXX > > We accept PayPal, credit card and bank transfer. > > We calculate these fees based on our client's license history, as well as the > duration of use and type of rights infringement. Failure to provide a proof or > pay for a valid license may result in your case being referred to our partner > attorney and significantly higher additional fees. > > To avoid further action, including legal action, provide proof of a valid > license or any other relevant information by May 2, 2025, or acquire it by > making payment in our online portal. > > Sincerely yours, > Marcus Schmitt > (CEO) > About Copytrack > > Since 2015, Copytrack has been helping creatives and brands protect their > copyrighted images. As one of the leading digital licensing and copyright > agents in the world, we have helped manage, license, and enforce over 200.000 > cases of image theft. Though most cases settle peacefully, we reserve the right > to proceed legally where necessary through our global network of partner law > firms in order to protect the intellectual property of our customers. > > Summary - Unauthorized use of the image – Case ID: xxxxx > > For the full report, visit https://portal.copytrack.com and enter this CASE-ID > XXXXX. > Rights holder Federico Caputo > Image used [7e90314ece] > https://stop.zona-m.net/2019/12/... > / > Online Since February 6, 2020 > Image license (valid for > 1 year from date of 374.50 € > purchase) > Compensation costs (past 350.00 € > usage) > Payment is due by May 21, 2025 > > > © 2025 COPYTRACK GmbH > Dresdener Strasse 31, 10179 Berlin • Trade register: Charlottenburg district > court • trade register number: HRB 173269B, Executive director: Marcus Schmitt > • VAT ID number: DE305466114 > > * . This email is a service from COPYTRACK GmbH. Delivered by Zendesk [NK5KM2-RV505] ----- End forwarded message -----

1 0

"Student Makes Tool That Identifies ‘Radicals’ on Reddit, Deploys AI Bots to Engage With Them"
by J.C. DE MARTIN May 19, 2025

May 19, 2025

*Student Makes Tool That Identifies ‘Radicals’ on Reddit, Deploys AI Bots to Engage With Them* /The tool scans for users writing certain keywords on Reddit and assigns those users a so-called “radical score,” before deploying an AI-powered bot to automatically engage with the users to de-radicalize them. / Joseph Cox May 19, 2025 at 9:13 AM https://www.404media.co/student-makes-tool-that-identifies-radicals-on-redd…

1 0

Re: [nexa] Qual è il senso...?
by alessandro marzocchi May 19, 2025

May 19, 2025

Ritorna una convinzione diffusa per la quale il "pensiero" di noi umani è altro rispetto a questo delle macchine, in altre parole noi non siamo fondati sulla statistica. Continuo ad avere dubbi. MMMM ... è la nostra "lallazione" iniziale, legata all'alimentazione dal seno: mmmmm ho fame e succhiare è la risposta. Da mmmm nasce la prima parola: mamma, pare che sia pressochè uguale in ogni lingua. mmmm ... ma-mma, l'infante riceve applausi, gratificazioni: bravo!!! Comincia a mettere in relazione mamma (parola, significante) con un volto, una persona (significato). Avviene su base materialistica, statistica ed analogamente con altre parole, con la lingua materna dei primissimi anni e così via. La scienza segue anch'essa un percorso analogo, provando e riprovando (Dante e poi Accademia del Cimento), trial and error. In breve: siamo davvero così irriducibilmente unici? Cordialmente. Duccio (Alessandro Marzocchi) Il giorno dom 18 mag 2025 alle ore 22:40 <nexa-request(a)server-nexa.polito.it> ha scritto: > Date: Sun, 18 May 2025 22:40:18 +0200 > From: maurizio lana <maurizio.lana(a)uniupo.it> > ciao Daniela, ... ... il tuo commento mostra un'impossibilità in linea > di > principio, perché nel chatbot non c'è una linea di pensiero ma un > mosaico di pezzi di altri. ... ...

3 2

Panel sovranità digitale e cybersecurity SISP 2025
by Mauro SANTANIELLO May 19, 2025

May 19, 2025

Care colleghe, cari colleghi, segnalo due panel della prossima conferenza della Società Italiana di Scienza Politica (SISP), che si terrà a Napoli dal 4 al 6 settembre 2025 presso l'Università Federico II, che potrebbero essere di vostro interesse. Panel 14.3 Digital Sovereignties: Governance, Security and Rights Panel 14.4 Institutionalizing Cybersecurity in the European Union: A Distinctive Approach? La descrizione completa dei panel è disponibile qui: https://www.sisp.it/convegno2025/?pagename=cms&name=sessiontracks&trackname… La deadline per l'invio di proposte di paper è il 25 maggio 2025. Cordiali saluti, Mauro Prof. Mauro Santaniello (PhD) Associate Professor in Political Science ICPC <https://www.internetpolicyresearch.eu/> Director| GIG-ARTS <https://gig-arts.eu/> Coordinator| Giganet <https://www.giga-net.org/> Secretary SWING <https://www.internetpolicyresearch.eu/swing-2025> Scientific Coordinator | UNU-CRIS <https://cris.unu.edu/people> Associate Research Fellow PRIN on Digital Sovereignty <https://www.internetpolicyresearch.eu/internet-and-communication-policy-cen…> Principal Investigator Latest publications <https://docenti.unisa.it/023694/ricerca/pubblicazioni>

1 0

Profili giuridici del neuromarketing
by Daniele Imbruglia May 19, 2025

May 19, 2025

Segnalo la pubblicazione dell'*Annuario 2023-2024* - *Profili giuridici del neuromarketing* <https://www.editricesapienza.it/book/10594> (Sapienza Università Editrice, Roma, 2025). La pubblicazione raccoglie i risultati della ricerca sui profili giuridici del Neuromarketing promossa da JODI <https://dei.web.uniroma1.it/ogid> e a cui hanno partecipato 20 studiosi di diverse Università italiane. Gli scritti coprono molteplici settori disciplinari, specifici campi di applicazione e singole tematiche: pratiche commerciali sleali, dati personali, intelligenza artificiale, servizi digitali, servizi finanziari, riconoscimento delle emozioni, disabilità cognitiva, social robot, teoria del contratto, protezione dei consumatori, rimedi contrattuali, educazione al consumo, discriminazione, vulnerabilità digitale. Un contributo è dedicato all’esame del codice di autocondotta della NMSBA, la più grande associazione al mondo di operatori di Neuromarketing. -- Daniele Imbruglia Professore associato di diritto privato Dipartimento di Diritto ed Economia dell’Impresa Facoltà di Economia - Sapienza Università di Roma Via del Castro Laurenziano, 9 - 00161 Roma RM https://uniroma1.academia.edu/DanieleImbruglia

1 0