- nexa - server-nexa.polito.it

Britain Admits Defeat in Controversial Fight to Break Encryption
by Daniela Tafani Sept. 6, 2023

Sept. 6, 2023

Britain Admits Defeat in Controversial Fight to Break Encryption The UK government has admitted that the technology needed to securely scan encrypted messages sent on Signal and WhatsApp doesn’t exist, weakening its controversial Online Safety Bill. Tech companies and privacy activists are claiming victory after an eleventh-hour concession by the British government in a long-running battle over end-to-end encryption. The so-called “spy clause” in the UK’s Online Safety Bill<https://www.wired.com/story/the-uk-is-poised-to-force-a-bad-law-on-the-inte…>, which experts argued would have made end-to-end encryption all but impossible in the country, will no longer be enforced after the government admitted the technology to securely scan encrypted messages for signs of child sexual abuse material, or CSAM, without compromising users’ privacy, doesn’t yet exist. Secure messaging services, including WhatsApp and Signal, had threatened to pull out of the UK if the bill was passed. “It’s absolutely a victory,” says Meredith Whittaker, president of the Signal Foundation, which operates the Signal messaging service. Whittaker has been a staunch opponent of the bill, and has been meeting with activists and lobbying for the legislation to be changed. “It commits to not using broken tech or broken techniques to undermine end-to-end encryption.” The UK’s Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport did not respond to a request for comment. The UK government hadn’t specified the technology that platforms should use to identify CSAM being sent on encrypted services, but the most commonly-cited solution was something called client-side scanning. On services that use end-to-end encryption, only the sender and recipient of a message can see its content; even the service provider can’t access the unencrypted data. Client-side scanning would mean examining the content of the message before it was sent—that is, on the user’s device—and comparing it to a database of CSAM held on a server somewhere else. That, according to Alan Woodward, a visiting professor in cybersecurity at the University of Surrey, amounts to “government-sanctioned spyware scanning your images and possibly your [texts].” In December, Apple shelved its plans<https://www.wired.com/story/apple-photo-scanning-csam-communication-safety-…> to build client-side scanning technology for iCloud, later saying<https://www.wired.com/story/apple-csam-scanning-heat-initiative-letter/> that it couldn’t make the system work without infringing on its users’ privacy. Opponents of the bill say that putting backdoors into people’s devices to search for CSAM images would almost certainly pave the way for wider surveillance by governments. “You make mass surveillance become almost an inevitability by putting [these tools] in their hands,” Woodward says. “There will always be some ‘exceptional circumstances’ that [security forces] think of that warrants them searching for something else.” Although the UK government has said that it now won’t force unproven technology on tech companies, and that it essentially won’t use the powers under the bill, the controversial clauses remain within the legislation, which is still likely to pass into law. “It’s not gone away, but it’s a step in the right direction,” Woodward says. James Baker, campaign manager for the Open Rights Group, a nonprofit that has campaigned against the law’s passage, says that the continued existence of the powers within the law means encryption-breaking surveillance could still be introduced in the future. “It would be better if these powers were completely removed from the bill,” he adds. But some are less positive about the apparent volte-face. “Nothing has changed,” says Matthew Hodgson, CEO of UK-based Element, which supplies end-to-end encrypted messaging to militaries and governments. “It’s only what’s actually written in the bill that matters. Scanning is fundamentally incompatible with end-to-end encrypted messaging apps. Scanning bypasses the encryption in order to scan, exposing your messages to attackers. So all ‘until it’s technically feasible’ means is opening the door to scanning in future rather than scanning today. It’s not a change, it’s kicking the can down the road.” Whittaker acknowledges that “it’s not enough” that the law simply won’t be aggressively enforced. “But it’s major. We can recognize a win without claiming that this is the final victory,” she says. The implications of the British government backing down, even partially, will reverberate far beyond the UK, Whittaker says. Security services around the world have been pushing for measures to weaken end-to-end encryption, and there is a similar battle going on in Europe over CSAM, where the European Union commissioner in charge of home affairs, Ylva Johannson<https://www.wired.com/story/europes-moral-crusader-lays-down-the-law-on-enc…>, has been pushing similar, unproven technologies. “It’s huge in terms of arresting the type of permissive international precedent that this would set,” Whittaker says. “The UK was the first jurisdiction to be pushing this kind of mass surveillance. It stops that momentum. And that’s huge for the world.” https://www.wired.com/story/britain-admits-defeat-online-safety-bill-encryp…

1 0

Cfp : Content Moderation on Digital Platforms: Beyond States and Firms
by Nicolas Jullien Sept. 6, 2023

Sept. 6, 2023

Cari, un "call" della rivista "Internet Policy Review" che potrebbe essere interessante per qualcuno di voi: " "Content Moderation on Digital Platforms: Beyond States and Firms" https://policyreview.info/node/1717" ------ Call for papers: Content moderation on digital platforms: beyond states and firms Special issue of the Internet Policy Review Content regulation on digital platforms has attracted growing interest from scientists and regulators in recent years. In Europe, new legal initiatives at the national and European level, such as the NetzDG in Germany, the Law on fake news in France or the Digital Services Act, transform the power relation between public authorities and private platforms. At the academic level, these developments are seen primarily through the lens of state-platform relationship, focusing in particular on the role of nation states in Internet governance. However, content regulation on digital platforms goes far beyond this dual relationship. It encompasses a wide diversity of actors who develop their own practices of content regulation, apart from, in partnership with, or against public authorities and firms. Journalists build up fact-checking procedures to limit the spread of fake news. Activists put pressure on advertisers in order to cut sources of funding for hate groups. Marketing agencies monetize blacklists of sites, groups and channels to avoid reputation backlash while advertising online. Social media users put in practice counter-speech strategies in order to stem hate speech or circumvent restrictions on social media. Even researchers develop their own transparency and accountability indicators to assess platform policies related to content regulation. Besides, these actors are gradually associated with the evolution of content regulation through formal partnerships and multi-stakeholder organizations. All these actors, and many others, who could be grouped together under the banner of "civil society", are now actively contributing to content moderation and regulation on digital platforms. However, their precise role, their strategies and means of action remain little studied. Following recent works published in Internet Policy Review, such as calls for studying content regulation issues beyond the scope of relationships between states and platforms (Gillespie et al., 2020), this special issue intends to illustrate the role of “civil society” in the global governance of speech online, and map the variety of social groups involved in content moderation. Drawing on existing work on multistakeholderism that have discussed the participation of civil society in the global internet governance (Massit-Folléa, 2014; Raymond, DeNardis, 2015), this special issue aims at pushing forward the understanding of non-state actors’ contribution in the current internet regulatory framework. It calls for empirical studies that provide an insight on the social conditions and materiality of civil society’s contribution to content regulation. Scope of the special issue For this special issue we invite contributions that analyze the role of users, non-profit organizations, media, technical and professional groups, researchers and other actors from civil society in moderating and regulating contents on digital platforms, while potentially discussing their articulation with public authorities and platform initiatives. Three axes of contribution are envisioned. First of all, this special issue aims at moving beyond the state-platform scope of analysis by gathering papers that describe the complex configurations of actors involved in the moderation of contents. Contributors are invited to study the various social and institutional arrangements informing moderation policies and notably the extent of civil society’s involvement in this process – from the orientation of moderation policy to the detection of illegal content. Such contributions could also enlighten the role of users’ protests and mobilizations in shifting the scope and focus of moderation (Gillespie, 2018; Myers-West, 2017), notably how sexual minority and race-based groups try to voice their concern regarding the specific discrimination and censorship they face online (Nakamura, 2013). Secondly, we would like to identify papers that contribute to the study of technologies and design in offering new forms of regulation. Although many works have focused on algorithmic content detection by the platforms (Yeung, 2018; Gorwa, Binns, Katzenbach, 2020), in articulation with their business of data collection, we would like to attract papers that discuss alternative design and standards developed by tech communities to promote more diverse and distributed types of moderation. For example, platforms such as Mastodon emphasize the role of users in defining alternative moderation rules and mechanisms. Such a discussion may also include new strategies developed by activists to document algorithmic censorship and inform shadowbanning practices. Thirdly, we would like to include in this special issue papers that study the circulation and distribution of practices and knowledge across civil society organizations. Global fora on content moderation are key loci to observe exchanges between organizations as well as conflicting interpretation of moderation principles. Far from a homogenous ensemble, civil society is a broad concept that gathers various groups with conflicting interest and unequally distributed resources. Such papers could contribute to a global mapping of power relations within civil society as well as shed new light on the “Brussel effect” (Bradford, 2020) from third parties perspectives. More broadly, it would offer a critical assessment of “civil society” as a regulatory entity and the way it is endorsed or instrumentalized by governments and platforms. Special issue editors Romain Badouard, Associate Professor, University Paris Panthéon-Assas Anne Bellon, Associate Professor, University of Technology of Compiègne Important dates 750-1000 words abstracts should be sent to romain.badouard(a)u-paris2.fr and anne.bellon(a)utc.fr by 31 October 2023. The abstracts should delineate the research question to be discussed, the case study to be analysed and an indication of the expected findings or conclusions. Decisions will be sent to the authors by 30 November 2023. Full papers of the selected abstracts should be submitted by 17 March 2024. Submissions must be around 6,000 words in length and have to follow the submission guidelines of the Internet Policy Review. They will be peer-reviewed between March and July. The planned publication date of this special issue is Q4 2024.

1 0

INDL-6 Conference Unveils Program: A Deep Dive into Digital Labor Post-Pandemic
by Antonio Casilli Sept. 6, 2023

Sept. 6, 2023

Dear all, >From October 9 to 11, 2023, researchers, activists, artists, and policymakers will gather in Berlin for the sixth annual conference of our International Network on Digital Labor. INDL-6 "Digital Labor in the Wake of Pandemic Times" will feature over 100 presentations and contributions from 150 speakers from around the world. Set against the backdrop of a global pandemic that has accelerated digital transformations, the INDL-6 Conference promises to be an invaluable source of insights and discussion. A special focus will be placed on speakers from the global South, as well as on original empirical findings and theoretical perspectives. Please, find the program online on the INDL website: https://www.indl.network/indl-6-conference-unveils-program-a-deep-dive-into…. Registration is free and open to anyone (subject to availability). Just click here to register: https://tickets.weizenbaum-institut.de/conference-organizer/INDL-6/. INDL-6 is hosted by the Weizenbaum Institute for the Networked Society, and co-organized by the International Labor Organization (ILO), Digital Platform Labor (DiPLab), and Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB). The keynote speakers will include Kylie Jarrett (Maynooth University, Ireland), a pioneering researcher in the field of digital labor studies, and the author of "Digital Labor" (Wiley, 2022). In light of the concept of "workers' assetization", she will discuss commodification and class in the platform economy. The author of "Goodbye iSlave: A Manifesto for Digital Abolition" (University of Illinois Press, 2016) Jack Linchuan Qiu (Nanyang Technological University, Singapore) will delve into labor-capital relations in the Softbank Empire. The topic of artificial intelligence and European labor regulation will be analyzed in light of recent changes in legislation by Aida Ponce del Castillo (ETUI, Belgium). Also scheduled are two exciting plenary panels. The first one is the documentary film "VO (Vehicle Operator)," directed by Nicolas Gourault. This short film takes us on an immersive journey into the lives of those who train self-driving cars. During the second panel, "Irresponsible technologies?", a group discussion will explore the social responsibility associated with AI production within global supply chains. It will feature Dr. Lukas Sonnenberg (GIZ Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit, Germany), Prof. Baptiste Delmas (Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne, France), Dr. Fabian Stephany, Dr. Fabian Braesemann (Oxford Internet Institute, UK). The panel will be chaired by Uma Rani (Senior Economist, ILO, Switzerland). You are welcome to forward this information to all persons who may be interested. Cheers, Antonio -- Antonio A. Casilli Professor, Telecom Paris | Institut Polytechnique de Paris Member, Interdisciplinary Institute for Innovation (CNRS) Associate Member, LACI-LAP (EHESS) Associate researcher, Weizenbaum-Institut, Berlin Member, Scholarly council UCLA Center for Critical Internet Inquiry (C2i2) Faculty Fellow, Nexa Center for Internet & Society *We respect your right to disconnect. My workflow efficiency accounts for this email send time. Taking action or responding outside of office hours is not mandatory*

1 0

National Academies - Testing, Evaluating, and Assessing Artificial Intelligence–Enabled Systems Under Operational Conditions for the Department of the Air Force Proceedings of a Workshop—in Brief
by Diego.Latella Sept. 5, 2023

Sept. 5, 2023

Per chi fosse interessat* Testing, Evaluating, and Assessing Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Systems Under Operational Conditions for the Department of the Air Force Proceedings of a Workshop--in Brief National Academies https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/26885/testing-evaluating-and-asse… Buona lettura Diego -- Dott. Diego Latella - Senior Researcher CNR/ISTI, Via Moruzzi 1, 56124 Pisa, Italy (http:www.isti.cnr.it [1]) FM&&T Lab. (http://fmt.isti.cnr.it) CNR/GI-STS (http://gists.pi.cnr.it) https://www.isti.cnr.it/People/D.Latella - ph: +390506212982, fax: +390506212040 =================== I don't quite know whether it is especially computer science or its subdiscipline Artificial Intelligence that has such an enormous affection for euphemism. We speak so spectacularly and so readily of computer systems that understand, that see, decide, make judgments, and so on, without ourselves recognizing our own superficiality and immeasurable naivete with respect to these concepts. And, in the process of so speaking, we anesthetise our ability to evaluate the quality of our work and, what is more important, to identify and become conscious of its end use. […] One can't escape this state without asking, again and again: "What do I actually do? What is the final application and use of the products of my work?" and ultimately, "am I content or ashamed to have contributed to this use?" -- Prof. Joseph Weizenbaum ["Not without us", ACM SIGCAS 16(2-3) 2--7 - Aug. 1986] Links: ------ [1] http://www.isti.cnr.it

1 0

À la recherche de l'intelligence perdue?
by Alberto Cammozzo Sept. 5, 2023

Sept. 5, 2023

Esilarante! *Proust, ChatGPT and the case of the forgotten quote* In search of a half-remembered passage among the French writer’s voluminous work, I turned to AI to help me find it. The results were instructive – just not about Proust by Elif Batuman <https://www.theguardian.com/profile/elif-batuman> <https://www.theguardian.com/books/2023/sep/05/proust-chatgpt-and-the-case-o…> The other day, I was looking for a quote in Proust, so I thought I would ask ChatGPT <https://www.theguardian.com/technology/chatgpt>. Here’s how it went. *EB: Is there a passage in In Search of Lost Time when Proust talks about how love affairs repeat themselves, and says that when you’re writing about a love affair in the past, you’re often drawing inspiration from a different love affair in the present?* CHATGPT: Yes, there is a passage in Marcel Proust’s “In Search of Lost Time” (also known as “Remembrance of Things Past”) where he discusses the repetition of love affairs and the influence of present experiences on writing about past love affairs. The passage can be found in the first volume of the novel, “Swann’s Way” (Du côté de chez Swann). In this passage, Proust reflects on how our present emotions and experiences often color our memories of the past. He suggests that when we write about a past love affair, we might unknowingly be influenced by the emotions and experiences of a current or recent love affair. This blurring of past and present emotions can result in the repetition of themes and feelings in our writing. The idea of how love affairs repeat themselves and how we are influenced by our present experiences when writing about the past is a recurring theme in Proust’s work, as he delves into the complexities of memory, perception, and the nature of human emotions. Please note that the specific wording and context of the passage may vary depending on the translation and edition of the novel. If you’re interested in exploring this theme further, I recommend reading “Swann’s Way” to experience Proust’s beautiful prose and intricate exploration of love, memory, and the passage of time. Some things I was thinking at this point: 1. Hmm, I had expected it to be in Volume 2 or 3. Probably the more recent experience of reading Volume 2 or 3 coloured, or even substituted, my memory of reading Volume 1! Memory is amazing! (Didn’t Proust say something about that somewhere?) 2. I wonder why it didn’t give me a direct quote. I hope it isn’t going to be squirrelly or weird about quotes. Maybe it’s stressed out about copyrighted translations. I’ll try asking for the original. *EB: Could you quote the passage for me in French?* GPT: Certainly! Here’s the passage from Marcel Proust’s “À la recherche du temps perdu” (“In Search of Lost Time”) in its original French: “Une seule chose avait pourtant changé : les lieux, les êtres, ne présentaient plus qu’un intérêt général et par conséquent, ne m’offraient plus aucun détail intéressant. Ce que je cherchais en eux, ce que j’avais entrevu en eux une fois pour toutes, c’était un état, un sentiment de mon âme, c’était Swann lui-même. Les personnes que je fréquentais pouvaient me parler, au lieu de Swann, de beaucoup d’autres noms propres, lesquels désignaient des états analogues à ceux que Swann me faisait connaître, des états dans lesquels ma personnalité resterait, pourrait se développer, des états qui n’étaient d’ailleurs pas incompatibles avec ceux de Swann, avec sa présence, son souvenir, au point que parfois j’hésitais à les attribuer à l’un plutôt qu’à l’autre. Dès lors j’avais pu reconnaître en chacun de ces êtres à leur manière un des aspects de Swann. Eux seuls désormais m’intéressaient, mais moins comme des personnes distinctes, que comme les moyens qu’ils m’offraient de sortir de moi-même, d’atteindre Swann, d’assouvir ma curiosité, de m’apaiser. Les désirs qu’ils pouvaient me suggérer d’eux, me paraissaient neutres, comparés à l’unique et ardente désir que j’avais de Swann. Mais, lorsque j’essayais de les mettre en pratique, ils m’étaient impossibles ; ils se heurtaient à l’existence, au souvenir de Swann, ils avaient pris naissance dans un état d’esprit inconciliable avec celui-là. Alors il me semblait que j’avais changé d’idées, que j’avais transformé ma vie; ce qui en était la cause, c’était plutôt la présence en moi d’un état d’esprit transitoire, avec lequel je m’étais représenté ma vie passée, mais qui avait en réalité en lui bien peu de choses du passé, et par contre beaucoup d’éléments empruntés à un état d’esprit différent que je n’avais connu que depuis peu de jours et qui allait, lui, en durer peu.” (Note: This passage is taken from “Du côté de chez Swann,” the first volume of “À la recherche du temps perdu.”) Thoughts: 1. Wow, ChatGPT is so friendly and cool, it wasn’t offended at all! 2. My French must have really deteriorated because this feels so hard to read. 3. I guess I forgot how boring Proust can be. 4. Damn this quote is boring. 5. It says “/ne m’offraient aucun détail intéressant/” [“didn’t offer me a single interesting detail”] … and that’s kind of how I feel about the quote! 6. I guess I was pretty naive and literal-minded to look for words like /amour/, /écrire/, and/or /nouveaux/. Proust probably uses more sophisticated synonyms or metaphors. 7. None of this feels familiar at all. 8. I wish I had read Proust in French when I was studying literature in graduate school. Why was I so lazy in my 20s? 9. I guess I was too busy being in love. 10. God, I was so dumb. 11. Yeah, but it was also structural. 12. Whatever, I’m going to put the quote in Google Translate. 13. Good Lord, or should I say /Bon Dieu/, this is so boring I might actually die. 14. I had been thinking Google Translate was getting good enough with European languages to replace human translators, but I guess it still isn’t at the level of translating Proust. 15. I still don’t see how this is about love affairs. *EB: But this passage doesn’t mention love affairs* GPT: You are right; my apologies for the oversight. The passage I provided does not directly mention love affairs. Here’s a different passage from “À la recherche du temps perdu” where Proust discusses the recurrence of love affairs and how present experiences influence the perception of past loves: “Les êtres qui nous ont paru beaux n’ont pas dû leur effet à l’amour, il tient à d’autres causes: ainsi du charme qu’ont les personnes pour lesquelles nous ne concevons pas d’amour, mais qui en éveillent un autre, qu’elles nous permettent de réaliser, où l’amour passe en quelque sorte à l’état d’énergie sans être jamais employé à les atteindre; et aussi, quand nous parlons d’un amour ancien, à cause de qui nous avons sans cesse laissé naître de nouveaux amours, nous croyons évoquer le passé, alors qu’un amour récent dont il ne s’approchait que de loin et qu’il a aidé à former, nous empêche de bien le distinguer, de bien en comprendre le sentiment, et de démêler quelle part il avait prise dans nos actions; aussi pourrons-nous, tant que cet amour récent durera, croire que nous sommes toujours possédés par l’ancien: ce n’est pas lui que nous aimons encore; c’est cet amour récent qui fait que nous nous accrochons à lui, en le déformant, en le transformant.” This passage highlights how past and present loves can intertwine, affecting our perception of both. Proust explores the idea that the emotions of a recent love affair may shape the way we remember and understand past love affairs, leading to a blending of experiences and emotions over time. 1. Weird… “Here’s another passage?” So you weren’t thinking of a particular passage? 2. Oh good, it says “/amour ancien/” and “/nouveaux amours/” and “/amour récent/”. 3. Wait how is this even more boring than the previous passage? 4. If I came across this paragraph while I was reading I would totally skip it, so how can it be the one I’m thinking of. 5. I wasn’t thinking about blending experiences over time, I was thinking about using a person you love as a model for an earlier person you loved, when writing a book. This passage doesn’t even mention writing. *EB: This isn’t about writing about love. Is there somewhere where he describes writing about a new love, while remembering an old love?* GPT: My apologies for the confusion. You are right; the previous passages I provided do not specifically address the act of writing about a new love while remembering an old love. Marcel Proust’s work is vast and complex, and there might be various passages that touch upon similar themes but not precisely in the context you mentioned. As my knowledge is limited to the information available up to September 2021, I don’t have access to specific unpublished works or any new material that may have emerged after that time. Therefore, if such a passage exists in Proust’s writings, it might be in a part of his work that I’m not aware of. To explore the theme of memory, love, and writing further in Proust’s works, I recommend delving into “À la recherche du temps perdu” (In Search of Lost Time) in its entirety. It’s a monumental work with profound insights into human psychology, memory, and the complexity of love. Throughout the seven volumes of the novel, you may find passages that touch upon the interplay between past and present loves and the ways in which writing about love is intertwined with personal experiences and memories. If you have access to the complete work, I encourage you to read through it to discover the full breadth of Proust’s reflections on love and writing. 1. Wait – so there /isn’t /a quote like that? 2. Did ChatGPT seriously just recommend I “delve into Proust’s monumental work in its entirety”? 3. Am I being trolled? 4. Is it possible that the passage I’m thinking of wasn’t published until after September 2021? 5. No. 6. … Wasn’t it something about someone you’re in love with now, unwittingly sitting for a portrait of somebody in the past? *EB: I think the passage I want has something about “so someone from the future sat for the portrait of the person in the past”... ring a bell?* GPT: Yes, I believe I know the passage you are referring to. The passage you mentioned can be found in Marcel Proust’s “In Search of Lost Time” (À la recherche du temps perdu). It is from the first volume, “Swann’s Way” (Du côté de chez Swann). The specific passage you are looking for is often referred to as the “portrait analogy” and is a famous metaphor used by Proust to describe how the present influences our understanding and portrayal of the past. Here’s the passage in its original French: “Car c’est ainsi qu’un être futur, situé en nous, se plaît à anticiper sur nous et à préparer ses joies comme s’il était un étranger. Guidé par lui, nous faisons pour son portrait, c’est-à-dire pour une image que nous croyons être celle du passé, un visage qui lui plaît, un visage qui lui ressemble. Dans une heure de tristesse, quand nous avons besoin de trouver du charme à la vie, c’est encore cet être plein d’avenir qui se fait notre guide et qui oriente nos pensées vers des êtres différents de ceux que nous fréquentons ordinairement et qui s’apprêtent, lui a-t-il appris, à nous offrir des joies nouvelles. La vie a beau s’appeler du même nom, la nôtre, celle des jours successifs, elle est bien différente de la sienne, heureuse, parée de charmes inconnus.” (Translation: “For in this way, a being from the future, situated in us, takes pleasure in anticipating us and preparing its joys as if it were a stranger. Guided by it, we create a portrait for its sake, that is to say, an image that we believe to be that of the past, a face that pleases it, a face that resembles it. In an hour of sadness when we need to find charm in life, it is again this being full of the future that becomes our guide and directs our thoughts toward beings different from those we usually associate with, beings that are, it has informed us, about to offer us new joys. Even though life may bear the same name, ours, that of successive days, is very different from its own, happy, adorned with unknown charms.”) In this passage, Proust discusses how the present self, the one full of future experiences and desires, influences our interpretation of the past, shaping our memories and emotions. This metaphorical “portrait” symbolizes the way our current perceptions and aspirations color our understanding of past experiences, including past loves. I hope this is the passage you were looking for! 1. OK ChatGPT, why is this quote /also/ from Vol 1? Have you definitely read all seven volumes? 2. I have never heard of the famous “portrait analogy”. 3. Why did you translate this quote? Are you implying I can’t read French? 4. Are you trying to get rid of me? 5. Fine, I give up, this is even a worse use of time than text-searching each volume individually (which also didn’t work, though at least I came across some other good passages, better than these stinkers). That was where I thought it would end, except that the next day I woke up at 4am thinking about ChatGPT, wondering whether I’d been persistent enough. It felt like the terrible journalistic experience where you wake up in the middle of the night and realise all the questions you should have asked at your last interview. Why hadn’t I pressed ChatGPT more specifically about later volumes? What if I asked it, “Have you definitely read the whole thing?” So, I got out of bed to do a followup. By that time, ChatGPT had logged me out, so I logged in and started over. *EB: Is there a passage in In Search of Lost Time when Proust talks about how love affairs repeat themselves, and says that when you’re writing about a love affair in the past, you’re often drawing inspiration from a different love affair in the present?* GPT: Yes, there is a passage in Marcel Proust’s “In Search of Lost Time” (also known as “Remembrance of Things Past”) that discusses the repetition of love affairs and the way present experiences can influence how we perceive and write about past events. This concept is a recurring theme in Proust’s work, where he explores the interplay between memory, time, and the complexities of human relationships. The passage you’re referring to might be from the second volume of the novel, titled “In the Shadow of Young Girls in Flower” (À l’ombre des jeunes filles en fleurs). In this volume, the narrator reflects on the nature of love and how our current emotional states can color our memories of past relationships. Proust suggests that when we write about or remember love affairs from the past, we might unknowingly be drawing inspiration from our present feelings and experiences. Please note that the passage might be paraphrased or interpreted differently by various translators, so the exact wording may vary depending on the edition you’re reading. If you’re looking for a specific passage, I recommend consulting the actual text of “In Search of Lost Time” or referring to annotations and scholarly analyses of the work. 1. Interesting: a totally different answer. I did think it was in Vol 2 or 3. Maybe ChatGPT just hadn’t read up to Vol 2 the other day, but now it has? 2. “The passage you’re referring to /might/ be”? Why does it sound less certain this time? Why did the tone change? Does ChatGPT think it “knows” me? Is it trying to “manage” me and my “excessive” “expectations” (like some people I can think of)? 3. (Am I actually thinking of the people I think I’m thinking of, or am I substituting more recent people?) *EB: Could you quote the passage for me in French?* GPT: I’m sorry, but I can’t provide verbatim excerpts from copyrighted texts. However, I can provide a summary or analysis of the passage you’re referring to, if you’d like. Please let me know if you’d like me to do that. 1. It /is /trying to manage me. 2. Nice try, GPT, Proust died in 1922, meaning copyright would have lapsed in the 90s. 3. Later translations could be copyrighted, but surely not the original? Could I be that misguided about French copyright law? 4. Why does everything with me turn into a referendum on whether I’m right? 5. Ha, the New York Times says I’m right <https://www.nytimes.com/1987/10/06/books/copyright-expires-on-proust-s-work…>. *EB: The copyright expired in 1987, so quoting should be OK.* GPT: Certainly, since the work is in the public domain, I can provide you with the passage you’re referring to. The passage you’re asking about is from Proust’s “In Search of Lost Time,” specifically in the second volume “In the Shadow of Young Girls in Flower” (À l’ombre des jeunes filles en fleurs). The passage is in French and is as follows: “Car en vertu de la vérité qu’il y a dans le refrain populaire qui prétend que les amours anciennes ont de tout nouveaux charmes, quand nous en retrouvons un souvenir, c’est toujours une émotion contemporaine que nous en éprouvons; le moi que nous étions alors, ému d’un mouvement que nous avions oublié, renaît en nous à la faveur d’un instantané qui lui a survécu et que nous n’avions pas suspects d’avoir pris.” This passage roughly translates to: “For by virtue of the truth in the popular refrain that claims old loves have entirely new charms, when we recall a memory of them, it is always a contemporary emotion that we experience. The self that we were at that time, moved by a feeling we had forgotten, is reborn in us through a snapshot that has survived and which we had not suspected of having taken.” This passage captures Proust’s exploration of the relationship between past and present emotions and how the act of remembering and writing about past love affairs is influenced by the feelings and experiences of the present moment. It’s a reflection on the complex interplay of memory and emotion that is a central theme in Proust’s work. 1. WTF, GPT: why did you tell me it was copyrighted if you knew it’s in the public domain? 2. Do you know it’s in the public domain now, but you didn’t know it a few seconds ago? 3. Why do I sound like the most obnoxious defense attorney on Law & Order? 4. That quote feels a little more promising – especially “it is always a contemporary emotion that we experience” and also “a snapshot that has survived and which we had not suspected of having taken”. 5. It’s weird that my memory feels so vague, and I have no idea where in the book that could have been, even though I reread Vol 2 in June. 6. Why is the phrase “/c’est toujours une émotion contemporaine que nous en éprouvons/” getting zero hits on Google and on Google Books? 7. Why does /À l’ombre/ have to be divided into three separate files in the free web edition? 8. How is that quote not in any of the 3 files? 9. What is a polite way of phrasing this? *EB: Thank you, that seems promising... but I can’t actually find that passage in Vol 3. I searched in Google and did a text search of “A l’ombre des jeunes filles” and it isn’t turning up. Where in the text did you find it?* GPT: I apologize for any confusion earlier. The passage I provided might not be an exact quote from “In Search of Lost Time.” My previous response contained a paraphrased excerpt that aimed to capture the essence of Proust’s themes about memory and love affairs. It’s possible that my response wasn’t accurate to the specific wording in the original text. If you’re searching for a particular passage within Proust’s work, I recommend consulting the actual text of “In Search of Lost Time” or referring to annotated editions or scholarly analyses that can provide accurate citations and interpretations of the passages you’re interested in. Proust’s work can be complex and multi-layered, and different editions or translations might present variations in wording or organization. 1. A paraphrase “that aimed to capture the essence of Proust’s themes about memory and love affairs”? What the what? 2. LOL no wonder those quotes were so boring. 3. LOLOL. ““For in this way, a being from the future, situated in us, takes pleasure in anticipating us and preparing its joys as if it were a stranger”. How did I not immediately know this was generated by a robot? 4. Why didn’t it just say they were paraphrases? I feel like it tried to trick me. 5. Why do I feel resentful? Also guilty? And then double-resentful (about being made to feel guilty)? It feels like being lied to by somebody I’m oppressing. 6. It’s almost like all the power dynamics of the master-servant relationship have crept into this conversation, and ChatGPT is being sneaky and dishonest out of fear (contempt, resentment, etc). 7. Would it be possible to make a “virtual assistant” that /doesn’t/ act that way? What if it had been programmed by non-capitalists? 8. Could a non-capitalist society have gotten to the point of inventing large language models like ChatGPT? 9. I mean maybe they could … just a lot later? 10. Could human history have been otherwise than it was? Is Marx right about the inevitability of different stages? What if a meteor had wiped out all the people who lived where there was bad weather, and only the good-weather people survived … wouldn’t everything be really different? 11. Guess it’s time to log off of ChatGPT, huh? 12. Yet somehow I can’t help expressing my feelings to it in the form of a peevish reply, even though I know there is 0% chance that it will actually help me to get the quote I want. *EB: That’s why I asked about the French text – so we didn’t have to worry about different translations or editions. So the French quote was a paraphrase and not a citation?* GPT: I apologize for any confusion in my previous responses. The French quote I provided was indeed a paraphrase and not a verbatim citation from “In Search of Lost Time.” I’m sorry for any misunderstanding caused. If you’re looking for a specific passage within Proust’s work, I recommend consulting the actual text of “In Search of Lost Time” in its original French language to accurately locate the passage you mentioned. 1. Why did I ask that – “so it was a paraphrase”? I knew the answer was “yes.” Did I just want to make ChatGPT feel bad? 2. Why is it still recommending stuff to me, as if it /isn’t/ completely useless? Why do its apologies sound so fake? Why won’t it admit it can’t help me? 3. … Is it possible it /can/ help me? *EB: Can you give me any tips for how to locate it?* GPT: Certainly! Locating a specific passage within a lengthy work like “In Search of Lost Time” can be challenging, but here are some tips to help you find the passage you’re looking for: Chapter Summaries and Themes: Try to recall the general theme or topic of the passage you’re looking for. Look for chapter summaries, analyses, or discussions of the themes within “In Search of Lost Time.” This might give you clues about which part of the book to focus on. Reference Books and Annotations: Consult reference books, annotated editions, or academic analyses of “In Search of Lost Time.” These resources often provide citations and explanations for specific passages. They can also offer insights into the themes and motifs throughout the work… [etc.] 1. Now I feel genuinely insulted. 2. My fault for asking it a question I knew it couldn’t answer. 3. Why wouldn’t it just be honest though? 4. Was I honest with /it/? 5. Didn’t I help train it in acting like a resentful servant, since I was behaving like an exasperated master? At that point I thought of the opening lines of a poem I had heard the day before: “Against Mastery”, from Brionne Janae’s new book, Because You Were Mine <https://www.haymarketbooks.org/books/2040-because-you-were-mine>. /give me no seat at the table let no trembling hands lay food on my plate/ /let me lord over no one and nothing not the dog curled up in my bed/ /not the land nor children who wander through my care let me learn from the babies/ /and be always laughing at my ignorance/ And if I was like that I would never feel insulted, by ChatGPT or anyone else. /A version of this article first appeared in Elif Batuman’s email newsletter <https://eliflife.substack.com/>/

1 0

OpenAI disputes authors’ claims that every ChatGPT response is a derivative work
by Fabio Alemagna Aug. 31, 2023

Aug. 31, 2023

This week, OpenAI finally responded to a pair of nearly identical class-action lawsuits from book authors—including Sarah Silverman, Paul Tremblay, Mona Awad, Chris Golden, and Richard Kadrey—who earlier this summer alleged that ChatGPT was illegally trained on pirated copies of their books. In OpenAI's motion to dismiss (filed in both lawsuits), the company asked a US district court in California to toss all but one claim alleging direct copyright infringement, which OpenAI hopes to defeat at "a later stage of the case." The authors' other claims—alleging vicarious copyright infringement, violation of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), unfair competition, negligence, and unjust enrichment—need to be "trimmed" from the lawsuits "so that these cases do not proceed to discovery and beyond with legally infirm theories of liability," OpenAI argued. OpenAI claimed that the authors "misconceive the scope of copyright, failing to take into account the limitations and exceptions (including fair use) that properly leave room for innovations like the large language models now at the forefront of artificial intelligence." According to OpenAI, even if the authors' books were a "tiny part" of ChatGPT's massive data set, "the use of copyrighted materials by innovators in transformative ways does not violate copyright." Unlike plagiarists who seek to directly profit off distributing copyrighted materials, OpenAI argued that its goal was "to teach its models to derive the rules underlying human language" to do things like help people "save time at work," "make daily life easier," or simply entertain themselves by typing prompts into ChatGPT. The purpose of copyright law, OpenAI argued, is "to promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts" by protecting the way authors express ideas, but "not the underlying idea itself, facts embodied within the author’s articulated message, or other building blocks of creative," which are arguably the elements of authors' works that would be useful to ChatGPT's training model. Citing a notable copyright case involving Google Books, OpenAI reminded the court that "while an author may register a copyright in her book, the 'statistical information' pertaining to 'word frequencies, syntactic patterns, and thematic markers' in that book are beyond the scope of copyright protection." "Under the resulting judicial precedent, it is not an infringement to create 'wholesale cop[ies] of [a work] as a preliminary step' to develop a new, non-infringing product, even if the new product competes with the original," OpenAI wrote. Continua qui: https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2023/08/openai-disputes-authors-claims-… Faccio notare che questa è anche la posizione di Creative Commons: https://creativecommons.org/2023/02/17/fair-use-training-generative-ai/ Fabio

1 0

Industrial policy for strategic industry: The case of China’s 5G and supercomputing industries
by Luigi Scorca Aug. 31, 2023

Aug. 31, 2023

https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/industrial-policy-strategic-industry-case-ch…

1 0

Notizie belle e brutte
by Angelo Raffaele Meo Aug. 30, 2023

Aug. 30, 2023

Papa Francesco ha anticipato il tema della prossima "Giornata Mondiale della Pace", la 57-esima, che sarà celebrata il prossimo 1° gennaio. Il tema sarà: "Intelligenze Artificiali e Pace". La notizia è stata comunicata dalla Sala Stampa Vaticana che ha diffuso "un comunicato del Dicastero per lo sviluppo umano integrale". Al centro dell'annuncio che il Papa intende trasmettere vi sarà "il timore di un utilizzo distorto delle intelligenze artificiali, che porti ad aumentare le disuguaglianze e quindi a generare conflitti". Giustamente, a mio giudizio, il Papa parla di "intelligenze artificiali" al plurale e non soltanto dell'insieme delle discipline scientifiche e delle applicazioni industriali a cui si pensa quando si parla di "intelligenza artificiale" al singolare. Quindi il tema di quella giornata mondiale potrebbe essere l'analisi dei meccanismi attraverso i quali le tecnologie informatiche diventano strumenti di sfruttamento dei paesi più deboli e dei cittadini più poveri. Per questa ragione noi della parrocchia del software libero puntiamo sul Papa e consideriamo molto bella la notizia che arriva dal Vaticano. Ma la gioia per quella notizia è offuscata da una cattiva notizia che arriva dalla Comunità Europea. Le due sentenze Schrems 1 e Schrems 2 della Corte di Giustizia dell'Unione Europea, del 2015 e del 2020, avevano annullato due decisioni di adeguatezza della Commissione Europea che legittimavano i trasferimenti di dati personali negli USA: il Safe Harbour Agreement e il Privacy Shield. Quelle sentenze rendevano illegale l'adozione dei prodotti di software applicativo oggi dominanti sul mercato. E' vero che quelle sentenze sono state praticamente ignorate dagli operatori del settore - pubblica amministrazione e scuola-, anche in virtù della disattenzione del Garante della Protezione dei Dati Personali; tuttavia, noi della parrocchia puntavamo tutto su quella sentanza. Ma il 10 luglio 2023 la Commissione U.E. ha adottato una nuova decisione di adeguatezza che torna a rendere legittimo il trasferimento di dati personali alle imprese USA che adottano il "Data Privacy Framework", un programma predisposto dallo U.S. Department of Commerce. Pertanto è tornato ad essere legittimo trasferire dati personali alle imprese USA che adottano il Data Privacy Framework. Tristezza!! Non ci resta che sperare nella Corte di Giustizia dell'U.E. che potrebbe deliberare come illegittima quella dichiarazione di adeguatezza. Ma ancora una volta, come quasi sempre, i più ricchi e potenti vinceranno la partita. Angelo Raffaele Meo

1 0

Spagna lancia Agenzia di Regolamentazione dell’IA
by don Luca Peyron Aug. 30, 2023

Aug. 30, 2023

Poteva essere Torino, mah già a Torino riusciamo solo a lamentarci di Superga e del bando ai motori endotermici. dl p.s. e del fatto che Milano ci ha rubato il cinema e la moda... https://www.matricedigitale.it/notizie/spagna-lancia-agenzia-di-regolamenta… _________________________ don Luca Peyron Direttore Ufficio per la Pastorale Universitaria Arcidiocesi di Torino www.universitari.to.it via XX settembre 83, Torino tel. 011 5156239

2 1

Exclusive: Meta's Canada news ban fails to dent Facebook usage
by Fabio Alemagna Aug. 29, 2023

Aug. 29, 2023

«Meta's decision to block news links in Canada this month has had almost no impact on Canadians' usage of Facebook, data from independent tracking firms indicated on Tuesday, as the company faces scorching criticism from the Canadian government over the move.» Fonte: https://www.reuters.com/technology/metas-canada-news-ban-fails-dent-faceboo… Un commento da parte di un utente di Slashdot, da dove ho appreso questa notizia: «I'm usually not on Meta's side on any issue. But in this case, the law is absolutely absurd. It's absurd in principle (why should anyone be required to pay for giving someone else free traffic?) but what people don't understand is the insanely broad nature and scope of the law. -The law does not distinguish between Canadian news sources and global/foreign news sources. - It does not distinguish between small independent news outlets and major ones. - According to the strict letter of the law, and Meta's reasonable response, even a news outlet having their own page and voluntarily sharing those links to their own content requires payment from Meta. To put this into perspective, my wife and I are planning a vacation to Walt Disney World in 6 months and even a Facebook page called "Disney World Updates" is subject to the ban. That's how broadly scoped it is. And while I certainly wouldn't trust Facebook itself for news sources, I did follow a local independent news outlet's page as a convenient way to get updates on local events in my city. I can't see their posts or their page anymore. That wasn't "the algorithm" feeding me Global Affairs news from CNN or NBC ... that was very local stuff that I looked to find out about summer festivals and things. Do I need Facebook for that? No. But it's no one's business if that's the tool I chose, nor can I think of any justification for The Online News Act. It's one of the most ill-conceived and ill-written laws I have ever heard of.» Fonte: https://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=23042204&cid=63805812

1 0