- nexa - server-nexa.polito.it

China’s Long March to Technological Supremacy
by J.C. DE MARTIN Aug. 28, 2019

Aug. 28, 2019

https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/china/2019-08-27/chinas-long-march-… (Sent from my wireless device; please excuse brevity and typos (if any))

1 0

All EFF’d Up | Yasha Levine
by J.C. DE MARTIN Aug. 27, 2019

Aug. 27, 2019

All EFF’d Up Silicon Valley’s astroturf privacy shakedown https://thebaffler.com/salvos/all-effd-up-levine (Sent from my wireless device; please excuse brevity and typos (if any))

4 3

Chinese Agencies 'Crack Telegram': A Timely Warning For End-To-End Encryption
by Luigi Scorca Aug. 27, 2019

Aug. 27, 2019

https://www.forbes.com/sites/zakdoffman/2019/08/25/chinese-agencies-crack-t… Luigi

1 0

Google, University of Chicago named in suit charging misuse of patient data | Healthcare IT News
by J.C. DE MARTIN Aug. 25, 2019

Aug. 25, 2019

The class action complaint alleges that, despite being deidentified, Google's expertise in data mining and AI makes it "uniquely able to determine the identity" of the medical records shared with it by the university. Google, University of Chicago named in suit charging misuse of patient data By Nathan Eddy July 01, 2019 04:03 PM https://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/google-university-chicago-named-suit-… (Sent from my wireless device; please excuse brevity and typos (if any))

1 0

Deconstructing Google’s excuses on tracking protection
by J.C. DE MARTIN Aug. 24, 2019

Aug. 24, 2019

https://freedom-to-tinker.com/2019/08/23/deconstructing-googles-excuses-on-… (Sent from my wireless device; please excuse brevity and typos (if any))

1 0

Apple Isn't Disrupting Banks, It Is Helping Them
by J.C. DE MARTIN Aug. 24, 2019

Aug. 24, 2019

https://www.forbes.com/sites/francescoppola/2019/08/21/apple-and-the-banks/ (Sent from my wireless device; please excuse brevity and typos (if any))

1 0

Report: A Crackdown On The Use Of Face Recognition Tech Is Brewing In The EU | Gizmodo Australia
by Alberto Cammozzo Aug. 24, 2019

Aug. 24, 2019

<https://www.gizmodo.com.au/2019/08/a-crackdown-on-the-use-of-face-recogniti…> [...] The EU has regulation in the works that will give citizens more power over how their facial recognition data is used, senior officials told the Financial Times. The plan will reportedly limit “the indiscriminate use of facial recognition technology” by both companies as well as public authorities. It will also give citizens the right to know when their facial recognition data is being used, according to a source who spoke with the Financial Times. According to the report, the restrictions on face recognition tech are part of a broader plan to address the use of artificial intelligence and to “foster public trust and acceptance” in this type of technology. A document obtained by the Financial Times stated that the intention is to “set a world-standard for AI regulation” with “clear, predictable and uniform rules … which adequately protect individuals.” “AI applications can pose significant risks to fundamental rights,” the document reportedly states. “Unregulated AI systems may take decisions affecting citizens without explanation, possibility of recourse or even a responsible interlocutor.” There have been a number of reports on how facial recognition tech has been inaccurate, misused, and abused, ranging from the tremendously dumb to unsettlingly disturbing and, in some cases, life-endangering. Which is oftentimes the point. The reported EU plan to target “indiscriminate” usage of facial recognition tech in public areas would extend to both public and private entities. Officials and private companies have mostly been able to continue to deploy this technology in flawed and unethical ways because there are very few explicit laws and legal requirements for transparency that would effectively limit or end their usage. The EU’s plans are reportedly still in their early stages, so it’s unclear what the exact parameters of the regulation will be. Still, sweeping legislation drafted to address technology that, unfortunately, is already being irresponsibly utilised is progress. The U.S. has yet to consider such a far-reaching plan, however, there has been some progress, with three U.S. cities instituting bans on the technology and others considering similar prohibitions. It’s also unclear if a massive surveillance system can coexist with individual rights to privacy and data. Sure, granting individuals the right to know exactly how their biometric data is being used is an important step toward transparency, but if they don’t like what they learn, what recourse will they have? And while some regulation is better than no regulation, some human rights advocates and ethical technologists might argue that simply putting limitations on a technology that can easily target vulnerable communities is not enough — that instead, we should ban it outright. Not all privacy experts believe that the technology needs to be banned everywhere forever. Appropriate uses cases may be possible. But while we’re seeing a litany of abuses, and until it’s proven that this technology causes more good than harm, it shouldn’t be used, especially by powerful government agencies and private corporations. It’s an argument the EU should consider as it decides how to ensure this invasive technology isn’t abused. Ultimately, its most ethical deployment may be no deployment at all.

1 0

Ethically Aligned Design, First Edition (EAD1e) | IEEE
by Alberto Cammozzo Aug. 24, 2019

Aug. 24, 2019

<https://ethicsinaction.ieee.org/> We released Ethically Aligned Design, Version 1 (EADv1) as a Request for Input in December of 2016 and received over two hundred pages of in-depth feedback about the draft. We subsequently released Ethically Aligned Design, Version 2 (EADv2) in December 2017 and received over three hundred pages of in-depth feedback about the draft. Since that time, over one thousand people from the realms of business, academia and policy helped write, edit, and review Ethically Aligned Design, First Edition.

1 0

Publication of RESET journal issue “Doing Gender Online”
by Francesca Musiani Aug. 24, 2019

Aug. 24, 2019

Cari colleghi e care colleghe, avevo già annunciato prima dell'estate l'uscita di questo numero di RESET -- l'introduzione è ora tradotta in inglese. carissimi saluti Francesca --------- We are delighted to announce the publication of *RESETs* latest issue entitled “Doing Gender Online”. Please find the summary below. Best regards, The Editorial Board of *RESET. Social Science Research on the Internet* *Marie Bergström & Dominique Pasquier*, "Doing Gender Online. Ordinary Practice Beyond Utopian Ideals. Introduction <https://journals.openedition.org/reset/1804>" - *Dina Pinsky*, "Doing gender online through flirtation. Digitally mediated romantic interactions among college students <https://journals.openedition.org/reset/1303>" - *Chloé Paberz*, "Garçons manqués, monstres et lolitas : jouer avec les rôles de filles dans une entreprise de jeux vidéo sud-coréenne <https://journals.openedition.org/reset/1341>" - *Johann Chaulet & Jessica Soler-Benonie* : "Se réunir pour jouer : les LAN parties entre ajustements et réaffirmation des identités genrées <https://journals.openedition.org/reset/1309>". - *Florian Vörös*, "La valeur des plaisirs pornographiques en ligne. Masculinités, sexualités et hiérarchies culturelles <https://journals.openedition.org/reset/1315>". - *Lucie Delias*, "Les facteurs de l’autonomie face à l’informatique connectée chez les retraités français : génération et trajectoires genrées <https://journals.openedition.org/reset/1321>". - *Varia* : *Alban* *Chaplet*, " Les consommations d’humour des étudiants. L’espace des préférences et des pratiques <https://journals.openedition.org/reset/1750>". -- Francesca Musiani, Ph.D. Chargée de recherche | Associate Research Professor, CNRS <http://www.cnrs.fr> Directrice adjointe | Deputy Director, Centre for Internet and Society <http://cis.cnrs.fr> [CIS], UPR 2000 Chercheuse associée | Associate Researcher, i3-CSI <http://www.csi.ensmp.fr/>, MINES ParisTech Global Fellow, Internet Governance Lab <https://internetgovernancelab.org>, American University I'm involved in: CPT <http://iamcr.org/s-wg/section/cp-t>-IAMCR | @PolicyR <http://policyreview.info/> | ISOC Franc <https://www.isoc.fr>e <https://www.isoc.fr> | CSA Lab <https://www.csa.fr/Informer/CSA-lab/Fonctionnement> | RESET <https://journals.openedition.org/reset/> On the Web <http://www.iscc.cnrs.fr/spip.php?article1960> | On Twitter <https://twitter.com/franmusiani>

1 0

Non è tanto il profitto di per sé che fa problema ma il come lo si ottiene e a chi lo si deve dare
by don Luca Peyron Aug. 23, 2019

Aug. 23, 2019

*Duecento tra le principali aziende di Wall Street e colossi finanziari - da Jp Morgan ad Amazon, da BlackRock a General Motors - hanno reso pubblico un documento in cui sostengono che per creare valore di lungo periodo, le aziende non devono solo portare dividendi ai propri azionisti, costi quel che costi.* Una notizia ed un commento apparentemente lontano dai nostri temi, ma credo invece significativo rispetto al governo della tecnologia, al suo futuro ed alla democraticità dell'intero sistema. Buona lettura per chi lo desidera dl http://www.vita.it/it/article/2019/08/20/zamagni-quel-documento-e-un-atto-d… _________________________ www.universitari.to.it via XX settembre 83, Torino tel. 011 5156239

4 3