- nexa - server-nexa.polito.it

Dei cottimisti del web dietro gli assistenti vocali Apple
by Antonio Casilli Sept. 4, 2019

Sept. 4, 2019

E' uscita or ora la traduzione italiana della lunga inchiesta del sito d'informazione Mediapart, alla quale ho partecipato anch'io, sulle intelligenze "artificiali artificiali" di Apple: condizioni di lavoro quotidiane, traumi e rischi psicosociali, violazioni della privacy degli utenti, sfruttamento della manodopera esternalizzata, ma soprattutto un sacco di informazioni nuove su come funzionano le micro-tasks di "addestramento dei dati". L’assistente vocale di Apple: il calvario dei dipendenti http://www.euronomade.info/?p=12472 (se vi interessa la versione in Francese, solo su abbonamento, ditemelo per email).

1 0

Gig Authoritarianism
by Antonio Casilli Sept. 4, 2019

Sept. 4, 2019

Un 'review essay' (tre recensioni, con un filo conduttore), a volte un po' facile, ma parecchio utile. Gig Authoritarians By Maya Vinokour https://www.publicbooks.org/gig-authoritarians/ -- Antonio A. Casilli

1 0

The Paradox of Automation as Anti-Bias Intervention by Ifeoma Ajunwa :: SSRN
by J.C. DE MARTIN Sept. 3, 2019

Sept. 3, 2019

The Paradox of Automation as Anti-Bias Intervention Ifeoma Ajunwa, The Paradox of Automation as Anti-Bias Intervention, 41 Cardozo, L. Rev. __ (2020 Forthcoming) 54 Pages Posted: 10 Mar 2016 Last revised: 15 Aug 2019 Ifeoma Ajunwa Cornell University ILR School/Law School; Harvard University - Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society Date Written: March 10, 2016 Abstract A received wisdom is that automated decision-making serves as an anti-bias intervention. The conceit is that removing humans from the decision-making process will also eliminate human bias. The paradox, however, is that in some instances, automated decision-making has served to replicate and amplify bias. With a case study of the algorithmic capture of hiring as heuristic device, this Article provides a taxonomy of problematic features associated with algorithmic decision-making as anti-bias intervention and argues that those features are at odds with the fundamental principle of equal opportunity in employment. To examine these problematic features within the context of algorithmic hiring and to explore potential legal approaches to rectifying them, the Article brings together two streams of legal scholarship: law and technology studies and employment & labor law. Counterintuitively, the Article contends that the framing of algorithmic bias as a technical problem is misguided. Rather, the Article’s central claim is that bias is introduced in the hiring process, in large part, due to an American legal tradition of deference to employers, especially allowing for such nebulous hiring criterion as “cultural fit.” The Article observes the lack of legal frameworks that take into account the emerging technological capabilities of hiring tools which make it difficult to detect disparate impact. The Article thus argues for a re-thinking of legal frameworks that take into account both the liability of employers and those of the makers of algorithmic hiring systems who, as brokers, owe a fiduciary duty of care. Particularly related to Title VII, the Article proposes that in legal reasoning corollary to extant tort doctrines, an employer’s failure to audit and correct its automated hiring platforms for disparate impact could serve as prima facie evidence of discriminatory intent, leading to the development of the doctrine of discrimination per se. The article also considers other approaches separate from employment law such as establishing consumer legal protections for job applicants that would mandate their access to the dossier of information consulted by automated hiring systems in making the employment decision. Keywords: Big Data, Algorithms, Disparate Impact, Employment Discrimination, Hiring, Business, Corporations, Organizations, Sociology of Work, Diversity https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Papers.cfm?abstract_id=2746078 (Sent from my wireless device; please excuse brevity and typos (if any))

1 0

Llanto por la muerte de Giovanni Buttarelli | European Data Protection Supervisor
by J.C. DE MARTIN Sept. 3, 2019

Sept. 3, 2019

https://edps.europa.eu/press-publications/press-news/blog/llanto-por-la-mue… (Sent from my wireless device; please excuse brevity and typos (if any))

1 0

Reader, I Googled It | The New Yorker
by J.C. DE MARTIN Sept. 2, 2019

Sept. 2, 2019

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2019/09/02/reader-i-googled-it Reader, I Googled It Amid fears about the death of books, finding new ways to bring them to life. By Dan ChiassonAugust 26, 2019 (Sent from my wireless device; please excuse brevity and typos (if any))

1 0

What People Hate About Being Managed by Algorithms, According to a Study of Uber Drivers
by J.C. DE MARTIN Sept. 2, 2019

Sept. 2, 2019

https://hbr.org/2019/08/what-people-hate-about-being-managed-by-algorithms-… (Sent from my wireless device; please excuse brevity and typos (if any))

1 0

Facebook scans system libraries from their Android app user’s phone in the background and uploads them to their server
by Giacomo Tesio Sept. 2, 2019

Sept. 2, 2019

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1167463054709334017.html Conoscere le versioni delle librerie installate significa sapere se il device è hackerabile. Dite che potrebbe interessare a qualcuno? Giacomo

1 0

Strike 2.0: how gig economy workers are using tech to fight back | Books | The Guardian
by Alberto Cammozzo Sept. 1, 2019

Sept. 1, 2019

<https://www.theguardian.com/books/2019/aug/31/the-new-resistance-how-gig-ec…> [...] And organised resistance by digitally outsourced workers has erupted repeatedly on the streets of major cities in recent years, usually beginning in the back alley spots where delivery riders are encouraged by their apps to congregate and then fanning out rapidly through WhatsApp networks, word of mouth and some technological trickery. In 2016, for example, an announcement by Deliveroo that it would soon be unilaterally altering its rider payment structure prompted a six-day “strike” in which riders acted en masse to make themselves unavailable for orders. Colleagues from Deliveroo’s rivals, Uber Eats, swiftly followed suit, and began taking advantage of a promotional offer within the app that granted new customers £5 off their first order. By repeatedly creating new accounts and ordering low-value meals to be delivered to the picket line, the strikers amassed both a mountain of free food at Uber’s expense and a steady stream of fellow riders, who would turn up with the order only to be met by a sea of radicalised peers cheering their arrival and chanting “Log out, log out!” In the words of one Deliveroo rider, the very technology that was designed to control workers was now being turned against their managers, allowing riders to “occupy the system in a way”. Not unlike the assembly line of the last century, and the auto strikes in Flint that subverted it, a tool engineered for capital was being hacked by the labour force. “It’s like a sit-in,” the Deliveroo rider told Woodcock. This kind of fightback can be found throughout the contemporary economy. New apps abound that allow workers to log abuse by managers, read up on their rights, organise their workplace and compare pay rates both with those in similar jobs in their industry and with their own company’s financial results, a powerful weapon for agitating colleagues and rejecting management explanations for low wages. The information asymmetry at the core of digital platforms such as Uber is gradually being undermined by a vibrant network of driver forums with hundreds of thousands of members sharing stories, advice, communications from Uber received through the app and payment details, including screenshots of receipts and monthly income tallies. These enable drivers to collectively gain an understanding of how the app’s secretive ratings systems and dispatch algorithms actually operate. Among other things, this sort of crowdsourced information provides drivers with the opportunity to game the system, for example by agreeing to log off from the app simultaneously, thereby tricking Uber’s algorithms into thinking there is a shortage of drivers and implementing surge pricing to tempt them back. Worker subversion of new management and surveillance technologies is merely one among many clandestine vulnerabilities inside the current economic system. Another can be found within those long, just-in-time supply chains that may appear to whip car parts and chicken meat and consumer electronics effortlessly across dozens of national borders but that are, in reality, almost entirely reliant on dense physical infrastructure. That network includes factories, warehouses and lorry depots, and the airports, stations, hotels, hospitals and schools that go with them: all firmly embedded in their geographical surroundings, and all highly susceptible to strike actions by those who maintain, guard and – like Fatima – clean them. In Britain, the cleaning sector alone employs 700,000 people. Since 2017, McDonald’s workers have organised themselves to fight back against conditions, and as this McStrike movement indicates, the very precariousness of work is itself a fuel for labour militancy; the more that low pay and casualisation become the norm, the more those on the wrong end of it have nothing to lose by striking back [...]

3 3

NYRB: "The Oligarch Threat"
by J.C. DE MARTIN Sept. 1, 2019

Sept. 1, 2019

*The Oligarch Threat** * /Tamsin Shaw // / On July 24, 2019, a buoyant Boris Johnson swept past crowds shouting “Bollocks to Brexit! Bollocks to Boris!” and was ushered into the hushed splendor of Buckingham Palace. There, he shook hands with the antique, bejeweled Queen Elizabeth II, and became the prime minister of Great Britain, elected not by popular mandate but by members of his Conservative Party. That same day, on the other side of the Atlantic, a frail and reluctant Robert Mueller took his oath before giving public testimony to the House Judiciary Committee, and later the House Intelligence Committee, on a controversial and difficult twenty-two-month-long investigation—made more challenging by multiple witnesses’ lying under oath—in which he had painstakingly examined Russian interference in the 2016 election of Donald Trump. […] Continua qui: https://www.nybooks.com/daily/2019/08/27/the-oligarch-threat/

1 0

NYRB: "Beware the Big Five"
by J.C. DE MARTIN Aug. 31, 2019

Aug. 31, 2019

*Beware the Big Five* Tamsin Shaw April 5, 2018 Issue / //The Darkening Web: The War for Cyberspace // //by Alexander Klimburg// //Penguin, 420 pp., $30.00// / The big Silicon Valley technology companies have long been viewed by much of the American public as astonishingly successful capitalist enterprises operated by maverick geniuses. The largest among them—Microsoft, Apple, Facebook, Amazon, and Google (the so-called Big Five)—were founded by youthful and charismatic male visionaries with signature casual wardrobes: the open-necked blue shirt, the black polo-neck, the marled gray T-shirt and hoodie. These founders have won immense public trust in their emergent technologies, from home computing to social media to the new frontier, artificial intelligence. Their companies have seemed to grow organically within the flourishing ecology of the open Internet. [...] continua qui: https://www.nybooks.com/articles/2018/04/05/silicon-valley-beware-big-five/

1 0