- nexa - server-nexa.polito.it

NY Times: "The Music Streams That Soothe an Industry"
by J.C. DE MARTIN July 29, 2009

July 29, 2009

THE NEW YORK TIMES July 26, 2009 Slipstream The Music Streams That Soothe an Industry http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/26/business/26stream.html?_r=1&ref=technology By BRAD STONE LIKE many teenagers, Josh Wilson, the 13-year-old son of the New York venture capitalist Fred Wilson, has on occasion visited the Internet’s peer-to-peer file-sharing services to download music and television shows. But recently, as Mr. Wilson recounted last week on his popular blog, A VC, Josh has started streaming television shows from Netflix under the family’s $24-a-month subscription plan and listening to licensed, ad-supported music videos from YouTube on his iPhone. Asked by his father why he was not using file-sharing services like BitTorrent to download shows like “Friday Night Lights,” Josh replied, “BitTorrent takes too long.” [... ampio pezzo centrale .....] Mr. Lefsetz believes that the answer is for the music industry to nourish the streaming sites and then push users toward subscribing to them for a monthly fee. “The key is to just get $10 from everybody,” he said. That, he said, might finally vanquish the demons of music piracy. Mr. Lefsetz uses himself as an example of this salvaged future. He used to turn to file-sharing sites to quickly sample new music he wanted to write about. Now he just streams songs free from Spotify. juan carlos

1 0

[Fwd: [A2k] Berkman: Google Books Settlement Open Workshop]
by J.C. DE MARTIN July 28, 2009

July 28, 2009

-------- Original Message -------- Subject: [A2k] Berkman: Google Books Settlement Open Workshop Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 13:44:33 -0400 From: Manon Ress <manon.ress(a)keionline.org> To: a2k discuss list <a2k(a)lists.essential.org> http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/googlebooks/Main_Page quote: The proposed Google Book Search settlement creates the opportunity for unprecedented access by the public, scholars, libraries and others to a digital library containing millions of books assembled by major research libraries. But the settlement is controversial, in large part because this access is limited in major ways: instead of being truly open, this new digital library will be controlled by a single company, Google, and a newly created Book Rights Registry consisting of representatives of authors and publishers; it will include millions of so-called “orphan works” that cannot legally be included in any competing digitization and access effort, and it will be available to readers only in the United States. It need not have been this way. This workshop seeks to bring a fresh, unique perspective to a complex and widely debated topic. It will focus not on the specific merits and demerits of the settlement itself, or the particular antitrust and privacy and other objections that have been raised. Instead, it will examine the idea of possible alternative universes and offer specific proposals for scenarios that may arise whether or not the settlement is approved. What can libraries, or universities, or non-profits, or Congress, do in the current landscape? And how might these possibilities help us to define a better world than the one that we have today and, more importantly, than the one that will exist if the Google settlement is approved in its current form? Regardless of what happens with respect to the Settlement, what alternative possibilities could lead to a richer, more open and better information ecosystem than the one we have today or might have tomorrow with the Settlement? By exploring these alternatives, this workshop seeks, in the end, to help inform the debate over the Settlement and its terms and to illuminate some of the key policy considerations that are at stake. Its ultimate goal is to develop a series of options and proposals that could improve on the status quo in novel ways. end of quote *************************************************************************** Manon Ress manon.ress(a)keionline.org Knowledge Ecology International 1621 Connecticut Ave, NW, Washington, DC 20009 USA Tel.: +1.202.332.2670, Fax: +1.202.332.2673 _______________________________________________ A2k mailing list A2k(a)lists.essential.org http://lists.essential.org/mailman/listinfo/a2k

1 0

passaggio del discorso di Viviane Reding
by J.C. DE MARTIN July 28, 2009

July 28, 2009

“E' necessario punire coloro che violano la legge. Ma al momento ci sono sul mercato offerte legali, attraenti e vantaggiose, per gli utenti? Il nostro attuale sistema giuridico sui diritti di proprietà intellettuale è veramente adatto alla internet generation? Abbiamo considerato tutte le opzioni alternative alle misure più repressive? Abbiamo esaminato la situazione con gli occhi di un sedicenne o solo dal punto di vista dei professori di diritto cresciuti nell’era di Gutenberg? Ritengo che la crescente pirateria è dovuta a una non-fiducia negli attuali modelli di business e nelle soluzioni giuridiche. E dovrebbe essere un campanello d'allarme per i politici”. Tratto da http://www.key4biz.it/News/2009/07/10/Policy/Viviane_Reding_economia_digita… juan carlos

3 4

How Copyright Can Be Viewed As Anti-Property
by Marco Pancini July 28, 2009

July 28, 2009

Interessante: http://techdirt.com/articles/20090719/0108125588.shtml -- Marco Pancini European Senior Policy Counsel Google Italy Corso Europa, 2 20122 Milano, Italia Tel. +39 02 36618524 Cell. +39.348.9946222 pancini(a)google.com Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/googlepolicyit This email may be confidential or privileged. If you received this communication by mistake, please don't forward it to anyone else, please erase all copies and attachments, and please let me know that it went to the wrong person. Thanks.

8 12

NY Times: "Advocates Ask Google for Privacy Guarantees in Online Library"
by J.C. DE MARTIN July 26, 2009

July 26, 2009

July 23, 2009, 8:04 pm Advocates Ask Google for Privacy Guarantees in Online Library By Miguel Helft Three advocacy groups have asked Google to commit to protect the privacy of readers in its book search service, which is poised for a major expansion under a pending class-action settlement. The groups, the Electronic Frontier Foundation, the American Civil Liberties Union and the Samuelson Law, Technology and Public Policy Clinic at the University of California, Berkeley, have asked Google to limit the data it collects about users’ reading habits, to commit to protect reader records by handing them over only in response to subpoenas or court orders, and to put into effect measures giving users control of their data. The groups made the requests in a letter to Eric Schmidt, Google’s chief executive. In an accompanying blog post, the groups are urging people to send e-mail messages to Mr. Schmidt demanding privacy protections. “We’ve asked that Google only respond to legitimate warrants when the government comes calling, for example, and we’ve asked that they not share your private reading data with third parties without your permission, among other things,” the groups wrote. On its public policy blog, Google said it shared many of the privacy goals raised by the advocacy groups. But Google also said that its expanded book search service would not be built until an landmark settlement of a copyright class action filed by authors and publishers is approved by a court. (That settlement, which will allow Google to build an expansive digital library, has attracted criticism and is currently being scrutinized by the Justice Department for possible antitrust problems.) Because the service has yet to be built, it was premature to draft a detailed privacy policy it, the company said. “The services authorized by the agreement haven’t been built or even designed yet,” Dan Clancy, engineering director for Google Books, wrote. “That means it’s very difficult (if not impossible) to draft a detailed privacy policy. While we know that our eventual product will build in privacy protections — like always giving users clear information about privacy, and choices about what if any data they share when they use our services — we don’t yet know exactly how this all will work. We do know that whatever we ultimately build will protect readers’ privacy rights, upholding the standards set long ago by booksellers and by the libraries whose collections are being opened to the public through this settlement.” Cindy Cohn, legal director at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, said that she decided to go ahead with the public campaign after months of discussions with Google. She said that Google’s response was insufficient and that the company should commit to guarantees in writing before the settlement is reviewed by a court in October. And she dismissed the argument that Google could not make privacy guarantees until the product was built. “Whether to hand data only in response to a warrant or not is not a tech decision,” she said in an interview. “Whether you are holding data for 30 days or longer is not a tech decision.” Other groups, including the American Library Association, have also raised concerns about privacy and have asked the court to exercise vigorous oversight of the settlement.

1 0

Re: [nexa] Conferenza Centro NEXA 2009: prof. Guedon
by a.dicorinto＠uniroma1.it July 24, 2009

July 24, 2009

Jean Paul Guedon è molto bravo. Delle sue opere è pubblicata in italiano Per la pubblicità del sapere nella collana Methexis (Edizioni Plus, Pisa UNiversity Press), grazie agli sforzi della nostra amica Maria Chiara Pievatolo che immagino conoscerete per l'eccellente critica alla privatizzazione della conoscenza che conduce in ambito universitario da molti anni in solitaria (prima che arrivasse <nexa :-))

2 1

Conferenza Centro NEXA 2009: prof. Guedon
by J.C. DE MARTIN July 24, 2009

July 24, 2009

Carissimi, come sapete [1] il 28 novembre 2009 avra' luogo la prima Conferenza Annuale del Centro NEXA su Internet & Società. In proposito, sono lieto di anticiparvi che alla conferenza partecipera' anche il prof. Jean-Claude Guedon, (McGill University), autore, tra le altre cose, di: "In Oldenburg's Long Shadow: Librarians, Research Scientists, Publishers, and the Control of Scientific Publishing" http://www.arl.org/resources/pubs/mmproceedings/138guedon.shtml Il prof. Guedon sara' il keynote speaker dell'Open Access Day del Politecnico di Torino il giorno prima, ma ho appena saputo che, come speravo, si fermera' anche per la conferenza del Centro NEXA. Un caro saluto, juan carlos [1] http://server-nexa.polito.it/pipermail/nexa/2009-July/000129.html

1 0

micro-volunteer opportunities via mobile phones
by J.C. DE MARTIN July 23, 2009

July 23, 2009

http://www.theextraordinaries.org/ Non ho parole. Viviamo davvero in un'epoca straordinaria. jc

1 0

NY Times: "Open-Source Backers March on Washington"
by J.C. DE MARTIN July 23, 2009

July 23, 2009

July 23, 2009, 2:03 pm Open-Source Backers March on Washington By Ashlee Vance Look out, lobbyists: Here come the open-source zealots. Some of the world’s largest technology companies have banded together in a bid to push open-source software on the United States government. They’ve formed a group called Open Source for America, which seeks to make sure that government agencies at least consider open-source software as an option in their buying decisions. The big, rather timely pitch behind this move is that open-source applications can help save the government money. [...] http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/07/23/open-source-backers-march-on-washi…

1 0

Steal this film II
by a.dicorinto＠uniroma1.it July 23, 2009

July 23, 2009

Ciao cari/e-- ho lnkato Steal this film II sul mio sito http://www.dicorinto.it/segnalazioni/steal-this-film-ii-the-dissolving-fort… Il filmaker, scrittore e “hacktivist” britannico Jamie King affronta in questo film la questione dei limiti alla libertà del Web. In Steal this Film II-The dissolving Fortress, Jamie King, animatore della “League of Noble Peers”, ripercorre la storia della “pirateria” culturale come modello di libera circolazione delle idee, ed entra nell’era dei campionamenti e del mash-up, del “riciclo” creativo di materiali musicali o visivi coperti da copyright fino ad originare qualcosa di completamente nuovo. Vale veramente la pena di vederlo...

1 0