- nexa - server-nexa.polito.it

My cent!
by G.Battista Frontera Oct. 3, 2011

Oct. 3, 2011

Cari Amici, Sono iscritto da qualche giorno a questa mailimg-list, e sino ad ora ho ascoltato in silenzio. Vorrei fare una proposta "balzana": secondo me questa lista dovrebbe essere una sorta di "think-thank" trasversale (come per altro lo è abbastanza), dove costruire idee per il rilancio italiano. Questo senza etichette e senza supplenze politiche (nel senso di creazione di partiti o liste o quant'altro). Dico questo perché, secondo me, quel che serve adesso è recupero di senso civico e buone idee e programmi, e non certo l'ennesimo partito o lista civica. Un incubatore insomma, che generi quelle buone idee e programmi di cui sopra. D'altra parte, adesso, dopo la dimissione di questo governo (speriamo presto!), quel che serve è un patto di fine legislatura, trasversale, generazionale e sociale, che faccia le cose realmente necessarie al paese: rilancio dell'economia, cambio della legge elettorale. Quel che serve, e che secondo me, noi possiamo dare contributo, è il far capire ai partiti che oggi la rete con la sua immediatezza, trasparenza e in-fottibilità (mi scuso per il termine colorito, intendevo che non si può barare), ha cambiato le regole del gioco. Ovvero i politici, oltre a capire che o giocano con queste regole o non interessano più ai cittadini, devono farsi una ragione che la necessità è un cambio generazionale. Scusatemi per lo sproloquio e mi ritiro in buon ordine! ;-) Ciao. Gb

3 2

Copyright vs. competition law
by Paolo Brini Sept. 30, 2011

Sept. 30, 2011

La ECJ dovrebbe esprimersi il 4 ottobre su questo importantissimo caso, in cui l'AG della corte ha espresso un'opinione a favore di Murphy. La sentenza potrebbe avere implicazioni profonde. <http://the1709blog.blogspot.com/2011/09/copyright-vs-competition-law-new-da…> Ciao, Paolo

2 1

Intervista a Zuckerman sul comma 29
by fabio chiusi Sept. 30, 2011

Sept. 30, 2011

Ciao a tutti, volevo segnalare questa mia intervista a Ethan Zuckerman sul cosiddetto comma 'ammazza-blog'. http://www.lettera43.it/tecnologia/web/27144/italia-liberta-a-rischio.htm A presto e buon fine settimana Fabio Chiusi

1 0

[NEXA]Internet per tutti e gratuito, paga la Diesel
by vale.it.newsletters＠gmail.com Sept. 30, 2011

Sept. 30, 2011

http://www.ilgiornaledivicenza.it/stories/Home/292602_internet_per_tutti_e_…

1 0

NY Times: "Italian Software Maker Contests Microsoft's Purchase of Skype"
by J.C. DE MARTIN Sept. 29, 2011

Sept. 29, 2011

Italian Software Maker Contests Microsoft's Purchase of Skype By KEVIN J. O'BRIEN <http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/o/kevin_j_obrien…> Published: September 28, 2011 BERLIN --- Reviving arguments that have dogged Microsoft <http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/business/companies/microsoft_corporation…> in Europe for nearly two decades, an Italian software maker is asking European officials to block Microsoft's $8.5 billion purchase of Skype <http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/business/companies/skype_technologies_sa…>, the Internet phone service, unless it is removed from Microsoft's ubiquitous Windows Office platform. In the past, the European Commission has been sympathetic to complaints about Microsoft's strategy of "bundling" popular applications with Windows, eventually requiring the software maker to make concessions on its media player and Internet browser. But legal experts were split over whether the latest complaint, filed Sept. 20 by Messagenet, a company based in Milan that is a rival to Skype Internet's phone service, would complicate or prevent European approval of the takeover, which would be the largest in Microsoft's history and the largest takeover in the technology sector this year. [...] Continua qui: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/29/technology/italian-software-maker-contest…

1 0

LQDN: risoluzione su NetNeutrality troppo debole
by Paolo Brini Sept. 29, 2011

Sept. 29, 2011

1 0

Fwd: [governance] Fwd: Proposals to regulate Internet could threaten freedom of expression, warns OSCE media freedom representative
by J.C. DE MARTIN Sept. 29, 2011

Sept. 29, 2011

-------- Original Message -------- Subject: [governance] Fwd: Proposals to regulate Internet could threaten freedom of expression, warns OSCE media freedom representative Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 13:26:51 +0400 From: Fouad Bajwa <fouadbajwa(a)gmail.com> Reply-To: governance(a)lists.cpsr.org,Fouad Bajwa <fouadbajwa(a)gmail.com> To: governance(a)lists.cpsr.org This could be of interest and concern for our European colleagues. Originally here http://www.osce.org/fom/83112 and also in the message below: ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: *OSCE* Date: Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 11:17 PM Subject: Proposals to regulate Internet could threaten freedom of expression, warns OSCE media freedom representative To: fouadbajwa VIENNA, 28 September 2011 – The OSCE Representative on Freedom of the Media, Dunja Mijatoviã, voiced concern today about Internet regulation policies proposed by several participating States and reminded them of their OSCE media freedom commitments. “Such initiatives endanger freedom of expression and risk erecting ‘mind walls’ - barriers to the flow of information and ideas,” Mijatoviã said. She cited in particular an initiative by Russia, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan, among others, to introduce an “international code of conduct for information security”, a proposal they would like to see adopted as a United Nations resolution. “Especially worrying is the draft code requesting States to curb ‘the dissemination of information that incites terrorism, secessionism or extremism or that undermines other countries’ political, economic and social stability, as well as their spiritual and cultural environment,’” Mijatoviã said. “This neglects the fact that any country’s ‘spiritual and cultural environment’ is enriched by a free flow of information and a vibrant civil society, as well as by a free and pluralistic media fostering debate, in particular on controversial issues of public interest. As is already the case with the national laws in the countries that support this initiative, the draft code relies on subjective and vague notions of ‘secessionism’ and ‘extremism’”. “Although States do have a legitimate right to ensure their own stability and protect themselves from all forms of crime, OSCE commitments rest on the core idea that freedom and security are intimately linked. There can be no freedom without security and no security without freedom,” she added. Mijatoviã also noted with concern that already in August the presidents of Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Russia and Tajikistan, citing security reasons, agreed to develop a common strategy to regulate and control the Internet, particularly social networks, on a regional level. In addition, the prosecutor-generals of several of these countries called for government control over social networks at a meeting in Minsk on 14 September. “Such proposals risk fragmenting the Internet, thus cutting off the users of those countries from access to the global information society and thereby interrupting the free flow of information,” Mijatoviã warned. “Free Internet, including social networks, blogs and online news media, leads to more transparency and political accountability worldwide – and this must be preserved.” Mijatoviã urged the respective governments to reconsider their Internet strategies, keeping in mind the borderless nature of the Internet, and to ensure that it remains an open and public forum for freedom of expression for their citizens, in line with OSCE commitments and international standards of media freedom. She advised the respective governments to apply the recommendations in the report produced by her Office on Freedom of Expression on the Internet as well as the Joint Declaration on Freedom of Expression and the Internet, adopted in June by the rapporteurs on freedom of expression of the UN, the Organization of American States and the African Union with the OSCE Representative on Freedom of the Media. The Representative offered her Office’s assistance to participating States in developing Internet regulation policies in line with OSCE commitments and international standards of media freedom. OSCE Press release ---- For your information Fouad

1 0

Fwd: [open-government] World's First Rating of Right to Information
by J.C. DE MARTIN Sept. 29, 2011

Sept. 29, 2011

-------- Original Message -------- Subject: [open-government] World's First Rating of Right to Information Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 07:29:39 +0200 From: Helen Darbishire <helen(a)access-info.org> To: <euopendata(a)lists.okfn.org>, <open-government(a)lists.okfn.org> access info logocentrelawdemocracylogo * *Press Release** For immediate release *Worldâ??s First Rating of Right to Information: 89 Countries Ranked*** *www.rti-rating.org* /28 September 2011, Madrid/Halifax/- On International Right to Know Day, two leading human rights organisations, Access Info Europe (Spain) and the Centre for Law and Democracy (Canada), are launching the first detailed analysis of the legal framework for the right to information (RTI) in 89 countries around the world. The RTI Rating <http://www.rti-rating.org> is based on 61 Indicators drawn from a wide range of international standards on the right to information, feedback from an international Advisory Council of renowned experts on the right to information and comparative study of numerous right to information and related laws from around the world. The findings of the RTI Rating show that there is a significant variety in the quality of the legal framework, with scores out of a maximum possible 150 ranging from 37 (Germany) to 135 (Serbia). Some of the key results: Â» More recent laws protect the right to know more strongly; of the 20 countries with scores above 100, 11 adopted their RTI laws since 2005, and 7 since 2000 â?? these laws tend to have much stronger oversight, enforcement and promotion. Â» Of the 20 countries with scores above 100, 7 are in East and Central Europe, 5 in Asia, 4 in the Americas, 3 in Africa and only one is in Western Europe; Â» Europe overall accounts for 15 of the bottom 20, primarily the older European laws which are more limited in scope and have weaker appeals mechanisms; /â??Effective protection of human rights like the right to information requires a sound legal basis,â?? /said Toby Mendel, Executive Director of the Centre for Law and Democracy./â??This rating tool enables us to pinpoint areas of weakness in the legal framework for RTI, and to direct future advocacy at resolving these.â?? / The RTI Rating shows not only a countryâ??s overall score, but also but also its strengths and weaknesses in relation to seven main categories: Right of Access, Scope; Requesting Procedures; Exceptions and Refusals; Appeals; Sanctions and Protections; and Promotional Measures. The score for the legal framework did not always accord with overall levels of transparency in a country in practice. Some national experts who reviewed the AIE and CLD country assessments noted that is sometimes a gap between the quality of the law and the practice. In some northern European countries, the older legal frameworks do not fully reflect the culture of transparency in practice, whereas in countries like Azerbaijan, Nepal and Ethiopia, strong laws on paper do not necessarily reflect a fully open society; the strong laws in El Salvador and Liberia were adopted too recently to assess the practice. /â??Testing of levels of transparency in practice is essential to have a full picture,â??/commented Helen Darbishire, Executive Director of Access Info Europe. /â??Adopting a law is only a first step to transparency; without accurate measures of access to information in practice, governments can participate in â??transparency washingâ?? and claim greater respect for this fundamental human right than is in fact the case.â??/ *Note for editors* Â·More information about the tools used in preparing the RTI Rating, the Advisory Committee and the detailed ratings for each country can be found at: www.rti-rating.org <http://www.rti-rating.org>. Â·Access Info Europe and the Centre for Law and Democracy remain open to comments and corrections to the RTI Rating. We know that only through expert feedback will we perfect this analysis. The following countries have not yet had national reviewers and comments from experts knowing about those countries would be particularly welcome: Antigua and Barbuda, Austria, Bangladesh, Cook Islands, Denmark, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Estonia, Greece, Guatemala, Guinea-Conakry, Iceland, Korea (South), Kosovo, Liechtenstein, Montenegro, Nicaragua, Panama, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, St Vincent and the Grenadines, Switzerland, Tajikistan, Trinidad and Tobago, Tunisia and Turkey. *For further information please contact:*** *Helen Darbishire*, Access Info Europe www.access-info.org <http://www.access-info.org> Email: helen(a)access-info.org <mailto:helen@access-info.org> | +34 667 685 319 *Michael Karanicolas*, Centre for Law and Democracy www.law-democracy.org <http://www.law-democracy.org> Email: michael(a)law-democracy.org <mailto:michael@law-democracy.org> | +1 902 448 5290

2 1

informazioni P.A
by Mariella Berra Sept. 28, 2011

Sept. 28, 2011

http://egov.formez.it/

1 0

P.A. Digitale: la regione Basilicata condannata ad utilizzare la P.E.C.
by Emanuele Lerro Sept. 28, 2011

Sept. 28, 2011

P.A. Digitale: la regione Basilicata condannata ad utilizzare la P.E.C. Importante sentenza in tema di class action e di diritto all’uso delle nuove tecnologie La *sentenza n. 478 del 2011<http://www.leggioggi.it/allegati/la-sentenza-del-tar-basilicata-che-accogli…> *, depositata dal T.A.R. Basilicata lo scorso 23 settembre, avrà certamente importanti effetti pratico-giuridici in tema di Pubblica Amministrazione Digitale. Per* la prima volta* dall’adozione del Codice dell’Amministrazione Digitale e dalla previsione del diritto all’uso delle nuove tecnologie (art. 3 del C.A.D.), un Tribunale viene chiamato ad esprimersi in merito attraverso una*Class Action* pubblica, attivata da Associazioni e cittadini. *1. La vicenda* Qualche mese addietro il movimento “Radicali Italiani<http://www.radicali.it/>” e l’Associazione “Agorà Digitale <http://www.agoradigitale.org/>”, unitamente ad alcuni cittadini, affermando la propria volontà di ricorrere all’uso delle tecnologie info-telematiche ed in attuazione del Decreto Legislativo 20 dicembre 2009 n. 198 in tema di efficienza della pubblica amministrazione (c.d. *Class Action*), invitavano la Regione Basilicata a pubblicare sulle pagine del proprio sito web l’indirizzo di Posta Elettronica Certificata in adempimento a quanto previsto dall’art. 54, comma 2 ter, del D.Lgs. 82/2005 (Codice dell’Amministrazione Digitale); gli stessi soggetti invitavano altresì la Regione ad adottare tutti gli atti amministrativi necessari a garantire l’effettiva possibilità per gli utenti di comunicare con la Regione medesima attraverso la PEC. Infatti, fino ad allora, la Regione Basilicata non aveva adempiuto all’obbligo di pubblicazione del proprio indirizzo PEC sul sito web istituzionale<http://www.regione.basilicata.it/> . Successivamente, a causa del silenzio e dell’inattività della P.A. rispetto alle richieste riportate nell’invito precedentemente inviato, gli istanti provvedevano ad instaurare una *Class Action innanzi al T.A.R. per la Basilicata* previa notifica di un ricorso per l’efficienza delle amministrazioni in virtù di quanto disposto dal D.Lgs 198/2009. Il giudizio si è ora concluso con la decisione n. 478/2011 con la quale il T.A.R. ha condannato la Regione Basilicata ordinandole di porre in essere gli adempimenti necessari ad adempiere agli obblighi di pubblicazione del proprio indirizzo PEC e a *rendere effettivo il diritto degli utenti di comunicare tramite* tale*mezzo informatico*, condannando la P.A. – non costituitasi in giudizio – anche alle rifusione delle spese legali. Sicuramente la conclusione cui è giunto il Tribunale Amministrativo è estremamente interessante, ma ancora più interessante sono le argomentazioni utilizzate ed alcuni principi di diritto sanciti. Continua qui: http://www.leggioggi.it/2011/09/28/p-a-digitale-la-regione-basilicata-conda… Questo il link al testo integrale della sentenza: http://www.leggioggi.it/allegati/la-sentenza-del-tar-basilicata-che-accogli… Saluti e.

1 0