- nexa - server-nexa.polito.it

[NEXA]Velocità.
by vale.it.newsletters＠gmail.com Oct. 20, 2011

Oct. 20, 2011

Tanto per renderci conto della velocità con cui i wikipediani aggiornano alcuni contenuti: http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gheddafi#Guerra_civile_del_2011.2C_la_cattura_… V

2 1

Repubblica: ""Facebook rispetti la legge europea", La sfida di tre studenti per la privacy"
by J.C. DE MARTIN Oct. 20, 2011

Oct. 20, 2011

DIRITTI DIGITALI "Facebook rispetti la legge europea" La sfida di tre studenti per la privacy La commissione per la protezione dei dati in Irlanda ha iniziato un procedimento contro il social network. Sul tavolo alcuni comportamenti che sembrano violare le direttive Ue in materia di informazioni personali. Un processo che parte dalla segnalazione di un ragazzo di Vienna /di FRANCESCA SIRONI/ DAVIDE contro Golia. Un ventiquattrenne austriaco contro il più importante social network del mondo. E' la storia di "Europe versus Facebook" il progetto in difesa della privacy lanciato da Max Schrems, studente di legge a Vienna. La storia nasce, ancora una volta, un po' per caso un po' per talento e intuito. Mentre si trovava negli Stati Uniti per studio, Max entrò in contatto con un ragazzo che lavorava nella compagnia di Palo Alto. Parlando con lui scoprì che tutti gli utenti di Facebook che non sono residenti negli Usa o in Canada (circa il 70% del totale) fanno riferimento alla sede irlandese del colosso. Da bravo studente di legge, Schrems si rende conto che stando a Dublino, Facebook deve far riferimento alle leggi irlandesi in materia di privacy, ben più rigide e precise di quelle americane. Inizia così la sua piccola campagna a fronte di 22 violazioni che individua nel comportamento del social network, accolte, il 24 agosto 2011, dalla DPC (Data Protection Commissioner) irlandese. [...] Continua qui: http://www.repubblica.it/tecnologia/2011/10/19/news/facebook_rispetti_la_le…

2 1

Fwd: [fcf_discussion] Net Neutrality Resolution Adopted in EU Parliament
by J.C. De Martin Oct. 20, 2011

Oct. 20, 2011

Begin forwarded message: > From: La Quadrature du Net <jz(a)laquadrature.net> > Date: 20 ottobre 2011 05:20:38 GMT-04:00 > To: fcforum_discussion(a)list.fcforum.net > Subject: [fcf_discussion] Net Neutrality Resolution Adopted in EU Parliament > Reply-To: fcforum_discussion(a)list.fcforum.net > > La Quadrature du Net - For immediate release > > Permanent link: http://www.laquadrature.net/en/net-neutrality-resolution-adopted-in-eu-parl… > > > Net Neutrality Resolution Adopted in EU Parliament > > > > *** Paris, October 20th, 2011 — The “Industry” Committee of the EU Parliament unanimously adopted a resolution on Net neutrality. Through this vote asking the European Commission to promptly assess the need for further legislative action, the Parliament is taking a strong stance in favour of Net neutrality. Pressure now increases on EU Commissioner Neelie Kroes, who may soon be forced to break away with her failed “wait and see” approach and take action. *** > > The resolution unanimously adopted by the Industry (ITRE) committee of the EU Parliament, which has been fiercely negotiated [1], is overall a positive text. It commits the EU Parliament to key issues: > > * The text is a strong political statement in favour of Net neutrality. It brings a useful definition of Net neutrality and of the network management policies that are detrimental to the users' freedoms and to competition [2]. > > * The resolution asks the Commission to move past its failed “wait-and-see” approach by assessing the need for further regulation on Net neutrality, within 6 months of EU telecoms regulators (BEREC) releasing their study on the discriminatory practices of ISPs [3]. > > However, the resolution falls short of asking for immediate legislative action to protect Net neutrality and for sanctions against Internet Service Providers (ISPs) who restrict access to the Internet. It also includes a loophole [4], which risks being interpreted as accepting such restrictions on mobile Internet on the pretext of congestion [5]. > > “While rather weak, the adopted resolution is a political commitment from the European Parliament in favour of Net neutrality, and aims to prevent telecom operators from restricting Internet access. Pressure is increasing on Commissioner Neelie Kroes and the EU telecoms regulators to come up with further legislation. Mrs Kroes must break away from her 'wait and see' approach and take action to effectively protect competition, innovation as well as citizens' freedom of expression and privacy online.", says Jérémie Zimmermann, spokesperson for La Quadrature du Net. > > The text adopted today in the ITRE committee vote will now move to be adopted in plenary without the possibility of further amendments, in a vote scheduled for late-November. > > > * References * > > 1. http://www.laquadrature.net/en/finalization-of-eu-parliaments-weak-net-neut… > > 2. Compromise amendment 8 "calls on the Commission consequently to guard that Internet Service Providers do not block, discriminate against, impair, or degrade the ability of any person to use a service to access, use, send, post, receive, or offer any content, application, or service of their choice irrespective of source or target". https://www.laquadrature.net/wiki/Network_Neutrality_resolution_amendments#… > > 3. Release of the Body of European Regulators of Electronic Communications' (BEREC) study on Internet traffic management practice is expected for February 2012. > > 4. http://www.laquadrature.net/en/major-loophole-remains-in-net-neutrality-res… > > 5. See paragraph 7 of the resolution, as amended by compromise amendment 10: https://www.laquadrature.net/wiki/Network_Neutrality_resolution_amendments#… > > > > ** About la Quadrature du Net ** > > > La Quadrature du Net is an advocacy group that promotes the rights and freedoms of citizens on the Internet. More specifically, it advocates for the adaptation of French and European legislations to respect the founding principles of the Internet, most notably the free circulation of knowledge. > > In addition to its advocacy work, the group also aims to foster a better understanding of legislative processes among citizens. Through specific and pertinent information and tools, La Quadrature du Net hopes to encourage citizens' participation in the public debate on rights and freedoms in the digital age. > > La Quadrature du Net is supported by French, European and international NGOs including the Electronic Frontier Foundation, the Open Society Institute and Privacy International. > > List of supporting organisations: https://www.laquadrature.net/en/they-support-la-quadrature-du-net > > > ** Press contact and press room ** > > Jérémie Zimmermann, jz(a)laquadrature.net, +33 (0)615 940 675 > > http://www.laquadrature.net/en/press-room > > > > ----- > +info http://list.fcforum.net/wws/info/fcforum_discussion > ----

2 1

Spot and Web: "VIZI PUBBLICITARI-Il Giurì blocca SIAE"
by J.C. DE MARTIN Oct. 20, 2011

Oct. 20, 2011

VIZI PUBBLICITARI-Il Giurì blocca SIAE Pubblicato il 19 ottobre 2011 <http://www.spotandweb.it/news/7704/vizi-pubblicitari-il-giuri-blocca-siae.h…> da admin <http://www.spotandweb.it/news/author/admin> *di Federico Unnia* Scorretta la pubblicità istituzionale sul bollino Stop del Giurì al messaggio diffuso dalla Siae in cui si affermava "Copia privata: piena legittimità dell'operato SIAE", facendosi riferimento alla sentenza della Corte di Giustizia europea del 21/10/2010, concernente l'ambito dei diritti d'autore, e in particolare la materia del cd. "compenso per copia privata", oggetto di numerose controversie dovute a una discrasia di fondo tra normativa italiana vigente e precetti comunitari. Lo ha stabilito il Giurì di autodisciplina pubblicitaria accogliendo il ricorso presentato da ASMI -- Associazione Supporti e Sistemi Multimediali Italiana, Verbatim Italia, Imation e Datamatic. Read more: http://www.spotandweb.it/news/7704/vizi-pubblicitari-il-giuri-blocca-siae.h…

2 1

Fwd: [A2k] European Parliament legal service confirms: ACTA may or may not be legal
by J.C. DE MARTIN Oct. 19, 2011

Oct. 19, 2011

Begin forwarded message: > From: Ante <ante(a)ffii.org> > Date: 19 ottobre 2011 15:40:10 GMT-04:00 > To: a2k discuss list <a2k(a)lists.keionline.org> > Subject: [A2k] European Parliament legal service confirms: ACTA may or may not be legal > Reply-To: ante(a)ffii.org > > European Parliament legal service confirms: ACTA may or may not be legal > 19 October, 2011 > > http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number9.20/acta-ep-legal-service-opinion > > Intellectual Property Enforcement > > Several weeks ago, the International Trade Committee of the European > Parliament asked for an opinion from the Parliament's internal legal service > regarding ACTA's legality and whether or not documents must be made public. At > the end of last week, the confidential response from the Legal Service was > delivered. The result is that the lawyers believe that ACTA may indeed be, or > possibly may not be, legal and in line with the existing legal framework of > the European Union. > > In response to the question about whether ACTA is in line with existing EU > legal provisions, the Legal Service explains that the text is open to > interpretation but, on the face of it, the agreement appears to be in line > with current EU law. Of course, if the interpretations of the other > negotiating parties are different from those which the Legal Service has > guessed at, then ACTA may, indeed, not be legal after all. > > Asked whether the preparatory documents of the Agreement must legally be > published, the Legal Service is very precise: there is no obligation under > international law to publish preparatory documents. They accept that > preparatory documents may be used to interpret unclear agreements and that > parts of ACTA are unclear. However, they helpfully point out that, as long as > the documents are not made public by any of the negotiating partners, they > cannot be used to assign meaning to the unclear sections of the text. The > Legal Service chooses not to address the wisdom of adopting an international > agreement, the meaning of which is likely to change if any of the negotiating > partners subsequently chooses to publish documents in order to "prove" that > its interpretation of the text is the correct one. > > The only minor point of concern in this context is that the European > Parliament has already published the leaked text of the digital chapter (which > refers to private companies unilaterally cutting citizens' Internet access) on > its own website. This minor point means that the European Parliament has > already shown that ACTA (by promoting lawless sanctions by private companies > against citizens and their right to freedom of expression and due process) is > in clear and unequivocal breach of the Treaty on European Union, which > requires the Union to support democracy and the rule of law in its > international relations. > > In the meantime, the Commission has provided a rather unexpected answer to a > priority written question on the meaning of the previously unheard-of > "fundamental principle" of "fair process" that is referred to in ACTA. The > Commission does not seek to argue that the "fundamental principle" is a > fundamental principle at all. Instead, it simply explains that the meaning of > the term "fair process" can be found in the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects > of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) of the World Intellectual Property > Association which... contains no reference whatsoever to "fair process". > > The Commission expresses the hope and assumption that this is what the other > ACTA negotiating partners also understood. In short, the "fundamental > principle" is not a "fundamental principle" and its meaning is, at best, an > educated guess on the part of the Commission. > > Parliamentary question > http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=WQ&reference=P-... > > Parliament's leak of ACTA digital chapter > http://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2009_2014/documents/d-us/dv/sup... > > Backup of Parliament's leak > http://www.edri.org/files/acta_disconnection.pdf (see footnote 6) > > FFII requests European Parliament’s Legal Services’ opinion on ACTA > (15.10.2011) > http://acta.ffii.org/?p=833 > > (contribution by Joe McNamee - EDRi) > > _______________________________________________ > A2k mailing list > A2k(a)lists.keionline.org > http://lists.keionline.org/mailman/listinfo/a2k_lists.keionline.org

1 0

seminario ad oggetto: Digital Workplace, Social Networks, Smart Mobs: privacy e libertà del lavoratore 30 novembre 2011 a Torino
by Mauro Alovisio Oct. 19, 2011

Oct. 19, 2011

Gent.mi segnalo interessante seminario ad oggetto: Digital Workplace, Social Networks, Smart Mobs: privacy e libertà del lavoratore nella disciplina dei controlli sulla prestazione anche alla luce delle previsioni dell'art. 8, lett.a) della manovra economica di Agosto, seminario organizzato dall'AssociazioneGiuslavoristi Italiani (AGI) Piemonte- Valle di Aosta , mercoledì 30 novembre - MAXI AULA 2 - Palazzo di Giustizia di Torino PRESENTAZIONE * Avv. Vincenzo MARTINO *Presidente AGI – Sezione Piemonte e Valle d’Aosta RELATORI * Prof.ssa Mariapaola AIMO *Università di Torino * Avv. Andrea STANCHI *Foro di Milano Cordiali saluti Mauro Alovisio http://fire.rettorato.unito.it/blog/?id=40524

1 0

Open Society: "Mapping Digital Media: Italy"
by J.C. DE MARTIN Oct. 19, 2011

Oct. 19, 2011

Mapping Digital Media: Italy Date: October 2011 Source: Open Society Foundations Author: Gianpietro Mazzoleni, Giulio Vigevani, and Sergio Splendore http://www.soros.org/initiatives/media/articles_publications/publications/m… /The Mapping Digital Media <http://www.soros.org/initiatives/media/listing?subject=Mapping%20Digital%20…> project examines the global opportunities and risks created by the transition from traditional to digital media. Covering 60 countries, the project examines how these changes affect the core democratic service that any media system should provide: news about political, economic, and social affairs./ Digital terrestrial television was introduced in Italy in 2001. The switch-off of analog broadcasting started in 2009 and is based on the progressive "digitization" of regional areas. The deadline for the definitive switch-over from analog to digital broadcasting is set for December 31, 2012. The television set remains the most common media device in Italian households. National television news and traditional newspapers are the media sources most used by Italians to obtain news about politics and daily events. However, the percentage of Italians whose sole source of information was television decreased from 46.6 to 26.4 percent between 2006 and 2009. Newspaper sales have been in long-term decline, fuelling concerns over whether professional journalism is financially sustainable in the long term. Digitization appears to be weakening local broadcasters, who have played an important role historically in safeguarding freedom of information. The multiplication of the national channels, especially RAI and Mediaset, has caused an important decrease in terms of audience and advertising income of local and regional broadcasters. This report calls on civil society, NGOs, and international organizations to urge the reform of legislation on conflicts of interest between political/institutional roles on one hand and media ownership on the other, as well as to monitor the last stage of digital switch-over, the final allocation of the digital spectrum, and the resulting state of media pluralism, in order to verify that parliament and government actions do not privilege the existing RAI--Mediaset duopoly or favor companies close to the prime minister. PDF: http://www.soros.org/initiatives/media/articles_publications/publications/m…

1 0

la differenza tra wikileaks e facebook...
by Masera Anna Oct. 19, 2011

Oct. 19, 2011

http://twitter.com/#!/inwpress/status/126664782429433856/photo/1/large

3 2

Lavoratori in rete, felici e sfruttati: invito a parlarne all'IGF di Trento
by a.dicorinto＠uniroma1.it Oct. 19, 2011

Oct. 19, 2011

1 0

In Memoriam - Steve Jobs
by Norberto Patrignani Oct. 19, 2011

Oct. 19, 2011

Carissim*, quando hanno cominciato a paragonare S.Jobs a M.L.King, M.Gandhi, ... Adriano Olivetti! Ho pensato che era troppo ed ho scritto una lettera aperta al mio coscritto ciao Norberto

3 3