- nexa - server-nexa.polito.it

nella riforma del diritto d'autore si pensi anche al fenomeno open licensing
by Simone Aliprandi Nov. 28, 2013

Nov. 28, 2013

Segnalo anche qui la versione sintetica del mio l'intervento al convegno "Diritto d'autore: tra il vecchio e il nuovo" che si è tenuto alla Camera dei Deputati il 2 ottobre 2013. Spero possa risultare un'utile riflessione per chi si occupa di scrivere i disegni di legge (e magari ogni tanto sbircia su questa lista). http://aliprandi.blogspot.it/2013/11/riforma-diritto-autore-open-licensing.… Un cordiale saluto. -- Simone Aliprandi - http://www.aliprandi.org

1 0

Fwd: Premio Nazionale per lXinnovazione nellXICT
by J.C. DE MARTIN Nov. 28, 2013

Nov. 28, 2013

-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Premio Nazionale per lXinnovazione nellXICT Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 16:04:21 +0100 To: undisclosed-recipients:; AICA, CDI Torino e CTI Liguria, con la partecipazione della Fondazione ASPHI, annunciano l?edizione 2013 del Premio per l?Innovazione nell?ICT ?PEROTTO-ZUCCA? riservato ai giovani under 30 1° premio di ? 10.000 - 2° premio di ? 5.000 - 3° premio di ? 3.000 premio speciale ASPHI di ? 4.000 Il bando è pubblicato all?indirizzo: http://www.premioperottozucca.it Il termine per la presentazione delle domande è il 31 gennaio 2014. Il premio ha il patrocinio di Regione Piemonte, Regione Liguria, Unione Industriale Torino e Confindustria Genova. Si avvarrà del supporto di numerose aziende, tra cui Fida Inform, Bet@com, HP nel ruolo di Main Sponsor e di AizoOn, Circle Cap, Finsa, Finsoft, Institute Reasearch Education, Gruppo Consoft e Gruppo Sigla. -- *****************************************

1 0

European Commission calls on the U.S. to restore trust in EU-U.S. data flows
by Alessandro Mantelero Nov. 28, 2013

Nov. 28, 2013

http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-13-1166_en.htm

1 0

Richiesta di aiuto nella ricerca di un dato su Internet
by Masera Anna Nov. 28, 2013

Nov. 28, 2013

Buongiorno, chissà se qualcuno in lista mi può aiutare. L'Nsa dice che controlla dati che rappresentano "solo" lo 0,25 % del traffico Internet globale: ma quanto del traffico Internet globale è solo "dati" (quindi x es non streaming, non i video di Youtube per intenderci) e quindi quanto cambierebbe la percentuale controllata da Nsa se si epurasse il traffico? Qualcuno in lista mi sa dire dove trovo quest'informazione? Grazie! Anna Inviato da iPhone

9 8

Come trovare chi o cosa su Internet: conferenza a Roma
by A Dicorinto Nov. 27, 2013

Nov. 27, 2013

A proposito di ricerche in rete... chi è a Roma sarà di certo interessato a parlare con noi del tema alla Stampa Romana. Presentiamo un libro sull'open source intelligence: Esplorare Internet. Manuale di investigazioni digitali e Open Source Intelligence http://dicorinto.it/eventi/incontro/presentazione-libro-esplorare-internet-… -- Arturo Di Corinto ---------------------------------> AVVERTENZE AI SENSI DEL D.Lgs. 196/2003 Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio di posta elettronica e/o nel/i file/s allegato/i sono da considerarsi strettamente riservate. Il loro utilizzo è consentito esclusivamente al destinatario del messaggio, per le finalità indicate nel messaggio stesso. Qualora riceviate questo messaggio senza esserne il destinatario, Vi preghiamo cortesemente di darcene notizia via e-mail e di procedere alla distruzione del messaggio stesso, cancellandolo dal Vostro sistema. Conservare il messaggio stesso, divulgarlo anche in parte, distribuirlo ad altri soggetti, copiarlo, od utilizzarlo per finalità diverse, costituisce comportamento contrario ai principi dettati dal D.Lgs. 196/2003

1 0

Fw: Imprese e socialmedia
by Mariella Berra Nov. 27, 2013

Nov. 27, 2013

----- Carissimi, vi segnalo questo report (sintesi) su Social Media Ability nelle aziende italiane http://www.osservatoriosocialmedia.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Infografi… ed è anche interessante http://www.miriambertoli.com/blog/numeri-e-ricerche/aziende-italiane-e-digi… rt

1 0

[Nexa Paper]: "Is there such a thing as free government data?" (Internet Policy Review)
by Giuseppe Futia Nov. 27, 2013

Nov. 27, 2013

Is there such a thing as free government data? Internet Policy Review <http://policyreview.info/>, /21 Nov 2013/ /by *Federico Morando*, *Raimondo Iemma*, *Simone Basso*/ The new European public sector information directive, released in June 2013, makes "marginal cost" the default charge for government data. How to implement this principle? A consultation has been issued. This article provides a brief review of the public sector information pricing issues. It then discusses the terms under which the ongoing consultation on the implementation guidelines of the PSI directive addresses pricing. In particular, this article discusses the calculation criteria for marginal costs. The full paper is available at: http://policyreview.info/articles/analysis/there-such-thing-free-government…<http://www.lastampa.it/2013/03/28/cultura/speciali/biennale-democrazia-2013…>

1 0

R: ISP e diritto d'autore (conclusioni C-314/12)
by Blengino Nov. 27, 2013

Nov. 27, 2013

Melius re perpensa... ad esser intellettualmente onesti, lo si poteva dire ;) http://www.ilpost.it/carloblengino/2013/11/27/il-copyright-vince-agcom-perde / _____ Da: Blengino [mailto:blengino@penalistiassociati.it] Inviato: martedì 26 novembre 2013 15.01 A: 'Stefano Quintarelli'; 'A Dicorinto'; 'oreste.pollicino' Cc: 'nexa' Oggetto: R: [nexa] ISP e diritto d'autore (conclusioni C-314/12) Confesso che la considerazione: This means that Member States wishing to easily delegate such activity to an administration should re-think their plans (this is for instance the case of the Italian copyright enforcement reform) mi pare un poco forzata. Vi sono nelle considerazioni dellAvvocato Generale alcuni passaggi utili per argomentare contro AGCOM ( ma per questo basta leggere le norme...), ma la deduzione riportata nel Blog citato da Stefano, ad esser intellettualmente onesti, mi pare eccessiva. C. -----Messaggio originale----- Da: nexa-bounces(a)server-nexa.polito.it [mailto:nexa-bounces@server-nexa.polito.it] Per conto di Stefano Quintarelli Inviato: martedì 26 novembre 2013 14.05 A: A Dicorinto; oreste.pollicino Cc: nexa; nexa-bounces; nexa-request Oggetto: Re: [nexa] ISP e diritto d'autore (conclusioni C-314/12) http://is.gd/tBcdQy - the Attorney General stresses that fact that web-blocking is subject to law reservation and should be pursued and reviewed by courts. This means that Member States wishing to easily delegate such activity to an administration should re-think their plans (this is for instance the case of the Italian copyright enforcement reform); - since important rights like freedom of speech, privacy, freedom of business ecc must be guaranteed, some national judges my come to the conclusions, in the concrete circumstances, that web-blocking is an excessive and inadequate measure; I believe that DPI (deep packet inspection) will not be tolerated by national courts; - courts can neither impose general web-blocking measures nor an result obligation: in other words, the web-blocking decision should specifically indicate the technological measures to be undertaken, it cannot consist in a just an order to block access to a certain website, leaving to the ISPs the liability about the effectiviness of the adopted measure. ciao, s. On 26/11/2013 13:45, A Dicorinto wrote: > Oh, yeah! > http://www.repubblica.it/tecnologia/2013/11/26/news/provider_chiusura_sito-7 1981938/?ref=HREC1-6 > > > 2013/11/26 oreste.pollicino <oreste.pollicino(a)unibocconi.it> > >> >> According to Advocate General Cruz Villalón an internet provider can be >> required to >> block access by its customers to a website which infringes copyright >> Such a court injunction must refer to specific blocking measures and >> achieve an appropriate >> balance between the opposing interests which are protected by fundamental >> rights >> >> >> continua qui >> >> >> http://curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/docs/application/pdf/2013-11/cp130149en.p df >> _______________________________________________ >> nexa mailing list >> nexa(a)server-nexa.polito.it >> https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa >> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > nexa mailing list > nexa(a)server-nexa.polito.it > https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa > -- conf room: http://quinta.quivideo.it blog: http://blog.quintarelli.it tumblr: http://stefanoquintarelli.tumblr.com bitmessage id: BM-2DC6u7NoBoBwSEzX7C8iPjJNrAmZT5s3ms _______________________________________________ nexa mailing list nexa(a)server-nexa.polito.it https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa

1 0

Stanford hiring a Law, Science, and Technology fellow
by Carmelo Fontana Nov. 27, 2013

Nov. 27, 2013

Sarebbe bello se fosse uno scholar italiano... C. Stanford Law School is looking for a fellow to run our LLM program in Law, Science, and Technology. This is a two-year position with time for research, and is aimed at people interested in the law teaching market. Applications due January 15. Teaching Fellow for Stanford Law School LLM Program in Law, Science and Technology The Teaching Fellow for the Stanford Law School LLM Program in Law, Science and Technology will work with candidates in the LLM specialization in Law, Science and Technology. The fellow will assume significant academic, advising and administrative responsibilities. He or she will be responsible for organizing and teaching two quarters of a colloquium addressing current issues and scholarship in intellectual property, cyberlaw, bioethics, and related fields. The fellow will also organize and facilitate informal workshops, outside speakers, and academic and social events; be responsible for day-to-day administrative management of the LLM program; advise and counsel LLM candidates on academic and personal issues; respond to inquiries from prospective LLM applicants; and interact with our faculty in support of the LLM program goals and needs. The fellow will work with the Executive Director of International Graduate Programs, and under the supervision of the Faculty Director of the Law, Science and Technology program. The fellow will also fully participate in the admissions process, working under the guidance of the Associate Dean for Admissions to admit the new class. Although this is a full time position, the fellow should have a reasonable amount of time to conduct his or her own research, and will have ready access to affiliated faculty for that purpose. Candidates for this position are expected to have strong academic records and references. Professional experience in the area is also valuable. This position is intended primarily for people who expect to pursue an academic career in a field that is reasonably related to the specialization and who hold a JD, JSD or LLM from a U.S. law school. Applicants are expected to commit to this position in one year increments, starting in August 2014, with a two-year commitment preferred. Those interested should apply by letter, summarizing their complete educational qualifications and experience, as well as any other information that might help us in making selections. Each applicant should also send us an official law school transcript, a resume, copies of any publications, and three letters of recommendation (at least two from law professors) commenting on the applicant’s suitability for the position in terms of teaching ability, analytic capability, interpersonal skills, and writing ability. Apply by January 15, 2014 Your application package should be sent to: aarroyo(a)stanford.edu Applicants must also submit their resume electronically through the applicant tracking system at http://stanfordcareers.stanford.edu/job-searchand reference job number 61372.

2 1

NYTimes Op-Ed: "End the N.S.A. Dragnet, Now"
by J.C. DE MARTIN Nov. 26, 2013

Nov. 26, 2013

November 25, 2013 End the N.S.A. Dragnet, Now By RON WYDEN, MARK UDALL and MARTIN HEINRICH WASHINGTON --- THE framers of the Constitution declared that government officials had no power to seize the records of individual Americans without evidence of wrongdoing, and they embedded this principle in the Fourth Amendment. The bulk collection of Americans' telephone records --- so-called metadata --- by the National Security Agency <http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/n/nationa…> is, in our view, a clear case of a general warrant that violates the spirit of the framers' intentions. This intrusive program was authorized under a secret legal process by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, so for years American citizens did not have the knowledge needed to challenge the infringement of their privacy rights. Our first priority is to keep Americans safe from the threat of terrorism. If government agencies identify a suspected terrorist, they should absolutely go to the relevant phone companies to get that person's phone records. But this can be done without collecting the records of millions of law-abiding Americans. We recall Benjamin Franklin's famous admonition that those who would give up essential liberty in the pursuit of temporary safety will lose both and deserve neither. The usefulness of the bulk collection program has been greatly exaggerated. We have yet to see any proof that it provides real, unique value in protecting national security. In spite of our repeated requests, the N.S.A. has not provided evidence of any instance when the agency used this program to review phone records that could not have been obtained using a regular court order or emergency authorization. [...] Continua qui: www.nytimes.com/2013/11/26/opinion/end-the-nsa-dragnet-now.html

1 0