- nexa - server-nexa.polito.it

Pubblicato rapporto dell'Advisory Council to Google on the Right to be Forgotten
by Alessandro Mantelero Feb. 5, 2015

Feb. 5, 2015

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1UgZshetMd4cEI3SjlvV0hNbDA/view?pli=1 Sarà in ogni caso un'interessante lettura, poiché un ulteriore tassello per la geo-politica della privacy. -- Avv. Alessandro Mantelero Aggregate Professor, Politecnico di Torino Director of Privacy and Faculty Fellow, Nexa Center for Internet and Society Coordinator, Double Degree program in Management and IP Law, Politecnico di Torino–Tongji University of Shanghai http://staff.polito.it/alessandro.mantelero http://nexa.polito.it/people/amantelero EMAIL POLICY: twice a day (Mon-Fri)

1 0

FCC’s Proposed Internet Rules Changes Little, No Real Impact On Interconnection or Choice
by J.C. DE MARTIN Feb. 5, 2015

Feb. 5, 2015

Food for thought on this horribly complex issue. juan carlos *FCC’s Proposed Internet Rules Changes Little, No Real Impact On Interconnection or Choice** * Dan Rayburn | Wednesday February 4, 2015 | 08:44 PM | 0 Comments FCC Chairman Wheeler released a fact sheet today that outlined the new rules he is proposing for the Internet, which falls far short of solving the main complaints we’ve heard about in the market for so long. Many think it’s a big win for consumers that the proposed laws will prohibit ISPs from blocking, throttling, or prioritization content on their network, yet to date, no ISP has been accused of doing this. It’s nice that these restrictions might be a law going forward, but it doesn’t do anything to address the complaints of what takes place outside the last mile, or all the debate around consumers wanting more choices for broadband services. In fairness, we haven’t seen the full proposal or all the details, but the fact is, that one of the biggest complaints we read about is that consumers want more choice when it comes to Internet service providers. The proposed rules won’t require any last-mile unbundling, so those that think the rules will foster more ISP services will be sadly mistaken. Think of how many times we read about consumers contending with local monopolies for their broadband Internet service and want more choice. Isn’t that the number one complaint by consumers? These new rules do nothing to address that. Not that I think they should, but this proposal doesn’t unbundle the last-mile and doesn’t regulate rates. So for those that call this a “win” for consumers, I don’t see it. There will be no new competition. The proposed new rules also allow ISPs to do “reasonable network management”, so those that wanted that off the table, won’t be happy either. […] Continua qui: http://blog.streamingmedia.com/2015/02/fcc-internet-rules-changes-little.ht…

1 0

EFF: Negotiators Burn Their Last Opportunity to Salvage the TPP by Caving on Copyright Term Extension
by J.C. DE MARTIN Feb. 5, 2015

Feb. 5, 2015

Dedicato ai cultori dell"evidence-based policy making", tra cui, sia chiaro, mi includo anche io - basta avere contezza del fatto che non basta l'"evidence", bisogna anche curare i rapporti di forza (che possono anche essere influenzati dall'evidence, certo, ma in maniera né semplice, né tanto meno automatica). jc *Negotiators Burn Their Last Opportunity to Salvage the TPP by Caving on Copyright Term Extension* New reports indicate that Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) negotiators have agreed to language that would bind its 12 signatory nations to extend copyright terms to match the United States' already excessive length of copyright. This provision expands the reach of the controversial US Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act (or the “Mickey Mouse Act” as it was called due to Disney’s heavy lobbying) to countries of the Pacific region. Nations including Japan, New Zealand, Malaysia, and Canada would all be required to extend their terms and grant Big Content companies lengthy exclusive rights to works for no empirical reason. This means that all of the TPP's extreme enforcement provisions would apply to creative works for upwards of 100 years. […] Continua qui: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2015/02/negotiators-burn-their-last-opportuni…

1 0

FCC: The Open Internet Fact Sheet
by J.C. DE MARTIN Feb. 5, 2015

Feb. 5, 2015

http://www.fcc.gov/document/chairman-wheeler-proposes-new-rules-protecting-… Buona decrittazione! juan carlos

1 0

Drone week at TED
by gianluca quaglia Feb. 4, 2015

Feb. 4, 2015

Drones: Will they save us or destroy us? qui il link ai video http://ideas.ted.com/tag/drones-will-they-save-us-or-destroy-us/

1 0

FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler: This Is How We Will Ensure Net Neutrality
by fabio chiusi Feb. 4, 2015

Feb. 4, 2015

"That is why I am proposing that the FCC use its Title II authority to implement and enforce open internet protections." Qui: FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler: This Is How We Will Ensure Net Neutrality | WIRED f.

1 0

"Parere sul migliore ordinamento della R. Università di Torino" di Scipione Maffei (1718)
by Giuseppe Futia Feb. 4, 2015

Feb. 4, 2015

Gentilissimi, il Centro Nexa su Internet & Società - nell'ambito del progetto <http://nexa.polito.it/universita-aperta> sul futuro dell'Università <http://nexa.polito.it/universita-aperta> seguito dal prof. Juan Carlos De Martin - è lieto di rendere disponibile il documento dello storico e drammaturgo veronese *Scipione Maffei*, intitolato "*Parere sul migliore ordinamento della R. Università di Torino*". Il documento è disponibile sul sito del Centro Nexa all'indirizzo: http://nexa.polito.it/universita-torino-maffei. Cordiali saluti, -- ------------------------------------------------- Giuseppe Futia Communication Manager Nexa Center for Internet & Society Politecnico di Torino - DAUIN Corso Duca degli Abruzzi, 24 - 10129 Torino web: http://nexa.polito.it mail: giuseppe.futia(a)polito.it tel. +39 011 090 7219

1 0

Cassazione e sequestri web
by Carlo Melzi d'Eril Feb. 4, 2015

Feb. 4, 2015

Caro Carlo, mi permetto di inviare a te e ai componenti della lista qualche considerazione di Giulio Vigevani e mia sul dispositivo di una sentenza assai attesa. A presto, Carlo http://www.quotidianodiritto.ilsole24ore.com/art/penale/2015-02-03/testate-… avv. Carlo Melzi d'Eril ACCMS STUDIO LEGALE via Podgora 13 20122 Milano t. +39 02 54107715 f. +39 02 54114827 <mailto:carlo.melzi@accms.it> carlo.melzi(a)accms.it carlo.melzideril(a)cert.ordineavvocatimilano.it …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… Nota di riservatezza : Il presente messaggio e gli eventuali allegati contengono informazioni strettamente riservate. Esso è riservato esclusivamente al destinatario sopra indicato, il quale è l'unico autorizzato ad usarlo, copiarlo e, sotto la propria responsabilità, diffonderlo. Si segnala, a chiunque ricevesse questo messaggio per errore o comunque ne avesse conoscenza senza averne titolo, che trattenerlo o divulgarlo a persone diverse dal destinatario è proibito. Grazie.

1 0

Andrus Ansip - Guest blog: Sir Tim Berners-Lee: "Net neutrality is critical for Europe's future"
by J.C. DE MARTIN Feb. 3, 2015

Feb. 3, 2015

Blog post - by Andrus Ansip - 2 February 2015 Guest blog: Sir Tim Berners-Lee, Founding Director, World Wide Web Foundation Net neutrality is critical for Europe's future I would like to welcome Sir Tim Berners-Lee in this first guest blog. Sir Tim makes important and valid points on the issue of net neutrality and the need for establishing European rules so that it remains protected. I find his thoughts to be especially timely given the current debate around the Telecoms Single Market regulation. I met Sir Tim in Brussels in November when we had a very interesting discussion about several issues, not only net neutrality. I hope that his blog will be the first of many to be composed by guest writers. Here it is: *Net Neutrality is Critical for Europe’s Future* /By Sir Tim Berners-Lee, Founding Director, //_World Wide Web Foundation_/ <http://www.webfoundation.org/> As inventor of the World Wide Web, people often ask me - "What's next? What will be the next big thing on the Web”? […] Continua qui: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/2014-2019/ansip/blog/guest-blog-sir-tim-ber…

1 0

Special Issue of the Monthly Review su "surveillance capitalism"
by J.C. DE MARTIN Feb. 3, 2015

Feb. 3, 2015

La storica rivista marxista americana "Montly Review" dedica un numero speciale al "surveillance capitalism", http://monthlyreview.org/2014/07/01/mr-066-03-2014-07/ Indice: "Surveillance Capitalism", John Bellamy Foster and Robert W. McChesney "Electronic Communications Surveillance", Lauren Regan "The New Surveillance Normal", David H. Price "The Zombie Bill", Beatrice Edwards "Surveillance and Scandal", Alfred W. McCoy "“We’re Profiteers”", David Vine "U.S. Control of the Internet", Prabir Purkayastha and Rishab Bailey "Merging the Law of War with Criminal Law", Jean-Claude Paye "The National Security State", Michael E. Tigar Ciao, juan carlos

1 0