June 2024 - nexa - server-nexa.polito.it

INVITATION TO A POLICY DEBATE ON "AI and Copyright: Policy Challenges and Perspective"
by Oreste Pollicino June 7, 2024

June 7, 2024

Dear friends, We are delighted to invite you to join the policy debate “"AI and Copyright: Policy Challenges and Perspective."”, which will take place on Thursday, 20 June 2024, at the Press Club (Rue Froissart 95, 1040 Bruxelles) from 12:00 PM to 2:00 PM. This event will provide an opportunity to bring together thought leaders, policymakers, and experts from various sectors to discuss critical policy issues regarding the intersection between copyright and artificial intelligence and explore the challenges and opportunities that AI technologies present for copyright policy. You will find attached latest version of the programme. Please let us know if you can join the event by confirming your participation here<https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfEhyBZcg_cWZb0jPjBk-DyQAkGxRYIqtE…> We look forward to meeting you at our event. Best wishes Paolo Cesarini, Giovanni De Gregorio, Andrea Parola, Oreste Pollicino, Cornelia Kutterer [La tua firma può scrivere un futuro. Aiuta gli studenti meritevoli a costruire il proprio. Dai il tuo 5x1000 alla Bocconi C.F. 80024610158] <https://giving.unibocconi.it/5x1000> Please note that the above message is addressed only to individuals filing Italian income tax returns. 5x1000 is a percentage of Italian personal income tax that taxpayers can allocate to Universities, scientific research and non profit organizations.

1 0

ANNUAL CONFERENCE of the Master in Intellectual Property | 17 giugno 2024, ore 10.00-16.00
by Nexa - Media June 7, 2024

June 7, 2024

Gentilissime, gentilissimi, Vi invitiamo a partecipare alla Conferenza Annuale del Master in Intellectual Property: International Seminar on "Thirty Years Since the Adoption of TRIPS: A Tentative Assessment", organizzato dal World Intellectual Property Organization, dall'Università di Torino, dalla SAA - School of Management, dal COREP e dal Centro Nexa su Internet & Società. L'incontro si terrà lunedì 17 giugno dalle ore 10.00 alle ore 16.00, presso l'Aula Magna del Campus Luigi Einaudi - Lungo Dora Siena 100/A, Torino. L'evento sarà inoltre fruibile online qui<https://unito.webex.com/unito-en/j.php?MTID=m06074deca44c5fad6fb0e0449bb00c…>. Partecipano al convegno, tra gli altri: Prof. Alessandro Cogo, Faculty Associate del Centro Nexa, Università degli Studi di Torino; Prof. Maurizio Borghi, Co-Direttore del Centro Nexa, Università degli Studi di Torino; Prof. Stéphane Grumbach, Trustee del Centro Nexa, French Institute for Research in Digital Science and Technology; Prof. Brett Frischmann, Trustee del Centro Nexa, Villanova University; Prof. Marco Ricolfi, Co-Fondatore e Co-Direttore del Centro Nexa, Università degli Studi di Torino. Maggiori informazioni e il programma completo della conferenza sono disponibili alla pagina: https://nexa.polito.it/annual-conference-master-intellectual-property-24 Si prega di confermare la propria partecipazione, sia online che in presenza, al seguente link<https://nexa.polito.it/annual-conference-master-intellectual-property-24>. Vi ringraziamo per l'attenzione, Cordiali saluti, -- Valeria Bergantino Communication Officer Nexa Center for Internet & Society Politecnico di Torino - DAUIN Via Pier Carlo Boggio, 65/A - 10138 Torino web: https://nexa.polito.it/ mail: valeria.bergantino(a)polito.it<mailto:valeria.bergantino@polito.it> tel: 3473443585

1 0

U.S. Clears Way for Antitrust Inquiries of Nvidia, Microsoft and OpenAI
by Daniela Tafani June 6, 2024

June 6, 2024

U.S. Clears Way for Antitrust Inquiries of Nvidia, Microsoft and OpenAI The Justice Department and the Federal Trade Commission agreed to divide responsibility for investigating three major players in the artificial intelligence industry. By David McCabe Reporting from Washington Published June 5, 2024Updated June 6, 2024, 2:42 a.m. ET Federal regulators have reached a deal that allows them to proceed with antitrust investigations into the dominant roles that Microsoft, OpenAI and Nvidia play in the artificial intelligence industry, in the strongest sign of how regulatory scrutiny into the powerful technology has escalated. The Justice Department and the Federal Trade Commission struck the deal over the past week, and it is expected to be completed in the coming days, according to two people with knowledge of the matter, who were not authorized to speak publicly about the confidential discussions. Under the arrangement, the Justice Department will take the lead in investigating whether the behavior of Nvidia, the biggest maker of A.I. chips, has violated antitrust laws, the people said. The F.T.C. will play the lead role in examining the conduct of OpenAI, which makes the ChatGPT chatbot, and Microsoft, which has invested $13 billion in OpenAI and made deals with other A.I. companies, the people said. The agreement signals intensifying scrutiny by the Justice Department and the F.T.C. into A.I., a rapidly advancing technology that has the potential to upend jobs, information and people’s lives. Both agencies have been at the forefront of the Biden administration’s efforts to rein in the power of the biggest tech companies. After a similar deal in 2019, the government investigated Google, Apple, Amazon and Meta and has since sued each of them on claims that they violated antimonopoly laws. For months, Nvidia, Microsoft and OpenAI largely escaped the brunt of the Biden administration’s regulatory scrutiny. But that began to change as generative A.I., which can produce humanlike text, photos, videos and audio, burst onto the scene in late 2022 and created an industry frenzy. Regulators have recently signaled that they want to get ahead of developments in A.I. In July, the F.T.C. opened an investigation into whether OpenAI had harmed consumers through its collection of data. In January, the F.T.C. also started a broad inquiry into strategic partnerships between tech giants and A.I. start-ups, including Microsoft’s investment in OpenAI and Google’s and Amazon’s investments in Anthropic, another young A.I. company. Still, the United States lags behind Europe in regulating artificial intelligence. European Union officials agreed last year on landmark rules to govern the fast-evolving technology, focused on the riskiest ways in which it can be used. In Washington last month, a group of senators released legislative recommendations for A.I., calling for $32 billion in annual spending to propel American leadership of the technology but holding off on asking for specific new regulations. The discussions between the F.T.C. and Justice Department over the A.I. companies entered their final stages within the last week and involved the senior levels of both agencies, said one person with knowledge of the discussions, who is an F.T.C. official. Lina Khan, the chair of the F.T.C., said in a February interview that when it came to A.I., the agency was trying to spot “potential problems at the inception rather than years and years and years later, when problems are deeply baked in and much more difficult to rectify.” Spokeswomen for the F.T.C. and the Justice Department declined to comment. Microsoft and OpenAI didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment. A representative for Nvidia declined to comment. <https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/05/technology/nvidia-microsoft-openai-antit…>

1 0

Fwd: Incontro con il prof. Juean-Claude Guédon: "Open science, digital platforms and institutional data sovereignty"
by Federica Cappelluti June 6, 2024

June 6, 2024

Buonasera, segnalo il seminario in oggetto organizzato insieme a Juan Carlos De Martin. In presenza, venerdì 14 giugno alle 14:30 presso la Biblioteca Centrale di Ingegneria del PoliTO. Cordialmente, Federica Cappelluti -------- Messaggio Inoltrato -------- Oggetto: Incontro con il prof. Juean-Claude Guédon: "Open science, digital platforms and institutional data sovereignty" Data: Thu, 6 Jun 2024 15:37:02 +0200 Mittente: eventi(a)polito.it Rispondi-a: eventi(a)polito.it ENGLISHVERSION FOLLOWS BELOW A tutto il personale. Gentilissime, gentilissimi, a nome della direttrice del Centro Studi su Scienza Aperta, prof.ssa Federica Cappelluti, vi segnaliamo il seminario del Prof. Juean-Claude Guédon, professore onorario dell'Université de Montréal (Canada), su "Open science, digital platforms and institutional data sovereignty", che si svolgerà il 14 giugno 2024 presso la sala della Biblioteca Centrale di Ingegneria, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi, 24 - Torino, dalle ore 14:30 alle 15:30. Seguiranno discussione informale e spuntino. Il seminario è organizzato dal Centro Studi su Scienza Aperta e dal Centro Nexa in collaborazione col Sistema bibliotecario. È gradita la registrazione al link: https://forms.gle/rWL4bMwky2XPqFCK6 <https://forms.gle/rWL4bMwky2XPqFCK6> Potete trovare maggiori informazioni sul sito dell’Ateneo <https://www.polito.it/ateneo/comunicazione-e-ufficio-stampa/appuntamenti/ne…> Dear all, on behalf of prof. Federica Cappelluti, director of the Study Center for Open Science, we would like to invite you to the seminar of Prof. Jean-Claude Guédon, honorary professor at Université de Montréal (Canada), on “Open science, digital platforms and institutional data sovereignty,” which will take place on June 14, 2024 at the hall of the Central Library of Engineering, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi, 24 - Turin, from 2:30 to 3:30 pm. Informal discussion and snacks will follow. The seminar is organized by the Study Center for Open Science and the Nexa Center in collaboration with the Library System. Registration is welcome: https://forms.gle/rWL4bMwky2XPqFCK6 <https://forms.gle/rWL4bMwky2XPqFCK6> Find out more on Politecnico’s website <https://www.polito.it/ateneo/comunicazione-e-ufficio-stampa/appuntamenti/ne…> Cordiali saluti, Nunzia Spiccia Ufficio Eventi e Fundraising Servizio Marketing ed Eventi Direzione Comunicazione, Cultura e Biblioteche

1 0

MEMENTO | Incontro intorno al volume "La regolazione giuridica dell'intelligenza artificiale" | 7 giugno 2024, ore 15.00
by Nexa - Media June 5, 2024

June 5, 2024

Gentilissime, gentilissimi, Vi ricordiamo che venerdì 7 giugno alle ore 15.00 si terrà l'incontro intorno al volume "La regolazione giuridica dell'intelligenza artificiale" di Ermanno Bocchini (Giappichelli Editore). Parteciperà alla discussione, tra gli altri, il Prof. Maurizio Borghi (co-direttore del Centro Nexa). L'evento si terrà IN PRESENZA presso la Sala Agorà dell'I3P - Incubatore di Imprese Innovative del Politecnico (Corso Castelfidardo 30/a, Torino). Per maggiori dettagli è possibile consultare la pagina web dedicata: https://nexa.polito.it/la-regolazione-giuridica-dell-intelligenza-artificia… Cordiali saluti, -- Valeria Bergantino Communication Officer Nexa Center for Internet & Society Politecnico di Torino - DAUIN Via Pier Carlo Boggio, 65/A - 10138 Torino web: https://nexa.polito.it/ mail: valeria.bergantino(a)polito.it<mailto:valeria.bergantino@polito.it> tel: 3473443585

1 0

Software libero e open source tra potenzialità e criticità: tre esperienze a confronto
by Alessandra Moi June 4, 2024

June 4, 2024

Webinar del Gruppo di studio sulle tecnologie dell’informazione nelle biblioteche e biblioteche digitali (TBID) dedicato al software libero e open source. https://www.aib.it/eventi/software-libero-e-open-source/ Giuseppe Aceto, Matteo Ruffoni e Giovanni Bergamin racconteranno esperienze vive sull’applicazione e l’uso di strumenti open source declinate all’interno del mondo dell’università, della scuola e delle biblioteche. Durante il webinar i tre relatori ci parleranno dei risultati positivi ma anche degli ostacoli incontrati nelle loro esperienze, con l’obiettivo di fornire degli spunti per iniziare a fare scelte consapevoli riguardo l’uso di strumenti alternativi a quelli forniti, spesso con limitazioni tecniche e funzionalità opache, dalle grandi piattaforme commerciali proprietarie. Modera Lorenzo Gobbo (Università della Svizzera italiana) *Giovedi 13 giugno 2024, 17:00-19:00https://zoom.us/j/92903336132 <https://zoom.us/j/92903336132>* Vi aspettiamo! Alessandra Moi

1 0

"Banning smartphones from school? What a brilliant idea"
by J.C. DE MARTIN June 3, 2024

June 3, 2024

*Banning smartphones from school? What a brilliant idea * Catherine Price <https://www.theguardian.com/profile/catherine-price> /New York’s governor backs a plan to remove smartphones from the classroom. Here are some suggestions for how it might work/ Sun 2 Jun 2024 On Thursday, Kathy Hochul, the New York governor, announced plans <https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/may/30/new-york-smartphone…> to sponsor legislation that would ban smartphones in schools as part of her broader effort to protect children from technology’s negative effects. She intends to introduce the bill later this year so that it can be considered during New York’s next legislative session, which begins in January. Hochul’s announcement should come as welcome news to anyone concerned about the effects of smartphones and social media on students’ attention spans, relationships, learning and mental health. However, given that it could be more than a year before the bill goes into effect – provided it’s passed to begin with – caregivers and school administrators may be wondering what they can do to shield their children from technology’s worst traits now. Simply put: a lot! Here are some suggestions for parents and schools, based on my professional research – and my personal experience as a parent. [...] continua qui: https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/article/2024/jun/02/banning-smartp…

2 1

173° Mercoledì di Nexa | 12 giugno 2024, ore 17.00
by Nexa - Media June 3, 2024

June 3, 2024

Gentilissime, gentilissimi, Vi invitiamo a partecipare al 173° Mercoledì di Nexa, che si terrà mercoledì 12 giugno, alle ore 17.00, con un incontro dal titolo "Metaverso come logica spaziale del digitale". Ospite dell'incontro: Simone Arcagni (Università di Palermo). L'incontro si terrà IN PRESENZA e ONLINE. SEDE FISICA dell'incontro: Centro Nexa su Internet e Società, Politecnico di Torino, Via Boggio 65/a, Torino (1° piano). Per accedere alla sala si raccomanda di suonare al citofono Portineria e di seguire le indicazioni segnalate lungo il percorso. QUI<https://nexa.polito.it/contatti> maggiori informazioni su come raggiungerci. STANZA VIRTUALE dell'incontro: https://didattica.polito.it/VClass/NexaEvent Di seguito maggiori dettagli: https://nexa.polito.it/mercoledi-173 Cordiali saluti, -- Valeria Bergantino Communication Officer Nexa Center for Internet & Society Politecnico di Torino - DAUIN Via Pier Carlo Boggio, 65/A - 10138 Torino web: https://nexa.polito.it/ mail: valeria.bergantino(a)polito.it<mailto:valeria.bergantino@polito.it> tel: 3473443585

1 0

Speech Synthesis Markup Language
by maurizio lana June 2, 2024

June 2, 2024

buonasera, per una riflessione sulla produzione di audiolibri per persone non vedenti qualcuno sa dove in Italia e fuori si lavora a livello di ricerca e/o applicativo su text-to-speech differenziato per tipologia di testo? (cioè un TTS che non dia una lettura piatta ma dia una resa espressiva appropriata al tipo di testo e ai singoli passaggi di testo). so di SSML (Speech Synthesis Markup Language) ma non ho la minima idea se esistano dei repository di testi annotati in SSML, né se sia obsoleto o avanzato, né di quali sistemi software possano ricevere in input un testo annotato in SSML. grazie dell'aiuto! Maurizio ------------------------------------------------------------------------ che faresti se vivessi così? mau mau, con chi fugge ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Maurizio Lana - 347 7370925

2 1

Stealing everything you’ve ever typed or viewed on your own Windows PC is now possible with two lines of code — inside the Copilot+ Recall disaster
by Daniela Tafani June 2, 2024

June 2, 2024

Stealing everything you’ve ever typed or viewed on your own Windows PC is now possible with two lines of code — inside the Copilot+ Recall disaster e the Copilot+ Recall disaster. Kevin Beaumont I wrote a piece recently about Copilot+ Recall, a new Microsoft Windows 11 feature which — in the words of Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella- takes “screenshots” of your PC constantly, and makes it into an instantly searchable database of everything you’ve ever seen. As he says, it is photographic memory of your PC life. I got ahold of the Copilot+ software and got it working on a system without an NPU about a week ago, and I’ve been exploring how this works in practice, so we’ll have a look into it that shortly. First, I want to look at how this feature was received as I think it is important to understand the context. The overwhelmingly negative reaction has probably taken Microsoft leadership by surprise. For almost everybody else, it won’t have. This was like watching Microsoft become an Apple Mac marketing department. At a surface level, it is great if you are a manager at a company with too much to do and too little time as you can instantly search what you were doing about a subject a month ago. In practice, that audience’s needs are a very small (tiny, in fact) portion of Windows userbase — and frankly talking about screenshotting the things people in the real world, not executive world, is basically like punching customers in the face. The echo chamber effect inside Microsoft is real here, and oh boy… just oh boy. It’s a rare misfire, I think. I think it’s an interesting entirely, really optional feature with a niche initial user base that would require incredibly careful communication, cybersecurity, engineering and implementation. Copilot+ Recall doesn’t have these. The work hasn’t been done properly to package it together, clearly. A lot of Windows users just want their PCs so they can play games, watch porn, and live their lives as human beings who make mistakes.. that they don’t always want to remember, and the idea other people with access to the device could see a photographic memory is.. very scary to a great many people on a deeply personal level. Windows is a personal experience. This shatters that belief. I think they are probably going to set fire to the entire Copilot brand due to how poorly this has been implemented and rolled out. It’s an act of self harm at Microsoft in the name of AI, and by proxy real customer harm. More importantly, at the time I pointed out this fundamentally breaks the promise of security in Windows. I’d now like to detail why. Strap in — this is crazy. I’m going to structure this as a Q&A with myself now, based on comments online, as it’s really interesting seeing how some people handwave the issues away. Q. The data is processed entirely locally on your laptop, right? A. Yes! They made some smart decisions here, there’s a whole subsystem of Azure AI etc code that process on the edge. Q. Cool, so hackers and malware can’t access it, right? A. No, they can. Q. But it’s encrypted. A. When you’re logged into a PC and run software, things are decrypted for you. Encryption at rest only helps if somebody comes to your house and physically steals your laptop — that isn’t what criminal hackers do. For example, InfoStealer trojans, which automatically steal usernames and passwords, are a major problem for well over a decade — now these can just be easily modified to support Recall. Q. But the BBC said data cannot be accessed remotely by hackers. A. They were quoting Microsoft, but this is wrong. Data can be accessed remotely. This is what the journalist was told for some reason: Q. Microsoft say only that user can access the data. A. This isn’t true, I can demonstrate another user account on the same device accessing the database. Q. So how does it work? A. Every few seconds, screenshots are taken. These are automatically OCR’d by Azure AI, running on your device, and written into an SQLite database in the user’s folder. This database file has a record of everything you’ve ever viewed on your PC in plain text. OCR is a process of looking an image, and extracting the letters. Q. What does the database look like? A: Q. How do you obtain the database files? A. They’re just files in AppData, in the new CoreAIPlatform folder. Q. But it’s highly encrypted and nobody can access them, right?! A. Here’s a few second video of two Microsoft engineers accessing the folder: Q. …But, normal users don’t run as admins! A. According to Microsoft’s own website, in their Recall rollout page, they do: In fact, you don’t even need to be an admin to read the database — more on that in a later blog. Q. But a UAC prompt appeared in that video, that’s a security boundary. A. According to Microsoft’s own website (and MSRC), UAC is not a security boundary: Q. So… where is the security here? A. They have tried to do a bunch of things but none of it actually works properly in the real world due to gaps you can drive a plane through. Q. Does it automatically not screenshot and OCR things like financial information? A. No: Q. How large is the database? A. It compresses well, several days working is around ~90kb. You can exfiltrate several months of documents and key presses in the space of a few seconds with an average broadband connection. Q. How fast is search? On device, really fast. Q. Have you exfiltrated your own Recall database? A. Yes. I have automated exfiltration, and made a website where you can upload a database and instantly search it. I am deliberately holding back technical details until Microsoft ship the feature as I want to give them time to do something. I actually have a whole bunch of things to show and think the wider cyber community will have so much fun with this when generally available.. but I also think that’s really sad, as real world harm will ensue. Q. What kind of things are in the database? A. Everything a user has ever seen, ordered by application. Every bit of text the user has seen, with some minor exceptions (e.g. Microsoft Edge InPrivate mode is excluded, but Google Chrome isn’t). Every user interaction, e.g. minimizing a window. There is an API for user activity, and third party apps can plug in to enrich data and also view store data. It also stores all websites you visit, even if third party. Q. If I delete an email/WhatsApp/Signal/Teams message, is it deleted from Recall? A. No, it stays in the database indefinitely. Q. Are auto deleting messages in messaging apps removed from Recall? A. No, they’re scraped by Recall and available. Q. But if a hacker gains access to run code on your PC, it’s already game over! A. If you run something like an info stealer, at present they will automatically scrape things like credential stores. At scale, hackers scrape rather than touch every victim (because there are so many) and resell them in online marketplaces. Recall enables threat actors to automate scraping everything you’ve ever looked at within seconds. During testing this with an off the shelf infostealer, I used Microsoft Defender for Endpoint — which detected the off the shelve infostealer — but by the time the automated remediation kicked in (which took over ten minutes) my Recall data was already long gone. Q. Does this enable mass data breaches of website? A. Yes. The next time you see a major data breach where customer data is clearly visible in the breach, you’re going to presume company who processes the data are at fault, right? But if people have used a Windows device with Recall to access the service/app/whatever, hackers can see everything and assemble data dumps without the company who runs the service even being aware. The data is already consistently structured in the Recall database for attackers. So prepare for AI powered super breaches. Currently credential marketplaces exist where you can buy stolen passwords — soon, you will be able to buy stolen customer data from insurance companies etc as the entire code to do this has been preinstalled and enabled on Windows by Microsoft. Q. Did Microsoft mislead the BBC about the security of Copilot? A. Yes. Q. Have Microsoft mislead customers about the security of Copilot? A. Yes. For example, they describe it as an optional experience — but it is enabled by default and people can optionally disable it. That’s wordsmithing. Microsoft’s CEO referred to “screenshots” in an interview about the product, but the product itself only refers to “snapshots” — a snapshot is actually a screenshot. It’s again wordsmithing for whatever reason. Microsoft just need to be super clear about what this is, so customers can make an informed choice. Q. Recall only applies to 1 hardware device! A. That isn’t true. There are currently 10 Copilot+ devices available to order right now from every major manufacturer: https://www.microsoft.com/en-gb/windows/copilot-plus-pcs#shop Additionally, Microsoft’s website say they are working on support for AMD and Intel chipsets. Recall is coming to Windows 11. Q. How do I disable Recall? A. In initial device setup for compatible Copilot+ devices out of the box, you have to click through options to disable Recall. In enterprise, you have to turn off Recall as it is enabled by default: WindowsAI Policy CSP - Windows Client Management Learn more about the WindowsAI Area in Policy CSP. learn.microsoft.com The Group Policy object for this has apparently been renamed (the MS documentation is incorrect): Q. What are the privacy implications? Isn’t this against GDPR? A. I am not a privacy person or a legal person. I will say that privacy people I’ve talked to are extremely worried about the impacts on households in domestic abuse situations and such. Obviously, from a corporate point of view organisations should absolutely consider the risk of processing customer data like this — Microsoft won’t be held responsible as the data processor, as it is done at the edge on your devices — you are responsible here. Q. Are Microsoft a big, evil company? A. No, that’s insanely reductive. They’re super smart people, and sometimes super smart people make mistakes. What matters is what they do with knowledge of mistakes. Q. Aren’t you the former employee who hates Microsoft? A. No. I just wrote a blog this month praising them: Breaking down Microsoft’s pivot to placing cybersecurity as a top priority My thoughts on Microsoft’s last chance saloon moment on security. doublepulsar.com Q. Is this really as harmful as you think? A. Go to your parents house, your grandparents house etc and look at their Windows PC, look at the installed software in the past year, and try to use the device. Run some antivirus scans. There’s no way this implementation doesn’t end in tears — there’s a reason there’s a trillion dollar security industry, and that most problems revolve around malware and endpoints. Q. What should Microsoft do? A. In my opinion — they should recall Recall and rework it to be the feature it deserves to be, delivered at a later date. They also need to review the internal decision making that led to this situation, as this kind of thing should not happen. Earlier this month, Microsoft’s CEO emailed all their staff saying “If you’re faced with the tradeoff between security and another priority, your answer is clear: Do security.” We will find out if he was serious about that email. They need to eat some humble pie and just take the hit now, or risk customer trust in their Copilot and security brands. Frankly, few if any customers are going to cry about Recall not being immediate available — but they are absolutely going to be seriously concerned if Microsoft’s reaction is to do nothing, ship the product, slightly tinker or try to wordsmith around the problem in the media. https://doublepulsar.com/recall-stealing-everything-youve-ever-typed-or-vie…

2 1