December 2013 - nexa - server-nexa.polito.it

R: Esclusiva : il Documento Confidenziale della Commissione Europea su Regolamento AGCOM e copyright, mai mostrato in precedenza. La Commissione contesta il pericolo di violazione di diritti fondamentali.
by marco.ricolfi＠studiotosetto.it Dec. 17, 2013

Dec. 17, 2013

mi pareva...

1 0

Domanda
by fabio chiusi Dec. 17, 2013

Dec. 17, 2013

Ciao a tutti. Scusate la domanda idiota, ma il testo di questa benedetta webtax è consultabile online? Stessa domanda per questo testo http://www.ilsole24ore.com/art/notizie/2013-12-15/web-tax-italia--legge-piu… Grazie f.

1 0

Fwd: [governance] Call for Experts on the Global Governance of Cyberspace
by J.C. DE MARTIN Dec. 17, 2013

Dec. 17, 2013

-------- Original Message -------- Subject: [governance] Call for Experts on the Global Governance of Cyberspace Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 14:54:31 +0000 From: Milton L Mueller <mueller(a)syr.edu> Reply-To: governance(a)lists.igcaucus.org, Milton L Mueller <mueller(a)syr.edu> To: Governance (governance(a)lists.igcaucus.org) <governance(a)lists.igcaucus.org> Dear Colleagues: If you want an opportunity to investigate the reform of Internet governance in collaboration with other academics and professionals, I encourage you to look at this "Call for Experts on the Global Governance of Cyberspace" from the Hague Institute for Global Justice. The participants will be required to prepare a 4,000-6,000 word paper in response to one of five questions relating to the governance of cyberspace. The 16 experts selected will get supported travel to The Hague in May 2014 for a 3-day conference. The authors of the best papers will also be sent to a conference in New Delhi, India. They are not only soliciting academics but also people from business, international organizations, civil society and national governments. The deadline for submission of applications is 31 January. I am an advisor to the Institute on this project and am helping them to solicit and review applications. Feel free to forward this note to any other lists you think would be appropriate. The complete call, including the 5 research questions, is here: http://thehagueinstituteforglobaljustice.org/index.php?page=News-News_Artic… Regards, Dr. Milton Mueller Professor, Syracuse University School of Information Studies

1 0

Esclusiva : il Documento Confidenziale della Commissione Europea su Regolamento AGCOM e copyright, mai mostrato in precedenza. La Commissione contesta il pericolo di violazione di diritti fondamentali.
by Fulvio Sarzana Dec. 17, 2013

Dec. 17, 2013

Esclusiva : il Documento Confidenziale della Commissione Europea su Regolamento AGCOM e copyright, mai mostrato in precedenza. La Commissione UE contesta formalmente allAGCOM il pericolo di violazione dei diritti fondamentali, chiedendo garanzie. Ma lAutorità approva il Regolamento. Roma, 17 dicembre 2013 La vicenda del regolamento AGCOM su diritto dautore, già incredibile per quanto accaduto sin qui, si arricchisce di giorno in giorno di fatti allapparenza inspiegabili. La Commissione Europea, chiamata ad emettere osservazioni al regolamento sul diritto dautore notificatole ad inizio settembre, in base alla direttiva 34/98, riempie un documento di 6 pagine di osservazioni, di contestazioni, alcune delle quali appaiono in grado di sconvolgere limpianto stesso del regolamento dalle fondamenta, e lo invia al Governo Italiano, alla fine di novembre di questanno. Il documento classificato come riservato, è firmato dal Vicepresidente della Commissione Maros Sefcovic, Commissario alle relazioni istituzionali, e arriva alla rappresentanza diplomatica italiana di Bruxelles il 2 dicembre, per essere poi inoltrato al Governo Italiano, ma i canali diplomatici sono lunghi ed il documento arriva in realtà al Governo Italiano solo in questi giorni. Si tengano bene presente le date, perché nei giorni precedenti la emissione del regolamento il 12 dicembre si diffondono notizie sulla stampa di approvazioni e via libera da parte della Commissione alla bozza di delibera Agcom <http://www.corrierecomunicazioni.it/tlc/24759_copyright-e-internet-e-quasi- fatta.htm> http://www.corrierecomunicazioni.it/tlc/24759_copyright-e-internet-e-quasi-f atta.htm Dunque si diffonde la voce di un via libera quasi totale da parte dellUE, e di piccole modifiche richieste dalla Commissione. Altrochè approvazione e piccole modifiche, il documento della Commissione è durissimo, e contesta allAGCOM anche luso stesso delle parole utilizzate, e le definizioni adottate. Si comincia con le critiche puntuali alle stesse definizioni adottate da AGCOM sulle definizioni di gestore della pagina internet ed uploader. Il punto 8 della lettera cosi si esprime: In merito alla definizione di gestore di pagina internet allarticolo 1, lettera h, del progetto di notifica la Commissione ritiene che lattuale formulazione possa dare origine ad incertezza giuridica. E ancora non è chiaro perché le autorità italiane propongono di introdurre lulteriore concetto di gestore di pagina internet, il quale non è usato né dalla direttiva sul commercio elettronico né più in generale dalla rilevante legislazione dellUE. La Commissione contesta quindi allAgcom di utilizzare un terminologia che non rientra nella legislazione UE, introducendo figure inesistenti, che fra l altro lo sono anche nellordinamento italiano. Una solenne bocciatura. E che cosa fa quindi lAGCOM? LAutorità non ha il tempo di valutare con attenzione le osservazioni ed è ovvio che sia cosi, non ne ha il tempo, deve correre ad approvare, dopo una manciata di giorni,il provvedimento il 12 dicembre. E, infatti tra le definizioni del regolamento pubblicato permane al punto h dellarticolo 1, anche la figura del gestore della pagina internet, nonostante la solenne bocciatura. Ma i fatti più imbarazzanti devono ancora venire. La Commissione contesta punto per punto le definizioni adottate dallAGCOM,sul punto relativo allopera digitale a quello di uploader, sulla rimozione selettiva in caso di disabilitazione, su tutto insomma. Segue su http://www.lidis.it/agcom_contestazione_commissione_europea.htm --- Questa e-mail è priva di virus e malware perché è attiva la protezione avast! Antivirus. http://www.avast.com

1 0

NYT Editorial: "A Powerful Rebuke of Mass Surveillance"
by J.C. DE MARTIN Dec. 17, 2013

Dec. 17, 2013

December 16, 2013 A Powerful Rebuke of Mass Surveillance By THE EDITORIAL BOARD <http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/opinion/editorialboard.html> For the first time since the revelation of the National Security Agency's vast dragnet of all Americans' telephone records, a federal court has ruled <http://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/17/us/politics/federal-judge-rules-against-n…> that such surveillance is "significantly likely" to be unconstitutional. In a scathing 68-page opinion <http://legaltimes.typepad.com/files/obamansa.pdf> peppered with exclamations of incredulity, United States District Judge Richard Leon, of the Federal District Court of the District of Columbia, found that the seven-year-old phone-data collection program --- which was established under the Patriot Act and has been repeatedly reauthorized by a secret intelligence court --- "almost certainly" violates the Fourth Amendment's prohibition against unreasonable searches. Reaching into the 18th century from the 21st, the judge wrote that James Madison "would be aghast" at the degree of privacy invasion the data sweep represents. The ruling by Judge Leon, who was nominated to the bench by President George W. Bush on Sept. 10, 2001, was remarkable for many reasons, but mainly because there were real people sitting in open court challenging the government's lawyers over the program's constitutionality. [...] Continua qui: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/17/opinion/a-powerful-rebuke-of-mass-surveil…

1 0

Berkman Report: "Internet Monitor 2013 - Reflections on the Digital World"
by J.C. DE MARTIN Dec. 16, 2013

Dec. 16, 2013

http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/publications/2013/reflections_on_the_digital_w… ***Internet Monitor 2013** **Reflections on the Digital World** * Published December 11, 2013 Internet Monitor 2013: Reflections on the Digital World, the Internet Monitor project's first-ever annual report, is a collection of essays from roughly two dozen experts around the world, including Ron Deibert, Malavika Jayaram, Viktor Mayer-Schönberger, Molly Sauter, Bruce Schneier, Ashkan Soltani, and Zeynep Tufekci, among others. The report highlights key events and recent trends in the digital space. To mirror the collaborative spirit of the initiative, we compile---based on an open invitation to the members of the extended Berkman community---nearly two dozen short essays from friends, colleagues, and collaborators in the United States and abroad. The result is intended for a general interest audience and invites reflection and discussion of the past year's notable events and trends in the digitally networked environment. Our goal is not to describe the "state of the Internet" in any definitive way, but rather to highlight and discuss some of the most fascinating developments and debates over the past year worthy of broader public conversation. Our contributors canvass a broad range of topics and regions---from a critique of India's Unique Identity project to a review of corporate transparency reporting to a first-person report from the Gezi Park protests. A common thread explores how actors within government, industry, and civil society are wrestling with the changing power dynamics of the digital realm. *An interactive, full text version of the report is available on H2O <http://h2o.law.harvard.edu/>, where you can remix, share, excerpt, and comment on each essay: H2O: Internet Monitor 2013 <http://h2o.law.harvard.edu/playlists/5125>.* *The full report and individual chapters are also available for download from the Internet Monitor website <http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/internetmonitor/annual-report/>.*

1 0

WSJ: "Jimmy Carter's Costly Patent Mistake" (paywall)
by ros Dec. 16, 2013

Dec. 16, 2013

Cari tutti Spero di non infrangere alcuna regola interna alla lista nel segnalarvi l'uscita del libro: Cittadini Digitali. L'agire politico al tempo dei Social Media. Qui trovate una brevissima descrizione http://www.politicaonline.it/ Eventualmente posso mandare in privato, a chi me lne facesse richiesta, anche l'introduzione al testo. cari saluti rosanna de rosa

1 0

Study on the application of Directive 2001/29/EC on copyright and related rights in the information society - 16.12.2013
by J.C. DE MARTIN Dec. 16, 2013

Dec. 16, 2013

http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/copyright/studies/index_en.htm#131216 In its Intellectual Property Strategy "A Single Market for Intellectual Property Rights" <http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/intellectual-property/strategy/index_en…> the Commission announced a series of initiatives to foster the creation of a comprehensive framework for copyright in the digital single market. Within this process, the Commission launched a number of legal and economic studies on certain aspects of the legal framework, as referenced in the "Communication on Content in the Digital Single Market <http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/copyright/licensing-europe/index_en.htm…>". The "Study on the application of Directive 2001/29/EC on copyright and related rights in the information society <http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32001L0029:EN:N…>", prepared by a Belgian law firm De Wolf & Partners (Framework Contract PN/2009-35/D), comprises an assessment of the extent to which the implementation of Directive 2001/29/EC is appropriate to the economic and technological realities of digital markets. The focus of this study is on the exclusive rights (the "making available right" and its localisation, and other aspects of rights related to transmissions of content in digital networks) as well as on a number of key limitations and exceptions (libraries and archives, research and educational purposes, persons with a disability, user-generated content, and press review). This Study is the first of the series to be published. The remaining studies will be published as soon as they are finalised. * Studypdf <http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/copyright/docs/studies/131216_study_en.…>

1 0

WSJ: "Jimmy Carter's Costly Patent Mistake" (paywall)
by J.C. DE MARTIN Dec. 16, 2013

Dec. 16, 2013

*Jimmy Carter's Costly Patent Mistake* His 1979 proposal has led to ill-conceived protection for software ideas and a tidal wave of litigation. By L. GORDON CROVITZ Dec. 15, 2013 6:31 p.m. ET Washington doesn't agree on much, but all three branches of government now have plans to reform the country's patent system. What's not widely understood is that this marks the failure of one of Washington's most ambitious experiments in industrial policy. Today's patent mess can be traced to a miscalculation by Jimmy Carter, who thought granting more patents would help overcome economic stagnation. In 1979, his Domestic Policy Review on Industrial Innovation proposed a new Federal Circuit Court of Appeals, which Congress... http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB1000142405270230329360457925266232511…

1 0

content production and perception of copyright
by Simone Aliprandi Dec. 16, 2013

Dec. 16, 2013

Segnalo un articolo che spero possa risultare di interesse. Si tratta di un'analisi sulla percezione che gli utenti comuni della rete hanno del tema "diritto d'autore". Se chi fa le leggi considerasse questi aspetti forse farebbe anche delle norme più vicine alla realtà contemporanea. http://aliprandi.blogspot.it/2013/12/copyrightsurvey-ejlt.html TITLE: Content production and perception of copyright: an analysis of habits and beliefs of internet users an article by Simone Aliprandi and Andrea Mangiatordi, published in European Journal of Law and Technology (Vol. 4, No. 3, 2013) and available under a Creative Commons Attribution - ShareAlike 3.0 unported license. ABSTRACT: This article presents an analysis based on data from an open dataset made available by an independent empirical research on the topic of "Copyright in the digital age". The original data includes information about attitudes, social perceptions and levels of awareness. After describing the initial objectives of the research and presenting the set of variables considered, an in-depth analysis is here discussed, focusing on the similarities and differences encountered in distinct categories of respondents. The main objective of this analysis is to test the soundness and the descriptive power of the classification proposed in the original study, which divided respondents into the four categories of "Generic", "Active", "Creative" and "Professional creative" users. Other possible clusters are identified here, and their possible associations with those groups is discussed. Results indicate that the views of authors of digital content about the practice of illegal download tend to differ from those of non producers. Non publishers of digital content seem to be almost equally distributed between those who are against download, and those who tolerate it. Grazie. Un cordiale saluto. -- Simone Aliprandi - http://www.aliprandi.org

1 0