- nexa - server-nexa.polito.it

SAVE THE DATE: "Rethinking Notice: Privacy Policies and Design" - U. Bocconi, 6 settembre 2016
by Aura Bertoni Sept. 5, 2016

Sept. 5, 2016

Cari amici della lista Nexa, ho il piacere di invitarvi al seminario organizzato dal centro ASK Bocconi Rethinking Notice: Privacy Policies and Design Ari Ezra Waldman (Associate Professor - Director of the Innovation Center for Law and Technology, NYLS) 6 settembre 2016, ore 17 Stanza 1C301 - Grafton Building, Via Roentgen 1, Milano Per informazioni ASK - Art, Science and Knowledge www.ask.unibocconi.it tel. +39 02 5836 3710 ask(a)unibocconi.it Un caro saluto, Aura Aura Bertoni, PhD, LLM Bocconi University ASK Research Centre Department of Legal Studies Via Roentgen 1 20136 Milan Italy +39 02 5836 5771

1 1

esposto
by Elia Gabriele Sept. 4, 2016

Sept. 4, 2016

A questo riguardo , da notare che la Whatsapp dice Informazioni sull'account dell'utente. L'utente fornisce a WhatsApp il proprio numero di cellulare per creare un account WhatsApp. L'utente accetta di fornirci regolarmente i numeri di telefono dei contatti presenti nella rubrica del suo dispositivo mobile, compresi quelli degli utenti dei nostri Servizi e degli altri contatti. L'utente conferma di essere autorizzato a fornirci tali numeri. L'utente può aggiungere altre informazioni al suo account, ad esempio un nome e un'immagine del profilo e un messaggio di stato. Scarica sui suoi utenti la responsabilità di avere "caricato" sui suoi server le informazioni personali delle persone che non sono suoi utenti!!!! Quindi quelli che trasferiranno il tuo numero (tutti) confermano che li hai autorizzati a fornirlo a Facebook! Gabriele Message: 4 Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 10:34:37 +0200 From: Stefano Quintarelli <stefano(a)quintarelli.it<mailto:stefano@quintarelli.it>> To: "nexa(a)server-nexa.polito.it<mailto:nexa@server-nexa.polito.it>" <nexa(a)server-nexa.polito.it<mailto:nexa@server-nexa.polito.it>> Subject: [nexa] esposto Message-ID: <4bc7cd2f-1f98-d7ce-7f31-d89e567a143c(a)quintarelli.it<mailto:4bc7cd2f-1f98-d7ce-7f31-d89e567a143c@quintarelli.it>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed ciao a tutti vorrei fare un esposto al garante della privacy per richiedere che il mio numero di telefono non venga trasferito da whatsapp a facebook a prescindere da chi lo ha in rubrica. c'e' qualche avvocato in lista che avrebbe voglia di aiutarmi con questo esposto ? ovviamente da fare subito... ciao!, s. Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. [rispetta l'ambiente]Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non è necessario.

4 5

Reuters: "Microsoft gets support in gag order lawsuit from U.S. companies"
by J.C. DE MARTIN Sept. 3, 2016

Sept. 3, 2016

*Microsoft gets support in gag order lawsuit from U.S. companies* Fri Sep 2, 2016 | 8:01 PM EDT By Dustin Volz | WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Technology, media, pharmaceutical and other companies, along with major corporate lobbying groups, filed legal briefs on Friday in support of a Microsoft Corp lawsuit that aims to strike down a law preventing companies from telling customers the government is seeking their data. Friday was the deadline for filing of friend-of-the-court briefs by nonparticipants in the case. The filings show broad support for Microsoft and the technology industry in its latest high-profile clash with the U.S. Justice Department over digital privacy and surveillance. Microsoft's backers included the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the National Association of Manufacturers, Delta Air Lines Inc, Eli Lilly and Co, BP America, the Washington Post, Fox News, the National Newspaper Association, Apple Inc, Alphabet Inc's Google, Amazon.com Inc, the Electronic Frontier Foundation and many others. […] Continua qui: http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSKCN1182SY

1 0

NYT: "How Tech Giants Are Devising Real Ethics for Artificial Intelligence"
by J.C. DE MARTIN Sept. 3, 2016

Sept. 3, 2016

*How Tech Giants Are Devising Real Ethics for Artificial Intelligence* By JOHN MARKOFF September 1, 2016 SAN FRANCISCO — For years, science-fiction moviemakers have been making us fear the bad things that artificially intelligent machines might do to their human creators. But for the next decade or two, our biggest concern is more likely to be that robots will take away our jobs or bump into us on the highway. Now five of the world’s largest tech companies are trying to create a standard of ethics around the creation of artificial intelligence. While science fiction has focused on the existential threat of A.I. to humans, researchers at Google’s parent company, Alphabet, and those from Amazon, Facebook, IBM and Microsoft have been meeting to discuss more tangible issues, such as the impact of A.I. on jobs, transportation and even warfare. Tech companies have long overpromised what artificially intelligent machines can do. In recent years, however, the A.I. field has made rapid advances in a range of areas, from self-driving cars and machines that understand speech, like Amazon’s Echo device, to a new generation of weapons systems that threaten to automate combat. […] Continua qui: http://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/09/02/technology/artificial-intelligence-eth…

1 1

EFF leak: EU copyright reform
by Guido Noto La Diega Sept. 2, 2016

Sept. 2, 2016

- le piattaforme UGC (tipo Youtube) dovranno firmare accordi di revenue share coi publisher - obbligatori i sistemi automatizzati di infringement assessment (ciao eccezioni ciao) https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2016/08/european-copyright-leak-exposes-plans…

4 5

PI: "Copyright UE, potrebbe andare peggio. Potrebbe piovere"
by J.C. DE MARTIN Sept. 2, 2016

Sept. 2, 2016

* "Copyright UE, potrebbe andare peggio. Potrebbe piovere"** * /Nuovi documenti sgorgati dalle istituzioni europee confermano le estensioni dei diritti a favore degli editori e degli operatori di streaming di contenuti protetti. In attesa della discussione sulla proposta di direttiva, si torna a parlare di tassa sui link e geoblocking giovedì 1 settembre 2016 di Claudio Tamburrino /Roma - Nuove indiscrezioni sulla proposta di riforma del copyright a livello europeo confermano le più pessimistiche anticipazioni: dall'estensione della tutela del diritto d'autore a favore degli editori fino all'erosione dei principi di non responsabilità degli intermediari previsto dalla direttiva Europea 31/2000/CE. A sollevare un polverone stavolta è la bozza della Direttiva di riforma della disciplina del copyright nel Mercato Digitale Unico, che rispetto al piano di azione diffuso nei giorni scorsi fornisce maggiori dettagli sulle intenzioni delle istituzioni europee: in ogni caso conferma la volontà di abbracciare la causa degli editori a discapito di tutte quelle voci che spingevano per una visione progressista della tutela della proprietà intellettuale online. […] Continua qui: http://punto-informatico.it/4337019/PI/News/copyright-ue-potrebbe-andare-pe…

3 2

MOOC of Distinction Digital Dis-courses
by Eleonora Panto Sept. 2, 2016

Sept. 2, 2016

Segnalo il nuovo MOOc of Distinction realizzato dal progetto EMMA (*) - di sicuro interesse per i partecipanti a questa mailing list: è possibile candidarsi a diventare animatori volontari del MOD avendo così un'occasione per conoscere più da vicino il parere degli esperti. *Persona, society and technology: processes of transformation in a digital age.* Barend Van Heusden, Bruno Sorrentino, BW Powe, Inge de Waard, Derrick de Kerchove, David Orban, David Weinberger, danah boyd, Cristina Miranda, Stephen Downes, Juliet Webster, Alessandro Bogliolo: 12 esperti internazionali presentano e confrontanole loro riflessioni sul tema della cultura digitale e ci accompagnano attraverso il mutevole panorama del sé, della società e della tecnologia trasformando gli aspetti critici e positivi in "food for thought" Il corso puo' essere fruito liberamente registrandosi alla piattaforma EMMA. E' possibile seguire uno o piu corsi, partendo da uno qualsiasi oppure seguendo uno dei tre assi sui cui il Digital Dis-course si sviluppa: situare il Sé nel contesto della cutlura digitale, mappare territori emergenti e orientare l'individuo nei nuovi contesti socio-tecnici, descrivere e ridescrivere paradigmi e realtà. ** Il corso e' gratuito e partira' il 19 settembre*. * ** per iscriversi: http://platform.europeanmoocs.eu/#mod* *grazie dell'ospitalita' Eleonora* * *(*) EMMA *The European Multiple MOOC Aggregator called EMMA for short, is a 30 month pilot action supported by the European Union. Itaims to showcase excellence in innovative teaching methodologies and learning approaches through the large-scale piloting of MOOCs on different subjects. EMMA will provide a system for the delivery of free, open, online courses in multiple languages from different European universities to help preserve Europe’s rich cultural, educational and linguistic heritage and to promote real cross-cultural and multi-lingual learning. Also follow us on twitter @EUmoocs EMMA è coordinato * * -- Eleonora Pantò Learning, Inclusion and Social Innovation Programme Developer ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- CSP – Innovazione nelle ICT s.c. a r.l. Strada del Lionetto n. 6 – 10146 Torino Italy C/o Politecnico di Torino/BRC C.so Castelfidardo, 30a – 10129 – Torino Italy ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tel. +39 011 4815139 Fax +39 011 4815001 cell. +39 3486086090 e-mail eleonora.panto(a)csp.it ATTENZIONE: ABBIAMO CAMBIATO SEDE This message and its attachments are privileged and confidential and exclusively destined to the addressee. In case you receive this message by mistake or you are not the addressee, please inform me immediately and destroy the message.

1 0

ACLU: "Predictive Policing Software Is More Accurate at Predicting Policing Than Predicting Crime"
by J.C. DE MARTIN Sept. 2, 2016

Sept. 2, 2016

*Predictive Policing Software Is More Accurate at Predicting Policing Than Predicting Crime** * By Ezekiel Edwards, Director, ACLU Criminal Law Reform Project August 31, 2016 | 12:15 PM “Predictive policing” has an enticing ring to it. The idea is that you feed a bunch of data into a mysterious algorithm, and poof, out comes intelligence about the future that tells police where the next crime is going to occur, or even who is going to commit it. What’s not to get excited about? Unfortunately, many predictions made by policing software don’t come true. This is because predictive tools are only as good as the data they are fed. Put another way: garbage in, garbage out. Data collected by police is notoriously bad (we don’t even know how many people police kill every year), easily manipulated, glaringly incomplete, and too often undermined by racial bias. When you feed a predictive tool contaminated data, it will produce polluted predictions. In fact, it appears predictive policing software is more accurate at predicting policing than predicting crime. Rather than informing us where criminals will be and when they will commit crimes, these algorithms more reliably predict where the police will deploy. […] Continua qui: https://www.aclu.org/blog/speak-freely/predictive-policing-software-more-ac…

2 1

Letture data & digital labor
by Antonio Casilli Sept. 1, 2016

Sept. 1, 2016

Due articoli freschi freschi in inglese su dati personali, lavoro degli utilizzatori e economia delle piattaforme digitali. Il primo è nel numero 2 di ROAR Magazine: Socialize the Internet! Google and Facebook are techno-parasites. They rake our data and squeeze us for profit. Let us demand remuneration. Let us demand data liberation. https://roarmag.org/magazine/socialize-the-internet/ Il secondo è una lunga inchiesta su Facebook: Immaterial Labour and Data Harvesting Facebook Algorithmic Factory (1) https://labs.rs/en/facebook-algorithmic-factory-immaterial-labour-and-data-… Buona lettura, -- Antonio A. Casilli Associate Professor, Telecom ParisTech Research Fellow Edgar-Morin Center (EHESS)

1 0

O'Neill: "How algorithms rule our working lives"
by J.C. DE MARTIN Sept. 1, 2016

Sept. 1, 2016

E' un estratto del libro, appena uscito, "Weapons of Math Distruction" (v. https://mathbabe.org/) sui cui non mi pronuncio, non avendolo ancora letto. juan carlos *----------- How algorithms rule our working lives* /Employers are turning to mathematically modelled ways of sifting through job applications. Even when wrong, their verdicts seem beyond dispute – and they tend to punish the poor/ by Cathy O'Neil Thursday 1 September 2016 06.00 BST A few years ago, a young man named Kyle Behm took a leave from his studies at Vanderbilt University in Nashville, Tennessee. He was suffering from bipolar disorder and needed time to get treatment. A year and a half later, Kyle was healthy enough to return to his studies at a different university. Around that time, he learned from a friend about a part-time job. It was just a minimum-wage job at a Kroger supermarket, but it seemed like a sure thing. His friend, who was leaving the job, could vouch for him. For a high-achieving student like Kyle, the application looked like a formality. But Kyle didn’t get called in for an interview. When he inquired, his friend explained to him that he had been “red-lighted” by the personality test he’d taken when he applied for the job. The test was part of an employee selection program developed by Kronos, a workforce management company based outside Boston. When Kyle told his father, Roland, an attorney, what had happened, his father asked him what kind of questions had appeared on the test. Kyle said that they were very much like the “five factor model” test, which he’d been given at the hospital. That test grades people for extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism, and openness to ideas. […] Continua qui: https://www.theguardian.com/science/2016/sep/01/how-algorithms-rule-our-wor…

1 0