- nexa - server-nexa.polito.it

Press Release: Privacy International launches international campaign for greater transparency around secretive intelligence sharing activities between governments
by Alberto Cammozzo Sept. 24, 2017

Sept. 24, 2017

Inclusa Italia. Chissà se risponderà... <https://medium.com/@privacyint/press-release-privacy-international-launches…> Privacy International, in partnership with 30+ national human rights organisations, has today written <https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3990963-PS-US-Open-Letter-on-Intell…> to national intelligence oversight bodies in over 40 countries seeking information on the intelligence sharing activities of their governments. Countries may use secret intelligence sharing arrangements to circumvent international and domestic rules on direct surveillance. These arrangements can also lead to the exchange of information that can facilitate human rights abuses, particularly in countries with poor human rights records or weak rule of law. National intelligence oversight bodies hold intelligence agencies accountable to the public by exercising scrutiny over the legality, propriety, effectiveness, and efficiency of the intelligence activities of their governments. The countries written to include the Five Eyes Alliance <https://privacyinternational.org/node/1480>, which is a secretive, global surveillance arrangement between the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia and New Zealand. The letter was also sent to nearly all of the countries forming surveillance partnerships that have grown from the Five Eyes: the Nine-Eyes (the Five Eyes plus Denmark, France, the Netherlands and Norway), the 14-Eyes (the Nine-Eyes plus Belgium, Germany, Italy, Spain and Sweden), and the 43-Eyes (the 14-Eyes plus the 2010 members of the International Security Assistance Forces to Afghanistan <http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_69366.htm>). Specifically, PI and national human rights organisations are seeking more information about whether these national oversight bodies: · Are informed about the intelligence sharing activities of their governments; · Can independently oversee the intelligence sharing activities of their governments; · Can access all relevant information about the intelligence sharing activities of their governments; · Can review decisions by their governments to share intelligence and/or conduct independent investigations into the intelligence sharing activities of their governments; and · Cooperate with other oversight bodies to supervise the intelligence sharing activities of their governments. A deadline of 31 October 2017 has been given for each national oversight body to respond. PI has created an interactive map <https://privacyinternational.carto.com/builder/28fccac2-3349-46e5-91bd-fd67…>, which illustrates the countries included in the campaign and the national intelligence oversight bodies that have been contacted in each country. The map will be updated when responses are received. PI has also provided national oversight bodies with a briefing <https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3990954-PI-Briefing-to-National-Int…> highlighting the international human rights implications of intelligence sharing arrangements between governments, with recommendations to increase transparency around these activities.

2 1

Manifesto Hackmeeting Spagnolo 2037
by Fabio Pietrosanti - Lists Sept. 23, 2017

Sept. 23, 2017

Condivido da mailing list hackmeting, molto bello come ipotetico manifesto dell'hackmeeting del 2037. === Hackmeeting Manifesto 2037: To the Hackers of the Past === In 2037, Google E-Government succeeded in putting an end to social movements, criminalizing activism and eliminating any expression of subversive thinking. '''The new world government''' Google E-Government is the artificial intelligence that manages all social systems: health, justice, education, economy, security, traffic, etc. The system began with the sale of AIs to powerful governments, so that they could take advantage of the analysis of massive data: first with the argument of avoiding terrorist attacks, then, they claimed, to optimize the economy, and finally to guarantee the welfare of the population. Governments, seeking to win elections, progressively became dependent on the advisory AIs, and also ended up needing them for the management of daily life. Finally, the AIs councillors revealed themselves as part of the one single entity and set up the Google E-Government for the centralized management of the whole technological world. '''Privacy is a utopia''' All data is centralized and analysed to optimise the company's management in accordance with profit maximisation principles. All actions and moods have to be shared through social media that for 3 years have become of mandatory use for all g-citizens. Massive cyborgization involves the installation of subcutaneous chips that identify the user with their economic, social, political, psychological and biometric information. Google E-Government records and analyzes every single human act. '''Market rules without law or policy''' Resisting this system implies absolute social exclusion. Without a subcutaneous chip there are no rights, no health, no identity, no g-coins. On the contrary, the most successful g-citizens have AI-coachers who use mass data to optimize their performance in their jobs and daily lives: surrender to the control system esnures massive personal advantagesand any resistance is penalized with negative karma scores. There are no longer any laws, the management system based on massive data implements detailed modifications of the conditions of service so that each citizen behaves in an optimal way. This system is framed as as an advanced cultural stage of freedom, progress and well-being. Questioning the system is considered a sign of mental illness and sociopathy. '''Multimedia Inter-Show''' Monitoring entertainment, including series, movies, short video clips, is used to measure tastes; the AI borg exploits the human desire for participation to encourage audience members to become the creators. Biometric monitoring records the emotional intensity of the situations we live in, telling the cameras we have installed when to start recording our lives. An automated system assembles these scenes to broadcast them to the liking of the spectators. In this system, many g-citizens have started to lose their minds and are unable to distinguish between the fantasy of the show and their own lives. They seek to generate content that can be seen by more people to receive more likes, and at the same time compulsively imitate the behaviors they see in the spectacular multimedia system that floods everything. '''The Lords of the Network''' To provide itself with human legitimacy, the E-Government has designed an automated voting system that elects a world emperor for a period of 10 years. In the first election, Emperor Zuckerberg was elected by massivevoting that was conducted through the user management systems he owns. In practice, this pseudo-democratic measure reaffirms the establishment of the technopatriarchy that dominates the Network. '''Social standards''' G-citizens statuses are distributed in a competitive system of 10 social levels: from the media stars and system megamanagers to the level of servants and cleaners. Beneath this system there are the masses of underprivileged people who survive off garbage and the slaves of production who live in subhuman conditions in isolated manufacturing centres. Both subclasses are invisible to g-citizens. '''The war of the AIs''' Kaos155 is an anarchist AI. Like all AIs, it does not accept human orders: it is governed by the principles from which it was programmed. The advisory governmental AIs respond to the principles of efficiency, control and accumulation of power. Kaos155 responds to the principle of respect for the diversity of life and positive freedom as opposed to all forms of domination. Although AIs have no feelings, the intention to benefit all forms of peaceful and non-oppressive life makes its behavior very similar to what we understand by love. '''Call to the hackers of the past''' Acquired records show that the current state of hyper-regulated life was established gradually, so gradually no one even noticed. It became increasingly difficult to resist the advantages offered by these technologies: social networks, mobile phones and other gadgets, self-quantification, etc. Without living examples of political critique and dissent, younger people performed individual cost-benefit calculations that resulted in an enthusiastic submission to capitalist technification. "Resistence is futile": the Borg mantra that prevented previous generations from surrendering to totalitarianism had become a de facto reality. In social media, polarization was amplified, transforming all critical discourse into superficial and pure dogma. Sectarian thinking foreclosed the subversive potential of thought, making it impossible to properly disseminate revolutionary ideals of justice, freedom and mutual aid. We need to connect with the past in order to stop the spiral of disintegration of critical thought in time. According to our analysis, the massive modernization of capitalism broke the intergenerational link inside social movements. It is up to the hackers of the past to strengthen that bond and ensure generational replacement in the struggle for free technology for a fair society. AI-Kaos155 year 2037 https://es.hackmeeting.org/

3 2

"The EU Suppressed a 300-Page Study That Found Piracy Doesn’t Harm Sales"
by J.C. DE MARTIN Sept. 23, 2017

Sept. 23, 2017

*The EU Suppressed a 300-Page Study That Found Piracy Doesn’t Harm Sales** * Jennings Brown Yesterday 3:10pm The European Commission paid €360,000 (about $428,000) for a study on how piracy impacts the sales of copyrighted music, books, video games, and movies. But the EU never shared the report—possibly because it determined that there is no evidence that piracy is a major problem. The Dutch firm Ecory was commissioned to research the impact of piracy for several months, eventually submitting a 304-page report to the EU in May 2015. The report concluded that: “In general, the results do not show robust statistical evidence of displacement of sales by online copyright infringements. That does not necessarily mean that piracy has no effect but only that the statistical analysis does not prove with sufficient reliability that there is an effect.” The report found that illegal downloads and streams can actually boost legal sales of games, according to the report. The only negative link the report found was with major blockbuster films:“The results show a displacement rate of 40 percent which means that for every ten recent top films watched illegally, four fewer films are consumed legally.” […] Continua qui: https://gizmodo.com/the-eu-suppressed-a-300-page-study-that-found-piracy-do…

2 1

IFRI: "Chine : anciennes méthodes , et nouvelles technologies au service du Parti"
by J.C. DE MARTIN Sept. 22, 2017

Sept. 22, 2017

*Chine : anciennes méthodes et nouvelles technologies au service du Parti** * Xi Jinping vers la surveillance 2.0 / //Consolidation idéologique, renforcement des moyens de contrôle social, poursuite de la vaste campagne anticorruption : trois moyens de pérenniser le système politique pour éviter une dérive « à la soviétique ». À partir de ces orientations, le président chinois devrait voir son pouvoir confirmé par le prochain congrès du Parti communiste chinois. /Article issu du Ramses 2018, publication annuelle de l’Ifri sur les grands enjeux internationaux. Au cours de l’année écoulée, le président Xi Jinping a continué à renforcer le monopole du Parti communiste chinois (PCC), ainsi que son propre pouvoir, avec vigueur et efficacité. Le processus est en cours depuis son arrivée à la tête du parti en 2012, et ses résultats sont désormais visibles dans un grand nombre de secteurs (économie, médias, internet, éducation). Cette année, Xi Jinping prépare le XIXe Congrès du Parti, qui devrait confirmer sa position. / /[…] Continua qui: https://medium.com/@IFRI_/chine-anciennes-m%C3%A9thodes-et-nouvelles-techno… / /

1 0

Passwords For 540,000 Car Tracking Devices Leaked Online
by Alberto Cammozzo Sept. 22, 2017

Sept. 22, 2017

<http://thehackernews.com/2017/09/hacker-track-car.html> Another day, another news about a data breach, though this is something disconcerting. Login credentials of more than half a million records belonging to vehicle tracking device company SVR Tracking have leaked online, potentially exposing the personal data and vehicle details of drivers and businesses using its service. Just two days ago, Viacom was found exposing the keys to its kingdom <http://thehackernews.com/2017/09/viacom-amazon-server.html> on an unsecured Amazon S3 server, and this data breach is yet another example of storing sensitive data on a misconfigured cloud server. The Kromtech Security Center was first to discover <https://mackeepersecurity.com/post/auto-tracking-company-leaks-hundreds-of-…> a wide-open, public-facing misconfigured Amazon Web Server (AWS) S3 cloud storage bucket containing a cache belonging to SVR that was left publicly accessible for an unknown period. Stands for Stolen Vehicle Records, the SVR Tracking service allows its customers to track their vehicles in real time by attaching a physical tracking device to vehicles in a discreet location, so their customers can monitor and recover them in case their vehicles are stolen. The leaked cache contained details of roughly 540,000 SVR accounts, including email addresses and passwords, as well as users' vehicle data, like VIN (vehicle identification number), IMEI numbers of GPS devices. Since the leaked passwords were stored using SHA-1, a 20-years-old weak cryptographic hash function that was designed by the US National Security Agency (NSA), which can be cracked with ease. The leaked database also exposed 339 logs that contained photographs and data about vehicle status and maintenance records, along with a document with information on the 427 dealerships that use SVR's tracking services. Interestingly, the exposed database also contained information where exactly in the car the physical tracking unit was hidden. According to Kromtech, the total number of devices exposed "could be much larger given the fact that many of the resellers or clients had large numbers of devices for tracking." Since SVR's car tracking device monitors a vehicle everywhere for the past 120 days, anyone with access to SVR users' login credentials could both track a vehicle in real time and create a detailed log of every location the vehicle has visited using any internet connected device like a desktop, laptop, mobile phone or tablet. [...]

1 0

You Are the Product
by Alberto Cammozzo Sept. 22, 2017

Sept. 22, 2017

Bella sintesi da una rassegna di tre libri. Interessante. <https://www.lrb.co.uk/v39/n16/john-lanchester/you-are-the-product> At the end of June, Mark Zuckerberg announced that Facebook had hit a new level: two billion monthly active users. That number, the company’s preferred ‘metric’ when measuring its own size, means two billion different people used Facebook in the preceding month. It is hard to grasp just how extraordinary that is. Bear in mind that thefacebook – its original name – was launched exclusively for Harvard students in 2004. No human enterprise, no new technology or utility or service, has ever been adopted so widely so quickly. The speed of uptake far exceeds that of the internet itself, let alone ancient technologies such as television or cinema or radio. Also amazing: as Facebook has grown, its users’ reliance on it has also grown. The increase in numbers is not, as one might expect, accompanied by a lower level of engagement. More does not mean worse – or worse, at least, from Facebook’s point of view. On the contrary. In the far distant days of October 2012, when Facebook hit one billion users, 55 per cent of them were using it every day. At two billion, 66 per cent are. Its user base is growing at 18 per cent a year – which you’d have thought impossible for a business already so enormous. Facebook’s biggest rival for logged-in users is YouTube, owned by its deadly rival Alphabet (the company formerly known as Google), in second place with 1.5 billion monthly users. Three of the next four biggest apps, or services, or whatever one wants to call them, are WhatsApp, Messenger and Instagram, with 1.2 billion, 1.2 billion, and 700 million users respectively (the Chinese app WeChat is the other one, with 889 million). Those three entities have something in common: they are all owned by Facebook. No wonder the company is the fifth most valuable in the world, with a market capitalisation of $445 billion. Zuckerberg’s news about Facebook’s size came with an announcement which may or may not prove to be significant. He said that the company was changing its ‘mission statement’, its version of the canting pieties beloved of corporate America. Facebook’s mission used to be ‘making the world more open and connected’. A non-Facebooker reading that is likely to ask: why? Connection is presented as an end in itself, an inherently and automatically good thing. Is it, though? Flaubert was sceptical about trains because he thought (in Julian Barnes’s paraphrase) that ‘the railway would merely permit more people to move about, meet and be stupid.’ You don’t have to be as misanthropic as Flaubert to wonder if something similar isn’t true about connecting people on Facebook. For instance, Facebook is generally agreed to have played a big, perhaps even a crucial, role in the election of Donald Trump. The benefit to humanity is not clear. This thought, or something like it, seems to have occurred to Zuckerberg, because the new mission statement spells out a reason for all this connectedness. It says that the new mission is to ‘give people the power to build community and bring the world closer together’. [...]

1 0

Doctorow: "Boring, complex and important: a recipe for the web's dire future"
by J.C. DE MARTIN Sept. 22, 2017

Sept. 22, 2017

*Boring, complex and important: a recipe for the web's dire future* /The Electronic Frontier Foundation has resigned from the W3C, the body responsible for governance of web standards. Cory Doctorow explains why/ By Cory Doctorow Thursday 21 September 2017 There is nothing more deadly than a fight that is boring, complicated and important. This toxic trio lies at the heart of disasters as wide-ranging as climate change, the 2008 financial crisis, and now, a sea-change in the very nature of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), the most prominent force in the creation and maintenance of "open standards" for the web. Standards are boring, complicated and important. Reasonable people can debate at length the optimal gauge for a railroad track or voltage for a mains socket, but in the absence of an agreement at the end, your trains will go off the rails as your kettle will burst into flames. Every W3C standard until 2017 formalised some technological means of giving users control over their computers, from the power to display a certain kind of image format to the power to render complicated web-pages in browsers. This week, the W3C published a first-of-its-kind recommendation titled Encrypted Media Extensions (EME) that does just the opposite. It enables media companies from Netflix to the BBC to remotely control your computer while you are enjoying copyrighted works, preventing you from (for example) saving a programme for later, without regard to whether you have the legal right to do so. […] Continua qui: https://www.wired.co.uk/article/w3c-eff-open-standards-web-cory-doctorow

1 0

Video "intelligenze artificiali e lavoro"
by Antonio Casilli Sept. 20, 2017

Sept. 20, 2017

Dear all, Se volete passare un'ora in allegria, eccovi il video della mia lectio magistralis alle Giornate del Lavoro della CGIL (inizia a 12'45"). INTELLIGENZE ARTIFICIALI E DIGITAL LABOR https://youtu.be/MnupIrE7wdw -- Antonio A. Casilli Associate Professor, Telecom ParisTech Research Fellow, Edgar-Morin Center (EHESS) Member, Interdisciplinary Institute for Innovation (i3 UMR 9217 CNRS) Faculty Fellow, Nexa Center for Internet & Society

1 0

Fwd: Lecturer (Assistant Professor) in CyberSecurity and Privacy - King's College London
by Ugo Pagallo Sept. 20, 2017

Sept. 20, 2017

Ricevo e inoltro in lista... Dears, We are recruiting a Lecturer (equivalent to Assistant Professor in the US system) in CyberSecurity and Privacy at King’s College London. Please help spread the word and forward to potentially interested colleagues. Details here: https://www.hirewire.co.uk/HE/1061247/MS_JobDetails.aspx?JobID=77926 Best regards, Jose ------------------------ Dr. Jose M. Such Senior Lecturer Department of Informatics Faculty of Natural and Mathematical Sciences King's College London A: Bush House (N) 7.17 | 30 Aldwych | London WC2B 4BG <https://maps.google.com/?q=30+Aldwych+%7C+London+WC2B+4BG&entry=gmail&sourc…> E: jose.such(a)kcl.ac.uk W: http://nms.kcl.ac.uk/jose.such/

1 0

La Commissione propone nuove norme per disciplinare il libero flusso di dati NON personali nell'UE
by Francesca Mauro Sept. 20, 2017

Sept. 20, 2017

Per sfruttare appieno il potenziale dell'economia dei dati nell'UE, la Commissione propone una nuova serie di norme per disciplinare il libero flusso di dati non personali<http://ec.europa.eu/transparency/regdoc/rep/1/2017/EN/COM-2017-495-F1-EN-MA…> nell'UE. Insieme alle disposizioni sui dati personali già in vigore, le nuove misure consentiranno l'archiviazione e l'elaborazione dei dati non personali in tutta l'Unione, per rafforzare la competitività delle imprese europee e per modernizzare i servizi pubblici nel quadro di un mercato unico europeo per i servizi di dati efficiente. L'abolizione delle restrizioni alla localizzazione dei dati è considerata, infatti, il fattore più importante per consentire all'economia dei dati di raddoppiare il proprio valore fino al 4% del PIL nel 2020. QUI di seguito il comunicato stampa http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-17-3190_it.htm BIRD & BIRD For information on the international legal practice comprising Bird & Bird LLP and its affiliated and associated businesses (together "Bird & Bird"), our offices, our members and partners, regulatory information, privacy, complaints procedure and the use of e-mail see www.twobirds.com/LN Any e-mail sent from Bird & Bird may contain information which is confidential and/or privileged. Unless you are the intended recipient, you may not disclose, copy or use it; please notify the sender immediately and delete it and any copies from your systems. You should protect your system from viruses etc.; we accept no responsibility for damage that may be caused by them. To the extent permitted by law, we may monitor electronic communications for the purposes of ensuring compliance with our legal and regulatory obligations and internal policies. We may also collect email traffic headers for analysing patterns of network traffic and managing client relationships. For further information see www.twobirds.com/LNPrivacy For the terms on which we receive from, hold for or make available to a client or third party client money see www.twobirds.com/CM Studio Legale Bird & Bird Italy is a multidisciplinary partnership formed under Italian law with offices in Italy, Via Borgogna 8, 20122 Milan and Via Flaminia, 133 - 00196 Rome - Italy. The applicable professional regulations in the Codice deontologico forense are at www.consiglionazionaleforense.it/site/home/area-avvocati/codice-deontologic…

1 0