- nexa - server-nexa.polito.it

Re: [nexa] [NEXA]Ma è uno scherzo?
by Stefano Quintarelli Jan. 11, 2011

Jan. 11, 2011

considerando 4-6 della direttiva. lo spirito della direttiva è aumento della circolazione dei dispositivi art 3.c gli stati hanno la facoltà di richiedere certificazioni ovvero apertura e facoltà di chiedere certificazioni il ns recepimento dice che è installabile autonomamente solo ciò che verrà definito a me sembra contrarionallo spirito. il fatto che poi le certificazioni si ereditino, rafforza il mio convincimento. cfr sul mio blog i requisiti per un cablaggio infibra, non mi pare sensato. il recepimento della direttiva era una occasione per liberalizzare. invece... -- www.reeplay.it www.eximia.it Il giorno 26/nov/2010, alle ore 15.37, marco scialdone <marcoscialdone(a)gmail.com> ha scritto: > Io ho scritto queste due fesserie (più utili sicuramente i link all'interno del post) > http://scialdone.blogspot.com/2010/11/esistono-piu-norme-di-quante-voi-uman… > > Sinceramente io non vedo nè contrasti con la direttiva (nè con le sue finalità, nè con il dato letterale) nè grandi cambiamenti rispetto al quadro normativo esistente. > > 2010/11/26 Paolo Brini <paolo.brini(a)iridiumpg.com> > Il 26/11/2010 15:01, Stefano Quintarelli ha scritto: > > come scritto nei commenti al mio post (dove ci sono altre chicche che vi invito a leggere) lo spirito della direttiva era rimuovere vincoli, non metterli. hanno aumentato significativamente le sanzioni > > Non ho letto la Direttiva, è stata trasposta male (tanto per cambiare)? > Qualche giurista sa dire se ci sono estremi per una segnalazione alla > Commissione? > > Ciao, > Paolo > > > _______________________________________________ > nexa mailing list > nexa(a)server-nexa.polito.it > https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa > > > > -- > Avv. Marco Scialdone > Blog: http://scialdone.blogspot.com > Site: www.computerlaw.it > PEC: marcoscialdone(a)ordineavvocatiroma.org > Flavors me > My profile: www.linkedin.com/in/marcoscialdone > CC Network: https://creativecommons.net/marcoscialdone/ >

4 6

Reuters: Europe seen needing regulation over Internet access
by Paolo Brini Jan. 11, 2011

Jan. 11, 2011

Europe's confidence that it need not follow the United States in adopting rules to ensure fair Internet access may be short-lived, as competition between mobile operators and service providers like Skype intensifies. http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE6BL2IY20101222 Ciao, Paolo

1 0

Articolo di Morozov sul Sole 24 Ore
by Giorgio Ventre Jan. 11, 2011

Jan. 11, 2011

Per chi non lo avesse ancora letto vi segnalo questo articolo di Morozov uscito sul Sole 24 Ore di oggi http://www.ilsole24ore.com/art/commenti-e-idee/2011-01-11/lautogol-internet- agenda-063829.shtml?uuid=AYDGIryC Ormai ovvio che Morozov intenda farsi una solida fama di professionista dellanti-Internet. A mio avviso il problema della Internet Freedom Agenda non sta nel fatto di ritenere Internet uno strumento fondamentale nella promozione della democrazia e dei diritti umani, ma nel ritenerlo da solo sufficiente a risolvere questi problemi. E davvero non credo che lavere avviato questa politica abbia svegliato le smanie censorie dei vari despoti al governo. Prima o poi si sarebbero resi conto del potenziale di diffusione di idee ed opinioni della Rete e sarebbero intervenuti con la delicatezza che li contraddistingue. Forse al contrario ora è assolutamente chiaro che filtrare ed ascoltare i contenuti in transito su Internet non è solo una violazione della privacy, ma ha una valenza assolutamente politica di controllo e repressione delle libertà di espressione. Un cordiale saluto a tutti Giorgio ============================================================================ == Prof. Ing. Giorgio Ventre COMICS Lab Dipartimento di Informatica e Sistemistica, Università di Napoli Federico II Via Claudio 21, 80125, Napoli, ITALY Tel: +39 081 7683908 Fax: + 39 081 7683816 Mob: +39 3356264000 E-mail: <mailto:giorgio.ventre@unina.it> giorgio.ventre(a)unina.it <http://www.comics.unina.it/> http://www.comics.unina.it <http://docenti.unina.it/giorgio.ventre> http://www.docenti.unina.it/giorgio.ventre ============================================================================ ==

1 0

EFF: "The Best of Cablegate: Instances Where Public Discourse Benefited from the Leaks"
by J.C. DE MARTIN Jan. 11, 2011

Jan. 11, 2011

Dedicato ai molti che sostengono che le rilevazioni di Wikileaks non contenevano nulla di nuovo o di interessante. juan carlos ------------- January 7th, 2011 The Best of Cablegate: Instances Where Public Discourse Benefited from the Leaks <http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2011/01/cablegate-disclosures-have-furthered-i…> /News Roundup <http://www.eff.org/blog-categories/news-roundup> by Rainey Reitman <http://www.eff.org/about/staff/rainey-reitman>/ Since late November, the whistleblower website Wikileaks has been in the process of releasing in waves over 250,000 leaked United States diplomatic cables. Known as "Cablegate," this is the largest publication of confidential documents by any organization. (Catch up on Wikileaks developments by reviewing EFF's page <https://www.eff.org/wikileaks> on this issue). Wikileaks' disclosures have caused tremendous controversy, with critics of Wikileaks claiming the leaks of classified information could endanger lives and harm international diplomacy. Others have commended Wikileaks, pointing to a long history of over-classification and a lack of transparency by the United States government. Regardless of the heated debate over the propriety of Wikileaks' actions, some of the cables have contributed significantly to public and political conversations all around the world. In this article, we highlight a small selection of cables that been critical to understanding and evaluating controversial events. 1. *"Dancing Boy" Scandal Alleges Child Prostitution, Possible Drug Use among U.S. Private Contractors * The /Guardian/ reported <http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/dec/02/foreign-contractors-hired-danci…> on a cable describing an incident in which employees of DynCorp, a U.S. military contractor, hired a "dancing boy" for a party. [...] Continua qui: http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2011/01/cablegate-disclosures-have-furthered-i…

3 2

NYTimes: "Brussels Wants 7-Year Limit on Works Digitized by Google"
by J.C. DE MARTIN Jan. 11, 2011

Jan. 11, 2011

Brussels Wants 7-Year Limit on Works Digitized by Google By JAMES KANTER <http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/k/james_kanter/i…> Published: January 10, 2011 BRUSSELS --- Companies like Google <http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/business/companies/google_inc/index.html…> that digitize artworks and books from public bodies should allow other companies and institutions to commercialize those materials after seven years, three experts advising the European Commission <http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/e/europea…> said Monday. The experts, including Maurice C. Lévy, the chairman and chief executive of Publicis, a communications and advertising company based in Paris, also encouraged the emergence of additional innovative companies besides Google to help digitize Europe's cultural heritage. "We believe there is a lot of opportunity for new players to come and confront Google," Mr. Lévy said. Google had been "essential in the process" of digitizing cultural materials like books, films, photographs and paintings, but it was not "very good for competition to have one player on the ground," he said. The amount of effort needed to digitize Europe's heritage should generate work for a lot of.... [...] Continua qui: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/11/business/global/11google.html

1 0

Ingiunzioni americane
by Paolo Brini Jan. 10, 2011

Jan. 10, 2011

Dopo l'ingiunzione del Dipartimento della Giustizia a Twitter per farsi consegnare tutti i dati di tutti gli account di coloro che seguono WikiLeaks, alcuni hanno sostenuto che ingiunzioni simili siano state consegnate a Facebook e Google. Il no comment per ora ottenuto dai due big non fa che alimentare i sospetti. Come cittadino dell'Unione, quali passi giudiziari (se ce ne sono) posso eventualmente intraprendere per oppormi al trasferimento di tutti i miei dati al Dipartimento di Giustizia americano (non che mi interessi molto ma è una questione di principio)? Al momento nessuno dei soggetti indicati ha fatto sapere nulla né a me né a molti altri followers o collaboratori di WikiLeaks. Ciao, Paolo

6 8

Google policy fellowship program 2011
by Marco Pancini Jan. 10, 2011

Jan. 10, 2011

FYI http://googlepublicpolicy.blogspot.com/2010/11/apply-for-2011-google-policy… -- Marco Pancini European Senior Policy Counsel Google Italy Corso Europa, 2 20122 Milano, Italia Tel. +39 02 36618524 Cell. +39.348.9946222 pancini(a)google.com Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/googlepolicyit This email may be confidential or privileged. If you received this communication by mistake, please don't forward it to anyone else, please erase all copies and attachments, and please let me know that it went to the wrong person. Thanks.

1 0

Servizio TG5 su Wikipedia
by J.C. DE MARTIN Jan. 10, 2011

Jan. 10, 2011

Servizio del TG5 su Wikipedia: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RygPOmuTBc0 Tralascio i commenti. juan carlos

2 1

Final report of the Comité des sages (REFLECTION GROUP ON BRINGING EUROPE’S CULTURAL HERITAGE ONLINE)
by Philippe Aigrain Jan. 10, 2011

Jan. 10, 2011

This follows a consultation to which both COMMUNIA and La Quadrature du Net had answered. I have not yet analyzed the report, but they seem to make a lukewarm endorsement of some of our recommendations. Ex: Very lukewarm, close to cold: 4.1.5 Many cultural institutions from across Europe claim rights on digitised material that is in the public domain. In other words, they assert new rights that would have been created by the digitisation of the material. The basis for such claims is, however, not always solid, and the situation may varyfrom one Member State to the other, depending on the copyright legislation of the country concerned. This can lead to a situation where digitised objects are protected in one country and not in another, which is particularly problematic in a cross-border context. Good: 4.3.1 The Comité feels strongly that public domain material digitised with public money should be freely accessible for all. This should be part of the funding conditions for the digitisation of public domain material across Europe. Starts well, and continues badly (in my opinion): 4.4.1 Public domain material digitised with public money should be freely available for non-commercial re-use by citizens, schools, universities, non-governmental and other organisations. 4.4.2 The Comité also recommends that cultural institutions make their digitised material available as widely as possible for commercial entities to build upon. This will stimulate the use of the material for new information products and services. 4.4.3 Cultural institutions can, however, ask private companies to pay for the commercial re-use of the material, in order to recoup the digitisation costs and finance further digitisation. This could be done on the basis of a one-off payment or through revenue-sharing models. Specific partnerships between cultural institutions and smaller companies or universities could be considered, in order to stimulate the re-use of the digitised material for innovative information services. Overall, they should read better the Public Domain Manifesto and our policy recommendations : if a digitized version of a public domain work is in the public domain there is no legal basis for making conditions on its reuse (it is actually contrary to fundamental right to create any). You can create taxes, public trusts, statutory contributions, or voluntary resource pooling to raise resources for digitizing. Philippe

1 0

[NEXA]PI: USA, Google contro Microsoft per le nuvole del governo
by vale.it＠gmail.com Jan. 10, 2011

Jan. 10, 2011

Sul tema dei bandi di gara di prodotti compatibili con il software di una determinata casa: http://punto-informatico.it/3066328/PI/News/usa-google-contro-microsoft-nuv… V

1 0