Buongiorno Si tratta certamente di uno degli articoli piu' chiari che mi sia mai capitato di leggere sul nesso cyber-nuclear. Tutti i concetti esposti possono essere compresi facilmente anche _senza_ possedere competenze/conoscenze specifiche ne' su questioni miliatri/nucleari, ne' su questioni cyber/informatiche.Per di piu', alcune considerazioni fatte per esempio sulla transizione _legacy --> modernized-systems_ si possono, a mio avviso, applicare a _qualunque_ sistema digitale. Ne suggerisco vivamente la lettura! https://tnsr.org/2021/06/cyber-risk-across-the-u-s-nuclear-enterprise/ Diego -- Dott. Diego Latella - Senior Researcher CNR/ISTI, Via Moruzzi 1, 56124 Pisa, Italy (http:www.isti.cnr.it [1]) FM&&T Lab. (http://fmt.isti.cnr.it) CNR/GI-STS (http://gists.pi.cnr.it) https://www.isti.cnr.it/People/D.Latella - ph: +390506212982, mob: +39 348 8283101, fax: +390506212040 =================== I don't quite know whether it is especially computer science or its subdiscipline Artificial Intelligence that has such an enormous affection for euphemism. We speak so spectacularly and so readily of computer systems that understand, that see, decide, make judgments, and so on, without ourselves recognizing our own superficiality and immeasurable naivete with respect to these concepts. And, in the process of so speaking, we anesthetise our ability to evaluate the quality of our work and, what is more important, to identify and become conscious of its end use. […] One can't escape this state without asking, again and again: "What do I actually do? What is the final application and use of the products of my work?" and ultimately, "am I content or ashamed to have contributed to this use?" -- Prof. Joseph Weizenbaum ["Not without us", ACM SIGCAS 16(2-3) 2--7 - Aug. 1986] Links: ------ [1] http://www.isti.cnr.it