Buongiorno
Si tratta certamente di uno degli articoli piu' chiari che mi sia mai capitato di leggere sul nesso cyber-nuclear. Tutti i concetti esposti possono essere compresi facilmente anche senza possedere competenze/conoscenze specifiche ne' su questioni miliatri/nucleari, ne' su questioni cyber/informatiche.Per di piu', alcune considerazioni fatte per esempio sulla transizione legacy --> modernized-systems si possono, a mio avviso, applicare a qualunque sistema digitale. Ne suggerisco vivamente la lettura!
https://tnsr.org/2021/06/cyber-risk-across-the-u-s-nuclear-enterprise/
Diego
--
CNR/GI-STS (
http://gists.pi.cnr.it)
https://www.isti.cnr.it/People/D.Latella - ph: +390506212982, mob: +39 348 8283101, fax: +390506212040
===================
I don't quite know whether it is especially computer science or its subdiscipline Artificial Intelligence that has such an enormous affection for euphemism. We speak so spectacularly and so readily of computer systems that understand, that see, decide, make judgments, and so on, without ourselves recognizing our own superficiality and immeasurable naivete with respect to these concepts. And, in the process of so speaking, we anesthetise our ability to evaluate the quality of our work and, what is more important, to identify and become conscious of its end use. […] One can't escape this state without asking, again and again: "What do I actually do? What is the final application and use of the products of my work?" and ultimately, "am I content or ashamed to have contributed to this use?"-- Prof. Joseph Weizenbaum ["Not without us", ACM SIGCAS 16(2-3) 2--7 - Aug. 1986]