Copyright King: Why the "I Have a Dream" Speech Still Isn't Free
Copyright King: Why the "I Have a Dream" Speech Still Isn't Free Posted byAlex_Pasternack <http://motherboard.vice.com/profiles/alex_pasternack>on Monday, Jan 16, 2012 Martin Luther King Jr.'s "I Have a Dream" speech isconsidered <http://www.news.wisc.edu/releases/3504.html>one of the most recognizable collection of words in American history. It's the rhetorical equivalent of a national treasure or a national park. The National Park Service inscribed it on the Lincoln Memorial and the Library of Congress put it into its National Recording Registry. So we might hold it to be self evident that it can be spread freely. Not exactly. Any unauthorized usage of the speech and a number of other speeches by King -- including inPBSdocumentaries -- is a violation of American law. You'd be hard pressed to find a good complete video version on the web, and it's not even to be found in the new digital archive ofthe King Center's website <http://www.thekingcenter.org/archive>. If you want to watch the whole thing, legally, you'll need toget the $20DVD <https://www.thekingcentergifts.com/default.aspx?p=viewitem&item=MLKAUD0001&s...>. That's because the King estate, and, as of 2009, the British music publishing conglomerateEMIPublishing <http://www.crainsnewyork.com/article/20090317/FREE/903179967>, owns the copyright of the speech and its recorded performance. While the copyright restrictionisn't news <http://motherboard.vice.com/2011/8/29/the-copyright-nightmare-of-i-have-a-dr...>, EMI's unusual role in policing the use of King's words -- the first instance of the company taking on a non-music based intellectual property catalog -- hasn't been widely reported. In November 2011,EMIGroup wasauctioned off <http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204224604577031694160429400.ht...>, and the publishing business was sold to a consortium run by Sony Corp for $2.2 billion. The awkward tussle over MLK's words bears recounting, especially giventhe ongoing controversy overSOPA <http://motherboard.vice.com/2012/1/16/sopa-is-on-the-chopping-block-but-the-...>, which targets copyright infringements on the Internet -- and highlights all sorts ofproblems <http://motherboard.vice.com/2012/1/13/sopa-backers-are-pirates-themselves>with our aging copyright system andgeneral ignorance <http://motherboard.vice.com/2011/12/16/dear-congress-it-s-no-longer-ok-to-not-know-how-the-internet-works>about how ideas actually spread in the digital age: [...] Continua qui: http://motherboard.vice.com/2012/1/16/copyright-king-why-the-i-have-a-dream-...
Interessante, ma come la mettiamo con il diritto di critica, considerato che mi sembra innegabile che si tratti di un discorso politico? Nel sistema italiano il discorso non rientra nelle libere utilizzazioni? Nel sistema americano non rientra nel fair use? V Il giorno 17/gen/2012, alle ore 04.41, J.C. DE MARTIN ha scritto:
Copyright King: Why the "I Have a Dream" Speech Still Isn't Free Posted by Alex_Pasternack on Monday, Jan 16, 2012
Martin Luther King Jr.‘s “I Have a Dream” speech is considered one of the most recognizable collection of words in American history. It’s the rhetorical equivalent of a national treasure or a national park. The National Park Service inscribed it on the Lincoln Memorial and the Library of Congress put it into its National Recording Registry. So we might hold it to be self evident that it can be spread freely.
Not exactly. Any unauthorized usage of the speech and a number of other speeches by King – including in PBS documentaries – is a violation of American law. You’d be hard pressed to find a good complete video version on the web, and it’s not even to be found in the new digital archive of the King Center’s website. If you want to watch the whole thing, legally, you’ll need to get the $20 DVD.
That’s because the King estate, and, as of 2009, the British music publishing conglomerate EMI Publishing, owns the copyright of the speech and its recorded performance. While the copyright restriction isn’t news, EMI’s unusual role in policing the use of King’s words – the first instance of the company taking on a non-music based intellectual property catalog – hasn’t been widely reported. In November 2011,EMI Group was auctioned off, and the publishing business was sold to a consortium run by Sony Corp for $2.2 billion. The awkward tussle over MLK’s words bears recounting, especially given the ongoing controversy over SOPA, which targets copyright infringements on the Internet – and highlights all sorts of problems with our aging copyright system and general ignorance about how ideas actually spread in the digital age:
[...]
Continua qui: http://motherboard.vice.com/2012/1/16/copyright-king-why-the-i-have-a-dream-... _______________________________________________ nexa mailing list nexa@server-nexa.polito.it https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa
participants (2)
-
J.C. DE MARTIN -
vale.it.newsletters@gmail.com