The Spurious Justifications for Eliminating Price Caps on .org and Other Legacy Domains
https://www.circleid.com/posts/20190423_spurious_justifications_for_eliminat... ICANN is about to do serious damage to its reputation by making a precipitous, ill-considered leap into the unknown should it follow through on removing price constraints on several legacy extensions, most notably .org. Doing so would expose a global community of non-profits to the risk of quickly-escalating exploitative pricing. The rationale for eliminating price caps relies on three points, all of which are incorrect — 1) that the registries for the legacy gTLDs should be treated the same as the new gTLD registries, that is as owners entitled to capture the entire value of the name spaces, 2) that price competition will restrain prices, and 3) that it is not ICANN's role to set and to regulate prices.
Per completezza, qui la Proposta di ICANN (a cui ancora per 5 giorni è possibile inviare commenti): https://www.icann.org/public-comments/org-renewal-2019-03-18-en Qui i commenti esistenti: https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/comments-org-renewal-18mar19/ Giacomo On 24/04/2019, Giacomo Tesio <giacomo@tesio.it> wrote:
https://www.circleid.com/posts/20190423_spurious_justifications_for_eliminat...
ICANN is about to do serious damage to its reputation by making a precipitous, ill-considered leap into the unknown should it follow through on removing price constraints on several legacy extensions, most notably .org. Doing so would expose a global community of non-profits to the risk of quickly-escalating exploitative pricing. The rationale for eliminating price caps relies on three points, all of which are incorrect —
1) that the registries for the legacy gTLDs should be treated the same as the new gTLD registries, that is as owners entitled to capture the entire value of the name spaces, 2) that price competition will restrain prices, and 3) that it is not ICANN's role to set and to regulate prices.
participants (1)
-
Giacomo Tesio