John Palfrey's Net Neutrality proposal to FCC
A citizens' choice framework for net neutrality 3 November 2010 I’ve just submitted a comment to the FCC with respect to a proposal for a compromise solution on network neutrality. I’m very grateful to the many friends who provided constructive criticism during the drafting and refinement of the ideas. Here’s the text: * * * Mr. Chairman and Members of the Commission: Thank you for the opportunity to submit ideas regarding a path forward on the topic of Net Neutrality. In this memo, I propose that the FCC should pursue a compromise solution on Net Neutrality that both preserves the open Internet and permits opportunity for reasonable product differentiation and network management on IP networks. The central tenet of this plan would be to locate the choice to differentiate services with the consumer, not with the Internet Service Provider. The overriding policy goal is to create incentives for increasing bandwidth infrastructure rather than monetizing or encouraging scarcity. And the plan should prioritize Managed Services that support national purposes as set forth in the National Broadband Plan. The Citizens’ Choice Framework would include the following elements: [...] Continua qui: http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2010/11/03/a-citizens-choice-framework-...
e' giusto che la scelta sia in capo agli utenti ho una domanda per gli avvocati (in basso) imlicitamente significa che ciascuno puo' richiedere, on top al suo collegamento best effort, che il suo semicircuito sia trattato con determinati livelli di servizio VideoTube ======= Operatore ======= Utente parte degli equivoci nascono dal considerare sempre connessioni end-to-end se Videotube si accorda con operatore per avere alta priorità nel delivery dello streaming, sono cavoli suoi, fintanto che Videotube non decide come deve essere gestito il mio vialetto di accesso, ovvero la mia coda locale (il mio "semicircuito"). ecco la domanda per gli avvocati: puo' il funzionamento del traffico sul MIO segmento di accesso essere determinato da accordi fatti dall'oepratore con altri, diversi da me ? perche' se io sono legittimato a non avere il mio traffico "mangled" sul mio segmento di accesso (salvo ragioni di non service-disruption), gia' solo gestire l'opt-in per l'operatore e' un problema.. ciao, s. On 04/11/10 06.26, J.C. DE MARTIN wrote:
A citizens' choice framework for net neutrality
3 November 2010
I’ve just submitted a comment to the FCC with respect to a proposal for a compromise solution on network neutrality. I’m very grateful to the many friends who provided constructive criticism during the drafting and refinement of the ideas. Here’s the text:
* * *
Mr. Chairman and Members of the Commission: Thank you for the opportunity to submit ideas regarding a path forward on the topic of Net Neutrality. In this memo, I propose that the FCC should pursue a compromise solution on Net Neutrality that both preserves the open Internet and permits opportunity for reasonable product differentiation and network management on IP networks.
The central tenet of this plan would be to locate the choice to differentiate services with the consumer, not with the Internet Service Provider. The overriding policy goal is to create incentives for increasing bandwidth infrastructure rather than monetizing or encouraging scarcity. And the plan should prioritize Managed Services that support national purposes as set forth in the National Broadband Plan.
The Citizens’ Choice Framework would include the following elements:
[...]
Continua qui: http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2010/11/03/a-citizens-choice-framework-...
_______________________________________________ nexa mailing list nexa@server-nexa.polito.it https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa
-- blog.quintarelli.it www.eximia.it www.reeplay.it
Allo stao credo (temo) di si, ma deve rispondere un civilista. -----Messaggio originale----- Da: nexa-bounces@server-nexa.polito.it [mailto:nexa-bounces@server-nexa.polito.it] Per conto di Stefano Quintarelli Inviato: giovedì 4 novembre 2010 9.10 A: J.C. DE MARTIN Cc: Nexa Center Oggetto: Re: [nexa] John Palfrey's Net Neutrality proposal to FCC e' giusto che la scelta sia in capo agli utenti ho una domanda per gli avvocati (in basso) imlicitamente significa che ciascuno puo' richiedere, on top al suo collegamento best effort, che il suo semicircuito sia trattato con determinati livelli di servizio VideoTube ======= Operatore ======= Utente parte degli equivoci nascono dal considerare sempre connessioni end-to-end se Videotube si accorda con operatore per avere alta priorità nel delivery dello streaming, sono cavoli suoi, fintanto che Videotube non decide come deve essere gestito il mio vialetto di accesso, ovvero la mia coda locale (il mio "semicircuito"). ecco la domanda per gli avvocati: puo' il funzionamento del traffico sul MIO segmento di accesso essere determinato da accordi fatti dall'oepratore con altri, diversi da me ? perche' se io sono legittimato a non avere il mio traffico "mangled" sul mio segmento di accesso (salvo ragioni di non service-disruption), gia' solo gestire l'opt-in per l'operatore e' un problema.. ciao, s. On 04/11/10 06.26, J.C. DE MARTIN wrote:
A citizens' choice framework for net neutrality
3 November 2010
I’ve just submitted a comment to the FCC with respect to a proposal for a compromise solution on network neutrality. I’m very grateful to the many friends who provided constructive criticism during the drafting and refinement of the ideas. Here’s the text:
* * *
Mr. Chairman and Members of the Commission: Thank you for the opportunity to submit ideas regarding a path forward on the topic of Net Neutrality. In this memo, I propose that the FCC should pursue a compromise solution on Net Neutrality that both preserves the open Internet and permits opportunity for reasonable product differentiation and network management on IP networks.
The central tenet of this plan would be to locate the choice to differentiate services with the consumer, not with the Internet Service Provider. The overriding policy goal is to create incentives for increasing bandwidth infrastructure rather than monetizing or encouraging scarcity. And the plan should prioritize Managed Services that support national purposes as set forth in the National Broadband Plan.
The Citizens’ Choice Framework would include the following elements:
[...]
Continua qui: http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/palfrey/2010/11/03/a-citizens-choice-framework-...
_______________________________________________ nexa mailing list nexa@server-nexa.polito.it https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa
-- blog.quintarelli.it www.eximia.it www.reeplay.it _______________________________________________ nexa mailing list nexa@server-nexa.polito.it https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa
participants (3)
-
Blengino -
J.C. DE MARTIN -
Stefano Quintarelli