si, difficile. imho dal punto di vista di linee guida io le seguenti cose le caldeggerei - ridurre le freq TV e darle agli MNO (il prezzo lo fa l'asta) - mettere scadenze brevi delle assegnazioni - aumentare lo spettro disponibile unlicensed nella parte alta - aumentare le potenze per tutti (il limite era stato fissato ad 1/3 degli USA come decisione di un funzionario "quanto fanno in USA ? noi facciamo meno della meta" (cosi' si vendevano piu' apparati , costava di piu' fare la rete...) - riservare una parte bassa per sperimentazioni e uso privato (per consentire sperimentazioni radio cognitive e beamforming) - assegnare una nuova categoria di licenze per stesse frequenze da MNO ma low power (SRD indoor) ciao, s. On 13/01/2012 09:49, Giorgio Ventre wrote:

Ammetto che la questione è davvero interessante ma mi riesce difficile capire se esiste una soluzione al problema, in termini di linee guida per definire una strategia politica sul tema Frequenze.

I Telco si lamentano di essere lasciati fuori dalla fetta più interessante del Mercato e di essere costretti a pagare somme enormi per lo spettro. Somme che peraltro garantiscono loro una posizione forte nei confronti dei service provider o comunque consente loro di avere revenue diretti.

Dall’altro i service provider dicono che non vogliono essere più sottoposti a questo “balzello” e chiedono spettro gratis (o quasi) giustificando questa richiesta con la loro enorme capacità di innovazione sui servizi.

Cosa peraltro vera, in fin dei conti.

Se a questo aggiungiamo poi che in Europa non esiste nessun service provider degno di nota, la questione da noi si complica ancora di più.

Saluti

Giorgio

Da: nexa-bounces@server-nexa.polito.it [mailto:nexa-bounces@server-nexa.polito.it] Per conto di J.C. DE MARTIN Inviato: venerdì 13 gennaio 2012 2.44 A: nexa@server-nexa.polito.it Oggetto: [nexa] Fwd: [IP] Google pleads for more unlicensed spectrum instead of more auctions

-------- Original Message --------

Subject:

[IP] Google pleads for more unlicensed spectrum instead of more auctions

Date:

Thu, 12 Jan 2012 20:20:42 -0500

From:

Dave Farber<mailto:dave@farber.net> <dave@farber.net>

Reply-To:

dave@farber.net

To:

ip<mailto:ip@listbox.com> <ip@listbox.com>

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Dewayne Hendricks<dewayne@warpspeed.com> Date: Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 8:01 PM Subject: [Dewayne-Net] Google pleads for more unlicensed spectrum instead of more auctions To: Multiple recipients of Dewayne-Net<dewayne-net@warpspeed.com>

Google pleads for more unlicensed spectrum instead of more auctions Cites inability to compete with big carriers in auctions By Brad Reed, Network World January 12, 2012 <http://www.networkworld.com/news/2012/011212-google-spectrum-254842.html>

LAS VEGAS - Google would really, really like to see the Federal Communications Commission open up a huge swath of unlicensed spectrum for mobile broadband. However, it doesn't look like the company will get its wish. During a panel discussion at the Consumer Electronics Show yesterday, Google senior policy counsel Rick Whitt outlined his company's case for making more unlicensed spectrum available instead of simply auctioning off spectrum to the highest bidders. In particular, Whitt cited Google's inability to compete with Verizon when bidding on the so-called "C Block" of spectrum on the 700MHz band that the FCC auctioned off in 2008 that now forms the backbone of Verizon's nationwide LTE network.

"We thought, 'What would it take for us to outbid Verizon?' And every one of the game theorists we talked to across the spectrum said the same thing: 'You'll never outbid Verizon,' " he said. "They are the incumbents and they will do everything they can to foreclose your entry into the market."

Whitt also cited concerns about the proposed spectrum auction legislation that recently passed in the House of Representatives. In particular, Whitt said that an all-licensed approach to spectrum wouldn't give carriers the spectrum they need to build out common infrastructure.

"The concern that many of us have ... is that [the proposed House legislation] seems to say, 'Everything that's cleared must be auctioned and everything that's auctioned must be licensed,' which in our mind would rule out unlicensed," said Whitt. "If nothing else, if you are an advocate of licensed usage there are things like guard bands or things like duplex gaps that are going to be really necessary to have the next generation of LTE networks built... This is beachfront spectrum. How about a couple public beaches?"

But Neil Fried, the chief telecommunications counsel for the House Energy and Commerce Committee, said that the spectrum in question would be wasted if it was used for short-field communications and said that it needed a national telecom carrier to properly build out and manage a nationwide mobile broadband network.

"There is a need for unlicensed spectrum and that will remain," said Fried. "The type of things we're talking about, the offloading? That's short haul, that's not long haul. If we're talking about beach-front property, are we talking about a place to go surfing or are we talking about a shipping lane? ... What we've done is we've set the right balance. The 700MHz and below, that's the prime stuff for the long-haul licensed wireless broadband use ... creating an oasis for unlicensed use would be essentially preventing the use for licensed."

[snip]

Dewayne-Net RSS Feed:<http://www.warpspeed.com/wordpress>

<https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now> Archives <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/14798382-eb93fc78> | <https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=14798382&id_secret=14798382-58a8a c4b> Modify Your Subscription | <https://www.listbox.com/unsubscribe/?member_id=14798382&id_secret=14798382- d392ffd3&post_id=20120112202047:D1040E7C-3D84-11E1-A979-F67A02A212EC> Unsubscribe Now

<http://www.listbox.com>

_______________________________________________ nexa mailing list nexa@server-nexa.polito.it https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa

-- blog.quintarelli.it www.ilsole24ore.com