January 8, 2011 Playing Catch-Up in a Digital Library Race By NATASHA SINGER AMERICA stood at the forefront of the public library movement in 1731, when Benjamin Franklin <http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/f/benjamin_frankl...> founded the Library Company of Philadelphia <http://www.librarycompany.org/about/index.htm>, our first successful lending library. Looking back on the project decades later, Franklin wrote in his autobiography <http://books.google.com/books?id=6wJSqhFuSt4C&pg=PT88&dq=%22these+libraries+...> that the growth of lending libraries had played a role not only in educating but also in democratizing American society. "These Libraries," he wrote, "have improv'd the general Conversation of the Americans, made the common Tradesmen & Farmers as intelligent as most Gentlemen from other countries, and perhaps have contributed to some degree to the Stand so generally made throughout the Colonies in Defence of their Privileges." Lending libraries may have been the newfangled democratizing factor of their day. Centuries later, though, the United States finds itself trailing Europe and Japan <http://www.ndl.go.jp/en/cdnlao/meetings/pdf/Open_Seminar_%28Japan%29.pdf> in creating the modern equivalent: a national digital library that would serve as an electronic repository for the nation's cultural heritage. In other words, there's a real digital library divide. In contrast to the United States, the National Library of Norway <http://www.nb.no/english> has been a global early adopter. In 2005, it announced a goal of digitizing its entire collection; by now it has scanned some 170,000 books, 250,000 newspapers, 610,000 hours of radio broadcasts, 200,000 hours of TV and 500,000 photographs. And, last year, the National Library of the Netherlands <http://www.kb.nl/index-en.html>said it planned to scan all... [...] Continua qui: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/09/business/09stream.html