"Nonprofit library" promises to appeal lower court ruling restricting their ability to digitally lend unauthorized e-books: "This ruling is a blow for libraries, readers, and authors" <https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-news/internet-archive-copyright...> Digital database Internet Archive lost the first ruling in a copyright <https://www.rollingstone.com/t/copyright/> infringement lawsuit <https://www.rollingstone.com/t/lawsuit/> filed against the “nonprofit library” by four of the biggest publishing companies. In June 2020, amid the Covid-19 pandemic, John Wiley & Sons, Hachette Book Group, HarperCollins and Penguin Random House sued <https://www.npr.org/2020/06/03/868861704/publishers-sue-internet-archive-for...> Internet Archive <https://www.rollingstone.com/t/internet-archive/> over their attempt to create a “National Emergency Library” by uploading countless e-books — or scanned versions of printed books — for users to “borrow” while bookstores and libraries across the nation were shuttered due to the pandemic. “Its goal of creating digital copies of books and providing them to whomever wants to download them reflects a profound misunderstanding of the costs of creating books, a profound lack of respect for the many contributors involved in the publication process, and a profound disregard of the boundaries and balance of core copyright principles,” the publishers argued at the time. Internet Archive countered that “as a library, the Internet Archive acquires books and lends them, as libraries have always done. This supports publishing, authors and readers. Publishers suing libraries for lending books, in this case protected digitized versions, and while schools and libraries are closed, is not in anyone’s interest.” Nearly two years later, the lawsuit went before a U.S. District Court in Manhattan, where the judge ruled that Internet Archive was producing “derivative” works that required permission from the publishers as the copyright holders. “An ebook recast from a print book is a paradigmatic example of a derivative work,” Judge John G. Koeltl wrote in his decision, adding that the publishers already license their own authorized e-books to libraries (via /The Associated Press/ <https://apnews.com/article/books-and-literature-manhattan-john-g-koeltl-busi...>). In a statement <http://blog.archive.org/2023/03/25/the-fight-continues/> following the ruling, Internet Archive — which also houses millions of other materials, including films, TV broadcasts, radio and music recordings, photographs and more — pledged to appeal the lower court’s decision.