Buongiorno a tutti, le letture consigliate NEXA che trovate qui http://nexa.polito.it/recommended-readings stanno crescendo, ma di sicuro restano ancora fuori libri e articoli fondamentali. Se volete segnalare libri e articoli che secondo voi non si possono non aver letto se si vuole parlare (o anche solo pensare) di un certo tema "internet & societa'", me lo segnalate per favore? Grazie, juan carlos
Ecco il mio contributo, proporrei questi testi e articoli: 1. Commons / pubblico dominio Boldrin Michele & Levine David K., Against Intellectual Monopoly ( http://www.dklevine.com/general/intellectual/againstnew.htm ) (Cambridge University Press 2008), http://www.dklevine.com/general/intellectual/againstnew.htm; Boyle James, The ( http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=470983 ) Opposite of Property, 66 law & contemp. Prob. 1 (2003), http://www.law.duke.edu/boylesite/; Boyle James, The Second Enclosure Movement and the Construction of the Public Domain ( http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=470983 ), 66 law & contemp. Prob. 33 (2003), http://www.law.duke.edu/boylesite/; Cohen Julie, Copyright, Commodification, and Culture: Locating the Public Domain, in The Future of the Public Domain: Identifying the Commons in the Information Law121-66 (Lucie Guibault & P. Bernt Hugenholtz eds., Kluwer Law International 2006); Cultural Environmentalism @ 10 (James Boyle & Lawrence Lessig eds.), 70 law & contemp. Prob. 1-232 (2007), http://www.law.duke.edu/boylesite/; Hardin Garrett, The Tragedy of the Commons, 162 Science 1243 (1968); Heller Michael A., The Tragedy Of The Anticommons: Property In The Transition From Marx To Markets ( file:///C:/Documents%20and%20Settings/TheGian/Local%20Settings/BIBLIOGRAPHY/Heller%20Michael%20A.,%20The%20Tragedy%20Of%20The%20Anticommons%20Property%20In%20The%20Transition%20From%20Marx%20To%20Markets,%20111%20HARV.%20L.%20REV.%20621%20(1998).pdf ), 111 Harv. L. Rev. 621 (1998); Lange David, Reimagining The Public Domain ( http://eprints.law.duke.edu/archive/00000825/ ), 66 Law & Contemp. Probs.463 ( about:....David, Reimagining The Public Domain, 66 LAW & CONTEMP. PROBS. 463 (2003).pdf ) (2003); LorenLydia Pallas, Building A Reliable Semi-commons Of Creative Works: Enforcement Of Creative Commons Licenses And Limited Abandonment Of Copyright ( about:....Lydia Pallas, Building A Reliable Semicommons Of Creative Works - Enforcement Of Creative Commons Licenses And Limited Abandonment Of Copyright, 14 GEO. MASON L. REV. 271 (2007).pdf ), 14 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 271 (2007); Macmillan Fiona ( http://www.bbk.ac.uk/law/about/ft-academic/macmillan/publications ), Commodification and Cultural Ownership, inCopyright And Free Speech: Comparative And International Analyses 35-65 (Jonathan Griffiths and Uma Suthersanen eds., Oxford University Press 2003); Merges Robert P., A New Dynamism in the Public Domain ( about:....Robert P., A New Dynamism in the Public Domain, 71 CHI. L. REV. 183 (2004).pdf ), 71 Chi. L. Rev. 183 (2004); Netanel Neil W., Copyright’s Paradox ( http://books.google.com/books?id=vo9G-0iZNQIC )(Oxford University Press 2008); Samuelson Pamela, Enriching Discourse on Public Domain ( about:....Pamela, Enriching Discourse on Public Domain, 55 DUKE L. J. 783 (2006).pdf ), 55 Duke L. J. 783 ( http://www.ischool.berkeley.edu/~pam/papers/enriching%20discourse%20on%20pub... ) (2006); Samuelson Pamela, The Public Domain - Mapping the Digital Public Domain - Threats and Opportunities, 66 law & contemp. Prob. 147 (2003) Vaidhyanathan Siva, Copyrights and Copywrongs: The Rise of Intellectual Property and How It Threatens Creativity ( http://books.google.com/books?id=sGjSY0rRC_wC )(New York University Press 2003); Van Schijndel Marieke and Joost Smiers, Imagining a World Without Copyright: the Market and Temporary Protection, a Better Alternative for Artists and Public Domain, in Copyright and Other Fairy Tales: Hans Christian Andersen and the Commodification of Creativity ( http://books.google.com/books?id=uKJe-oKumjEC ) 129 (Helle Porsdam ed., Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd. 2006). 2. Commons e cyberlaw Barlow John Perry, The Economy of Ideas: A Framework for Patents and Copyrights in the Digital Age (Everything You Know About Intellectual Property is Wrong), Wired 2.03, 1994, www.wired.com/wired/archive/2.03/economy.ideas.html; ( http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/2.03/economy.ideas.html; ) Boyle James, Shamans, Software & Spleens: Law and the Construction of The Information Society(Harvard University Press 1996); Clark Charles, The Future of the Copyright in a Digital Environment 139-146 (P. Bernt Hugenhotltz ed., Kluwer Law International 1996); Cohen Julie,A Right to Read Anonymously: A Closer Look at Copyright Management in Cyberspace, 28 Conn. L. R. 981 (1996); Elkin-Koren Niva, It'sAllAbout Control: Rethinking Copyright in the New Information Landscape, in The Commodification of Information 79-106 (Niva Elkin-Koren & Neil W. Netanel eds., 2002); Jenkins Henry,Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide (New York University Press 2008); KuRaymond S. R., Consumers And Creative Destruction: Fair Use Beyond Market Failure, 18 Berkeley Tech. L.J. 539 (2003); KuRaymond S. R., The Creative Destruction of Copyrights: Napster and the New Economics of Digital Technology, 69 u. Chi. L. Rev. 263(2002); Litman Jessica, Sharing and Stealing, 27 Hastings Comm. & Ent. L.J. 1 (2004); Litman Jessica, Digital Copyright(Prometheus Books 2001); National Research Board, The Digital Dilemma: Intellectual Property in The Information Age (National Academy Press, 2000); Von Lohmann Fred, Fair Use as Innovation Policy, 23 Berkeley Tech. L. J. 829 (2008) [American consumers increasingly take iPods, TiVos and similar private copying technologies for granted. Yet copyright law lacks a coherent account for this private, non-transformative copying. This article contends that copyright law's historical tolerance for such copying as a fair use has served as an important element of both copyright and innovation policy. This is because, to the extent it permits private copying, fair use creates incentives for technology companies to build innovative new products that enable such copying. Far from being an unfair "subsidy" from copyright owners to technology innovators, this aspect of fair use has yielded complementary technologies that enhance the value of copyrighted works. This fair use incentive to technology companies, moreover, is justified in light of a persistent market failure that would otherwise result in underproduction of certain kinds of socially-beneficial innovations. Finally, there are reasons to believe that technology innovators may not in many cases be able to appropriate to themselves the value of the fair uses that their technologies enable, because those uses will not be part of their marginal costs of production. To the extent that the value of these fair uses ends up being captured by the public, rather than technology innovators, this also furthers the purposes of copyright law.] 3. File-sharing Katyal Sonia K., Privacy vs. Piracy ( about:..Sonia K., Privacy vs. Piracy, 7 YALE J. LAW & TECH. 222 (2005).pdf ), 7 Yale J. Law & Tech. 222 (2005); Lemley Mark & Reese Anthony, Reducing Digital Copyright Infringement Without Restricting Innovation, 56 Stan. L. Rev. 1345 (May 2004); Liebowitz Stan, How Reliable is the Oberholzer-Gee and Strumpf Paper on File-Sharing? (University of Texas at Dallas, Working Paper, August 2007), available at http://copyrightalliance.net/files/ssrn-id1014399.pdf; Liebowitz Stan, File Sharing: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?, 49 J.L. & Econ. 1 (2006); Oberholzer-Gee Felix & Strumpf Koleman, The Effect Of File Sharing On Record Sales: An Empirical Analysis (University of North Carolina, Working Paper, June 2005), available at http://www.unc.edu/~cigar/papers/FileSharing_March2004.pdf ( http://www.unc.edu/~cigar/papers/FileSharing_March2004.pdf ). 4. Internet e Democrazia Benkler Yochai, Through the Looking Glass: Alice and Constitutional Foundations of the Public Domain, 66 J. Law & Contemp. Probs. 173 ( http://www.law.duke.edu/journals/lcp/articles/lcp66dWinterSpring2003p173.htm ) (2003); Benkler Yochai, Free as the Air to Common Use: First Amendment Constraints on the Enclosure of the Public Domain, 74 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 354 (1999); Lange David & Powell Jefferson H., No Law: Intellectual Property in the Image of an Absolute First Amendment ( http://www.amazon.com/gp/reader/080474579X/ref=sib_dp_pt#reader-link ) (Stanford Law Books 2008), http://www.amazon.com/reader/080474579X?_encoding=UTF8&ref_=sib_dp_pt#reader...; Pollack Malla, A Listener’s Free Speech, A Reader’s Copyright, 35 Hofstra L. Rev. 1457 (2007); Samuelson Pamela, Copyright and Freedom of Expression in Historical Perspective, 10 J. Intell. Prop. L. 319 ( http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/intpl10&id=325&collection=guest&index=journals/intpl ) (2003); Shapiro Andrew L., The Control Revolution: How the Internet is Putting Individuals in Charge and Changing the World we Know(Public Affairs 1999); Suthersanen Uma, Towards An International Public Interest Rule? Human Rights And International Copyright Law, inCopyright And Free Speech: Comparative And International Analyses 35-65 (Jonathan Griffiths and Uma Suthersanen eds., Oxford University Press 2003); Torremans Paul, Is Copyright a Human Right? ( file:///E:/DUKE/IP%20SJD/DISSERTATION/PART%20I/5.%20THE%20SEARCH%20FOR%20CULTURAL%20DISTINCTIVENESS%20AS%20PARADIGM%20OF%20EQUALITY/Torremans%20Paul,%20Is%20Copyright%20a%20Human%20Right,%202007%20Mich.%20St.%20L.%20Rev.%20271%20(2007).pdf ), 2007 Mich. St. L. Rev. 271 (2007). Un saluto, Giancarlo
"J.C. DE MARTIN" <demartin@polito.it> 10/13/2009 2:13 AM >>> Buongiorno a tutti,
le letture consigliate NEXA che trovate qui http://nexa.polito.it/recommended-readings stanno crescendo, ma di sicuro restano ancora fuori libri e articoli fondamentali. Se volete segnalare libri e articoli che secondo voi non si possono non aver letto se si vuole parlare (o anche solo pensare) di un certo tema "internet & societa'", me lo segnalate per favore? Grazie, juan carlos _______________________________________________ nexa mailing list nexa@server-nexa.polito.it https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa
Segnalo anche "La conoscenza come bene comune. Dalla teoria alla pratica" Bruno Mondadori a cura di C. Hess <http://books.google.it/books?q=+inauthor:%22C.+Hess%22&source=gbs_metadata_r...> , E. Ostrom <http://books.google.it/books?q=+inauthor:%22E.+Ostrom%22&source=gbs_metadata...> , edizione italiana a cura di P. Ferri <http://books.google.it/books?q=+inauthor:%22P.+Ferri%22&source=gbs_metadata_...> e con una mia premessa Fiorello <http://books.google.it/books?q=+inauthor:%22P.+Ferri%22&source=gbs_metadata_...> ________________________________ Da: nexa-bounces@server-nexa.polito.it [mailto:nexa-bounces@server-nexa.polito.it] Per conto di Giancarlo Frosio Inviato: martedì 13 ottobre 2009 11.05 A: J.C. DE MARTIN; nexa@server-nexa.polito.it Oggetto: Re: [nexa] letture consigliate Ecco il mio contributo, proporrei questi testi e articoli: 1. Commons / pubblico dominio Boldrin Michele & Levine David K., Against Intellectual Monopoly <http://www.dklevine.com/general/intellectual/againstnew.htm> (Cambridge University Press 2008), http://www.dklevine.com/general/intellectual/againstnew.htm; Boyle James, The <http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=470983> Opposite of Property, 66 law & contemp. Prob. 1 (2003), http://www.law.duke.edu/boylesite/; Boyle James, The Second Enclosure Movement and the Construction of the Public Domain <http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=470983> , 66 law & contemp. Prob. 33 (2003), http://www.law.duke.edu/boylesite/; Cohen Julie, Copyright, Commodification, and Culture: Locating the Public Domain, in The Future of the Public Domain: Identifying the Commons in the Information Law 121-66 (Lucie Guibault & P. Bernt Hugenholtz eds., Kluwer Law International 2006); Cultural Environmentalism @ 10 (James Boyle & Lawrence Lessig eds.), 70 law & contemp. Prob. 1-232 (2007), http://www.law.duke.edu/boylesite/; Hardin Garrett, The Tragedy of the Commons, 162 Science 1243 (1968); Heller Michael A., The Tragedy Of The Anticommons: Property In The Transition From Marx To Markets <file:///C:/Documents and Settings/TheGian/Local Settings/BIBLIOGRAPHY/Heller Michael A., The Tragedy Of The Anticommons Property In The Transition From Marx To Markets, 111 HARV. L. REV. 621 (1998).pdf> , 111 Harv. L. Rev. 621 (1998); Lange David, Reimagining The Public Domain <http://eprints.law.duke.edu/archive/00000825/> , 66 Law & Contemp. Probs. 463 <about:..\..\..\BIBLIOGRAPHY\Lange David, Reimagining The Public Domain, 66 LAW & CONTEMP. PROBS. 463 (2003).pdf> (2003); Loren Lydia Pallas, Building A Reliable Semi-commons Of Creative Works: Enforcement Of Creative Commons Licenses And Limited Abandonment Of Copyright <about:..\..\..\BIBLIOGRAPHY\Loren Lydia Pallas, Building A Reliable Semicommons Of Creative Works - Enforcement Of Creative Commons Licenses And Limited Abandonment Of Copyright, 14 GEO. MASON L. REV. 271 (2007).pdf> , 14 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 271 (2007); Macmillan Fiona <http://www.bbk.ac.uk/law/about/ft-academic/macmillan/publications> , Commodification and Cultural Ownership, in Copyright And Free Speech: Comparative And International Analyses 35-65 (Jonathan Griffiths and Uma Suthersanen eds., Oxford University Press 2003); Merges Robert P., A New Dynamism in the Public Domain <about:..\..\..\BIBLIOGRAPHY\Merges Robert P., A New Dynamism in the Public Domain, 71 CHI. L. REV. 183 (2004).pdf> , 71 Chi. L. Rev. 183 (2004); Netanel Neil W., Copyright's Paradox <http://books.google.com/books?id=vo9G-0iZNQIC> (Oxford University Press 2008); Samuelson Pamela, Enriching Discourse on Public Domain <about:..\..\..\BIBLIOGRAPHY\Samuelson Pamela, Enriching Discourse on Public Domain, 55 DUKE L. J. 783 (2006).pdf> , 55 Duke L. J. 783 <http://www.ischool.berkeley.edu/~pam/papers/enriching discourse on public domains.pdf> (2006); Samuelson Pamela, The Public Domain - Mapping the Digital Public Domain - Threats and Opportunities, 66 law & contemp. Prob. 147 (2003) Vaidhyanathan Siva, Copyrights and Copywrongs: The Rise of Intellectual Property and How It Threatens Creativity <http://books.google.com/books?id=sGjSY0rRC_wC> (New York University Press 2003); Van Schijndel Marieke and Joost Smiers, Imagining a World Without Copyright: the Market and Temporary Protection, a Better Alternative for Artists and Public Domain, in Copyright and Other Fairy Tales: Hans Christian Andersen and the Commodification of Creativity <http://books.google.com/books?id=uKJe-oKumjEC> 129 (Helle Porsdam ed., Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd. 2006). 2. Commons e cyberlaw Barlow John Perry, The Economy of Ideas: A Framework for Patents and Copyrights in the Digital Age (Everything You Know About Intellectual Property is Wrong), Wired 2.03, 1994, www.wired.com/wired/archive/2.03/economy.ideas.html <http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/2.03/economy.ideas.html;> ; Boyle James, Shamans, Software & Spleens: Law and the Construction of The Information Society (Harvard University Press 1996); Clark Charles, The Future of the Copyright in a Digital Environment 139-146 (P. Bernt Hugenhotltz ed., Kluwer Law International 1996); Cohen Julie, A Right to Read Anonymously: A Closer Look at Copyright Management in Cyberspace, 28 Conn. L. R. 981 (1996); Elkin-Koren Niva, It's All About Control: Rethinking Copyright in the New Information Landscape, in The Commodification of Information 79-106 (Niva Elkin-Koren & Neil W. Netanel eds., 2002); Jenkins Henry, Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide (New York University Press 2008); Ku Raymond S. R., Consumers And Creative Destruction: Fair Use Beyond Market Failure, 18 Berkeley Tech. L.J. 539 (2003); Ku Raymond S. R., The Creative Destruction of Copyrights: Napster and the New Economics of Digital Technology, 69 u. Chi. L. Rev. 263 (2002); Litman Jessica, Sharing and Stealing, 27 Hastings Comm. & Ent. L.J. 1 (2004); Litman Jessica, Digital Copyright (Prometheus Books 2001); National Research Board, The Digital Dilemma: Intellectual Property in The Information Age (National Academy Press, 2000); Von Lohmann Fred, Fair Use as Innovation Policy, 23 Berkeley Tech. L. J. 829 (2008) [American consumers increasingly take iPods, TiVos and similar private copying technologies for granted. Yet copyright law lacks a coherent account for this private, non-transformative copying. This article contends that copyright law's historical tolerance for such copying as a fair use has served as an important element of both copyright and innovation policy. This is because, to the extent it permits private copying, fair use creates incentives for technology companies to build innovative new products that enable such copying. Far from being an unfair "subsidy" from copyright owners to technology innovators, this aspect of fair use has yielded complementary technologies that enhance the value of copyrighted works. This fair use incentive to technology companies, moreover, is justified in light of a persistent market failure that would otherwise result in underproduction of certain kinds of socially-beneficial innovations. Finally, there are reasons to believe that technology innovators may not in many cases be able to appropriate to themselves the value of the fair uses that their technologies enable, because those uses will not be part of their marginal costs of production. To the extent that the value of these fair uses ends up being captured by the public, rather than technology innovators, this also furthers the purposes of copyright law.] 3. File-sharing Katyal Sonia K., Privacy vs. Piracy <about:..\BIBLIOGRAPHY\Katyal Sonia K., Privacy vs. Piracy, 7 YALE J. LAW & TECH. 222 (2005).pdf> , 7 Yale J. Law & Tech. 222 (2005); Lemley Mark & Reese Anthony, Reducing Digital Copyright Infringement Without Restricting Innovation, 56 Stan. L. Rev. 1345 (May 2004); Liebowitz Stan, How Reliable is the Oberholzer-Gee and Strumpf Paper on File-Sharing? (University of Texas at Dallas, Working Paper, August 2007), available at http://copyrightalliance.net/files/ssrn-id1014399.pdf; Liebowitz Stan, File Sharing: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?, 49 J.L. & Econ. 1 (2006); Oberholzer-Gee Felix & Strumpf Koleman, The Effect Of File Sharing On Record Sales: An Empirical Analysis (University of North Carolina, Working Paper, June 2005), available at http://www.unc.edu/~cigar/papers/FileSharing_March2004.pdf <http://www.unc.edu/~cigar/papers/FileSharing_March2004.pdf> . 4. Internet e Democrazia Benkler Yochai, Through the Looking Glass: Alice and Constitutional Foundations of the Public Domain, 66 J. Law & Contemp. Probs. 173 <http://www.law.duke.edu/journals/lcp/articles/lcp66dWinterSpring2003p173.htm> (2003); Benkler Yochai, Free as the Air to Common Use: First Amendment Constraints on the Enclosure of the Public Domain, 74 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 354 (1999); Lange David & Powell Jefferson H., No Law: Intellectual Property in the Image of an Absolute First Amendment <http://www.amazon.com/gp/reader/080474579X/ref=sib_dp_pt#reader-link> (Stanford Law Books 2008), http://www.amazon.com/reader/080474579X?_encoding=UTF8&ref_=sib_dp_pt#reader...; Pollack Malla, A Listener's Free Speech, A Reader's Copyright, 35 Hofstra L. Rev. 1457 (2007); Samuelson Pamela, Copyright and Freedom of Expression in Historical Perspective, 10 J. Intell. Prop. L. 319 <http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/intpl10&id=325&collectio...> (2003); Shapiro Andrew L., The Control Revolution: How the Internet is Putting Individuals in Charge and Changing the World we Know (Public Affairs 1999); Suthersanen Uma, Towards An International Public Interest Rule? Human Rights And International Copyright Law, in Copyright And Free Speech: Comparative And International Analyses 35-65 (Jonathan Griffiths and Uma Suthersanen eds., Oxford University Press 2003); Torremans Paul, Is Copyright a Human Right? <file:///E:/DUKE/IP SJD/DISSERTATION/PART I/5. THE SEARCH FOR CULTURAL DISTINCTIVENESS AS PARADIGM OF EQUALITY/Torremans Paul, Is Copyright a Human Right, 2007 Mich. St. L. Rev. 271 (2007).pdf> , 2007 Mich. St. L. Rev. 271 (2007). Un saluto, Giancarlo
"J.C. DE MARTIN" <demartin@polito.it> 10/13/2009 2:13 AM >>> Buongiorno a tutti,
le letture consigliate NEXA che trovate qui http://nexa.polito.it/recommended-readings stanno crescendo, ma di sicuro restano ancora fuori libri e articoli fondamentali. Se volete segnalare libri e articoli che secondo voi non si possono non aver letto se si vuole parlare (o anche solo pensare) di un certo tema "internet & societa'", me lo segnalate per favore? Grazie, juan carlos _______________________________________________ nexa mailing list nexa@server-nexa.polito.it https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa
Cari Tutti, domani purtroppo mancherò al Mercoledì di Nexa, perchè al MAO abbiamo una presentazione del Libro Bianco sulla Creatività. Vi auguro una buona discussione A presto Enrico
Caro Fiorello, gia' inserito! jc On 13/ott/2009, at 12.16, "Fiorello Cortiana" <f.cortiana@provincia.milano.it
wrote:
Segnalo anche "La conoscenza come bene comune. Dalla teoria alla pratica" Bruno Mondadori a cura di C. Hess, E. Ostrom, edizione italiana a cura di P. Ferri e con una mia premessa
Fiorello
Da: nexa-bounces@server-nexa.polito.it [mailto:nexa-bounces@server- nexa.polito.it] Per conto di Giancarlo Frosio Inviato: martedì 13 ottobre 2009 11.05 A: J.C. DE MARTIN; nexa@server-nexa.polito.it Oggetto: Re: [nexa] letture consigliate
Ecco il mio contributo, proporrei questi testi e articoli:
1. Commons / pubblico dominio
Boldrin Michele & Levine David K., Against Intellectual Monopoly (Cambridge University Press 2008), http://www.dklevine.com/general/intellectual/againstnew.htm ; Boyle James, The Opposite of Property, 66 law & contemp. Prob. 1 (2003), http://www.law.duke.edu/boylesite/; Boyle James, The Second Enclosure Movement and the Construction of the Public Domain, 66 law & contemp. Prob. 33 (2003), http://www.law.duke.edu/boylesite/ ; Cohen Julie, Copyright, Commodification, and Culture: Locating the Public Domain, in The Future of the Public Domain: Identifying the Commons in the Information Law 121-66 (Lucie Guibault & P. Bernt Hugenholtz eds., Kluwer Law International 2006); Cultural Environmentalism @ 10 (James Boyle & Lawrence Lessig eds.), 70 law & contemp. Prob. 1-232 (2007), http://www.law.duke.edu/boylesite/ ; Hardin Garrett, The Tragedy of the Commons, 162 Science 1243 (1968); Heller Michael A., The Tragedy Of The Anticommons: Property In The Transition From Marx To Markets, 111 Harv. L. Rev. 621 (1998); Lange David, Reimagining The Public Domain, 66 Law & Contemp. Probs. 463 (2003); Loren Lydia Pallas, Building A Reliable Semi-commons Of Creative Works: Enforcement Of Creative Commons Licenses And Limited Abandonment Of Copyright, 14 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 271 (2007); Macmillan Fiona, Commodification and Cultural Ownership, in Copyright And Free Speech: Comparative And International Analyses 35-65 (Jonathan Griffiths and Uma Suthersanen eds., Oxford University Press 2003); Merges Robert P., A New Dynamism in the Public Domain, 71 Chi. L. Rev. 183 (2004); Netanel Neil W., Copyright’s Paradox (Oxford University Press 2008); Samuelson Pamela, Enriching Discourse on Public Domain, 55 Duke L. J. 783 (2006); Samuelson Pamela, The Public Domain - Mapping the Digital Public Domain - Threats and Opportunities, 66 law & contemp. Prob. 147 (2003) Vaidhyanathan Siva, Copyrights and Copywrongs: The Rise of Intellectual Property and How It Threatens Creativity (New York University Press 2003); Van Schijndel Marieke and Joost Smiers, Imagining a World Without Copyright: the Market and Temporary Protection, a Better Alternative for Artists and Public Domain, in Copyright and Other Fairy Tales: Hans Christian Andersen and the Commodification of Creativity 129 (Helle Porsdam ed., Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd. 2006).
2. Commons e cyberlaw
Barlow John Perry, The Economy of Ideas: A Framework for Patents and Copyrights in the Digital Age (Everything You Know About Intellectual Property is Wrong), Wired 2.03, 1994, www.wired.com/wired/archive/2.03/economy.ideas.html ; Boyle James, Shamans, Software & Spleens: Law and the Construction of The Information Society (Harvard University Press 1996); Clark Charles, The Future of the Copyright in a Digital Environment 139-146 (P. Bernt Hugenhotltz ed., Kluwer Law International 1996); Cohen Julie, A Right to Read Anonymously: A Closer Look at Copyright Management in Cyberspace, 28 Conn. L. R. 981 (1996); Elkin-Koren Niva, It's All About Control: Rethinking Copyright in the New Information Landscape, in The Commodification of Information 79-106 (Niva Elkin-Koren & Neil W. Netanel eds., 2002); Jenkins Henry, Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide (New York University Press 2008); Ku Raymond S. R., Consumers And Creative Destruction: Fair Use Beyond Market Failure, 18 Berkeley Tech. L.J. 539 (2003); Ku Raymond S. R., The Creative Destruction of Copyrights: Napster and the New Economics of Digital Technology, 69 U. Chi. L. Rev. 263 (2002); Litman Jessica, Sharing and Stealing, 27 Hastings Comm. & Ent. L.J. 1 (2004); Litman Jessica, Digital Copyright (Prometheus Books 2001); National Research Board, The Digital Dilemma: Intellectual Property in The Information Age (National Academy Press, 2000); Von Lohmann Fred, Fair Use as Innovation Policy, 23 Berkeley Tech. L. J. 829 (2008) [American consumers increasingly take iPods, TiVos and similar private copying technologies for granted. Yet copyright law lacks a coherent account for this private, non-transformative copying. This article contends that copyright law's historical tolerance for such copying as a fair use has served as an important element of both copyright and innovation policy. This is because, to the extent it permits private copying, fair use creates incentives for technology companies to build innovative new products that enable such copying. Far from being an unfair "subsidy" from copyright owners to technology innovators, this aspect of fair use has yielded complementary technologies that enhance the value of copyrighted works. This fair use incentive to technology companies, moreover, is justified in light of a persistent market failure that would otherwise result in underproduction of certain kinds of socially-beneficial innovations. Finally, there are reasons to believe that technology innovators may not in many cases be able to appropriate to themselves the value of the fair uses that their technologies enable, because those uses will not be part of their marginal costs of production. To the extent that the value of these fair uses ends up being captured by the public, rather than technology innovators, this also furthers the purposes of copyright law.]
3. File-sharing
Katyal Sonia K., Privacy vs. Piracy, 7 Yale J. Law & Tech. 222 (2005); Lemley Mark & Reese Anthony, Reducing Digital Copyright Infringement Without Restricting Innovation, 56 Stan. L. Rev. 1345 (May 2004); Liebowitz Stan, How Reliable is the Oberholzer-Gee and Strumpf Paper on File-Sharing? (University of Texas at Dallas, Working Paper, August 2007), available at http://copyrightalliance.net/files/ssrn-id1014399.pdf ; Liebowitz Stan, File Sharing: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?, 49 J.L. & Econ. 1 (2006); Oberholzer-Gee Felix & Strumpf Koleman, The Effect Of File Sharing On Record Sales: An Empirical Analysis (University of North Carolina, Working Paper, June 2005), available at http://www.unc.edu/~cigar/papers/FileSharing_March2004.pdf .
4. Internet e Democrazia
Benkler Yochai, Through the Looking Glass: Alice and Constitutional Foundations of the Public Domain, 66 J. Law & Contemp. Probs. 173 (2003); Benkler Yochai, Free as the Air to Common Use: First Amendment Constraints on the Enclosure of the Public Domain, 74 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 354 (1999); Lange David & Powell Jefferson H., No Law: Intellectual Property in the Image of an Absolute First Amendment (Stanford Law Books 2008), http://www.amazon.com/reader/080474579X?_encoding=UTF8&ref_=sib_dp_pt#reader... ; Pollack Malla, A Listener’s Free Speech, A Reader’s Copyright, 35 Hofstra L. Rev. 1457 (2007); Samuelson Pamela, Copyright and Freedom of Expression in Historical Perspective, 10 J. Intell. Prop. L. 319 (2003); Shapiro Andrew L., The Control Revolution: How the Internet is Putting Individuals in Charge and Changing the World we Know (Public Affairs 1999); Suthersanen Uma, Towards An International Public Interest Rule? Human Rights And International Copyright Law, in Copyright And Free Speech: Comparative And International Analyses 35-65 (Jonathan Griffiths and Uma Suthersanen eds., Oxford University Press 2003); Torremans Paul, Is Copyright a Human Right?, 2007 Mich. St. L. Rev. 271 (2007).
Un saluto,
Giancarlo
"J.C. DE MARTIN" <demartin@polito.it> 10/13/2009 2:13 AM >>> Buongiorno a tutti,
le letture consigliate NEXA che trovate qui http://nexa.polito.it/recommended-readings stanno crescendo, ma di sicuro restano ancora fuori libri e articoli fondamentali.
Se volete segnalare libri e articoli che secondo voi non si possono non aver letto se si vuole parlare (o anche solo pensare) di un certo tema "internet & societa'", me lo segnalate per favore?
Grazie,
juan carlos
_______________________________________________ nexa mailing list nexa@server-nexa.polito.it https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa
Da me anche se sono imbarazzata Reti telematiche e reti sociali. Una riflessione per la crescita di forme di auto-organizzazione della società . http://www.sistemapiemonte.it/innovazionetecnologia/osservatorioICT2007, Indicazioni per i governi delle reti Vanno, quindi, individuati meccanismi istituzionali di governo delle reti all'interno di un progetto di sviluppo locale, tali da consentire di superare l'esclusione, le frammentazioni e governare l'eterogeneità. L’obiettivo e la sfida consistono nell'individuare le modalità per indurre ad un gioco cooperativo di lungo periodo attori tecnologici, economici e istituzionali Elinear Ostrom nel suo libro, Governing the commons, individua i seguenti meccanismi istituzionali che possono essere applicati alla crescita di reti sociali e tecnologiche per lo sviluppo dei servizi sociali, di impresa. e, più in generale, per le reti che riorganizzano e facilitano la vita quotidiana (Ostrom,1 992). Esse sono : 1. individuazione dei confini del gruppo; 2. regole che governano l'uso dei beni collettivi che tengano in considerazione le condizioni e le necessità locali; 3. capacità di partecipazione per valutare e programmare le regole che hanno un impatto sulla loro condizioni; 4. sistemi di monitoraggio dei comportamenti dei gruppi della comunità. I membri della comunità devono sottostare ai sistemi e alle regole di controllo, sistemi che devono prevedere regole e sanzioni; 5. meccanismi di partecipazione che consentano la possibilità di accedere a meccanismi di risoluzione dei conflitti poco costosi. In particolare diventano sempre più necessarie specifiche forme di sostegno istituzionale come indirizzi di regolazione per la strutturazione delle reti . Infatti favorire la crescita di networks sociali aperti che interagiscono fra loro, con le istituzioni pubbliche e con il mondo esterno è una opoccasione per lo sviluppo di un capitale sociale e umano e economico.. Dalle ricerche sulle comunità locali e dalle ricerche sulle reti civiche si possono fornire alcune indicazioni per individuare i canali attraverso i quali il capitale umano e sociale si possono sviluppare a) incrementare i flussi di informazione (lavoro, delibere, procedure amministrative, scambio di idee e conoscenze); b) stimolare lo sviluppo di regole di reciprocità (mutuo aiuto e mutua informazione). Le forme di reciprocità possono orientarsi in modo specifico o generalizzato. Nel primo caso si sviluppano all'interno di gruppi omogenei, caratterizzati dalla somiglianza; nel secondo collegano reti con caratteristiche non omogenee; c) considerare positivamente le azioni collettive. L'azione collettiva è collegata alle reti sociali, ma l'azione collettiva può dare origine a nuove reti; d) incrementare le interrelazioni fra le reti sociali . La sfida è quella di ristabilire la rappresentanza dei cittadini a tutti i livelli della società. Una funzione importante la svolge, quindi, la politica, ma non quella con la P maiuscola, bensì politiche in grado di adeguare la tecnologia alle condizioni di contesto. In questo compito i governi regionali e locali, meno distanti del governo nazionale dai contesti territoriali, sono maggiormente in grado di definire pogetti e interventi finalizzati e adeguati meccanismi istituzionali di regolazione (Lowi, 1974). Ma questo chiama in campo il tema della governance locale. ----- Original Message ----- From: J.C. DE MARTIN To: Fiorello Cortiana Cc: Giancarlo Frosio ; <nexa@server-nexa.polito.it> Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 12:56 PM Subject: Re: [nexa] R: letture consigliate Caro Fiorello, gia' inserito! jc On 13/ott/2009, at 12.16, "Fiorello Cortiana" <f.cortiana@provincia.milano.it> wrote: Segnalo anche "La conoscenza come bene comune. Dalla teoria alla pratica" Bruno Mondadori a cura di C. Hess, E. Ostrom, edizione italiana a cura di P. Ferri e con una mia premessa Fiorello ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Da: nexa-bounces@server-nexa.polito.it [mailto:nexa-bounces@server-nexa.polito.it] Per conto di Giancarlo Frosio Inviato: martedì 13 ottobre 2009 11.05 A: J.C. DE MARTIN; nexa@server-nexa.polito.it Oggetto: Re: [nexa] letture consigliate Ecco il mio contributo, proporrei questi testi e articoli: 1. Commons / pubblico dominio Boldrin Michele & Levine David K., Against Intellectual Monopoly (Cambridge University Press 2008), http://www.dklevine.com/general/intellectual/againstnew.htm; Boyle James, The Opposite of Property, 66 law & contemp. Prob. 1 (2003), http://www.law.duke.edu/boylesite/; Boyle James, The Second Enclosure Movement and the Construction of the Public Domain, 66 law & contemp. Prob. 33 (2003), http://www.law.duke.edu/boylesite/; Cohen Julie, Copyright, Commodification, and Culture: Locating the Public Domain, in The Future of the Public Domain: Identifying the Commons in the Information Law 121-66 (Lucie Guibault & P. Bernt Hugenholtz eds., Kluwer Law International 2006); Cultural Environmentalism @ 10 (James Boyle & Lawrence Lessig eds.), 70 law & contemp. Prob. 1-232 (2007), http://www.law.duke.edu/boylesite/; Hardin Garrett, The Tragedy of the Commons, 162 Science 1243 (1968); Heller Michael A., The Tragedy Of The Anticommons: Property In The Transition From Marx To Markets, 111 Harv. L. Rev. 621 (1998); Lange David, Reimagining The Public Domain, 66 Law & Contemp. Probs. 463 (2003); Loren Lydia Pallas, Building A Reliable Semi-commons Of Creative Works: Enforcement Of Creative Commons Licenses And Limited Abandonment Of Copyright, 14 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 271 (2007); Macmillan Fiona, Commodification and Cultural Ownership, in Copyright And Free Speech: Comparative And International Analyses 35-65 (Jonathan Griffiths and Uma Suthersanen eds., Oxford University Press 2003); Merges Robert P., A New Dynamism in the Public Domain, 71 Chi. L. Rev. 183 (2004); Netanel Neil W., Copyright’s Paradox (Oxford University Press 2008); Samuelson Pamela, Enriching Discourse on Public Domain, 55 Duke L. J. 783 (2006); Samuelson Pamela, The Public Domain - Mapping the Digital Public Domain - Threats and Opportunities, 66 law & contemp. Prob. 147 (2003) Vaidhyanathan Siva, Copyrights and Copywrongs: The Rise of Intellectual Property and How It Threatens Creativity (New York University Press 2003); Van Schijndel Marieke and Joost Smiers, Imagining a World Without Copyright: the Market and Temporary Protection, a Better Alternative for Artists and Public Domain, in Copyright and Other Fairy Tales: Hans Christian Andersen and the Commodification of Creativity 129 (Helle Porsdam ed., Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd. 2006). 2. Commons e cyberlaw Barlow John Perry, The Economy of Ideas: A Framework for Patents and Copyrights in the Digital Age (Everything You Know About Intellectual Property is Wrong), Wired 2.03, 1994, www.wired.com/wired/archive/2.03/economy.ideas.html; Boyle James, Shamans, Software & Spleens: Law and the Construction of The Information Society (Harvard University Press 1996); Clark Charles, The Future of the Copyright in a Digital Environment 139-146 (P. Bernt Hugenhotltz ed., Kluwer Law International 1996); Cohen Julie, A Right to Read Anonymously: A Closer Look at Copyright Management in Cyberspace, 28 Conn. L. R. 981 (1996); Elkin-Koren Niva, It's All About Control: Rethinking Copyright in the New Information Landscape, in The Commodification of Information 79-106 (Niva Elkin-Koren & Neil W. Netanel eds., 2002); Jenkins Henry, Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide (New York University Press 2008); Ku Raymond S. R., Consumers And Creative Destruction: Fair Use Beyond Market Failure, 18 Berkeley Tech. L.J. 539 (2003); Ku Raymond S. R., The Creative Destruction of Copyrights: Napster and the New Economics of Digital Technology, 69 u. Chi. L. Rev. 263 (2002); Litman Jessica, Sharing and Stealing, 27 Hastings Comm. & Ent. L.J. 1 (2004); Litman Jessica, Digital Copyright (Prometheus Books 2001); National Research Board, The Digital Dilemma: Intellectual Property in The Information Age (National Academy Press, 2000); Von Lohmann Fred, Fair Use as Innovation Policy, 23 Berkeley Tech. L. J. 829 (2008) [American consumers increasingly take iPods, TiVos and similar private copying technologies for granted. Yet copyright law lacks a coherent account for this private, non-transformative copying. This article contends that copyright law's historical tolerance for such copying as a fair use has served as an important element of both copyright and innovation policy. This is because, to the extent it permits private copying, fair use creates incentives for technology companies to build innovative new products that enable such copying. Far from being an unfair "subsidy" from copyright owners to technology innovators, this aspect of fair use has yielded complementary technologies that enhance the value of copyrighted works. This fair use incentive to technology companies, moreover, is justified in light of a persistent market failure that would otherwise result in underproduction of certain kinds of socially-beneficial innovations. Finally, there are reasons to believe that technology innovators may not in many cases be able to appropriate to themselves the value of the fair uses that their technologies enable, because those uses will not be part of their marginal costs of production. To the extent that the value of these fair uses ends up being captured by the public, rather than technology innovators, this also furthers the purposes of copyright law.] 3. File-sharing Katyal Sonia K., Privacy vs. Piracy, 7 Yale J. Law & Tech. 222 (2005); Lemley Mark & Reese Anthony, Reducing Digital Copyright Infringement Without Restricting Innovation, 56 Stan. L. Rev. 1345 (May 2004); Liebowitz Stan, How Reliable is the Oberholzer-Gee and Strumpf Paper on File-Sharing? (University of Texas at Dallas, Working Paper, August 2007), available at http://copyrightalliance.net/files/ssrn-id1014399.pdf; Liebowitz Stan, File Sharing: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?, 49 J.L. & Econ. 1 (2006); Oberholzer-Gee Felix & Strumpf Koleman, The Effect Of File Sharing On Record Sales: An Empirical Analysis (University of North Carolina, Working Paper, June 2005), available at http://www.unc.edu/~cigar/papers/FileSharing_March2004.pdf. 4. Internet e Democrazia Benkler Yochai, Through the Looking Glass: Alice and Constitutional Foundations of the Public Domain, 66 J. Law & Contemp. Probs. 173 (2003); Benkler Yochai, Free as the Air to Common Use: First Amendment Constraints on the Enclosure of the Public Domain, 74 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 354 (1999); Lange David & Powell Jefferson H., No Law: Intellectual Property in the Image of an Absolute First Amendment (Stanford Law Books 2008), http://www.amazon.com/reader/080474579X?_encoding=UTF8&ref_=sib_dp_pt#reader...; Pollack Malla, A Listener’s Free Speech, A Reader’s Copyright, 35 Hofstra L. Rev. 1457 (2007); Samuelson Pamela, Copyright and Freedom of Expression in Historical Perspective, 10 J. Intell. Prop. L. 319 (2003); Shapiro Andrew L., The Control Revolution: How the Internet is Putting Individuals in Charge and Changing the World we Know (Public Affairs 1999); Suthersanen Uma, Towards An International Public Interest Rule? Human Rights And International Copyright Law, in Copyright And Free Speech: Comparative And International Analyses 35-65 (Jonathan Griffiths and Uma Suthersanen eds., Oxford University Press 2003); Torremans Paul, Is Copyright a Human Right?, 2007 Mich. St. L. Rev. 271 (2007). Un saluto, Giancarlo >>> "J.C. DE MARTIN" <demartin@polito.it> 10/13/2009 2:13 AM >>> Buongiorno a tutti, le letture consigliate NEXA che trovate qui http://nexa.polito.it/recommended-readings stanno crescendo, ma di sicuro restano ancora fuori libri e articoli fondamentali. Se volete segnalare libri e articoli che secondo voi non si possono non aver letto se si vuole parlare (o anche solo pensare) di un certo tema "internet & societa'", me lo segnalate per favore? Grazie, juan carlos _______________________________________________ nexa mailing list nexa@server-nexa.polito.it https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ nexa mailing list nexa@server-nexa.polito.it https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa
participants (5)
-
Enrico Bertacchini -
Fiorello Cortiana -
Giancarlo Frosio -
J.C. DE MARTIN -
Mariella Berra