The influence of access to eReaders, computers and mobile phones
on children's book reading frequency
Margaret K. Merga, Saiyidi Mat Roni
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.02.016
Highlights
• Children underutilised devices for recreational book reading,
even when daily book readers.
• Reading frequency was less when children had access to mobile
phones.
• Reading in general was less when children were given access to
more digital devices.
Abstract
Regular recreational book reading is a practice that confers
substantial educative benefit. However, not all book types may be
equally beneficial, with paper book reading more strongly associated
with literacy benefit than screen-based reading at this stage, and a
paucity of research in this area. While children in developed
countries are gaining ever-increasing levels of access to devices at
home, relatively little is known about the influence of access to
devices with eReading capability, such as Kindles, iPads, computers
and mobile phones, on young children's reading behaviours, and the
extent to which these devices are used for reading purposes when
access is available. Young people are gaining increasing access to
devices through school-promoted programs; parents face aggressive
marketing to stay abreast of educational technologies at home; and
schools and libraries are increasingly their eBook collections,
often at the expense of paper book collections. Data from the 997
children who participated in the 2016 Western Australian Study in
Children's Book Reading were analysed to determine children's level
of access to devices with eReading capability, and their frequency
of use of these devices in relation to their recreational book
reading frequency. Respondents were found to generally underutilise
devices for reading purposes, even when they were daily book
readers. In addition, access to mobile phones was associated with
reading infrequency. It was also found that reading frequency was
less when children had access to a greater range of these devices.
URL:
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131517300489