Il 13/06/2011 12:08, Philippe Aigrain ha scritto:
A report of the special rapporteur on freedom of expression and opinion
carries a weight, whether or not it will be adopted in the Human Rights
Council. He has an independent status and the ability to interact
directly with UN Member States governments.
As a matter of fact, it has already caused a review of the
"3-strikes act" in New Zealand. Although the NZ review rejected the
report, stating that Internet access is not a fundamental right and
that cutting permanently Internet access to a citizen is legitimate
for a country which wants to protect "intellectual property", it
also made clear how arrogant and corrupt are 3-strikes supporters
(very clear in some newspapers headlines like "The corrupt stays
corrupt" in TechDirt, which is very true for New Zealand and the EU,
as US cables released by WikiLeaks showed).
Unfortunately, I believe that the smallest bribe in american dollars
or promises of future employments (remember the key Telecoms Package
negotiators from the Council, Levaillant and Svab, now working for
Vivendi Universal and AT&T) are more powerful than the greatest
UN report.
Ciao,
Paolo