Cito la conclusione di questo articolo di Bruce Schneier, divertente e acuto allo stesso tempo. juan carlos URL: http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2012/12/feudal_sec.html [...] Today's internet feudalism, however, is ad hoc and one-sided. We give companies our data and trust them with our security, but we receive very few assurances of protection in return, and those companies have very few restrictions on what they can do. This needs to change. There should be limitations on what cloud vendors can do with our data; rights, like the requirement that they delete our data when we want them to; and liabilities when vendors mishandle our data. Like everything else in security, it's a trade-off. We need to balance that trade-off. In Europe, it was the rise of the centralized state and the rule of law that undermined the ad hoc feudal system; it provided more security and stability for both lords and vassals. But these days, government has largely abdicated its role in cyberspace, and the result is a return to the feudal relationships of yore. Perhaps instead of hoping that our Internet-era lords will be sufficiently clever and benevolent -- or putting our faith in the Robin Hoods who block <https://mobilescope.net/> phone surveillance and circumvent DRM <http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2011/01/how-to-strip-drm-from-kindle-e-books-...> systems -- it's time we step in in our role as governments (both national and international) to create the regulatory environments that protect us vassals (and the lords as well). Otherwise, we really are just serfs. A version of this essay was originally published <http://www.wired.com/opinion/2012/11/feudal-security/> on Wired.com