1. Introduction
The Structure of the Argument
Rebooting ‘Code as Law’
Aspiring to Legitimacy in Code
‘Code as Law’, Code Versus Law, or Something Else?
Concluding
Part I: Computational Legalism and the Rule(s) of Code
2. A Design Perspective: Code Is More Than Law
Affordance
Infusing Code with Normativity
3. A Legal Philosophy Perspective: Code is Less Than Law
What is Legalism?
Computational Legalism
Conclusion
Part II: What Makes a Good Rule?
4. Criteria for Laws
Normative Criteria for Law-Making: the Aspirations of
Legality
Conclusion
5. Criteria for Code
Input and Output Legitimacy in Code
Input Legitimacy
Conclusion
Part III: Legitimating Code: Theory and Practice
6. The Digisprudential Affordances
Assessing Decisions, Or Assessing Design?
Mapping the Criteria
From Characteristics To Affordances
Conclusion
7. Operationalising Digisprudence
The Programmer of the Programmer
Agile Development
Integrated Development Environments
Code and Natural Language
Conclusion
8. Rebooting Code as Law: Conclusions and Next Steps
The Contemporary Relevance of Digisprudence
Next Steps?
Concluding Thoughts