Due analisi del rapporto DNI sulla vicenda Putin-DNC. Mi paiono concordi sul valore politico interno della risposta di Obama e sulla debolezza tecnica a supporto delle tesi esposte. ICT diventerà un tema centrale nella politica dei prossimi anni, e si presterà a facili ep ericolose strumentalizzazioni per opacità e asimmetria informativa. Mi chiedo: I politici sono preparati? E i giornalisti che ne devono parlare? <https://krebsonsecurity.com/2017/01/dni-putin-led-cyberattack-propaganda-eff...> DNI: Putin Led Cyber, Propaganda Effort to Elect Trump, Denigrate Clinton Russian President Vladimir Putin directed a massive propaganda and cyber operation aimed at discrediting Hillary Clinton and getting Donald Trump elected, the top U.S. intelligence agencies said in a remarkable yet unshocking report released on Friday. <https://www.emptywheel.net/2017/01/06/the-declassified-russian-hack-report/> The Intelligence Community’s report on Russia’s tampering in the election is here. What we see of it is uneven. I think the report is strongest on Russia’s motive for tampering with the election, even if the report doesn’t provide evidence. I think there are many weaknesses in the report’s discussion of media. That raises concerns that the material on the actual hack — which we don’t get in any detail at all — is as weak as the media section. This will be a working thread. The first 5 pages are front-matter and fluff, which means this is less than a 10 page report, plus a media annex which is problematic.