-------- Original Message -------- Subject: [IP] How the NSA is Transforming Law Enforcement Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 16:29:31 -0400 From: David Farber via ip <ip@listbox.com> Reply-To: dave@farber.net, "David Farber" <farber@gmail.com> To: ip <ip@listbox.com> Begin forwarded message: *From: *Dewayne Hendricks <dewayne@warpspeed.com <mailto:dewayne@warpspeed.com>> *Subject: **[Dewayne-Net] How the NSA is Transforming Law Enforcement* *Date: *May 21, 2014 at 4:13:37 PM EDT *To: *Multiple recipients of Dewayne-Net <dewayne-net@warpspeed.com <mailto:dewayne-net@warpspeed.com>> *Reply-To: *dewayne-net@warpspeed.com <mailto:dewayne-net@warpspeed.com> How the NSA is Transforming Law Enforcement By NADIA KAYYALI May 20 2014 <https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2014/05/how-nsa-transforming-law-enforcement> If you’ve been imagining NSA surveillance as something distant, with analysts sitting in remote data centers quietly analyzing metadata—stop now. NSA surveillance has become a part of day-to-day law enforcement fabric in the United States. The Snowden disclosures <https://www.eff.org/document/20140513-greenwald-noplacetohidedocuments> that were made public as part of Glenn Greenwald’s book /No Place to Hide/ <http://glenngreenwald.net/> drive this point home, and they emphasize why we need real change to government surveillance, not minor reforms. There are two key points necessary to understand the domestic aspect of NSA surveillance: the integral role <http://complex.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2013/11/14/the_fbi_is_helping_the_nsa...> of the FBI in helping the NSA <http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/apr/19/hoovers-fbi-todays-surv...> spy on Americans, and the acceptance of usage of NSA material for domestic and traditional law enforcement purposes. These are contingent, of course, on the fact that the NSA’s procedures allow widespread targeting of Americans <https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2013/06/depth-review-new-nsa-documents-expose-...>. Much of the material published on May 13 expanded on the disturbing revelations that we’ve already seen, but there were some standout points: new information about the degree of spying on the U.N. and other foreign officials, documents demonstrating the economic espionage aspect of NSA surveillance, and some interesting technical details about NSA programs. Among those technical details, what was especially striking for those of us in the United States were the slides that described how the FBI enables NSA surveillance. A series of slides demonstrated that the FBI essentially serves as an attack dog for the NSA, doing the NSA’s domestic dirty work. One slide, which was previously published, notes that for purposes of PRISM, relationships with communications providers are only through the FBI. (slide23.jpg <safari-reader://www.eff.org/files/2014/05/20/slide23.jpg>). Another slide describes how the FBI and NSA partner to “address an unreliable and incomplete Facebook collection system.” (slide81.jpg <safari-reader://www.eff.org/files/2014/05/20/slide81.jpg>). There are also a series of slides describing the FBI’s relationship with Microsoft. One notes that the NSA is now able to collect Microsoft Skydrive data as a “result of the FBI working for many months with Microsoft to get this tasking and collection solution established .” (slide27.jpg <safari-reader://www.eff.org/files/2014/05/20/slide27.jpg>). The documents also show that the NSA, Department of Justice, and FBI collaborated to collect Skype data. (slide29.jpg <safari-reader://www.eff.org/files/2014/05/20/slide29.jpg>). Similarly, after Microsoft enabled encrypted chat: “MS, working with the FBI, developed a surveillance capability to deal with the new SSL.” (slide30.jpg <safari-reader://www.eff.org/files/2014/05/20/slide30.jpg>). Clearly, the NSA would have a much more difficult—if not impossible—time collecting information without the FBI. None of this should be surprising. It's easy to forget that Section 215 of the Patriot Act allows the Federal Bureau of Investigation—/not/ the NSA—to apply for production of business records <http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/1861>. Remember the Verizon order <https://www.eff.org/document/2013-06-05-guard-verizon-215-secondary-order> that jumpstarted the NSA surveillance conversation? That order was an application to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court /by the FBI/ for production of Verizon’s business records to the NSA. [snip] Archives <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now> <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/14798382-eb93fc78> | Modify <https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=14798382&id_secret=14798382-58a8ac...> Your Subscription | Unsubscribe Now <https://www.listbox.com/unsubscribe/?member_id=14798382&id_secret=14798382-d...> [Powered by Listbox] <http://www.listbox.com>
