One
of the striking features of reports purporting to
estimate the
“damage” caused by piracy - both of software and
content - is that
without exception, as far as I can tell, their numbers
and methodology simply
do not withstand close scrutiny.
The
trouble is, when it's a question of lone voices like
mine or even that of Techdirt's Mike
Masnick, probably the most
dogged debunker of piracy FUD, the
content industries
can ignore such posts, presumably in the belief that
our quick analyses somehow
don't count.
But
that's not possible when the same points comes from a
respected organisation
like the Social Science research
Council,
“an independent, nonprofit international organization
founded in
[...]
Given
the scope and rigour of this report, I think it will
go down as a decisive
moment when the discourse around piracy changed
fundamentally, with the content
industries being forced, finally, to explain and
justify their methodologies,
rather than simply stating their claimed results. And
once this level of rigour
is brought to bear on the subject, we will start to
see very different figures
being quoted, and maybe even different policies being
put in in place as a
result. That's bound to happen one day, when reality
finally catches up with
the content industries: it's just a question of
time....
Articolo
intero qui: http://blogs.computerworlduk.com/open-enterprise/2011/03/finally-calling-time-on-piracy-fud/index.htm