Grazie Marco
interessante. Infatti Valerio Capraro è tra i firmatari iniziali
della lettera aperta.
Riporto qui l'abstract del suo pre-print (disponibile qui
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2605.05419 per chi vuole)
LLMorphism is the biased belief that human cognition works like a
large language model. I argue that the rise of conversational LLMs
may make this bias increasingly psychologically available. When
artificial systems produce human-like language, people may draw a
reverse inference: if LLMs can speak like humans, perhaps humans
think like LLMs.
This inference is biased because similarity at the level of
linguistic output does not imply similarity in cognitive
architecture. Yet, LLMorphism may spread through two mechanisms:
analogical transfer, whereby features of LLMs are projected onto
humans, and metaphorical availability, whereby LLM vocabulary
becomes a culturally salient vocabulary for describing thought.
I distinguish LLMorphism from mechanomorphism, anthropomorphism,
computationalism, dehumanization, objectification, and
predictive-processing theories of mind. I outline its implications
for work, education, responsibility, healthcare, communication,
creativity, and human dignity, while also discussing boundary
conditions and forms of resistance.
I conclude that the public debate may be missing half of the
problem: the issue is not only whether we are attributing too much
mind to machines, but also whether we are beginning to attribute
too little mind to humans.
Ciao, Enrico
Il 09/05/2026 18:12, M. Fioretti via
nexa ha scritto:
Bello il thread sulla visione realistica dell'IA. Da meditare, secondo
me, insieme a questo (anch'esso dall'Italia, non so se l'autore sia
iscritto):
https://x.com/ValerioCapraro/status/2052722061898912184
Marco
https:mfioretti.substack.com