belle slide grazie dal mio punto di vista molto condivisibili. ci divide solamente l'idea della assoluta spiegabilita'. (che non e' solo un fatto tecnico, ma anche organizzativo ed economico). la conclusione, in realta', non cambia. ciao, s. On 10/05/2018 18:13, Giacomo Tesio wrote:
Non servivano delle morti per prevederlo. Bastava un *minimo *di competenza informatica.
Slide 33, 38 e successive: https://shamar.github.io/documents/2018_Milano_The-Delusions-of-Neural-Netwo...
Giacomo
2018-05-10 17:43 GMT+02:00 Alberto Cammozzo <ac+nexa@zeromx.net <mailto:ac+nexa@zeromx.net>>:
Sensors detected Elaine Herzberg, but software reportedly decided to ignore her.
<https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2018/05/report-software-bug-led-to-death... <https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2018/05/report-software-bug-led-to-death-in-ubers-self-driving-crash/>> [...] If the software is programmed to be too cautious, the ride will be slow and jerky, as the car constantly slows down for objects that pose no threat to the car or aren't there at all. Tuning the software in the opposite direction will produce a smooth ride most of the time—but at the risk that the software will occasionally ignore a real object. According to Efrati, that's what happened in Tempe in March—and unfortunately the "real object" was a human being. [...] _______________________________________________ nexa mailing list nexa@server-nexa.polito.it <mailto:nexa@server-nexa.polito.it> https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa <https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa>
_______________________________________________ nexa mailing list nexa@server-nexa.polito.it https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa