Sono nomine di Trump. Il team gestisce la transizione e le nomine nello spoil system e garantisce la continuità. Questo il sito di Trump, anche se la stamapa è più aggiornata: <https://www.greatagain.gov/presidential-transition.html> Questa è la lista dei candidati "in pectore" nel transition team <http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/us/politics/donald-trump-administrat...> Segnalo anche che la nomina per intelligence e security investe Ronald Burgess, un militare che pare essere persona equilibrata. Nemmeno The Intercept riesce a parlarne male: <https://theintercept.com/2016/11/16/donald-trump-picks-classic-establishment...> Questa potrebbe essere una buona notizia. ciao, Alberto On 11/17/2016 11:27 AM, Stefano Quintarelli wrote:
Grazie per la interesasnte segnalazione questa e' una nomina di Trump o di Obama ? (come viene composto il "transition team" ?) ciao, s.
On 17/11/2016 10:28, Alberto Cammozzo wrote:
rivelerebbe una strategia antitrust indulgente nel big tech
<https://theintercept.com/2016/11/15/google-gets-a-seat-on-the-trump-transiti...>
Google is among the many major corporations whose surrogates are getting key roles on Donald Trump’s transition team.
Joshua Wright has been put in charge of transition efforts at the influential Federal Trade Commission after pulling off the rare revolving-door quadruple-play, moving from Google-supported academic work to government – as an FTC commissioner – back to the Google gravy train and now back to the government.
The Intercept has documented how Wright, as a law professor at George Mason University, received Google funding for at least four academic papers, all of which supported Google’s position that it did not violate antitrust laws when it favored its own sites in search engine requests and restricted advertisers from running ads on competitors. George Mason received $762,000 in funding from Google from 2011 to 2013.
[]
The appointment clarifies to some extent how a Trump administration will operate on antitrust policy, especially as it relates to Silicon Valley.
[] Now it look as if Trump’s high-level attacks on his enemies might not flow down to the appointees inside the bureaucracy, who could be more inclined to wave through big media mergers and decline to enforce high-tech collusion.
Google is currently facing antitrust allegations in Europe. In May, Politico reported that the FTC planned to take a second look at Google’s search bias, three years after they closed an investigation, despite reported recommendations to prosecute from agency staff. Having someone on the Google payroll twice doing hiring for the new Administration may halt any new investigation at the FTC.
_______________________________________________ nexa mailing list nexa@server-nexa.polito.it https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa