Caro Guido,

Non sono sicuro di capire il nesso tra l'articolo, la mia reazione e la posizione di ENISA, ma a scanso di equivoci, né io né ENISA parliamo a nome dell'Unione Europea (io perché qui esprimo posizioni personali, ENISA in quanto agenzia indipendente il cui ruolo è prevalentemente consultivo, non decisionale - vedi https://www.enisa.europa.eu/about-enisa/activities per ulteriori dettagli). 

Per altro anche Andrus Ansip, Vice-Presidente della Commissione Europea, si è ripetutamente espresso pubblicamente contro l'uso di "back-door". Il problema è che secondo me ognuno sta usando il termine "back-door" senza mettersi d'accordo sulla semantica. :)

Ciao,

Andrea

On Thursday, March 31, 2016, Guido Noto La Diega <noto.la.diega@gmail.com> wrote:
Grazie per la segnalazione.
"ENISA has spoken out against creating backdoors for law enforcement
agencies to access encrypted communication..."
http://www.euractiv.com/section/digital/news/eu-cybersecurity-agency-slams-calls-for-encryption-backdoors/

2016-03-31 12:32 GMT+01:00 Andrea Glorioso <andrea@digitalpolicy.it>:
> Grazie. Uno dei pochi articoli sensati che abbia letto in queste settimane.
>
> Mi chiedo se non sarebbe stato meglio avere una procedura trasparente e
> controllata (è bene ricordare che l'ordine del giudice avrebbe permesso ad
> Apple di mantenere un controllo notevole sia sul dispositivo, sia sul
> sistema operativo modificato, sia sull'intera procedura di accesso ai dati)
> invece di una procedura opaca.
>
> Ciao,
>
> Andrea
>
>
> On Wednesday, March 30, 2016, J.C. DE MARTIN <demartin@polito.it> wrote:
>>
>> Lettura vivamente raccomandata.
>>
>> juan carlos
>>
>> -----------
>>
>> In the wake of Apple v FBI, we need to address some uncomfortable truths
>>
>> A temporary truce has emerged in the raging battle between Apple and the
>> FBI, but technology fragility and corporate power remain unaddressed
>>
>> Julia Powles and Enrique Chaparro
>>
>> Tuesday 29 March 2016 21.11 BST
>>
>> It has been a spectacular six-week showdown – the world’s most valuable
>> brand, Apple, pitted against the powerful American agents of the FBI. Two
>> titans of spin, locked in a fast-moving battle over a dead terrorist’s
>> smartphone. Now, as dramatically as it exploded, the FBI’s legal demand that
>> Apple help it crack the iPhone of one of the San Bernardino killers has
>> evaporated – the agents hacked their way in anyway, assisted by a mysterious
>> third party.
>>
>> There was always more to the Apple v FBI case than met the eye – and it is
>> true for this latest twist too. The biggest issue is that both sides stand
>> to gain a lot more from this battle than any of us. With little relation to
>> reality, and backed by a worryingly partisan chorus, the notoriously closed
>> Apple is emerging as a champion of users’ rights. Equally worryingly, a
>> government agency is claiming the power to keep to itself a tool that can
>> potentially break security features on millions of phones, while earmarking
>> a demand for further judicial or legislative intervention in the future.
>> Whichever way you look, this feud is far from a road to freedom in the
>> digital environment.
>>
>> […]
>>
>> Continua qui:
>> http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/mar/29/apple-fbi-encryption-san-bernardino-uncomfortable-truths
>>
>
>
> --
>
> --
> I speak only for myself. Sometimes I do not even agree with myself. Keep it
> in mind.
> Twitter: @andreaglorioso
> Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/andrea.glorioso
> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=1749288&trk=tab_pro
>
> _______________________________________________
> nexa mailing list
> nexa@server-nexa.polito.it
> https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa
>



--
Guido

Dr. Guido Noto La Diega
Associate Lecturer in Law: Intellectual Property Law - Buckinghamshire
New University

President of Ital-IoT - Centre of Multidisciplinary Research on the
Internet of Things

Avvocato (Commercial and IP/IT Lawyer)

Cultore della materia in Civil Law and Intellectual Property -
University of Palermo

Department of Law
Queen Alexandra Road
High Wycombe
Buckinghamshire HP11 2JZ

noto.la.diega@gmail.com

+44(0)2078823386

@guidonld

 https://it.linkedin.com/pub/guido-noto-la-diega-ph-d/6/614/669


This e-mail and any attachment hereto are strictly confidential and
are exclusively intended for the person above identified. Without
intended recipient’s entitlement, use, copy and dissemination of this
e-mail is prohibited. If you have received it in error, please advice
us immediately by telephone and return the documents received to the
above address, deleting the files. Thank you.

Diese E-Mail enthält vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschützte
Informationen. Das unerlaubte Kopieren sowie die unbefugte Weitergabe
dieser Mail ist nicht gestaettet. Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat
sind oder diese E-Mail irrtümlich erhalten haben, informieren Sie
bitte sofort den Absender  und vernichten Sie diese Mail. Danke.

Il presente messaggio di posta elettronica ed ogni eventuale allegato
contengono informazioni strettamente riservate e sono indirizzati
esclusivamente al soggetto sopra indicato. In mancanza di
autorizzazione del destinatario, ne sono vietati l’uso, la
riproduzione e la divulgazione. Se avete ricevuto questo messaggio per
errore, siete pregati di avvisarci immediatamente per telefono e di
restituirci i documenti ricevuti all’indirizzo sopra indicato,
distruggendo i file. Grazie.

BE ECO-FRIENDLY: Unless necessary, please do not print this e-mail


--

--
I speak only for myself. Sometimes I do not even agree with myself. Keep it in mind.
Twitter: @andreaglorioso
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/andrea.glorioso
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=1749288&trk=tab_pro