Grande notizia!

Qui le determinazioni della Corte.

On those grounds, the Court (Third Chamber) hereby rules:

1.      The concept of ‘fair compensation’, within the meaning of Article 5(2)(b) of Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society, is an autonomous concept of European Union law which must be interpreted uniformly in all the Member States that have introduced a private copying exception, irrespective of the power conferred on the Member States to determine, within the limits imposed by European Union law in particular by that directive, the form, detailed arrangements for financing and collection, and the level of that fair compensation.

2.      Article 5(2)(b) of Directive 2001/29 must be interpreted as meaning that the ‘fair balance’ between the persons concerned means that fair compensation must be calculated on the basis of the criterion of the harm caused to authors of protected works by the introduction of the private copying exception. It is consistent with the requirements of that ‘fair balance’ to provide that persons who have digital reproduction equipment, devices and media and who on that basis, in laworin fact, make that equipment available to private users or provide them with copying services are the persons liable to finance the fair compensation, inasmuch as they are able to pass on to private users the actual burden of financing it.

3.      Article 5(2)(b) of Directive 2001/29 must be interpreted as meaning that a link is necessary between the application of the levy intended to finance fair compensation with respect to digital reproduction equipment, devices and media and the deemed use of them for the purposes of private copying. Consequently, the indiscriminate application of the private copying levy, in particular with respect to digital reproduction equipment, devices and media not made available to private users and clearly reserved for uses other than private copying, is incompatible with Directive 2001/29.

http://curia.europa.eu/jurisp/cgi-bin/form.pl?lang=EN&Submit=rechercher&numaff=C-467/08



On 21 October 2010 13:58, Paolo Brini <paolo.brini@iridiumpg.com> wrote:
Private copying levies on blank CDs, MP3 players and other digital media
are allowed under EU copyright law but only when charged on goods sold
to individuals and not those sold to companies, the European Court of
Justice (ECJ) has said.

http://tacd-ip.org/archives/250

Ciao,
Paolo


_______________________________________________
nexa mailing list
nexa@server-nexa.polito.it
https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa



--
Avv. Marco Scialdone
Blog: http://scialdone.blogspot.com
Site: www.computerlaw.it
PEC: marcoscialdone@ordineavvocatiroma.org
Flavors me
My profile: www.linkedin.com/in/marcoscialdone
CC Network: https://creativecommons.net/marcoscialdone/