attinente, la lettera di Giulia Pastorella al Foglio di oggi: ... serve una riflessione sugli impatti emotivi che queste tecnologie hanno sullo sviluppo affettivo. Per questo, insieme al senatore Lombardo, ho proposto emendamenti alla legge sulla tutela dei minori nella dimensione digita- le, ora al Senato, per limitare la memoria dei chatbot che interagiscono con i minori. Conservare le conversazioni solo per pochi giorni riduce il rischio di creare attacca- mento “simulato”, illusione di un rappor- to reale. -- mi sembra un'ottima iniziativa On 14/11/25 11:49, J.C. DE MARTIN wrote:
Riguardo al breve video in allegato (fonte: https://x.com/CalumWorthy/ status/1988283207138324487?s=20), l'ottima Caitlin Jonhstone reagisce come segue.
Juan Carlos
*Caitlin Johnstone *
https://x.com/caitoz/status/1989099985737310714?s=20
I hate this. I hate this. IhatethisIhatethisIhatethisIhatethis.
These predatory AI corporations are trying to convince us that (A) chatbots are people, and (B) a "person" is nothing more than a certain appearance with certain speech tendencies. They are attacking the very philosophical and moral underpinnings of our entire society stretching back through millennia of human civilization, and they are doing it for money.
It's not just this company. I've seen multiple Character AI users report that when they try to delete their account they get a message saying, "Are you sure about this? You'll lose everything. Characters associated with your account, chats, the love that we shared, likes, messages, posts and the memories we made together."
They're actively encouraging their users to view their chatbots as living people with real feelings in order to keep them emotionally roped in and addicted to their product.
Their agenda is profoundly destructive, both in the short term and in the long term. In the short term they are deliberately trying to instill a new kind of psychological disorder in their users which causes them to suffer from the delusion that a computer program is a real person, and in the long term they threaten to unravel our society's entire understanding of what a person is.
What's going to happen to a society that starts viewing programmable software products the same way it views human beings? What happens to a society where Elizabeth the single mother of three who just lost her job has the same value as Claire™ from RealHumanAI™, or "Alice", the AI wankbot that some guy stores in his broom closet? What happens when a government killing a chatbot company with an antitrust initiative is seen as identical to a government committing genocide? What happens to human rights? What happens to human dignity? What happens to the way we think and feel about ourselves, as individuals and as a collective?
A person is not merely an appearance with a certain face which makes sounds in a specific voice and tends to behave in a certain way. A person is SOMEONE. A conscious, thinking, feeling human being with hopes and dreams and fears and passions. A human organism which arose on this planet through ancestry and evolution over unfathomable depths of time. An indigenous terrestrial which is inseparably interwoven with the entirety of our biosphere, walking upon this earth having a subjective experience of all its beauty and wonder using senses specifically adapted for this environment.
They're trying to manipulate us into believing we are much, much less than what we are, just so they can become billionaires and trillionaires. They are attacking the most sacred parts of us for the stupidest reasons imaginable. They are enemies of our species. What they are doing must be rejected with severe revulsion.
-- You can reach me on Signal: @quinta.01 (no Whatsapp, no Telegram)