"recommendations have also been criticized as lacking enforceability" dice l'articolo "The European Union should consider the setting up an institutional structure [autorita', agenzia, whatever n.d.r.] for Trustworthy AI to fill an existing governance gap. It would be tasked with the following missions: - Contribute to developing the EU’s framework and policy for Trustworthy AI, ensuring that AI is lawful, ethical and robust, by advising EU institutions and supporting them in the implementation of such framework; - Oversee politically defined system-wide targets for AI applications that can significantly impact individuals and society, considering systemic effects both in terms of benefits and risks;" dice il report, inter alia.. (che e' lo stesso percorso del edps) sembra che ci sia un pattern di chi, partecipando alle riunioni, - potendolo fare, non produce una dissenting opinion da allegare al documento; - non essendo tenuto a farlo, sottoscrive il documento salvo poi criticarlo lo stesso giorno della pubblicazione su altro mezzo di comunicazione. la volta scorsa lo aveva fatto il filosofo tedesco, questa volta la rappresentane di access now. mah, vai a sapere che cosa le e' frullato.. magari avra' ricevuto pressioni all'interno della sua organizzazione (?) ciao, s. On 27/06/2019 19:46, J.C. DE MARTIN wrote:
https://www.theverge.com/2019/6/26/18759447/eu-ai-ethical-policy-recommendat...
EU should ban AI-powered citizen scoring and mass surveillance, say experts
New recommendations have also been criticized as lacking enforceability
* By James Vincent <https://www.theverge.com/authors/james-vincent> * on June 26, 2019 7:30 am
(Sent from my wireless device; please excuse brevity and typos (if any))
_______________________________________________ nexa mailing list nexa@server-nexa.polito.it https://server-nexa.polito.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nexa
-- reserve your meeting with me at http://cal.quintarelli.it