...
Censura persone che usano la propria libertà di espressione per esprimere ciò che pensano, e selezionerai necessariamente guide politiche di cui NON SAI COSA PENSANO, perché quella libertà di espressione non la esercitano.
Giacomo, per favore, non appiopparmi idee e concetti che non solo non ho mai scritto ma di cui sono profondamente contrario. Nessuno vuole censurare nessuno. Prendiamo Trump, uno la libertà di espressione l'ha intesa essenzialmente come "libertà di offendere". In questo articolo del giornale "The Guardian" [1] dal titolo: "Political correctness: how the right invented a phantom enemy" il tema è l'attacco di Trump al "politically correct". "During the first debate of the Republican primaries, Fox News host Megyn Kelly asked Trump how he would answer the charge that he was "part of the war on women". "You’ve called women you don’t like ‘fat pigs,’ ‘dogs,’ ‘slobs,’ and ‘disgusting animals’," Kelly pointed out. "You once told a contestant on Celebrity Apprentice it would be a pretty picture to see her on her knees …" "I think the big problem this country has is being politically correct" Trump answered, to audience applause. "I’ve been challenged by so many people, I don’t frankly have time for total political correctness. And to be honest with you, this country doesn’t have time either." Bene, l'articolo è stato commentato da Stallman nel suo blog [2]: "Right-wing bullies stretch the term "political correctness" to present any disapproval as mere narrowminded ideology. The pressures criticized as "political correctness" do exist. The term "trigger warnings" is used by people who ask for them, even demand them. "Microaggressions" and "cultural appropriation" derive from schools of thought that use them for actions that they disapprove of. They are meant to criticize acts seen as mistreatment of those who are weak or hurt. I agree with them on some issues, but on some points I think they go too far. For instance, telling people to say "black" instead of "negro" (which was not a pejorative word), then to say "African-American" instead of "black", then to say "people of color" instead of "African-American", led me to decline to follow them. ("Of color" is so clumsy that using it strikes me as conspicuous subservience.) I stuck with "blacks". (Then I learned Spanish, in which they are called "los negros", which means "the blacks".) I feel vindicated now that blacks have come around to using the term "black" again. What right-wingers have done is apply the label of "political correctness" to any disapproval of anything — even substantive condemnation of a nasty actions. Trump uses this distortion (see examples in the first article) when he bullies the weak, to imply that disapproval of bullying is mere "political correctness". Non commento, anche perché faccio fatica a capire cosa effettivamente intendesse dire RMS. Antonio [1] https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/nov/30/political-correctness-how-th... [2] https://stallman.org/archives/2016-nov-feb.html#7_December_2016_(Right-wing_...)