i supporter di "Champaign for Accountability" non sono noti; google accusa che sia una "manovra sporca" di oracle, con cui come sapete è in causa per un tema importantissimo e sottovalutato: le SW API (nel caso specifico di Java, ma il tema è generale) possono essere protette da Copyright? https://www.wired.com/story/googles-academic-influence-campaign-its-complica... [https://media.wired.com/photos/596816bdf6ff0f3cb25344b1/191:100/pass/Google-FeatureArt-525645784.jpg]<https://www.wired.com/story/googles-academic-influence-campaign-its-complicated/> Google’s Academic Influence Campaign: It's Complicated<https://www.wired.com/story/googles-academic-influence-campaign-its-complica...> www.wired.com Several academics named in a database of Google funding recipients say they’ve never received money from the company. g ________________________________ Da: nexa <nexa-bounces@server-nexa.polito.it> per conto di J.C. DE MARTIN <demartin@polito.it> Inviato: giovedì 13 luglio 2017 15:33 A: Nexa Oggetto: [nexa] Chronicle: "Scholars Cry Foul at Their Inclusion on List of Academics Paid by Google" Scholars Cry Foul at Their Inclusion on List of Academics Paid by Google By Chris Quintana July 12, 2017 This week an advocacy group published what it called a list of scholars who have received money from Google and who have written papers that supported its interests, sometimes without disclosing that apparent conflict of interest. Sarah T. Roberts said she doesn’t understand why she was on the list. Sure, she told The Chronicle, she was a Google fellow in 2009, but that meant a $7,000 award to cover her expenses during a 10-week stint working in Washington, D.C., for the American Library Association. Why that 2009 fellowship would be relevant to a 2015 paper on information privacy — in which Ms. Roberts, an assistant professor of information studies at the University of California at Los Angeles, was listed as the fourth author — is not clear to her. More important, she said, she didn’t receive any money from the technology giant in connection to that paper. And if the advocacy group’s concern was that she had benefited from Google in the past, that information is on her curriculum vitae. […] Continua qui: http://www.chronicle.com/article/Scholars-Cry-Foul-at-Their/240635 [http://www.chronicle.com/theme/che/img/app-icons/ognameplate.png]<http://www.chronicle.com/article/Scholars-Cry-Foul-at-Their/240635> Scholars Cry Foul at Their Inclusion on List of Academics Paid by Google<http://www.chronicle.com/article/Scholars-Cry-Foul-at-Their/240635> www.chronicle.com After the publication of a report alleging that many scholars took money from the technology giant and failed to disclose that information, several of them challenged the report as misleading and unfair.